簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張秀澂
論文名稱: 電腦動畫融入教學對國中生電化學學習成就影響之研究
指導教授: 洪志明
Horng, Jhy-Ming
楊永華
Yang, Yong-Hua
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 化學系
Department of Chemistry
論文出版年: 2002
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 162
中文關鍵詞: 電化學電腦動畫
英文關鍵詞: electrochemistry, computer animation
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:150下載:39
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 「電化學」概念是國中學生在學習上感到較為困難的部分,常會出現一些迷思概念。因此本研究的目的,探討如何幫助學生建立正確的化學觀念,有助於其有意義的學習。探討的主要內容分為三部分﹕第一部分是使用電腦軟體製作動畫教材。第二部分是探討自製的電腦動畫教材融入講解式教學法、實驗教學法、小組示範實驗教學法,是否可達到輔助教學的效果?是否可減少學生在電化學學習上的迷思概念?第三部分是探討學生對媒體輔助教學和研究者的上課方式之反應。
    本研究對學生在「電化學」學習上有融入媒體輔助的教學策略,包括講解式教學,實驗教學法和小組示範實驗教學法。每一教學法進行之後,實驗組與控制組學生分別在教室進行討論、綜合歸納,此時實驗組配合電腦動畫輔助教學,而控制組則否。
    研究結果顯示,(1)電腦動畫融入講解式教學法時,對低分群學生的學習,有顯著的成效。(2)電腦動畫融入實驗教學法時,對學生學習成效有顯著的成效。(3)電腦動畫融入小組示範實驗教學法時,對學生學習成效不顯著。由問卷結果顯示,學生認為使用本研究製作的電腦動畫輔助教學 (1) 可提高學習理化的興趣。(2) 可輔助講解式教學。(3)可輔助實驗教學。(4) 幫助學生進入溶液中的粒子微觀世界。(5)「科學史的動畫」幫助瞭解科學的演進是奠基於前人的足跡。在教學策略方面,(1) 沒有一個學生認為「做實驗是一件很浪費時間的事」。(2)上理化課,學生認為先到實驗室做實驗,再和老師、同學討論,學習效果較佳。(3)講解式的教學時,學生喜歡以黑板板書為主,輔助其它教具或媒體。
    研究者建議科學教師在引導國中學生學習時,必須慎重選擇適當的教學資源與教學方法,盡量讓學生親身參與具體的學習活動,以提高他們的學習動機和興趣,但遇到抽象觀念,或需要電腦模擬實驗時,可以融入合適的電腦教學媒體,達到「高品質教學教學過程」,使我們的科學教育走向優質教育的新境界。

    It is difficult and confusing for junior high school students in learning “Electrochemistry” The purpose of this research was to investigate how to help student to build up proper concept of chemistry, and achieve meaningful learning results. The investigation included three parts: The first part was to design computer animation teaching material. The second part was to use these animation media in teaching for the lecture, experiment and small-group demonstrated experiment, and evaluate the effectiveness of students’ learning. The third part was to investigate the response of students to media-aided teaching material and investigator’s teaching methods.
    The strategies of media-aided teaching electrochemistry in this research included lecture, experiment, and small-group demonstrated experiment. Followed with separate strategies offered, both of experimental group and controlled group students were undergoing discussion separately, but only experimental groups were given computer animation teaching material for teaching aids during discussion.
    The key finding from this study were (1) the lecture when combined with computer-aided animation media would result in significant learning efficacy for low-graded students. (2) Group experiment when combined with computer animation teaching media would result in significant learning efficacy for both groups’ students. (3) Demonstrated experiment combined with computer-aided animation showed no significant difference in students learning.
    The students’ response from the questionnaires with regard to the computer animation-aided media were : (1) could raise learning interest, (2) could assist lecture teaching method, (3) could assist experiment teaching method, (4) could help student enter into the world of microscopic particle in the solution, (5) the ”Animation of History of Science” could help understand the steppingstone of science development
    As to teaching strategies, (1) none of the students thought “experiment wastes time”, (2) students indicated experiment and group discussion prior to lecture would result in better learning efficacy, (3) As to lecture, students preferred to use black-board and be supported by other teaching media or material.
    In summary, it was suggested that the science teacher should carefully choose proper teaching resources & methods to lead student’s learning, and enable students to actively participate in their learning activity in order to raise student’s learning motivation & interest. For abstract concept, it would be helpful to use proper computer animation teaching media in order to achieve “high quality teaching process of teaching”.
    Key words﹕electrochemistry、computer animation.

    中文摘要 I 英文摘要 II 目次 IV 表次 VI 圖次 VIII 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機與目的 2 第三節 研究範圍極限制 3 第四節 重要名詞解釋 4 第二章 理論基礎與文獻探討 第一節 智力發展 6 第二節 學習理論 8 第三節 科學教育的建構論 10 第四節 科學教學與科學探究法 11 第五節 概念改變 13 第六節 電腦輔助教學 14 第七節 科學史在科學教育上的意義與應用 18 第八節 電化學概念之相關研究 20 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究流程 27 第二節 研究對象 29 第三節 教材設計 29 第四節 研究工具之發展 33 第五節 施測程序 47 第六節 資料的收集與處理 48 第四章 資料分析與結果 第一節 電化學前測、後測和延宕測驗成績的統計結果分析 50 第二節 電化學概念的學習成就分析 72 第三節 電化學媒體輔助教學學習後問卷之結果分析 90 第四節 理化科教學評鑑分析 95 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 綜合討論 103 第二節 結論 108 第三節 檢討 110 第四節 建議 111 參考文獻 一、中文部分 112 二、英文部分 114 附錄 附錄一、前測與後測 119 附錄二、延宕測驗 126 附錄三、電化學媒體輔助教學學習後問卷調查 132 附錄四、理化科教學評量表 134 附錄五、前後測各單元試題選項答題案人數統計 137 附錄六、延宕測驗各單元試題選項答題案人數統計 146 附錄七、教案 152

    參考文獻
    一、 中文部分
    1. 丁鋐鎰(2001) ﹕國中氧化還原概念之精熟學習研究。國立台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
    2. 王全益(1993) ﹕突破傳統教學知心路歷程-電腦多媒體教學。菁莪季刊18,82年12月
    3. 王克先(1996),學習心理學,桂冠圖書公司,1996年10月,初版五刷。
    4. 王美芬(1992)﹕我國五、六年級學生有關月亮錯誤概念的診斷及補救教學策略的應用。台北市立師範學院學報,23期,357-380.
    5. 王美芬、熊召弟(1988):國民小學自然科教材教法,心理出版社,1998年3月,出版四刷。
    6. 吳鐵雄(1992)﹕電腦輔助教學在我國的實施與展望。教育資料集刊,17,289-302。
    7. 李 吟(1991)﹕改進國中低成就學生學習策略的電腦輔助教學設計。國民中學教學策略國際學術研討會會議資料與紀錄。
    8. 李鴻亮(2000):數位媒體與教材教法的結合(下),科學科技與媒體雙月刊,第51期,民國89年6月。
    9. 林香岑(2001):高中「電化學」概念媒體教學與教師教學策略之研究。國立台灣師範大學碩士論文,民國90年6月。
    10. 林陳湧、童麗珠(2000):生物實驗教學能力重要性評估比較研究,師大學報:科學教育類,民國89年,45(2),21-38
    11. 邱美子(2002):國中電化學電腦動畫輔助教學之學習成效研究。國立台灣師範大學碩士論文,民國91年6月。
    12. 邱貴發(1992)﹕電腦輔助教學成效探討。視聽教育雙月刊,33(4),11-18。
    13. 洪瑞振(1996)﹕推展國中電腦輔助教學之策略,中華工藝教育月刊,29,20-26。
    14. 國民中學理化教師手冊第三冊(1988),國立編譯館主編,民國77年8月正式本初版。
    15. 國民中學選修科目,理化教師手冊 下冊(1987),國立編譯館主編,民國76年1月適用本。
    16. 張世忠(1999),一堂國中理化科之教學觀察、評論和展望。科學教育月刊,219期,88年 4月 p.2-9。
    17. 張玉燕(1994)﹕教學媒體。台北﹕五南圖書出版公司。
    18. 張俊彥、陳盈霖(2000)﹕不同電腦輔助教學模式對高中學生「恆星演化」學習成就極其態度之影響。師大學報﹕科學教育類,民國89年,45(2),1-20。
    19. 張春興(1997):教育心理學,台灣東華書局,1997年12月修訂版第六次印。刷。
    20. 張霄亭(1988):視聽教育與教學媒體。臺北五南圖書出版公司。
    21. 張馨文 (2000)﹕師院學生電化學心智模式之研究。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    22. 郭重吉(1996)﹕科學哲學的省思。教育研究雙月刊,49期,25-38。
    23. 郭順利(1998)﹕高中學生在電化學的錯誤概念。國立台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
    24. 郭鴻銘、沈青嵩(1976)﹕科學素養之內涵。科學教育月刊,第一期。
    25. 陳忠志 (1987)﹕力學錯誤概念與教學成效的關係,第二次認知與學習研討會專輯,頁158-176。
    26. 陳英煌(1993)﹕開創「國中理化」教學的新境界,菁莪季刊16,82年6月,p.38-45
    27. 傅麗玉(1996)﹕科學史與台灣中等學校之整合-問題與建議。化學教學面面觀師大中等教育輔導委員會,頁165-193。
    28. 楊榮祥(1983):科學教學方法----理論與實際:舒華布的引導式探討模式,科學教育月刊, 民國72年,第64期。
    29. 楊榮祥(1984):科學教學方法----理論與實際:探討式與講解式教學模式之比較。科學教育月刊,, 民國73年,第68期。
    30. 董家莒、張俊彥(1999)﹕以「問題解決」為策略之電腦輔助教學學習成效﹕以土石流單元為例。中華民國第十五屆科學教育學術研討會手冊,133。
    31. 董家莒、張俊彥、蕭建華、戴明國(2001):多媒體電腦輔助學習歷程對學生地球科學學習成就之影響,師大學報,民國90年,46(1,2),43-64。
    32. 劉宏文(1996) ﹕建構主義的認識論觀點即其在科學教育上的意義,科學教育月刊,193期,85年10 月 p.8-21。
    33. 歐陽鍾仁(1988),科學教育概論,五南圖書出版股份有限公司,民國77年9月,再版。
    34. 鄭秀如、林煥祥﹕科學史對高中學生學習成就之影響科學與教育學報 第二期 p.205~222
    35. 蕭碧茹、洪振方(2000):以認知歷史分析法探討科學史及其在科學教育的意涵。科學教育月刊,235期
    36. 魏明通(2002),科學教育,五南圖書出版股份有限公司,2002年3月,初版四刷。
    二、英文部分
    1. Allsop,R.T.;George,N.H.(1982).Redox in Nuffield advanced chemisstry.Education in chemistry,19, 57-59.
    2. Bangert-Drowns,R.L.,Kulik,J.A.,&Kulik,C-L.C.(1985).Effectiveness of computer-based education in secondary schools. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction.12(3),59-68.
    3. Brand,M.(1987).What Beginner Teachers Find Most Difficult in Standard 8-10 Chemistry and why; Paper presented at 11th National Convention of Teachers of Mathematics,PhysicalScience and Biology of South Africa,July1987.
    4. Brush,S.G.(1989).History of science and science educcation.Interchange, 20 (2),60-70.
    5. Casteel,C.A.(1989) Effects of chunked reading among learning disabled students﹕An experimental chunked passages.Journal of Educational Technology Systems,17(2),115-121.
    6. Cavin,C.S.,& Lagowski,J.J.(1987) Effects of computer simulated or laboratory experiments and student aptitude on achievement and time in a college general chemistry laboratory course. Journal of Research in Science teaching,24(2),145-160.
    7. Cavin,C.S.,Cavin,E.D.,& Logowski,J.J.(1981).The effects of computer assisted instruction on the attitudes of colloge students toward computers and chemistry.Journal of Research in Science teaching,18(4)329-333。
    8. Chang,C.Y.(2000).Enhancing tenth graders′earth science learning through computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Geoscience Education,48,81-85.
    9. Clark,R.(1983).Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research,53(4),445-459.
    10. Clark,R.(1985).Confounding in educational computing research. Journal of Educational computing Research,1(2),137-148.
    11. Clark,R.(1994).Media will never influence learning.Educational Technology Research and Development,42(2),21-29.
    12. Dagher,Z.R.(1994).Sci.Educ.78,601-614.
    13. De Jong,O.(1995).Characteristics of Chemistry Education in Research in Europe:A Three-Context View;Paper presented at theThird Conference on Research in Chemical Education,Lublin-Kazimierz,Poland,September 1995.
    14. Dillshaw,F.G., & Bell,S.(1985).Learning outcomes of computer programming instruction for middle-grades sdudents﹕A pilot study. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science teaching. St.Paul,MN.
    15. Gamett,P.J.;Treagust,D.F.(1992a).Conceptual difficulties experience by high school students of electrochemistry :electriccircuits and oxidation-reduction equations.Journal of Research in science Teaching,29(2),121-142.
    16. Gamett,P.J.;Treagust,D.F.(1992a).Conceptual difficulties experience by high school students of electrochemistry :electrochemical (galvanic) and rlectrolytic cells. Journal of Research in science Teaching,29(2),1079-1099.
    17. Gardner,H.(1987).The mind's new science﹕A History of the cognitive revolution.New York﹕Basic Books.
    18. Geban,O.,Askar,P.,& Ozkan,I.(1992). Effects of computer simulations and problem-solving approaches on high school students. Journal of EducationalResearch,86(1),5-10.
    19. Greenbowe,T.J.(1994).An interactive multimedia software program for exploring electrochemical cells.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(2),1079-1099.
    20. Hannafin,M.J.(1984).Guidelines for determining instructional locus of control in the design of computer-assited instruction. Journal of instruction Development,7(3),6-10.
    21. Hicks,B.,& Hyde,D. (1973)Teaching about CAI.Journal of Teacher Education.24,120.
    22. Hiebert,J.,& Carpenter,T.P.(1992).Learning and teaching with understanding.In D.A.Grouws(Ed).Handbook of Research on mathematics teaching and learning﹕A project of NationalCouncil of Teachers of Mathematics.New York﹕MacMillan.
    23. Hiebert,J.,& Carpenter,T.P.,Fennema,E.,Fuson,K.,Human,P.,Murray,H.,Olivier,A.,& Wearne,D.(1996).Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction﹕The case mathematics .Educational Researcher,25(4),12-21.
    24. Hughes,W.R.(1974). Astudy of the use of computer simulated experiments in the physics classroom. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction.1,1-6.
    25. Jensen,M.S.,& Finley,F.N.(1995).Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education, 79(2),147-166.
    26. K.A.Burke, Thomas J. Greenbowe,and Mark A.,Windschitl.( 1998 ).Developing and Using Conceptual Computer Animations Chemistry Instruction, Journal of Chemical Education.Vol.75 No.12 December 1998,1658-1661
    27. Kipnnis,N.(1996).The〝Historical-Investigative〞Approach to Teaching Science.Science & Education, 5, 277-192。
    28. Kuhn,T.S.(1970)The structure of scientific revolutions.(2nded)Chicago:University of Chicago Press
    29. Kulik,J.A.,& Kulik,C.C.(1987).Review of recent research literature on computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology,12,222-230.
    30. Lawson,A.(1991).Is Piaget's epistemic subject dead? Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 28, 581-592.
    31. Litchifield,B.C.,Driscoll,M.P.,& Dempsey,J.V.(1990).Presentation sequence and example difficulty﹕Their effect on concept and rule learning in computer-based instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction.17(1),35-40.
    32. Lochhead,J,& Dufresene,R.(1989).Helping Students understand Difficuilt Science Concept Through the Use of Dialogues with history. History and Philosophy of Science Education.Tallahassee, FL﹕Department of Philosophy, Florida State University,221-229。
    33. Masher,G.L.(1995).Student's understanding of Current Electrochemical cells; M.Sc.Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand,Johannesburg.
    34. Matthews,M.R.(1992).History,philosophy,and science teaching﹕the present rapproachment. Science & Education,1(1),11-47.
    35. Matthews,M.R.(1994). Science teaching﹕The role of history and Philosophy of Science.N.Y.﹕Routledge.
    36. Michael J.Sanger and Thomas J. Greenbowe(1997) Students,Misconceptions in Electrochemistry:Current Flow in Electrolyte Solutions and the Solt Bridge Journal of Chemical Education.Vol.74 No.7 July 1997,819-823
    37. Michael J.Sanger and Thomas J. Greenbowe(1999),An Analysis of college chemistry Texbooks As Sources of Misconceptions and Errors in ElectrochemistryJournal of Chemical Education.Vol.76 No.6 June 1999,853-860
    38. Michael J.Sanger and Thomas J. Greenbowe(2000) Addressing Student Misconceptions concerning electron flow in aqueous solutions with instruction including computer animations and conceptual change strategies International urnal Fournal of Sciene Education ,2000,Vol.22,Vol.22,No.5,521-537
    39. Millar,R.(1989).Constructive criticisms.International Journal of Science Education,Vol.11,special issue,pp.587-596.
    40. Nersessian,N.J.(1995).Opening the black box﹕cognitive science and history of science.The History of Science Society,194-211.
    41. Noble,C.(1993).Concept circle diagrams﹕A metacognitive learning strategy to enhance meaningful learning in the elementary science classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Louisiana State University,Baton Rouge.
    42. Novak,J.D.Studies Sci.Educ.1988,15,77-101.
    43. Ogude,A.N.& Bradley,J.D(1994).Ionic conducation and electrical neutrality in Operating electrochemical cells.Journal of .Chemical.Education,71(1),29-34.
    44. Ogude,A.N.& Bradley,J.D(1996). Electode processes and aspect relating to cell e.m.f., current, and cell component in operating electrochemical cells .Journal of .Chemical.Education,73(12),1145-1149.
    45. Oldroyd,D.R.(1977).Teaching the history of chemistry in New South Wales secondary schools.The Australian Science Teachers Journal,23(2),9-22.
    46. Osborne,R.J.;Bell,B.F.( 1983).Eur.J.Sci.Educ.,5,1-14.
    47. Penelope Ann Huddle And Margaret Dawn White,(2000).Using a Teaching Modelt to Correct Known Misconceptions in Electrochemistry, Journal of Chemical Education.Vol.77 No.1 January 2000,104-110
    48. Piaget ,J.(1970). Piaget′s theory.Carmichael′s of Child Psychology.Wiley,New York.
    49. Posner,J.,Strike,K.,Hewson,P. & Gertzog,w.(1982).Accommodation of a scientific conception﹕Toward a theory of conceptual change,ScienceEducation,66(2), 211-227.
    50. Rieber,L.P.,Boyce,M.J.,& Assad,C.(1990). The effects of computer animation on adult learning and retrieval tasks. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction.17(2),46-52.
    51. Roach,L.E.,& Wandersee,J.H.(1993).Short Story Science﹕Using Historical Vignettes as a Teaching Tool. The Science Teacher,9,18-21.
    52. Roach,L.E.,& Wandersee,J.H.(1995).Putting People Back into Science﹕Using Historical Vignettes.School Science and Mathematics,95(7),365-370.
    53. Roblyer,M.D.,Castine,W.H., King,F.J.(1988).Assessing the impact of computer-based instruction﹕a veview of recent research. Computers in the Schools,5(3/4),1-139.
    54. Sipple,C.J.,& Sipple,R.J.(1980,3rd ed).Computer dictionary.Indianapolis,Ind.﹕H.W.Sams.
    55. Solomon,J.(1989). Teaching the History of Science﹕Is Nothing Scared? Teaching the History of Science,42-54.
    56. Solomon,J.,Duveen,I.,Scot,L.& McCarthy,S.(1992).Teaching about the nature of science through history﹕Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science teaching,29(4),409-421.
    57. Tamir,P.(1989).Training Teachers to Teach Effectively in the Laboratory.Science Education,73(1),pp.59-69.
    58. Tippins, D.,Nichols. And Tobin,K.(1993).Restructuring Science teacher education with communites of learners. Journal of Science Teacher Education,4(3),65-72.
    59. von Glasersfeld,E.(1991) Constructivism in Education,The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum,pp32~33 Pergamon Press.
    60. Wheatley, G. H. (1991).Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education,75(1):9-21.
    61. Wong,E.D.(1993).J.Res.Sci.Teach.30,1259-1272.

    QR CODE