研究生: |
王軍潔 Wang, Jun-Jie |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
個人與社會責任模式介入游泳課之行動研究 An Action Research of Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Into the Swimming Curriculum |
指導教授: |
程瑞福
Chen, Jui-Fu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
體育學系 Department of Physical Education |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 79 |
中文關鍵詞: | 教師自省 、品德教育 、團隊凝聚力 、蛙泳 |
英文關鍵詞: | Teacher introspection, Moral Education, Team cohesion, breaststroke |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.DPE.009.2018.F03 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:199 下載:38 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自古以來中華民族的傳統美德是以「德」為重。但,隨著經濟與社會的發展,現今 的老師覺得:學生難教,教師難做。學生也鮮少關心他人,道德素質越來越薄弱。本研 究以個人與社會責任模式 (Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility, TPSR) 介入游泳 課為行動研究,並探討其研究歷程、介入後學生變化,再從中進行教學反思。研究者為 新任體育教師,研究參與者為廣東省深圳市某高中一年級 29 名學生。本研究設計 10 節 教學單元,透過觀察、教師日誌、訪談、學習單等資料蒐集再進行分析。研究結果:在 游泳課實施 TPSR 責任模式雖然波折但是是可行的,尤其對增加團隊凝聚力、學生學 習態度、學習興趣、學生參與數,增進師生感情。研究者在行動研究中也對班級組織層 面、教學設計層面、提出一些省思。建議:合理安排,靈活運用 TPSR 模式;設計目標 時必須充分了解班級、了解學生;也必須先了解 TPSR 責任目標的精髓,做到備學生、 備課齊頭並進;也需長期運用,從大環境著手,對體育館外的表現跟蹤觀察與記錄。
Since ancient times, the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation have been based on " morality". However, with the development of economy and society.Students seldom care about others, and their moral quality is getting worse. TPSR is introduced into swimming Curriculum as an action research, meanwhile discusses its research process, changes of students after the introduction of TPSR, and draws reflections of teaching from it. The researcher is a newly designated physical education teacher, the research participants are 29 students from grade one of a senior high school in Shenzhen city.10 teaching units were designed in this study, and then materials were collected and analyzed through observation, teacher's journal, interviews, study sheets and so on. Research results: it is feasible to implement TPSR in swimming Curriculum although it has twists and turns. It especially increases team cohesion, students learning attitude, learning interest, students' participation, and also promotes the relationship between teachers and students. Researchers also put forward some thoughts on class organization and teaching design when conducting the action research. Suggestion: arrange reasonably and use TPSR flexibly. When setting goals, we must fully understand the class, students and the essence of TPSR goals, so that preparing students and preparing lessons can advance side by side; also, the model needs to be used for a long time to track and record the performance outside the stadium from the perspective of the general environment.
一、中文部分
丁立宇(2011)。品格教育的體育教學模式-TPSR責任模式之介紹。學校體育,(127),71-76。
王心揚(1995)。美國新社會史的興起及其走向。新史學,6(3),155-183。
尤虔怡(2013)。高關懷學生在個人與社會責任模式之敘說探究 : 以獨輪車學習為例未出版碩士論文)。
田續鴻、蔡俊賢(2010)。不同體育教學法對國中撞球教學個人與社會責任知覺之影響。高師大體育,(9),55-68。
任海濤(2017)。 「校園欺凌」的概念界定及其法律責任[J]。華東師範大學學報(教育科學版),2017,(02):43-50+118。
李文心、楊裕隆、林章榜(2016)。實施個人與社會責任模式對降低學生知覺他人影響學習行為之探究。臺大體育學報,(31),27-42。
李柏昂(2016)。個人與社會責任模式融入飛盤爭奪賽教學之行動研究-以非行少年為例(未出版碩士論文)。
李柏昂、闕月清(2016)。個人與社會責任模式融入飛盤爭奪賽後非行少年責任層級之表現情形。臺東大學體育學報,(24),33-55。
余雅婷、周宏室(2011)。從身體活動中建立學習者的責任感-個人與社會責任模式(TPSRM)的觀點。臺灣運動教育學報,6(1),45-60。
周宏室、徐偉庭(2012)。個人與社會責任課程模式之探究。中華體育季刊,26(1),101-108。
林靜萍、丁立宇(2013)。體育課中發展品格-個人與社會責任模式。中等教育,64(2),157-177。
林憶如(2013)。個人與社會責任融入國中體育教學實務分享。中等教育,64(2),178-191。
洪慶林,杜鑫,宋曉俊(2017)。高校游泳課教學現狀研究分析[J]。體育世界(學術版),2017,(01):152-153。
徐偉庭(2017)。體育課促進青少年正向發展之研究分析。體育學報,50(3),239-256。
徐偉庭、周宏室、潘義祥(2014)。以自我決定理論為架構檢驗體育課學生的責任行為。體育學報,47(3),425-436。
徐偉庭、周宏室、陳文長(2012)。中學生體育課責任概念之探究。課程與教學,15(3),165-180。
國務院教育督導委員會辦公室(2016)。 關於開展校園欺凌專項治理的通知。http://www.moe.gov.cn /jybxwfb /gzdtgzdt /s5987 /201605 /t20160509_242514。
普通高中課程方案(實驗)(中華人民共和國教育部制訂)。 (2008)。 教育理論與實踐:中小學教育教學版 / Theory and Practice of Education, (1), 12。
教育部(2002)。關於印發《全國普通高等學校體育課程教學指導綱要》的通知http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A10/moe_918/tnull_8465.html。
規劃綱要工作小組辦公室(2010)。 國家中長期教育改革和發展規劃綱要(2010-2020年). 當代文化與教育研究, (3), 1。
程瑞福(2010)。學校體育課程教學現況與展望。學校體育,(121),25-29。
喻雪莲(2010)。成都市中小學游泳課開設阻礙因素及應對措施研究(D)。四川師範大學。(未出版碩士論文)
蘇春景、徐淑慧、楊虎民(2016)。家庭教育視角下中小學校園欺凌成因及對策分析[J]. 中國教育學刊,(11):18-23。
曾海, 張穎, 劉安清, 吳本連, 潘義祥, 陶宏, & 董芹芹(2016)。當代體育課程個人與社會責任模式(TPSR) 的發展解析。 Journal Of Beijing Sport University, 39(1), 89。
楊明翰(2012) 。TPSR融入體育教學對高中生個人、社會責任與利社會行為之影響(未出版碩士論文)。
潘義祥(2012)。體育課程個人與社會責任模式之研究發展趨向。中華體育季刊,26(4),491-497。
潘義祥(2013)。個人與社會責任教學融入運動教育模式之整合課程規劃。中華體育季刊,27(2),105-112。
劉樺楠, 季瀏, 董翠香 (2015)。道德社會學視角下運動教育模式的德育實踐研究。Journal Of Beijing Sport University, 38(6), 89.
顏宛平(2013)。國中體育課實施個人與社會責任模式之學生經驗(未出版碩士論文)。
顏宛平、掌慶維(2013)。國中體育課實施個人與社會責任模式之學生經驗。中等教育,64(2),15-38。
羅平(2011)海爾森「個人和社會責任教學模式」及其啓示[J]。體育學刊,2011,18(03):98-102。
鐘敏華(1995)。武德與運動倫理。中華體育季刊,8(4),58-65。
二、英文部分
Coakley, J. J. (1992) Burnout among adolescent athletes: a personal failure or social problem? Sociology of Sport Journal, 9, 271–285.
DeBusk, M., & Hellison, D. (1989). Implementing a Physical Education Self-Responsibility Model for Delinquency-Prone Youth. Journal Of Teaching In Physical Education, 8(2), 104.
Fraser-Thomas, J. L., Côté, J., & Deakin, J. (2005). Youth sport programs: An avenue to foster positive youth development. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 10, 19-40.
Gordon, B. (2005). An evaluation of a six month implementation of the responsibility model in a New Zealand secondary school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massey University, New Zealand.
Gordon, B. (2010). An examination of the responsibility model in a New Zealand secondary school physical education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 21-37.
Gordon, B., Thevenard, L., & Hodis, F. (2011). Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility in New Zealand Secondary School Physical Education. New Zealand Physical Educator, (1), 18.
Hellison, D. (1995). Teaching responsibility through physical activity. Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
Hellison, D., & Walsh, D. (2002). Responsibility-based youth programs evaluation: Investigating the investigations. Quest, 54, 292-307.
Hellison, D. )., & Wright, P. ). (2003). Retention in an urban extended day program: A process-based assessment. Journal Of Teaching In Physical Education, 22(4), 369-381.
Hellison, D. R., & Hellison, D. R. (2011). Teaching personal and social responsibility through physical activity. Champaign, Ill. : Human Kinetics, c2011.
Hellison, D., & Martinek, T. (2006). Social and individual responsibility programs. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), The handbook of physical education (pp. 610-626). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kavussanu, M. (2008). Moral behavior in sport: a critical review of the literature. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 124-138.
Kang,K. J., & Lee, A. S. (2011). Effects of responsibility model on social behavior in underserved youth. Book of Abstracts(p. 42). Daequ, Korea: 2011 International Sport Science Congress.
Nicholas L. Holt Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología del Ejercicio y el Deporte.
Newton, M., Watson, D. L., Kim, M., & Beacham, A. O. (2006). Understanding Motivation of Underserved Youth in Physical Activity Settings. Youth & Society, 37(3), 348-371.
Pope, C. C. (2001). Youth Development and Physical Activity (Book). Culture, Sport, Society, 4(3), 109.
Wright, P., & Burton, S. (2008). Implementation and outcomes of a responsibility- based physical activity program integrated into an intact high school physical education class. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 138-154.
Wright, P. M., White, K., & Gaebler-Spira, D. (2004). Exploring the relevance of the personal and social responsibility model in adapted physical activity: A collective case study. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23, 71-87.
Wright, P., Li. W, Ding, S., & Pickering, M. (2010). Integrating a personal and social responsibility program into a Wellness course for urban high school students: Assessing implementation and educational outcomes. Sport, Education & Society, 12(3), 277-298.