簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳淑惠
Shu-hui Chen
論文名稱: 籃球投籃行動的知覺方式與距離效應
Effects of perceptual modality and distance on basketball shooting
指導教授: 卓俊伶
Jwo, Jun-Ling
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
論文出版年: 2003
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 106
中文關鍵詞: 間接知覺與行動直接知覺與行動投籃型式
英文關鍵詞: indirect perception and action, direct perception and action, shooting patterns
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:131下載:39
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 籃球投籃行動的知覺方式與距離效應
    研 究 生:陳淑惠
    指導教授:卓俊伶博士
    日 期:2003年6月
    摘 要
    在探討個體知覺與行動的文獻中,主要可分成傳統間接知覺與行動觀點以及生態心理學直接知覺與行動觀點。本研究的問題是:(1)不同知覺方式的投籃得分在距離限制下是否有差異?(2)投籃動作型式的選擇與不同知覺方式和不同距離限制關聯性為何?(3)在距離限制下不同知覺方式的投籃動作型式是否有差異?以20位高中女生為實驗參與者,平均年齡為17.4 ± 0.5歲,實驗期間每位實驗參與者皆需在六個不同距離(1.8、3.8、5.8、7.8、9.8、及11.8公尺)進行間接與直接知覺方式的投籃行動。間接知覺方式為實驗參與者在各個投籃距離下,選擇投籃動作型式圖片與知覺投籃得分為其行動結果;直接知覺方式為實驗參與者,在各個投籃距離下的實際投籃動作型式影片,經因素分析法給予之評分以及投籃得分為其行動結果,經相依樣本二因子變異數分析2(知覺方式)×6(投籃距離)、c2多重列聯表、G2統計法、以及χ2百分比同質性進行考驗結果發現:(1)不同知覺方式的投籃得分除了在1.8公尺距離無差異外,其餘各距離限制下有差異(3.8、5.8、7.8、9.8、及11.8公尺);(2)投籃動作型式的選擇與不同知覺方式和不同距離限制有關聯;(3)在不同投籃距離下間接知覺與直接知覺方式,除了在距離1.8、3.8、5.8、7.8、以及11.8公尺之投籃動作;距離5.8與11.8公尺之軀幹動作;距離11.8公尺之腳部動作無差異外,其餘在六個投籃距離下間接知覺與直接知覺之投籃各動作型式皆有差異。
    關鍵詞:間接知覺與行動、直接知覺與行動、投籃型式

    Effects of Perceptual Modality and Distance on Basketball Shooting Action
    Master’s Thesis, 2003 Shu-hui Chen
    Advisor: Junling Jwo, Ph.D.
    Abstract
    Traditional view of indirect perception and action and ecological psychology view of direct perception and action were found research literatures of individual’s perception and action. Research questions in this study were: (1) Were there difference in shooting scores between the two different perceptual modalities under distance constrains? (2) What was the association among the shooting patterns, the perceptual modality, and the distance constraint? (3) Were there difference in shooting patterns between the two perceptual modalities under distance constrains? Twenty high school female students (mean age = 17.4 ± 0.5 yrs.) served as participants. The experimental task was to shoot basketball for 10 times from six different distances (1.8, 3.8, 5.8, 7.8, 9.8, and 11.8 meters away from baseline) through the two different perceptual modalities. Shooting performance was filmed and analyzed by using component approach and scoring system. Tow way repeated measure ANOVA with 2 (perceptual modality) ´ 6 (shooting distances), c2 multiple contingency table, G2 test, c2 test for homogeneity were administered for analyses. The finding were as follows: (1) There were differences in shooting scores between indirect and direct perceptual modalities under distance constrains except for the 1.8 meter away from baseline. (2) There was association among shooting patterns, perceptual modalities, and distances constraints. (3) There were differences in shooting patterns between indirect and direct perceptual modalities under six distance constrains except for the shooting patterns under 1.8, 3.8, 5.8, 7.8, and 11.8 meters away from baseline; trunk under 5.8 and 11.8 meters away from baseline; feet under 11.8 meters away from baseline.
    Keywords: indirect perception and action, direct perception and action, shooting patterns.

    目 次 頁次 口試委員與系主任簽字証書……………………………………………… i 授權書……………………………………………………………………… ii 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………… iv 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………… v 謝誌………………………………………………………………………… vi 目次……………………………………………………………………… vii 圖次……………………………………………………………………… xiii 第壹章 緒論……………………………………………………………… 1 第一節 問題背景………………………………………………………… 1 第二節 名詞解釋與操作性定義………………………………………… 6 第三節 研究假定與限制………………………………………………… 8 第四節 研究的重要性…………………………………………………… 8 第五節 研究問題………………………………………………………… 9 第貳章 理論基礎與文獻探討……………………………………………10 第一節 間接知覺與行動的觀點…………………………………………11 第二節 直接知覺與行動的觀點…………………………………………14 第三節 知覺與行動相關文獻探討………………………………………18 第四節 文獻探討總結……………………………………………………22 第五節 假說………………………………………………………………23 第參章 研究方法…………………………………………………………24 第一節 實驗參與者………………………………………………………24 第二節 實驗器材…………………………………………………………24 第三節 場地佈置…………………………………………………………25 第四節 評分量表…………………………………………………………26 第五節 實驗步驟與工作要求……………………………………………28 第六節 資料處理與分析…………………………………………………29 第肆章 結果………………………………………………………………31 第一節 不同知覺方式在距離限制下之投籃得分情形…………………31 第二節 投籃動作型式的反應與不同知覺方式和不同距離限制之關聯 性…………………………………………………………………33 第三節 在距離限制下不同知覺方式之投籃動作型式比較……………38 第伍章 討論………………………………………………………………68 第一節 不同知覺方式在距離限制下之投籃得分情形…………………68 第二節 投籃動作型式的反應與不同知覺方式和不同距離限制之關聯 性…………………………………………………………………70 第三節 在距離限制下不同知覺方式之投籃動作型式比較……………72 第陸章 結論與建議………………………………………………………74 第一節 結論………………………………………………………………74 第二節 建議………………………………………………………………75 引用文獻…………………………………………………………………… 76 附錄………………………………………………………………………… 82 附錄一 實驗參與者同意書………………………………………………83 附錄二 評量表……………………………………………………………84 表1 投籃動作型式評量表……………………………………………84 表2 投籃得分評量表…………………………………………………85 附錄三 投籃動作型式特徵說明圖………………………………………85 圖1 雙手投籃…………………………………………………………85 圖2 單手投籃…………………………………………………………86 圖3 雙手持球手位於腰部……………………………………………86 圖4 雙手持球手位於胸部……………………………………………86 圖5 雙手持球手位於下巴……………………………………………87 圖6 雙手持球手位於頭部之上………………………………………87 圖7 雙手持球手位於耳後……………………………………………87 圖8 單手持球手位於腰部……………………………………………88 圖9 單手持球手位於胸部……………………………………………88 圖10 單手持球手位於下巴……………………………………………88 圖11 單手持球手位於頭部之上………………………………………89 圖12 單手持球手位於耳後……………………………………………89 圖13 單手持球手位於耳上……………………………………………89 圖14 單手持球手位於耳後45度………………………………………90 圖15 單手持球手位於耳後180度…………………………………… 90 圖16 單手持球手位於耳後腰部………………………………………90 圖17 無轉動……………………………………………………………91 圖18 微轉動……………………………………………………………91 圖19 轉動………………………………………………………………91 圖20 兩腳平行…………………………………………………………92 圖21 同側腳向前,兩腳距離未超過單腳長度………………………92 圖22 同側腳向前,兩腳距離超過單腳長度…………………………92 圖23 對側腳向前,兩腳距離未超過單腳長度………………………93 圖24 對側腳向前,兩腳距離超過單腳長度…………………………93 附錄四 統計分析公式……………………………………………………93 附錄五 統計摘要表………………………………………………………95 表3 投籃得分平均數與標準差………………………………………95 表4 投籃得分二因子變異分析摘要表………………………………95 表5 投籃得分單純主要效果變異分析摘要表………………………95 表6 間接知覺得分在不同距離下之投籃得分事後比較摘要表……96 表7 直接知覺得分在不同距離下之投籃得分事後比較摘要表……96 表8 投籃動作之多重列聯分析結果摘要表…………………………96 表9 知覺方式、投籃距離、以及投籃動作獨立性考驗摘要表……97 表10 投籃持球手部高度之多重列聯分析結果摘要表………………97 表11 知覺方式、投籃距離、以及投籃持球手部高度動作型式 之獨立性考驗摘要表……………………………………………97 表12 軀幹動作之多重列聯分析結果摘要表…………………………98 表13 知覺方式、投籃距離、以及軀幹動作獨立性考驗摘要表……98 表14 腳部動作之多重列聯分析結果摘要表…………………………98 表15 知覺方式、投籃距離、以及腳部動作獨立性考驗摘要表……99 表16 投籃距離1.8公尺之動作型式百分比同質性考驗摘要表…… 99 表17 投籃距離1.8公尺之持球手部高度事後比較表……………… 99 表18 投籃距離1.8公尺之軀幹動作事後比較表……………………100 表19 投籃距離3.8公尺之動作型式百分比同質性考驗摘要表……100 表20 投籃距離3.8公尺之持球手部高度事後比較表………………100 表21 投籃距離3.8公尺之軀幹動作事後比較表……………………101 表22 投籃距離3.8公尺之腳部動作事後比較表……………………101 表23 投籃距離5.8公尺之動作型式百分比同質性考驗摘要表……101 表24 投籃距離5.8公尺之持球手部高度事後比較表………………102 表25 投籃距離5.8公尺之腳部動作事後比較表……………………102 表26 投籃距離7.8公尺之動作型式百分比同質性考驗摘要表……102 表27 投籃距離7.8公尺之持球手部高度事後比較表………………103 表28 投籃距離7.8公尺之軀幹動作事後比較表……………………103 表29 投籃距離7.8公尺之腳部動作事後比較表……………………103 表30 投籃距離9.8公尺之動作型式百分比同質性考驗摘要表……104 表31 投籃距離9.8公尺之投籃動作事後比較表……………………104 表32 投籃距離9.8公尺之持球手部高度事後比較表………………104 表33 投籃距離9.8公尺之軀幹動作事後比較表……………………105 表34 投籃距離9.8公尺之腳部動作事後比較表……………………105 表35 投籃距離11.8公尺之動作型式百分比同質性考驗摘要表… 105 表36 投籃距離11.8公尺之持球手部高度事後比較表…………… 106 表37 投籃距離11.8公尺之腳部動作事後比較表………………… 106

    引用文獻
    一、中文部分
    中華民國籃球協會審定。(1992)。國際籃球規則。台北市:中華民國籃球協會。
    王保進。(2002)。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北市:心理出版社。
    邱皓政。(2003)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北市:五南。
    卓俊伶和賴世烔。(2000)。失能學生動作表現與技能的過程取向評估。學校體育,10,5-8。
    林清山。(1992)。心理與教育統計學。台北市:東華。
    林雪蕙譯。(1986)。一探人腦和電腦之平行式學習。科學月刊,17,756-759。
    張春興。(1998)。張氏心理學辭典。台北市:東華。
    陳學志和卓淑玲。(1986)。人類心智運作與電腦模擬。科學月刊,17,760-762。
    黃榮村。(1990)。知覺、記憶與知識結構─台灣認知心理學的研究現況與展望。科學月刊,21,52-57。
    黃榮村。(1993)。心理與行為研究的拓荒者-當代心理學家。台北市:中正。
    梁嘉音、卓俊伶、和簡曜輝。(1998)。距離對籃球投籃動作型式的影響:個案研究。體育學報,25,199-208。
    陳淑惠。(2002)。投籃工作分析與修正調整。2002國際適應體育研討會報告書,台北市:國立台灣師範大學體育研究與發展中心主編,頁343-348。
    楊梓楣和卓俊伶。(1998a)。接球動作型式的環境限制變項探討。體育學報,25,269-278。
    楊梓楣和卓俊伶。(1998b)。5-12歲女童接球動作發展的年齡差異。體育學報,26,81-88。
    櫻井正二郎。(1986)。談視覺的計算理論。科學月刊,17,743-746。
    二、西文部分
    Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-150.
    Bard, C., & Fleury, M. (1976). Analysis of visual search activity during sport problem situations. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 3, 214-222.
    Beek, P. J., Peper, C. E., & Stegeman, D. F. (1995). Dynamical models of movement coordination. Human Movement Science, 14, 573-608.
    Blumberg, M. S., & Wasserman, E. A. (1995). Animal mind and the argument from design. American Psychologist, 50, 133-144.
    Bruce, V., Green, P. R., & Georgeson, M. A. (1996). Visual perception: Physiology, psychology, and ecology (3rd ed.). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Burton, A. W., Greer, N. L., & Wiese, D. M. (1992). Changes in overhand throwing patterns as a function of ball size. Pediatric Exercise Science, 4, 50-67.
    Burton, A. W., & Miller, D. E. (1998). Movement skill assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Cutting, J. E. (1986). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Davis, W. E. (1983). An ecological approach to perceptual-motor learning. In R. L. Eason, T. L. Smith, & F. Caron (Eds.), Adapted physical activity: From theory to application. (pp. 162-171). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Davis, W. E., & Burton, A. W. (1991). Ecological task analysis: Translating movement behavior theory into practice. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 8, 154-177.
    De Rivera J. (1976). Field theory as human-science: Contributions of Lewin’s Berlin group. New York: Gardner Press.
    Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
    Gabbard, C. P. (1992). Lifelong motor development (2nd ed.). Chicago: Brown & Benchmark.
    Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Gordon, I. E. (1989). Theories of visual perception. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Haywood, K. M., & Getchell, N. (2001). Life span motor development (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Herkowitz, J. (1978). Developmental task analysis: The design of movement experiences and evaluation of motor development status. In M. V. Ridenour (Ed.). Motor development: Issues and applications, (pp. 134-164). Princeton, NJ: Princeton Book.
    Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11-26.
    Hirose, N., & Nishio, A. (2001). The process of adaptation to perceiving new action capabilities. Ecological Psychology, 13, 49-69.
    Kamm, K., Thelen, E., & Jensen, J. L. (1990). A dynamical systems approach to motor development. Physical Therapy, 70, 763-775.
    Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Kugler, P. N., Kelso, J. A. S., & Turvey, M. T. (1980). On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures: I. Theoretical lines of convergence. In G. E. Stelmach, & J. E. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior. (pp. 3-47). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    Langendorfer, S. J., & Roverton, M. A. (2002). Individual pathways in the development of forceful throwing. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 245-256.
    Liu, S., & Burton, A. W. (1999). Changes in basketball shooting patterns as a function of distance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 831-845.
    Magill, R. A. (1998). Motor learning: Concepts and applications. Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill.
    Mark, L. S., & Vogele, D. (1987). A biodynamic basis for perceived categories of action: A study of sitting and stair climbing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 367-384.
    Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: W. H. Freeman.
    Meijer, O. G. (1988). The hierarchy debate: Perspectives for a theory and history of movement science. Amsterdam: Free University Press.
    Michaels, C. F. (2000). Information, perception, and action: What should ecological psychologists learn from Milner and Goodale (1995)? Ecological Psychology, 12, 241-258.
    Michaels, C. F., Withagen, R., Jacobs, D. M., Zaal, F. T. J. M., & Bongers, R. M. (2001). Information, perception and action: A reply to commentators. Ecological Psychology, 13, 227-244.
    Nessler, J. (1973). Length of time necessary for viewing a ball while catching it. Journal of Motor Behavior, 5, 179-185.
    Newell, K. M. (1985). Coordination, control, and skill. In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg, & I. M. Franks (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control (pp. 295-317). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade, & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341-361). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Nijhoff.
    Newell, K. M., McDonald, P. V., & Kugler, P. N. (1991). The perceptual-motor workspace and the acquisition of skill. In J. Requin, & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neurosciemnce. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.
    Robertson, S., Collins, J., Elliott, D., & Starkes, J. (1994). The influence of skill and intermittent vision on dynamic balance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 333-339.
    Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
    Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Schmidt, R. A. (1989). Toward a better understanding of the acquisition of skill: Theoretical and practical contributions of the task approach. In J. S. Skinner, C. B. Corbin, D. M. Landers, P. E. Martin, & C. L. Wells (Eds.), Future directions in exercise and sport science research. (pp. 395-410). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Schmidt, R. A., & McCabe, J. F. (1976). Motor program utilization over extended practice. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 2, 239-247.
    Sekuler, R., & Blake, R. (1994). Perception (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Shapiro, D. R., & Dummer, G. M. (1998). Perceived and actual basketball competence of adolescent males with mild mental retardation. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 197-190.
    Sharp, R. H., & Whiting, H. T. A. (1974). Exposure and occluded duration effects in a ball-catching skill. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 139-147.
    Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (2001). Perception and action are inseparable. Ecological Psychology, 13, 163-166.
    Turvey, M. T., Fitch, H. L., & Tuller, B. (1982). The Bernstein perspective: I. The problems of degrees of freedom and context-conditioned variability. In J. A. S. Kelso (Ed.), Human motor behavior: An introduction. (pp. 239-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Turvey, M. T., & Shaw, R. E. (1979). The primacy of perceiving: An ecological reformulation of perception for understanding memory. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research (pp. 167-222). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
    Ulrich, B. D. (1987). Perceptions of physical competence, motor competence, and participation in organized sport: Their interrelationships in young children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58, 57-67.
    Ulrich, B. D., & Ulrich, D. A. (1997). Young children’s perceptions of their ability to perform simple play and more difficult motor skills. In J. E. Clark, & J. H. Humphrey (Eds.), Motor development: Research and reviews Vol. 1. (pp. 24-45). Reston, VA: National Association for Sport and Physical Education.
    Wallace, S. A., & Hagler, R. W. (1979). Knowledge of performance and the learning of a closed motor skill. Research Quarterly, 50, 265-271.
    Warren, W. H., & Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 371-383.
    Whiting, H. T. A., Alderson, G. J. K., & Sanderson, F. H. (1973). Critical time intervals for viewing and individual differences in performance of a ball-catching task. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 155-164.
    Whiting, H. T. A., & Sharp, R. H. (1974). Visual occlusion factors in a discrete ball-catching task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 11-16.
    Wickstrom, R. L. (1983). Fundamental motor patterns (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
    Williams, A. M., Davids, K., Burwitz, L., & Williams, J. G. (1992). Perception and action in sport. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 22, 147-204.
    Williams, A. M., Davids, K., & Williams, J. G. (1999). Visual perception and action in sport. London: E & FN Spon.

    QR CODE