簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林麗文
Natpapat Lertsiriteerakul
論文名稱: 網站瀏覽行為的背景效果研究
Context effects in Web browsing behavior
指導教授: 沈永正
Shen, Yung-Cheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Management
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 37
中文關鍵詞: assimilation effectscontrast effectsambiguityextremity
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:241下載:25
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 是什麼因素會影響同化與對比的效果產生?和已往社會心理學領域有不同的研究。
    Higgings(1997)提出模擬兩可、相似的刺激會產生同化效果 (1977)。Paul M. Herr, Steven J. Sherman, and Russel H. Fazio.(1982)發現當目標物是溫和的刺激物時,造成評比結果是相似的;但若是極端的刺激物時,會產生對比效果。本研究目的為討論同化和對比度的影響。結果發現,我們可使用模糊性和j極端性為因素來達成結果。

    How assimilation and contrast effects are occurs, what are the factors that influence assimilation or contrast effects to be occurred? There are various previous research in the field of Social Psychology, for example, as ambiguous stimuli, priming with moderately extreme exemplars of a category appearing to produce assimilation effects which is consistent with that proposed by Higgings et al. (1977).In 1982, in a consequence of priming: Assimilation and Contrast effects by Paul M. Herr, Steven J. Sherman, and Russel H. Fazio., they found that their ratings were assimilated to the primed anchor when subjects were primed with moderately extreme levels (of small or large animals). If extremely large or extremely small animals were primed, a contrast effect would be occurred. Regarding to the related research as mentioned above, this current study will focus on the assimilation and contrast effects. We will find out the results by using two variables: ambiguity and extremity to determine the results.

    ABSTRACT i TABLE OF CONTENTS v CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Study purpose 1 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW AND HYPOTHESIS 2.1 A well-known Empirical study of Assimilation and Contrast effects and theory foundation 2-4 2.2 Research Hypothesis 5 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3.1 Pretest 6-7 3.2 Main Experiment and Design 8 3.2.1 Participant and Design 8 3.2.2 Independent Variable 8 3.2.3 Dependent Variable 9 3.2.4 Procedure 9-10 CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH RESULT 4.1 Manipulation Check 12-13 4.2 Dependent Measures 14 4.3 Test for hypotheses 16-24 CHAPTER 5 GENERAL DISCUSSION 5.1 Conclusion 25-26 5.2 Academic implication 26-27 5.3Managerial implication 27-28 5.4 Limitations and future study 28-29 REFERENCE 30 APPENDIX 31-37

    Herr, P. M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1106-1115.
    Herr, P. M. (1989). Priming price: Prior knowledge and context effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 67-75
    Thomas Mussweller (2001). Focus of comparison as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast in social comparison, Personality and social psychology bulletin
    Herr, P. M., Sherman, S. J., and Fazio, R. H. (1983). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 232-340
    Fritz Strack, Norbert Schwarz, Herbert Bless, AlmutKubler and Michaela Wanke (1993). Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast effect, European Journal of Social Psychology
    Higgins, E. T. (1996), “Knowledge Activation: Accessibility, Applicability and Salience,” in Social psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, ed. E. Tory Higgins and Arie W. Kruglanski, New York : Guilford Press, 133-168
    Meyers-Levy, J., and Sternthal, B. (1993).A two-factor explanation of assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 359-368
    Schwarz, N., Munkel, T., & Hippler. H.,J. (1990). What determines a “ perspective”? Contrast effects as a function of the dimension tapped by preceding questions. European journal of Social Psychology, 20, 357-361
    Stuart J. Barnes ,Richard T. Vidgen (2002) An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce quality,116
    Zhang Chen Yuan, (2007) Scale Development for attitude toward websites, 31
    HaoShen, Yuwei Jiang and RashmiAdaval (2009) Contrast and Assimilation effects of processing fluency, Journal of consumer research

    下載圖示
    QR CODE