研究生: |
楊建隆 Yang, Jann-long |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
臺灣地區大四學生選修「體育課」考量因素之研究 A Study of Cogitating Factors of Taking the Course of Physical |
指導教授: |
鄭志富
Cheng, Chih-Fu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
體育學系 Department of Physical Education |
畢業學年度: | 84 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 86 |
中文關鍵詞: | 體育課 、考量因素 |
英文關鍵詞: | Physical Education Classes, cogitating factor |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:115 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所碩士論文
臺灣地區大四學生選修「體育課」考量因素之研究
研究生:楊建隆 指導教授:鄭志富 博士
摘 要 本研究的主要目的在於瞭解臺灣地區大四學生選修「體
育課」考量因素之優 先順序,並比較不同背景變項(男、女,國立、
私立,大學、學院,前三年所獲 體育成績不同)之大四學生在選修「
體育課」時考量因素之差異。 研究對象為臺灣地區已開設「體育
課」之大學校院的大四學生(八十四學年 度已選修者)共1,138名。
並以 【臺灣地區大四學生選修「體育課」考量因素調 查問卷】 為研
究工具,進行問卷調查。根據實際調查所得資料,以獨立樣本t考 驗
、單因子變異數分析及薛費法事後比較等統計分析方法處理,結果發現:
一、大四學生選修「體育課」考量因素之優先順序為 :(一)師資因素
;(二) 課程因素;(三)運動場地器材因素;(四)興趣選項
經驗因素;(五)體 育目標因素;(六)成績評量經驗因素;(
七)運動樂趣因素。 二、大四男、女學生在選修「體育課」時,對考
量因素之重要程度皆有顯著差異 存在。 三、國立、私立大四
學生在選修「體育課」時,對「課程因素」之重要程度的考 量有
顯著差異存在。 四、大學、學院大四學生在選修「體育課」時,對「
體育目標」、「興趣選項經 驗」、「運動場地器材」、「師資」
、「課程」等因素之重要程度的考量, 有顯著差異存在。 五
、大學前三年所獲體育成績不同的大四學生在選修「體育課」時,對「體
育目 標」、「興趣選項經驗」、「成績評量經驗」等因素之重要
程度的考量,有 顯著差異存在。
A Study of the Cogitating Factors of Taking the Course of
Physical Education of Senior Students in
Taiwan Master Thesis, 1996 Yang, Jann-
long Adviser:Cheng, Chih-fu Ed.D
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to understand the
priority order of the cogit-ating factors of taking the course
of Physical Education of senior students inTaiwan, and to
compare the differences of the cogitating factors of senior
stud-ents of different backgrounds( male / female, national /
private, university /college, grades of the course in the
previous years), When taking the course ofPhysical Education.
The subjects of this study are 1,138 senior students of colleges
and unive-rsities in Taiwan which offer the course of Physical
Education who have takenthe course in the 1995 - 96 Academic
Year. A 〞Questionnaire of the CogitatingFactors of Taking the
Course of Physical Education of Senior Students in Taiwan〝 was
distributed and retrieved. The data obtained were processed with
Indepen-dent Sample t-Test , one-way ANOVA , and Scheff’e
test were utilized for dataanalysis. The findings are as the
followi:1. The priority order of the cogitating factors of
taking the course of PhysicalEducation of senior students are:
(a)Teachers,(b)Course Contents,(c)Facil-ities and
Equipment,(d)Experiences in Interest-election,(e)Course
Objectives,(f)Experiences in Grades Gained, and(g)Fun in the
Sports.2. In the degrees of importnce in the cogitting fctors of
taking the course ofPhysical Education, a significant
difference exists between the male and femaleseniors.3. In the
degrees of importnce in the " Course Contents " in taking the
courseof Physical Education, a significant difference exists
between the senior stude-nts of the national and those of the
private ones.4. In the degrees of importnce in " Course
Objectives , " " Experiences inInterest-election," "
Facilities and Equipment," " Teachers," " Course Contents,"a
significant difference exists between the senior students of the
universitiesand those of colleges.5. In the degrees of
importnce in " Course Objectives, " " Experiences inInterest-
election," " Experiences in Grades Gained, " a significant
differenceexists among the students who have gained different
grades in the previous years.
A Study of the Cogitating Factors of Taking the Course of