簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳思葶
Wu, Szu-Ting
論文名稱: 語文資優班英文教師閱讀教學之信念與實踐:兩位國中教師之個案研究
EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices About Reading Instruction in Language Talented Programs: A Case Study of Two Junior High School Teachers
指導教授: 羅美蘭
Lo, Mei-Lan
口試委員: 王宏均
Wang, Hung-chun
曾琦芬
Tseng, Chi-Fen
羅美蘭
Lo, Mei-Lan
口試日期: 2021/10/18
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 144
中文關鍵詞: 英語資優教育教師信念以英語為外語閱讀教學
英文關鍵詞: English talented education, teacher beliefs, EFL reading instruction
研究方法: 個案研究法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200529
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:169下載:27
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 有鑒於全球化的影響和差異化教學的推廣,語言資優教育在臺灣逐漸獲得更多關注。由於語言資優學程被視為創新的課程教學,因此,了解語言資優教師的教學信念和課堂實踐極其重要。本研究以質性個案研究探討一位資深和一位新手國中語言資優班英語教師對英語閱讀的教學信念及課堂實踐,並進一步指出造成教師信念和實踐之差異的因素。研究資料搜集主要透過四次半結構式訪談、18堂課室觀察以及兩位教師的教學講義,藉以探討上述議題。
    研究結果顯示雖然兩位教師有相似的英語閱讀教學信念,然而他們在促進英語資優生將閱讀知識內化為輸出技能和實施多元的學習任務上持不同觀點。就研究者所觀察到的教學實踐而言,資深教師獨有的課堂實踐為發展英語資優生的賞析能力、推廣學生提問、以及融入深度討論;而新手教師獨有的課堂實踐為尋讀和略讀法的教學、強調搭配字、名詞子句和文本結構、進行多元學習任務、以及提供清楚的指示和示範。本研究也顯示兩位教師的課堂實踐皆和其陳述的信念大致一致,唯新手教師的信念和實踐有兩處分歧,造成差異的原因為時間限制、學生參與程度、以及電子文本的複雜性。

    Language talented education has gained increasing attention in Taiwan given the influence of globalization and promotion of differentiated instruction. As language talented programs are regarded as an innovative instruction in curriculums, it is crucial to understand teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and classroom practices in this context. This study adopted a qualitative case study to explore an experienced and a novice EFL junior high school teachers’ beliefs and practices about English reading instruction in language talented programs and further identified factors causing the belief-practice inconsistency. Data was collected from four semistructured interviews, 18 lessons of classroom observations, and the two instructors’ teaching materials.

    The findings suggested that the two teachers showed a different perceptive on facilitating English talented learners to transform reading inputs into outputs and implementing various learning tasks in language talented classes. In terms of their observed classroom practices, developing students’ interpretative and evaluative skills and promoting student-generate questions were observed exclusively in the experienced teacher’s classrooms. Novice teacher’s peculiar practices included teaching scanning and skimming strategies, emphasizing collocations, noun clauses, and text structures, implementing various learning tasks, and providing clear instructions and demonstrations. Findings also suggested that the two teachers’ beliefs were mainly converged with their instructional behaviors, while there were two instances of divergence in the novice teacher’s lessons due to time constraints, student engagement, and complexity of e-texts.

    CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Background and Motivation 1 Purposes of the Study and Research Questions 5 Significance of the Study 6 Definition of Terms 7 Teachers’ Beliefs about Reading Instruction 7 English Talented Students 8 Language Talented Programs 8 Experienced and Novice Teachers 9 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 10 Teachers’ Beliefs 10 Experienced and Novice Teachers’ Beliefs 11 The Role of Teachers’ Beliefs in Classroom Practices 13 Critical Incident Techniques and Teachers’ Practices 15 Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices about Reading Instruction 15 Teachers’ Beliefs about Reading Instruction 15 Approaches to Reading Instruction and Reading Strategies 16 The Role of Bloom's Revised Taxonomy in Reading Instruction 20 Studies on Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices About Reading Instruction 21 Factors Causing Belief-Practice Inconsistency in Reading Instruction 24 Definitions and Characteristics of Language Talented Learners 26 Definitions of Giftedness and Talent 26 Characteristics of Language Talented Learners 28 Curriculums for Talented Learners and Language Talented Programs in Taiwan 30 Modifications of Curriculums for Talented Learners 30 Modifications of Curriculums for Language Talented Learners in Taiwan 32 Significance of Reading Instruction in Language Talented Programs 34 Research on Teacher Beliefs about English Talented Programs in Taiwan 36 Summary 37 CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 38 Participants and the Research Contexts 39 Participants 39 Research Contexts 41 Instruments 43 Semistructured Interviews 43 Informal Conversational Interviews 45 Classroom Observations 45 Data Collection Procedures 47 Data analysis 50 Trustworthiness 53 CHAPTER FOUR FINDINGS 54 Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Language Talented Classes 54 Experienced Teacher’s Beliefs of Teaching EFL Reading in Language Talented Classes 54 Experienced Teacher’s Practices in Language Talented Classes 64 Convergences Between Experienced Teacher’s Beliefs and Practices 72 Novice Teacher’s Beliefs and Practices in Language Talented Classes 78 Novice Teacher’s Beliefs of Teaching EFL Reading in Language Talented Classes 78 Novice Teacher’s Practices in Language Talented Classes 87 Convergences and Divergences Between Novice Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices and Factors Causing the Inconsistency 97 Comparisons Between the Two Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices 104 Both Teachers’ Beliefs of Teaching EFL Reading in Language Talented Classes 104 Both Teachers’ Practices in Language Talented Classes 108 Relations of the Two Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices 113 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 114 Major Findings and Discussion 114 Teachers’ Beliefs of Teaching EFL Reading in Language Talented Classes 114 Teachers’ Practices in Language Talented Classes 115 Relations Between Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices 117 Pedagogical Implications 118 Limitations of the Study and Suggestions for Future Research 119 Conclusion 120 REFERENCES 123 APPENDICES 133

    Bailey, J. M. (1996). Literacy development in verbally talented children. In J. VanTassel-Baska, D. Johnson, & L. Boyce (Eds.), Developing verbal talented (pp. 97-114). Ally and Bacon.
    Baskin, B., & K. Harris. (1980). Books for the gifted child. Bowker.
    Basturkmen, H. (2012). Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System, 40(2), 282-295.
    Bloom, B. S. (1953). Thought-processes in lectures and discussions. The Journal of General Education, 7(3), 160-169.
    Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.
    Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.
    Brown, D. F., & Rose, T. D. (1995). Self-reported classroom impact of teachers' theories about learning and obstacles to implementation. Action in Teacher Education, 17(1), 20-29.
    Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In B. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 709-725). Macmillan.
    Carrell, P. L. (1984b). Evidence of a formal schema in second language comprehension. Language Learning, 34(2), 87-112.
    Chen, Y. F. (陳郁夫) (1988)。Identification and instructions of literacy giftedness [文學資優的識別與指導]。Gifted Students’ Creativity and Special Talents (資優學生創造力與特殊才能), Psychological Publishing (心理出版社)。
    Chen, W. F. (2008). Junior high school EFL teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and practices on reading instruction: A case study [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Cheng-chi University.
    Cho, J., & Trent, A. (2006). Validity in qualitative research revisited. Qualitative Research, 6(3), 319-340.
    Clark, C. M. (1988). Asking the right questions about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking. Educational Researcher, 17(2), 5-12.
    Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). Macmillan.
    Coiro, J. (2003). Rethinking comprehension strategies to prepare students for critical evaluation on the Internet. The New England Reading Association Journal, 39(2), 29–34.
    Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.
    Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
    Davis, M. M., Konopak, B. C., & Keadence, J. E. (1993). An investigation of two chapter i teachers’ beliefs about reading and instructional practices. Literacy Research and Instruction, 33(2), 105-118.
    Dean, G. (2002). English and literacy. In D. Eyre & H. Lowe (Eds.), Curriculum provision for the gifted and talented in the secondary school (pp. 27-41). David Fulton Publishers.
    Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. D. C. Heath.
    Drew, S. V. (2012). Open up the ceiling on the Common Core State Standards: Preparing students for 21st‐century literacy—now. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(4), 321-330.
    Duff. P. A. (2007). Case study research in applied linguistics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Eskey, D. E., & Grabe, W. (1988). Interactive models for ESL reading: Perspectives on instruction. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 223-238). Cambridge University Press.
    Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
    Farrell, T. S., & Bennis, K. (2013). Reflecting on ESL teacher beliefs and classroom practices: A case study. RELC Journal, 44(2), 163-176.
    Farrell, T. S., & Ives, J. (2015). Exploring teacher beliefs and classroom practices through reflective practice: A case study. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 594-610.
    Farris, P.J., C.J. Fuhler, and M.P. Walther. (2004). Teaching reading: A balanced approach for today’s classrooms. McGraw Hill.
    Feryok, A., (2004). Personal practice theories: Exploring the role of language teacher experiences and beliefs in the integration of theory and practice. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Auckland.
    Fives, H., & Gill, M. G. (Eds.). (2014). International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs. Routledge.
    Fox. L. H., & Durden. W. G. (1982). Educating Verbally Gifted Youth. Fastback 176. Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
    Gagné, F. (2004). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Definitions and conceptions of giftedness (pp. 79-95). Corwin Press.
    Gagné, F. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (3nd ed., pp. 98-119). Cambridge University Press.
    Gatbonton, E. (1999). Investigating experienced ESL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 35–50.
    Gatbonton, E. (2008). Looking beyond teachers' classroom behaviour: Novice and experienced ESL teachers' pedagogical knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 161-182.
    Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The relationship between L2 reading comprehension and schema theory: A matter of text familiarity. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 1(2), 142-149.
    Goodman, J. (1988). Constructing a practical philosophy of teaching: A study of preservice teachers' professional perspectives. Teaching & Teacher Education, 4(2), 121-137.
    Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. Visible Language, 6(4), 291-320.
    Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.
    Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.
    Grellet, F. (1981). Developing reading skills: A practical guide to reading comprehension exercises. Cambridge University Press.
    Irwin, J. W. (1991). Teaching reading comprehension processes (2nd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
    Janesick, V. (1977). An ethnographic study of a teacher's classroom perspective [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Michigan State University.
    Jerome, J. K. (1999). Three men in a boat: To say nothing of the dog! & three men on the bummel. Penguin.
    Johnson, K. E. (1992). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices during literacy instruction for non-native speakers of English. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24(1), 83-108.
    Johnson, K. E. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice ESL teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(4), 439-452.
    Jonathan, A. P., & Carolyn, M. C. (2021). Critical issues and practices in gifted education: A survey of current research on giftedness and talent development. Routledge.
    Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 419-469.
    Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implication of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.
    Kao, H. C. (2008). A study on elementary school English teachers’ beliefs in reading and reading instruction [Unpublished master’s thesis], National Changhua University of Education.
    Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart &Winston.
    Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
    Ku, H. Y. (2008). A case study on senior high school English teachers’ beliefs and practices on reading instruction [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Cheng-chi University.
    Kusumastuti, I., Fauziati, E., & Marmanto, S. (2021). Revealing Teacher’s Beliefs of Higher Order Thinking Skills in Teaching Reading at Junior High School. English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings. Univsersitas Muhammadiyah Senarang.
    Kyngäs, H., Mikkonen, K., & Kääriäinen, M. (Eds.). (2019). The application of content analysis in nursing science research. Springer Nature.
    LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1985). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed.). (pp. 689-718). International Reading Association.
    Lee, Y.S. (李雨軒) (2019)。Challenges and counter-measures of local educational authority implementing junior gifted education [地方主管教育機關推動國中資優教育的挑戰與因應措施]。 Taiwan Educational Review Monthly Journal (台灣教育評論月刊) , 8(7), 44-48.
    Levande, D. I. (1989). Theoretical orientation to reading and classroom practice. Reading Improvement, 26(4), 274.
    Liang, W. L. (2010). A study of elementary school English teachers’ beliefs towards the implementation of reading activities in south Taiwan [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Pingtung University of Education.
    Lortie, D. C. (2020). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
    Lewis, G. (1995). Bringing up your gifted child. Angus and Robertson Publishers.
    Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Maker, C. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Pro-Ed.
    Meijer, P. C., Verlopp, N., & Beijaard, D. (1999). Exploring language teachers’ practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(1), 59-84.
    Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass.
    Ministry of Education. (2014). Curriculum Guidelines of Twelve-Year Basic Education [十二年國民基本教育課程綱要]. Retrieved from: https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/32077/83646.pdf
    Ministry of Education. (2018). Guide Manual of Curricular Modifications for English Talented Students [資賦優異學生課程調整參考手冊]. Retrieved from: https://reurl.cc/pmLdvl
    Ministry of Education. (2019). Curriculum Guidelines for Fields of Special Needs Related to Twelve-Year Basic Education for the Gifted [十二年國民基本教育資賦優異相關之特殊需求領域課程綱要]. Retrieved from: https://sec.ntpc.edu.tw/Information/AdministrativeDetails/314
    Mitchell, E.W. (2005). The influence of beliefs on the teaching practices of high school foreign language teachers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Massachusetts.
    Mohammed, R. (2016). Critical incident analysis: Reflections of a teacher educator. Research in Teacher Education, 6(1), 25-29.
    Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Firetto, C. M., Hendrick, B. D., Li, M., Montalbano, C., & Wei, L. (2018). Quality talk: Developing students’ discourse to promote high-level comprehension. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 1113-1160.
    Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge University Press.
    Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
    Parker, J. (1989). Instructional strategies for teaching the gifted. Allyn and Bacon.
    Passow, A. H. (1996). Talent identification and development in the language arts. In J. VanTassel-Baska, D. Johnson, & L. Boyce (Eds.), Developing verbal talented (pp. 22-33). Ally and Bacon.
    Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
    Peterson, P. L., & Comeaux, M. A. (1987). Teachers' schemata for classroom events: The mental scaffolding of teachers' thinking during classroom instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(4), 319-331.
    Polio, C., Gass, S. and Chapin, L. (2006) Using stimulated recall to investigate native speaker perceptions in native-nonnative speaker interactions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 237-267.
    Redmann, D. H., Lambrecht, J. J., & Stitt-Gohdes, W. L. (2000). The critical incident technique: A tool for qualitative research. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 42(3), 132.
    Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The Enrichment Triad Model: A plan for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21(2), 227-233.
    Richards, J. C., Gipe, J. P., & Thompson, B. (1987). Teachers’ beliefs about good reading instruction. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 8(1), 1-6.
    Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 559-586.
    Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
    Richards, J. C., Li, B., & Tang, A. (1998). Exploring pedagogical reasoning beliefs. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Beyond Training (pp. 86–103). Cambridge University Press.
    Ross, B., Pechenkina, E., Aeschliman, C., & Chase, A. M. (2017). Print versus digital texts: understanding the experimental research and challenging the dichotomies. Research in Learning Technology, 25. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1976
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Toward an interactive model of reading. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed., pp. 722-750). International Reading Association.
    Sadaf, A., & Johnson, B. L. (2017). Teachers' beliefs about integrating digital literacy. into classroom practice: An investigation based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(4), 129-137.
    Sigel, I. E. (1985). A conceptual analysis of beliefs. In I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children (pp. 345-371). Erlbaum.
    Silberstein, S. (1987). Let’s take another look at reading: Twenty-five years of reading instruction. English Teaching Forum, 25(4), 28-35.
    Schneiderman, E. I., & Desmarais, C. (1988). The talented language learner: Some preliminary findings. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 4(2), 91-109.
    Sherman, R. R., Sherman, R. R., & Webb, R. B. (Eds.). (1988). Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods. Psychology Press.
    Smith, F. (1973). Psycholinguistics and reading. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Stevens, K. (1980). The effect of background knowledge on the reading comprehension of ninth graders. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12 (2), 151-154.
    Smit, N., van de Grift, W., de Bot, K., & Jansen, E. (2017). A classroom observation tool for scaffolding reading comprehension. System, 65, 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.014
    Tabachnick, B. R., & Zeicher, K. M. (1984). The impact of the student teaching experience on the development of teacher perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 28-36.
    Thompson, M. C. (1996a). Mentors on paper. In J. D. VanTassel-Baska, T. Johnson, & L. N. Boyce (Eds.), Developing verbal talent (pp. 56-74). Allyn and Bacon.
    Tompkins, G., Campbell, R., Green, D., & Smith, C. (2014). Literacy for the 21st century. Pearson Australia.
    Tsai, C. C. (蔡崇建) (1989)。Are your children gifted? [您的孩子資優嗎?]。Times Publishing (時報)。
    Tseng, C. C. (2008). Establishment of principles for English talented curriculum development and their transformation into criteria for English talented program evaluation in senior high school in Taiwan [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. National Taiwan Normal University.
    Tseng, C. C. (2013). Exploring teacher beliefs about English talented programs in senior high School: An application of repertory grid technique. English Teaching & Learning, 37(1), 1-42.
    Tsui, A. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
    Tsui, A. B. (2005). Expertise in teaching: Perspectives and issues. In K. Johnson (Eds.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 167-189). Palgrave Macmillan.
    VanTassel-Baska, J. (1994). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners. Allyn and Bacon.
    VanTassel-Baska, J. D. (1996a). The process of talent development. In J. D. VanTassel-Baska, T. Johnson & L. N. Boyce (Eds.), Developing verbal talent (pp. 3-22). Allyn and Bacon.
    Williams, E. (1983). Communicative reading. In K. Johnson & D. Porter (Eds.), Perspectives in communicative language teaching (pp. 171-186). Academic Press.
    Woolley, G. (2011). Reading Comprehension. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg.
    Wu, C. F. (2002). The study on high school trainees’ theoretical orientations toward reading instruction and reading instructional practices [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE