本研究旨在探討高職綜合職能科智能障礙畢業生進入大專院校的概況，從中了解其學校適應及影響其適應的因素，亦欲了解其面對學校適應問題的因應之道。採用個案研究，立意取樣，針對五位研究參與者及其重要他人進行訪談及觀察，並蒐集非干擾性測量資料，以持續比較法分析處理之。歸納本研究之結論如下，對於高職綜合職能科智能障礙畢業生進入大專院校就讀後：
一、 學校適應狀況主要受其身心特質及所就讀學校與科系學業學習標準的影響。
二、 學業學習面向是其較顯著的問題與困難。
三、 面對學校適應問題時的因應之道。
根據本研究發現，研究者提出相關建議，作為欲就讀大專院校之智能障礙畢業生及其家長、教育主管機關及未來研究之參考。

This study was intended to examine the overview of graduates with IDDfrom section of special education in vocational high school who entered intothe college. Furthermore, it was to know their college adjustment, the factors oftheir college adjustments and how they would solve the problems which they met. The method adopted in this study was a case study research, andchoosing participants was by purposive sampling. The researcher interviewed five participants and their significant others. In addition, the researcher alsoobserved them and collected their archival data. Constant comparisonmethods were mainly used to analyze data. The findings of this study arelisted as follows：
1. Their college adjustment are affected by their physical characteristics and the achievement standards of their academic majors.
2. The obvious issues appear in their college academic performances.
3. As having the difficulties of college adjustment, they will find a way to deal with it.

According to the findings, several suggestions are provided forgraduates from section of special education in vocational high school whowant to entry into the college and their parents, educational administrations and researchers who are willing to conduct further study on this topic.

中文部分
林幸台（2012）：心智障礙學生就讀大專院校：國外現況之探討。大專校院智能障礙學生校園支持服務策略研討會，37-62。
林坤燦、羅清水、邱瀞瑩（2008）：台灣地區大專校院身心障礙學生休退學現況調查研究。東台灣特殊教育學報，10，1-19。
林惠芬（2004）：高職輕度智能障礙學生學校生活適應之研究。特殊教育學報，19，57-85。
林惠芬（2006）：智能障礙者教育。載於許天威、徐享良、張勝成主編，新特殊教育通論(第二版)，137-162。臺北：五南。
周玫君（2010）：一位輕度智障大專畢業生就業歷程之個案研究。特殊教育課程與教學研討會，18，49-62 。
胡曼莉(2013)：智能障礙學生大學升學之路探究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
許天威、蕭金土、吳訓生、林和姻、陳亭予（2002）：大專校院身心障礙學生學校適應狀況之研究。特殊教育學報，16，159-198。
陳麗如（2011）：大專校院不同障礙類別與障礙程度身心障礙學生教育需求分析。長庚人文社會學報，4（2），293-334。
陳麗如（2008）：大專校院身心障礙學生生活困擾與資源運用之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，33（3），25-54。
陳麗如（2007）：身心障礙教材教法。臺北：心理。
教育部（2007）：身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準。台北：教育部。
教育部（2015）：大專校院學生數統計（身障）。特殊教育通報網。取自https://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/default.asp。
鈕文英（2010）：美國智能和發展障礙協會2010年定義的內容和內涵。國小特殊教育，49，21-32。
鈕文英（2014）：質性研究方法與論文寫作。台北：雙葉。
詹文宏、周台傑（2006）：高中職學習障礙學生和一般學生學校適應模式之研究。特殊教育學報，24，113-134。
蔡宜璇（2014）：大專校院智能障礙學生學校適應狀況之研究。國立嘉義大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義市。

英文部分
Bouck, E. C. (2014). The postschool outcomes of students with mild intellectual disability: does it get better with time? Journal of IntellectualDisability Research, 58(6), 534-548.
Grigal, M., Hart,D., & Weir, C. (2012). A survey of postsecondary education programs for students with intellectual disabilities in the United States. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 223-233.
Hart, D. (2006). Research to practice: postsecondary education options for students with intellectual disabilities. Research to Practice Series, Institute for Community Inclusion, 1-6. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umb.edu/ici_researchtopractice/6.
Lori Briel (2014). Eddie’s journey through college to a full time job. Think College Stories. Retrieved from http://www.thinkcollege.net/.
Neubert, D., Moon, M., Grigal, M., & Redd, V. (2001). Post-secondary educational practices for individuals with mental retardation and other significant disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16, 155-168. Retrieved from http://www.waisman.wisc.edu/connections/pdfs/Neubert_Moon_Grigal_Redd_2001.pdf.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, (2015). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=60.
Zafft, C., Hart, D., & Zimbrich, K. (2004). College career connection: a study of youth with intellectual disabilities and the impact of postsecondary education. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39(1), 45-53.
Lincoln, Y., (2002). On The Nature Of Qualitative Evidence. The Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.usc.edu/dept/chepa/pdf/ASHE_lincoln.pdf.
Barbara, P., (2009). A Review of Corbin and Strauss’ Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. The Weekly Qualitative Report, 2, 140-143. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/WQR/corbin.pdf.
Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008. Retrieved from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-110publ315/pdf/PLAW-110publ315.pdf.