由於社會變遷，已婚婦女就業率逐年增加，傳統的性別角色分工面臨考驗，相關的婦女研究也隨之興起。但過去的研究焦點多集中在婦女身上，忽略家庭組成份子另一性「男性」。因此社會變遷的當下，父親在青少年階段究竟該扮演什麼樣的父親？是值得探討的問題，使父母雙方都能在孩子成長的過程中一起成長，共同擔起教養的責任。
本研究的主要目的在瞭解國內台北市國中生的父親在父職上的實踐狀況及分析影響父職態度及父職實踐的因素。研究目的如下：
一、瞭解已婚男性在子女青少年階段的父職態度與父職實踐現況。
二、探討已婚男性不同個人、家庭因素，其父職態度、父職實踐的差異性。
三、分析已婚男性之父職態度與父職實踐的相關程度。
四、探討影響已婚男性父職態度、父職實踐的因素。
本研究採Bronfenbrenner於1979年提出生態系統理論（ecological systems theory）為理論基礎，以關懷與陪伴、能力發展、養家與示範、日常照顧四個面向為父職的內涵，欲以個人變項『年齡、教育程度、個人收入、性別角色態度』、家庭變項『子女變項（子女人數、子女性別、子女就讀年級）、婚姻滿意度、家庭經濟型態（家庭收入型態、家庭社經地位）、夫妻工作特性（樣本工作時間、妻子工作時間、夫妻工作型態）』來分析影響父職態度及父職實踐的因素。
本研究採問卷調查研究，以「父職態度及父職實踐量表」、「性別角色態度量表」、「個人基本資料」、「婚姻滿意度量表」來進行資料收集，以SPSS 10.0 for Windows 統計套裝軟體進行描述統計、單因子變異數分析（ANOVA）、皮爾森積差相關分析、迴歸等統計分析。研究結果發現：
一、已婚男性對於父職有重視的傾向，實踐程度仍有提升空間。
二、婚姻滿意度、子女受教育年數（子女就讀年級）對父職態度有解釋 力。
三、父職態度、婚姻滿意度、家庭社經地位對父職實踐有解釋力。
四、已婚男性最重視養家與示範，實踐程度亦最高。

Year-by-year the rate of married female employment has been raising because of the social transition. The situation has caused some change in traditional distribution of sex role. More and more studies about women have been done. What about the other family member, Father of teenagers? Both Father and Mother should become mature and be responsible for nurturing children.
The most part of this research is to understand in Taipei City how Fatherhood is carried out while children go to junior high school and to find out factors that effect married male attitude and fulfillment of fatherhood. The purposes of this research are as follows:
1.Nowadays what married men’s attitude is and how they fulfill fatherfood while their children go to junior high school.
2.Explore differences of married male attitude and fulfillment of fatherhood by factors of person and family.
3.Analyze correlations between married male attitude and fulfillment of fatherhood.
4.Find out factors that influence married male attitudes and fulfillment of fatherhood.
The study picks the ecological systems theory that Bronfenbrenner brought forth in 1979 for theoretical bases. Fatherhood in this study connotes four dimensions: solicitude and escort, capability development, breadwinner and demonstration, daily attention. Personal variables and family variables were considered to find out factors that act on married male attitudes and fulfillment of fatherhood. Personal variables are age, level of education, earning, and sex role attitude. Family variables are children characters（children number, children sex, children grade）, matrimonially satisfaction degree, family economic type （family earning type, family socio-economic status）, spouse employment characters（sample work hours, wife work hours, and spouse employment type）.
The study was carried out by questionnaires: ‘The attitudes and fulfillment of Fatherhood scale’, ‘The attitudes towards sex role scale’, ‘Personal basic data’, ‘The matrimonially satisfaction scale’. These retrieved questionnaires were handled with SPSS 10.0 for Windows for descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson product-moment correlation analysis, regression and so on. Finding of the study are as following:
1.Married male inclines to make much of fatherhood, but fatherhood fulfillment can be promoted still.
2.Matrimonially satisfaction, and children grade mean something to married male attitudes towards fatherhood.
3.Attitudes towards fatherhood, matrimonially satisfaction, and family socio-economic status mean something to fatherhood.
4.Married male thinks highly of, and fulfillment of breadwinner and demonstration is highest.

參考書目
中文部份
王大維（民89）。「父職參與」或「參與親職的父親」？ 應用心理研究，7，12-18。
王行、莫藜藜（民84）。已婚男性的家庭價值及其對家庭的需求之探究－－兼論家庭政策之規劃（I）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告NSC84-2411-H031-002-H3。
王珮玲（民82）。父親角色與兒童發展之探討。 教育研究， 32，52-57。
王舒芸（民85b）。 現代奶爸難為乎？－雙工作家庭中父職角色之初探。國立台灣師範大學社會學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
王叢桂（民86）。父職與母職認知基模及其生涯承諾關係的探討。 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告NSC86-2413-H031-001。
王叢桂（民87）。父職的實踐及其影響因素的研究－社會心理學角度的分析。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告NSC87-2413-H031-001。
王叢桂（民89）。促進參與父職因素的探討。 應用心理研究，6，131-171。
王麗玲（民85）。南區大學生對父親家庭角色態度之探討。私立中國文化大學家政學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
台北市主計處（民90）。台北市家庭收支概況調查報告。台北市：台北市主計處。
伊慶春（民80）。台北地區婚姻調適的一些初步研究發現。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，1（3），151-173。
行政院主計處（民92）。臺灣地區人力運用調查報告。台北市：行政院主計處。
李正傑（民90）。雙薪家庭高承諾男性的工作與家庭生活經驗之研究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
李思亮（民90）。已婚男性婚姻品質相關之研究--以育有學齡子女父親為對象。國立臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
周麗端（民90）。夫妻的家庭價值觀與婚姻滿意度之研究。生活科學學報，7，133-155。
周麗端、吳明華、唐先梅、李淑娟（民88）。婚姻與家人關係。台北：國立空中大學。
林莉菁（民89）。單親父親的男性角色和親職角色之研究。 國立臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林震雯（民82）。雙生涯家庭父母親職角色與兒童性別角色態度之關係。私立中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文，未出版。
柯里斯、林為正 譯（民84）。父愛不缺席：心理醫生剖析父親的十二種模式。台北：智庫。
唐先梅（民87）。從家務工作的本質來談夫妻家事分工。兩岸社會變遷中家庭與其相關問題學術研討會論文集，317-344。私立輔仁大學社會文化研究中心。
唐先梅（民90）。雙薪家庭夫妻在不同家務項目之分工情形及個人影響因素。生活科學學報，7，105-131。
夏以玲（民87）。家庭暴力對少年暴力犯罪行為之影響。私立靜宜大學青少年兒童福利學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
徐綺穗（民89）。父職及其與子女行為關係之研究。 教育研究，8， 193-204。
高淑清（民89）。雙薪家庭：角色分擔的開始。載於中華民國家庭教育協會主編，家庭教育學（頁131-154）。台北：師大書苑。
高淑貴、賴爾柔（民77）。雙生涯家庭親職角色之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告NSC75-0301-H002-32F。
張佩韻（民88）。離婚單親父親父職角色與親子關係之研究。私立中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文，未出版。
曹中瑋（民74）。自我狀態、夫妻溝通型態與婚姻滿意度之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版。
郭佳華（民90）。父親參與父職教育方案相關因素之研究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
陳秀如（民90）。國小學生父親參與子女生活及學習相關活動之研究。 私立靜宜大學青少年兒童福利學系碩士論文，未出版。陳淑貞（民82）。父親涉入子女生活及其相關因素之研究。私立中國文化大學家政學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
陳琦茂（民89）。少年父母教養知覺與親子衝突之研究—未犯罪與犯罪少年之比較。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文，未出版。
陳曉慧(民88)。國小學童父親性別角色態度、親職角色與親職教育需求之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
黃坤瑛（民78）。影響父職角色扮演因素之研究－「雙工作家庭」與「單工作家庭」之比較。 國立台灣大學農業推廣研究所碩士論文，未出版。
黃慧森（民90）。高職男生父職角色知覺與認同之研究－以屏東縣市為例。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
蔡佳宜（民89）。兒童知覺父親角色涉入之探討。國立彰化師範大學輔導系碩士論文，未出版。
蔡淑昭（民85）。台灣地區父親家庭角色之研究。私立中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
英文部份
Ahmeduzzaman, M., ＆ Roopnarine, J. L. (1992).Sociodemographic factors, functioning style, social support, and fathers’ involvement with preschoolers in African-American families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 699-707.
Almeida, D. M., ＆ Galambos, N. L. (1991). Examining father involvement and the quality of father-adolescent relations. Journal of Research on A dolescence, 1, 155-172.
Blair ,S.L, Wenk, D., ＆ Hardesty,C.(1994). Marital quality and paternal involvement: Interconnections of men’s spousal and parental roles. Journal of Men’s Studies, 2, 221-237.
Brannon, R. & Juni, S. (1984). A scale for measuring attitudes about masculinity. Psychological Documents, 14(1).
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992).Ecological systems Theory. In Vasta (Ed), Six theories of child development : revised formulations and current issues. London ; Philadelphia : J. Kingsley.
Crouter, A. C., Perry-Jenkins, M., Huston, T., ＆ McHale, S. M. (1987). Processes underlying father involvement in dual-earner and single-earner families. Developmental Psychology, 23, 431-440.
Daly, K. (1993). Reshaping fatherhood: Finding the models. Journal of Family Issues, 14(4), 550-557.
Daly, K. J. (1995). Reshaping fatherhood: Finding the models. In W. Marsiglio (Ed.), Fatherhood : Contemporary theory, research, and social policy(chap. 2). Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications.
Demos, J. (1986). Past, present and personal: The family and the life course in American history. New York: Oxford University Press.
Doherty, W. J., Kouneski, E. F., Ericson, M.F. (1998). Responsible fathering: An overview and conceptual framework. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 60 (2), 277-293.
Epstein, J. I. (1984). Effects on parents of teacher practices in parent involvement. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
Gerson, K. (1993). No man’s land: Man’s changing commitments to family and work. New York: Basic Books.
Goldscheider ＆ Waite, L. J. (1991). New families, no families: The transformation of the American home. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gottman, J. ＆DeClaire, J.（1997）. The heart of parenting: How to raise an emotionally intelligent child. New York:Simon ＆Schuster.
Gottman, J., & DeClaire, J. (1997). The heart of parenting: How to raise an emotionally intelligent child. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Grossman, F. K., Poiiack, W. S., ＆ Golding, E. (1988). Fathers and children: Predicting the quality and quantity of fathering. Developmental Psychology, 24, 82-91.
Haas, L. (1988). Understanding fathers’ participation in childcare: A social constructionist perspective. Paper presented to the National Council on Family Relations, Phliadelphia.
Harris, K. M., & Morgan, S. P. (1991). Fathers, sons, and daughters: Differential paternal involvement in parenting. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 531-544.
Hollingshead, A. B., Redlich, F. C. (1958). Social class and mental illness: A community study. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hosley, C. A. ＆ Montemayor, R. (1997). Father and adolescents. In M. E. Lamb (3rd ed.), The role of the father in child development(chap. 9). New York : Wiley.
Ishii-Kuntz, M. ＆ Coltrane, S. (1992), Predicting the sharing and household labor: Are parenting and housework distinct? Sociological Perspectives, 35, 629-647.
Krejcie, R. V.,＆ Morgan, D. W. （1970）. Determining sample size for research activities. Education and Psychological Measurement,30,607-610.
Lamb M. E. (1986). The changing roles of father. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.). The father’s role－Applied perspectives(chap. 1). New York : J. Wiley.
Lamb M. E. (1997a). Fathers and child development：An introductory overview and guide. In M. E. Lamb (3rd ed.), The role of the father in child development(chap. 1). New York : Wiley.
Lamb M. E. (1997b). The development of father-infant relationship. In M. E. Lamb (3rd ed.), The role of the father in child development(chap. 2). New York : Wiley.
Lamb M. E. (2000). The history of research on father involvement：An overview. Marriage ＆ Family Review, 29(2/3), 22-42.
Lamb, M. E., Pleck, J. H., Charnov, E. L., & Levine, J. A. (1987). A biosocial perspective on paternal behavior and involvement. In J. B. Lancaster, J. Altmann, A. S. Rossi, & L. R. Sherrod (Eds.), Parenting across the lifespan: Biosocial dimensions(pp.111-142) . New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Levent, R. F., Hirsch, L. S., Cozza, T. M., MacEachern, M., & Schnedeker, J. (1992). The male role: An investigation of contemporary norms. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 14(3), 325-337.
Marsiglio ＆ Cohan(2000). Contextualizing father involvement and paternal influence: Sociological and qualitative themes. Marriage ＆ Family Review, 29(2/3), 75-95.
Marsiglio, W. (1991). Paternal engagement activities with minor children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 973-986.
Marsiglio, W.(1995). Fatherhood scholarship: An overview and agenda for the future. In W. Marsiglio (Ed.), Fatherhood : Contemporary theory, research, and social policy(chap. 1). Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications.
Noller P. ＆ Victor C. J. (1991). Family environments and adolescent development. In P. Noller ＆ C. J. Victor (1991), The adolescent in the family(chap. 4). London and New York : Routledge.
Orbuch ,Thornton, Cancio (2000). The impact of marital quality, divorce, and remarriage on the relationships between parents and their children. Marriage ＆ Family Review, 29(4).221-246.
Pleck E. H.＆ Pleck, J. H. (1997). Fatherhood ideals in the United States: Historical dimension In M. E. Lamb (3rd ed.). The role of the father in child development(chap. 3). New York : Wiley.
Pleck, J. H. (1983). Husbands’ paid work and family roles: Current research issues. In H. Lopata ＆ J. Pleck (Eds.), Research in the interweave of social roles. Vol. 3.Families and jobs(pp.231-333).Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Pleck, J. H. (1985). Working wives, working husbands. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Pleck, J. H. (1997). Paternal involvement: Levels, sources, and consequences. In M. E. Lamb (3rd ed.), The role of the father in child development(chap. 5). New York : Wiley.
Russell, G. (1983). The changing role of fathers. St. Lucia, Queensland: University of Queensland Press.
Russell, G. (1986). Primary caretaking and role sharing fathers. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.). The father’s role－Applied perspectives(chap. 2). New York : J. Wiley.
Schumm , W. R., Paff-Bergen, L. A., Hatch, R. C., Obiorah, F. C., Copeland, J. M., Meens, L. D., & Bugaighis, M. A. (1986). Conurrent and disriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381-387.
Smith, C. A. (Ed.). (1999). The encyclopedia of parenting theory and research. CT: Greenwood press.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-30.
Thompson Jr., E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1987). The structure of male role norms. In M. S. Kimmel (Ed.), Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity(chap. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wilkie,J. R. (1993). Changes in U.S. men’s attitudes toward the family provider role 1972-1989. Gender ＆Society, 7, 261-279.