研究生: |
林亮吟 Lin, Liang-Yin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
大學院長角色認同之個案研究 A case study of the role identity of the university dean |
指導教授: |
黃乃熒
Whang, Nai-Ying |
口試委員: |
黃乃熒
Whang, Nai-Ying 王錦雀 Wang, Chin-Chueh 蔡進雄 Tsai, Chin-Hsiung |
口試日期: | 2024/05/22 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
教育政策與行政研究所 Graduate Institute of Educational Policy and Administration |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 169 |
中文關鍵詞: | 院長 、角色認同 、角色落差 |
英文關鍵詞: | dean, role identity, role discrepancy |
研究方法: | 個案研究法 、 深度訪談法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400828 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:94 下載:9 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究為個案研究,旨在探討大學院長角色認同轉變及其現況、院長任務履行範圍所需的角色認同、院長自我角色認同與他人對其角色期待間之落差,以及院長面臨角色認同之挑戰及其因應之道。為達成研究目的,本研究以個案研究為研究設計,以訪談法為主,文件分析為輔,透過訪談個案大學院長、系主任及學生,以及相關文件的蒐集,獲取寶貴的研究素材。本研究續依研究素材進行分析及綜整,提出本研究之結論及建議,作為大學院長履行職務之參考,並提供相關政策建言及作法供學校一級主管、系主任及學生參考,以供借鏡。
本研究之結論歸納如下:
一、大學院長角色認同之轉變及其現況。
(一) 學院走向具有實質學術發展作用,院長對自我角色認同不再是榮譽職位。
(二) 院長的角色認同經歷學者走向管理者的拉扯。
(三) 院長角色認同之任務履行範圍包含行政管理及學術發展兩大構面。
(四) 院長妥善運用職權及專業能力可提升自我的角色認同。
二、大學院長面對壓力之角色認同挑戰。
(一) 院長自我角色認同與學校一級單位期待之落差,削弱院長的成就感及熱忱。
(二) 院長角色認同的困難來自於系主任對其期待之落差。
(三) 院長角色認同的困境來自於學校政策與系所執行之落差所導致。
(四) 院長角色認同的困難來自於承擔不分系發展、募款及建立人脈關係的壓力。
三、大學院長面對角色認同挑戰之因應之道。
(一) 院長面對學校政策與系所執行差距之角色認同困境,其解方在於以人為本的決策參與。
(二) 院長角色認同與學校一級單位要求落差之解決,在於強化合作關係的緊密。
(三) 為解決院長在不分系發展之角色認同壓力,宜聆聽學生的聲音。
(四) 為解決院長在募款及建立人脈關係之角色認同壓力,宜積極參與培訓。
This study is a case study, aiming to explore the transformation and current situation of the role identity of the dean of the university's school of education, the role identity required to fulfill the dean's tasks, the gap between the dean's self-role identity and others' expectations of his role, and the role of the dean. Chang faces the challenge of role identity and how to deal with it. In order to achieve the purpose of the research, this study uses a case study as the research design, mainly using the interview method, supplemented by document analysis. Through interviews with the dean, department head and students of the school of education of the case university, and the collection of relevant documents, valuable research can be obtained material. This study continues to analyze and synthesize the research materials, and puts forward the conclusions and suggestions of this study as a reference for university deans to perform their duties. It also provides relevant policy suggestions and practices for the reference of first-level supervisors, department heads and students of the school.
The conclusions of this study are summarized as follows:
1. Changes in role identity of university deans and their current situation.
(1) The direction of the college has a substantial academic development role, and the dean’s self-identity is no longer an honorary position.
(2) The dean’s role identity has been pulled from scholars to managers.
(3) The scope of tasks identified by the dean’s role includes administrative management and academic development.
(4) Proper use of authority and professional abilities by deans can enhance their role identity.
2. Role identity challenges faced by university deans under pressure.
(1) The gap between the dean’s self-identity and the expectations of the school’s first-level units weakens the dean’s sense of accomplishment and enthusiasm.
(2) The difficulty in identifying the dean’s role comes from the gap between department heads’ expectations for him.
(3) The dilemma of dean’s role identification is caused by the gap between school policies and department implementation.
(4) The difficulty in identifying the dean’s role comes from the pressure to undertake departmental development, fund-raising, and building personal relationships.
3. How university deans respond to role identity challenges.
(1) The dean faces the role identity dilemma of the gap between school policies and department implementation. The solution lies in people-oriented participation in decision-making.
(2) The solution to the gap between the dean’s role identity and the requirements of the school’s first-level units lies in strengthening the close cooperative relationship.
(3) In order to resolve the pressure on deans to identify their roles regardless of departmental development, it is advisable to listen to the voices of students.
(4) In order to resolve the pressure on deans to identify with their role in fundraising and establishing personal relationships, it is advisable to actively participate in training.
陳伯璋 、 蓋浙生(2005)。新世紀高等教育政策與行政。高等教育出版社。
吳家瑩(2011)。新教育學的建構—創新教育知識的經驗。學富文化事業有限公司。
周志宏(1989)。學術自由與大學法。蔚理法律出版社。
周祝瑛(1999)。大陸高等教育問題研究──兼論臺灣相關課題。師大書苑。
林少龍、邵詩茹(2009)。角色認同與去人性化之關係:情緒勞動之中介角色。商管科技季刊,10(3),553-573。
洪瑞璇(2001)。大學女性院長生命故事之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學。
張德銳(1990)。台北市國民中學行政人員所經歷的角色衝突與角色不明確之研究。新竹師院學報,4,61-89。
教育部(1994)。中華民國教育報告書—邁向二十一世紀的教育遠景。教育部。
教育部(2001)。大學教育政策白皮書。教育部。
許士軍(2019)。以「學院實體化」培育當前社會的實用人才──由學系到學程。評鑑雙月刊,80,19-20。
郭丁熒(2006)。「恨鐵不成鋼」與「恰如其分」:不同年代出生者對目前大學生角色知覺之研究。教育學誌(原初等教育學報),36,1-54。
郭生玉(2012)。心理與教育研究法:量化、質性與混合研究方法。精華出版社。
陳柱明(2008)。國防大學軍事學院院長轉型領導與教官教學效能關係之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
黃乃熒(2001)。論學術自由及理想的學術組織經營型態的建構。教育與社會研究,6,91-122。
林筠諺(2010)。大一新生校系選擇影響因素關係之研究。教育研究與發展期刊,6(3),223-256。
黃瑞琴(2021)。質性教育研究方法(第三版)。心理出版社。
楊家榆(2015)。大學學院組織管理、院長領導角色與學院組織效能關係之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中正大學。
楊朝祥(2009)。台灣高等教育的挑戰、超越與卓越。教育資料集刊,44,1-28。
劉秀曦、楊瑩(2016)。析論英國高等教育研究經費分配機制之運作及其對我國的啟示。當代教育研究季刊,25(2),77 – 112。
顏國樑(2002)。教育法規。臺麗文文化事業股份有限公司。
James E. Ryan(2017)。人生思考題:哈佛教育學院院長提出的5+1個人生重要問題(廖月娟譯)。天下文化。(原著出版於2017年)
Arnold Birenbaum.(1984). Toward a theory of role acquisition. Sociological Theory,2,315-328. https://doi.org/10.2307/223352
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May,D. R. (2004). A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly,15(6), 801–823.
Arntzen, E. (2016). The Changing Role of Deans in Higher Education—From Leader to Manager. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 2068–2075. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040918
Altbach, P. G. (2001). Academic freedom: International realities and challenges. Higher Education ,41,205–219.
Anglin, A.A., Kincaid, P., Short, J.C., Allen, D.(2022). Role theory perspectives: past, present, and future applications of role theories in management research. J. Manag. 48 (6), 1469–1502. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221081442
Bray, N. J. (2010). The Deanship and Its Faculty Interpreters: Do Mertonian Norms of Science Translate into Norms for Administration? The Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 284–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11779054
Brasof, M., & Mansfield, K. C. (2018). Student voice and school leadership: Introduction. Journalof Ethical Educational Leadership,5(2), 5–8. https://jecel.scholasticahq.com/article/37394-student
voice-and-school-leadership-introduction
Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000435
Bright, D. F., & Richards, M. P. (2001). The Academic Deanship: Individual Careers and Institutional Roles. San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass.
Brown,A.D.,& Lewis.M.A.,& Oliver.N.(2021). Identity Work, Loss and Preferred Identities: A Study of UK Business School Deans. Organization Studies.,42(6),823–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084061985746.
Burke, Peter J. and Jan E. Stets. (2009). Identity Theory.
Coll, K. (2018). Education Deans: Challenges and Stress.Journal of Organizational and Educaitional Leadership,4(1),1-16.
Cox, T.,Jr(1994).Cultural Diversity in Organizations: Theory, Research and Practice.
Carter, M. J., & Marony, J. (2018). Examining self-perceptions of identity change in person, role, and social identities. Current Psychology, 40(1), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9924-5
Carter, M. J., & H.Mangum.(2020). Role identities: Measurement and outcomes of conventional vs. idiosyncratic balance. Current Psychology,41, 2586–2597.
Carter, M. J., Aguilar, J. E., & Flores, G. R. (2021). Role identities and self-efficacy: Examining the effect of conventional versus idiosyncratic role identity meanings. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02084-w
Chuan Hu.,&Rui Cao.,&Jiao Huang.,& Ying Wei.(2022). The effect of self-discrepancy on online behavior: a literature review. Frontiers in Psychology,26(13),1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883736
De Boer, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2009). The Changing Nature of the Academic Deanship. Leadership, 5(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715009337765
De Wit,H., & Altbach, P. G. (2021) Internationalization in higher education: global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(1), 28-46. DOI:10.1080/23322969.2020.1820898
De Guzman, A. B., & Hapan, Ma. F. Z. (2013). Understanding the Twists and Turns of Academic Deanship: A Phenomenology of Filipino Medical Technology Deans’ Struggles as Organizational Managers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,12(23), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0102-0
Del Favero, M. (2003). Faculty-Administrator Relationships as Integral to High-Performing Governance Systems: New Frameworks for Study. American Behavioral Scientist,46 (7), 902-922. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276420225011
Del Favero, M. (2006). Disciplinary variation in preparation for the academic dean role. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(3), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360600793069
Davies, J. (2015). Reflections on the role of the business school dean. London: Chartered Association of Business Schools.
Eric Lavigne.(2020). The demographics and career paths of Canadian university deans:gender, race, experience, and provenance. Studies in Higher Education, 45(2), 1949-1960. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03075079.2019.1612350
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
Favero, M. D. (2003). Faculty-Administrator Relationships as Integral to High-Performing Governance Systems: New Frameworks for Study. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(7), 902–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764202250119
Gmelch, W. H., Wolverton, M., Wolverton,M.L., (1999).The Education Dean's Search for Balance.
Gmelch, W. H, Wolverton, M., Wolverton,M.L., & Sarros,J.C., (1999). THE ACADEMIC DEAN: An Imperiled Species Searching for Balance. Research in Higher Education,40(6), 717–740. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018717015528
Gmelch, W. H. (2000). Leadership Succession: How New Deans Take Charge and Learn the Job. Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(3), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190000700305
Grube, J. A., & Piliavin, J. A. (2000). Role identity, organizational experiences and volunteer performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1108–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002611007
Harvey, M., Shaw, J. B., McPhail, R., & Erickson, A. (2013). The selection of a dean in an academic environment: Are we getting what we deserve? International Journal of Educational Management, 27(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541311289800
Higgins, E. T. (1989). Self-discrepancy theory: What patterns of self-beliefs cause people to suffer? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 22, pp. 93–136). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60306-8
Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2004). Ambiguity in Social Categorization: The role of prejudice and facial affect in race categorization. Psychological Science, 15(5), 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00680.x
Johnson, J. F. (2009). Balancing professional and home life. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 41–49.
Karran, T. (2009) Academic freedom: in justification of a universal ideal.Studies in Higher Education, 34(3), 263-283, DOI: 10.1080/03075070802597036
Krahenbuhl G.S.(2004). Building the Academic Deanship: Strategies for Success. American Council on Higher Education. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
Killeya-Jones, L. A. (2005). Identity Structure, Role Discrepancy and Psychological Adjustment in Male College Student-Athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 28(2), 167–185.
Levke Henningsen., Alice H. Eagly,, Klaus Jonas.(2021). Where are the women deans? The importance of gender bias and self-selection processes for the deanship ambition of female and male professors .Journal of Applied Social Psychology,52(8),602-622.
Lasley, T. J., & Haberman, M. (1987). How Do University Administrators Evaluate Education Deans? Journal of Teacher Education, 38(5), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718703800504
Lavigne, E. (2019). The collegial and managerial roles and qualifications of Canadian university deans. Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2304–2317. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1496409
Layne, P. (2010). Perspectives on leadership from female engineering deans.Leadership and Management in Engineering, 10(4), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000083
Lemay, E. P. J., & Ashmore, R. D. 2004. Reactions to perceived categorization by others during the transition to college: Internationlization and self-verification processes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7,173–187.
Lodico, M., Spaulding, D. & Voegtle, K. (2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice, 2nd Edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v14i3.103
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47.
Mamiseishvili, K., & Stuckey, A. (2022). Foreign-born academic leaders in U.S. higher education. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 15(5), 657–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000405
Meisinger, Richard J., Jr.(1994).College and University Budgeting: An Introduction for Faculty and Academic Administrators. National Association of College and University Business Officers.
Matczynski, T., Lasley, T. J., & Haberman, M. (1989). The Deanship: How Faculty Evaluate Performance. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(6), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718904000603
Montez, J. M., Wolverton, M., & Gmelch, W. H. (2002). The Roles and Challenges of Deans. The Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2002.0034
Morris, T. L., & Laipple, J. S. (2015). How prepared are academic administrators? Leadership and job satisfaction within US research universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1019125
Nina-Sophie Fritsch.(2016). Patterns of career development and their role in the advancement of female faculty at Austrian universities: New roads to success? Higher Education, 72, 619–635. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10734-015-9967-6
Rosser, V. J., Johnsrud, L. K., & Heck, R. H. (2003). Academic Deans and Directors: Assessing Their Effectiveness from Individual and Institutional Perspectives. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2003.11777185
Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391486
Riley, A., & Burke, P. J. (1995). Identities and self-verification in the small group. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 61–73.
Seale, O., & Cross, M. (2018). Executivism and deanship in selected South African universities. Oxford Review of Education, 44(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1389709
Sharma, S., Amir, S. D. S., & Kannan, J. (2016). Leadership Behavior of Deans And Its Impact on Effectiveness for Quality in A High Ranking University. TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM, 41(184),49-58. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6071
Shannon Cleverley-Thompson.(2016). The Role of Academic Deans as Entrepreneurial Leaders in Higher Education Institutions. Innovative Higher Education, 41(1),75-85.
Schlechter, P., Hellmann, J. H., & Morina, N. (2022). Self-discrepancy, depression, anxiety, and psychological well-being: The role of affective style and self-efficacy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 46(6), 1075–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-022-10314-z
Sumera Sattar., Shahzaman Khan.,& Sharin Iqbal (2020). Impact of self-esteem and body image on sports participation of female athletes.THE SKY-International Journal, 4.DOI:10.51846/the-sky.v4i1.816
Sluss, D. M., van Dick, R., & Thompson, B. S. (2011). Role theory in organizations: A relational perspective. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 1. Building and developing the organization (pp. 505–534). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12169-016
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2014a). Self-Esteem and Identities. Sociological Perspectives, 57(4), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/073112141453614
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2014b). Emotions and Identity Nonverification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(4), 387–410.
Stryker, Sheldon.(1980). Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version.
Templeton, Lindsey Lee (2021). In Pursuit of the Academic Deanship: Women's Considerations, Choice Environments, and Career Paths.
Ryan Trettevik.(2016). Identities, Goals, and Emotions. Social Psychology Quarterly,79(3),263-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272516649934
Thi Lan Huong Nguyen(2013). Barriers to and facilitators of female Deans’ career advancement in higher education: an exploratory study in Vietnam. Higher Education, 66, 123–138. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10734-012-9594-4
Wepner, S. B., Henk, W., & Lovell, S. (2015). Developing deans as effective leaders for today's changing educational landscape. College of Education Faculty Research and Publications, 393. https://epublications.marquette.edu/edu_fac/393
Weiner,S.(2005). Role conflict, role ambiguity and self-efficacy among school social workers.
Wolverton, M., Wolverton, F. M. L., & Gmelch, W. H. (2022). The Impact of Role Conflict and Ambiguity on Academic Deans. The Journal of Higher Education,70(1),80-106. https://doi.org/10.2307/2649119
OECD Family Database. (2016). LMF2.5: Time use for work, care and other day- to- day activities. http://www.oecd.org/els/famil y/datab ase.htm.
Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy,6(1), 65-78
Van Maanen, J. (1978). People processing: Strategies of organizational socialization. Organizational Dynamics, 7(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(78)90032-3
Vough, H. C., Cardador, M. T., Bednar, J. S., Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2013). What clients don't get about my profession: A model of perceived role-based image discrepancies. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1050-1080. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0490
Jones, D. P.(1995).Higher Education and High Technology: A Case for Joint Action. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED400721
Van Dusen,G.C.(2000).Digital Dilemma: Issues of Access, Cost, and Quality in Media-Enhanced and Distance Education.
Merisotis ,J. P. & Phipps ,R. A. (1999).What's the Difference?: Outcomes of Distance vs. Traditional Classroom-Based Learning. Change,31(3),13-17.
Merisotis , J. P. (1994).College and University Budgeting: An Introduction for Faculty and Academic Administrators. Second Edition.
McBride,S. A. (2000).Academic Economics: The Academic Dean and Financial Management, New Directions for Community Colleges,109,51-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.10907
McCall, George H. and J. T. Simmons.(1978). Identities and Interaction. Revised edition.
Merriam, S.B. (2001) Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
Meyerson, D.E., & J. K. Fletcher (2000). A Modest Manifesto for Shattering the Glass Ceiling. Harvard Business Review,78(1),127-136.
Maurer, T. J., & London, M.(2018). From Individual Contributor to Leader: A Role Identity Shift Framework for Leader Development Within Innovative Organizations. Journal of Management, 44(4),1426-1452. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920631561437
Kristen Marcussen.(2006).Identities, Self-Esteem, and Psychological Distress: An Application of Identity-Discrepancy Theory.Sociological Perspectives, 49(1),1–24. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2006.49.1.1
Kristen Marcussen and Mary Gallagher.(2017). The role of aspirations and obligations in explaining the relationship between identity discrepancies and psychological distress. Sociological Perspectives , 60(6),1019 –1038.
Phillips ,E.C., Morell ,C.,and Chronister ,J.L.(1996).Responses to reduced state funding. New Directions for Higher Education,94,9-20.
Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/259261
Townsend ,B. K.,and Bassoppo-Moyo,S.(1996).If I'd Only Known: Administrative Preparation that Could Have Made a Difference. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,New York,NY.
Turner, R. H. (1978). The role and the person. American Journal of Sociology, 84(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/226738
Gitlow,A.L.(1995).Reflections on higher education.
Roberts, L. M. 2005. Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 30, 685–711.
Ramaley,J.(2000). Embracing Civic Responsibility.AAHE Bulletin,52(7), 9-13.
Swann, W. B., & Ely, R. J. (1984). A battle of wills: Self-verification versus behavioral confirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1287–1302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1287
Vough, H. C., Cardador, M. T., Bednar, J. S., Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2013). What clients don't get about my profession: A model of perceived role-based image discrepancies. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1050–1080. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0490