簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊筑婷
Yang, Chu-Ting
論文名稱: EFL大學生寫作動機及寫作回饋的認知對寫作成績之影響
The Effects of Self-determination and Perceptions of Teacher Corrective Feedback on L2 Writing Performance
指導教授: 朱錫琴
Chu, Hsi-Chin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 78
中文關鍵詞: 路徑分析內在動機外在動機第二語言寫作教師寫作回饋
英文關鍵詞: path analysis, L2 writing, teacher WCF, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.DE.003.2019.A07
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:274下載:32
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究目的為二:(一)探討影響第二語言寫作成績的相關因素。(二)以路徑分 析法分析預測各變項和第二語言寫作成績的直接與間接的因果關係。本研究旨在透過路徑分析,觀察第二語言寫作成績、動機以及第二語言學習者對於 教師寫作回饋的認知,了解這些變項之間的直接與間接的關係。本研究藉由文獻回顧, 先畫出對於這三個變項的假設路徑圖。之後,本研究收集 330 筆大學生問卷資料以及其 之英文寫作成績,來驗證此假設路徑圖。路徑分析的結果顯示,「內在動機- 刺激」可以有效預測「第二語言學習者對於教 師寫作回饋在文法、語言問題上的認知」以及「第二語言學習者對於教師寫作回饋在架 構問題上的認知」。而「第二語言學習者對於教師寫作回饋在架構問題上的認知」可以 有效預測第二學習者的寫作成績。至於間接效果的部分,路徑分析的結果顯示,「第二 語言學習者對於教師寫作回饋在文法、語言問題上的認知」可以有效調節「內在動機- 刺 激」和「第二語言學習者對於教師寫作回饋在架構問題上的認知」。除此之外,「第二語 言學習者對於教師寫作回饋在架構問題上的認知」也可以有效調節「第二語言學習者對 於教師寫作回饋在文法、語言問題上的認知」和寫作成績。透過此模型,教師可以清楚 了解如何有效運用教師寫作回饋、動機來增強學生第二語言寫作的成績。

    When compared to other language skills, most EFL learners consider writing the most challenging skill in second language learning (Maarof, Yamat & Li, 2011). To delve into the issue about how to teach L2 writing more efficiently, the current study aimed to examine the causal relationships among SDT-related variables, L2 learners’ perceptions of two different types of teacher WCF and writing performance. To this end, this study firstly drew a hypothesized path analysis model based on the rationales reviewed in the literature review. In addition, the valid data of 330 subjects adapted from Tsao (2018) were recruited to examine the model. The results revealed that intrinsic motivation had the largest predictive power on L2 learners’ perceptions of teacher WCF both about local and global issues and L2 learners’ perceptions of teacher WCF about global issues could significantly predict L2 learners’ writing scores. With regard to the mediating effects, intrinsic motivation toward stimulation could exert significant indirect effects on L2 learners’ perceptions of teacher WCF about global issues via L2 learners’ perceptions of teacher WCF about local issues. In addition, L2 learners’ perceptions of teacher WCF about local issues could also exert significant indirect effects on writing performance via L2 learners’ perceptions of teacher WCF about global issues. The importance of intrinsic motivation, L2 learners’ perceptions of teacher WCF regarding local and global issues in acquiring L2 writing were all highlighted in this study. In short, the results provided several insights for educators to teach L2 writing.

    中文摘要 i ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF APPENDICES vii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Background and Motivation of the Study 1 Significance of the Study 7 CHAPTER TWO LITERA TURE REVIEW 9 Introduction to SDT 9 Intrinsic Motivation 10 Extrinsic Motivation 12 Empirical Studies on Motivation and Language Scores 15 Teacher Written Corrective Feedback 19 Empirical Studies about Written Corrective Feedback 21 Learners’ Cognitive Processing Stages of Written Corrective Feedback 23 Individual differences and corrective feedback 25 L2 learners’ perceptions of two types of teacher WCF 29 CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 31 Introduction 31 Research Framework 31 Participants 33 Instruments 33 Data Collection 34 Data Analysis 35 Path Analysis 36 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 37 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION 46 Pedagogical Implications 52 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Studies 55 Conclusion 57 REFERENCE 58 APPENDICES 70 Appendix A 70 Appendix B 74 Appendix C 78 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Descriptive of all variables in the empirical path model 39 Table 2. Correlations between IMa, IMk, IMs, EMe, Emi, EMid, EMin, WCFLocal, WCFGlobal and WS 40 Table 3. The Goodness of Fit Indices of the empirical path model 41 Table 4. Standard Regression and Effect Size Estimates 43 Table 5. Direct, Indirect, and Total Effects of the Outcome Model 45 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. A taxonomy of human motivation 15 Figure 2. Hypothesized path model of this study 32 Figure 3. The empirical path analysis model 43 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix. A The Self-regulated Learning Variables Questionnaires (English) 70 Appendix. B The Self-regulated Learning Variables Questionnaires (Chinese) 74 Appendix. C The Writing Proficiency Test 78

    Amabile, T. M., DeJong, W., & Lepper, M. R. (1976). Effects of externally imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(1), 92.
    Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    Berg, E. C. (1999). Preparing ESL students for peer response. Tesol Journal, 8(2), 20-25. Bernaus, M. (1995). The role of motivation in the learning of English as a foreign language. Bells: Barcelona English Language and Literature Studies, 6, 11-21. Bidin, S., Jusoff, K., Aziz, N. A., Salleh, M. M., & Tajudin, T. (2009). Motivation and
    attitude in learning English among UiTM students in the northern region of Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 2(2), 16.
    Binalet, C. B., & Guerra, J. M. (2014). A Study on the relationship between motivation and language learning achievement among tertiary students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(5), 251-260.
    Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102-118.
    Bitchener, J. (2017). Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications. New York: Routledge.
    Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191-205. Brown, H. D. (2002). Principles of language learning and teaching (3rd ed.). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
    Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Carroll, J. B. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign-language teaching. Linguistics, 11(112), 5-14.
    Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude, 83-118.
    Chang, M. M., & Lehman, J. D. (2002). Learning foreign language through an interactive multimedia program: An experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 81-98.
    Chen, X. (2017). An investigation of the relationship between pragmatic competence and motivation for non-English majors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(12), 1308-1314.
    Cheng, Y. S., Horwitz, E. K., & Schallert, D. L. (1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49(3), 417-446.
    Cohen, A. D. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (57-69). New York: Prentice-Hall.
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
    Corno, L., & Rohrkemper, M. (1985). The intrinsic motivation to learn in classrooms. Research on Motivation in Education, 2, 53-90.
    Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98.
    Dattalo, P. (2013). Analysis of multiple dependent variables. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105.
    Deci, E. L., & Cascio, W. F. (1972, April). Changes in intrinsic motivation as a function of negative feedback and threats. Presented at the Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston. Retrieved from http://0-search.ebscohost.com.opac.lib.ntnu. edu.tw/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED063558&lang=zh-tw&site=eds-liv
    Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1998). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation: Clear and reliable effects. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester.
    Deci, E.L, & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
    Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346.
    Dhanapala, K. V., & Hirakawa, Y. (2016). L2 reading motivation among Sri Lankan university students. Reading Psychology, 37(2), 202-229.
    Diab, R. L. (2005). EFL university students' preferences for error correction and teacher feedback on writing. TESL Reporter, 38(1), 27-51.
    Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284.
    Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117-135.
    Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Dörnyei, Z. (2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 43-59.
    Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second 60 language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Dörnyei, Z. (2014). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1.
    Eisenberger, R., & Shanock, L. (2003). Rewards, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 121-130.
    Ellis, R. (2004). Individual differences in second language learning. In A. Davies & C. Elder (eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (525-551). Oxford: Blackwell.
    Enginarlar, H. (1993). Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing. System, 21(2), 193-204.
    Faqeih, H. I. (2015). Learners’ Attitudes towards corrective feedback. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 664-671.
    Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple‐draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33-53.
    Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short-and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Perspectives on response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161-184.
    Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1992). A student's contributions to second language learning. Part I: Cognitive variables. Language Teaching, 25(4), 211-220.
    Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A student's contributions to second-language learning. Part II: Affective variables. Language Teaching, 26(1), 1-11.
    Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum.
    Hajian, L., Farahani, A. A. K., & Shirazi, M. A. (2014). A study of students’ and teachers’ preferences and attitudes towards correction of classroom written errors in Iranian EFL context. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(5), 287-297.
    Harackiewicz, J. M. (1979). The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1352.
    Harputlu, L., & Ceylan, E. (2014). The effects of motivation and metacognitive strategy use on EFL listening proficiency. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 124-131.
    Hartshorn, K. J., & Evans, N. W. (2015). The effects of dynamic written corrective feedback: A 30-week study. Journal of Response to Writing, 1(2).
    Hashemian, M., & Heidari, A. (2013). The relationship between L2 learners’ motivation/attitude and success in L2 writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 476-489.
    Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
    Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(2), 141-163.
    Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1996). Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 287-308.
    Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53 – 60.
    Horwitz, E. K. (2000). It ain’t over’til it’s over: On foreign language anxiety, first language deficits, and the confounding of variables. The Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 256-259.
    Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton–Century–Crofts.
    Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101.
    Jang, S. (2010). The interaction of mediating factors in recast efficacy on noticing and L2 development. The Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26(4), 49-79.
    Jones, B. D., Llacer-Arrastia, S., & Newbill, P. B. (2009). Motivating foreign language students using self-determination theory. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 171-189.
    Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta‐analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1-18. Kao, C. W., & Reynolds, B. L. (2017). A Study on the Relationship among Taiwanese
    College Students' EFL Writing Strategy Use, Writing Ability and Writing
    Difficulty. English Teaching & Learning, 41(4).
    Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second‐language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3),305-313.
    Khoiriyah, S. L. (2016). The correlation among attitude, motivation and speaking achievement of college students across personality factors. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(1), 78-92.
    Kleinmann, H. H. (1978). The strategy of avoidance in adult second language
    acquisition. Second Language Acquisition Research: Issues and Implications, 157-174. Kondo-Brown, K. (2006). Affective Variables and Japanese L2 Reading Ability. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18(1), 55-71.
    Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.
    Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college‐level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 203-218.
    Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the" overjustification" hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129.
    Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309-365.
    Littlewood, W. (1996). “Autonomy”: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24(4), 427-435.
    Liu, X. (2014). Influence of Motivation, Autonomy and Online Environment on Listening Skills of Elementary and Intermediate Learners of English. International Education Studies, 7(7), 19.
    Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer
    review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1),
    30-43.
    Maarof, N., Yamat, H., & Li, K. L. (2011). Role of teacher, peer and teacher-peer feedback in
    enhancing ESL students’ writing. World Applied Sciences Journal, 15(Innovation and
    Pedagogy for Lifelong Learning), 35-29.
    Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407-452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Mao, Z. (2011). A Study on L2 Motivation and Applications in Reading Class in Senior High School. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 1(12).
    Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2013). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. Nagin, C. National Writing Project.(2003). Because writing matters: Improving student
    writing in our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
    Nassaji, H. (2017). Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (Vol. 66). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
    Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self‐determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57-85.
    Noels, K., Clément, R., & Pelletier, L. (2001). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientations of French Canadian learners of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 424-442.
    Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self‐determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57-85.
    Jun, S. W. (2012). Developing self-regulated learning skills to overcome lexical problems in writing: Case studies of Korean ESL learners. Retrieved from: http://www.bibme.org/citation-guide/apa/journal-article/
    Oxford, R., & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 78(1), 12-28.
    Ölmez, F. (2015). An investigation into the relationship between l2 reading motivation and reading achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 597-603. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459-470.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.
    Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33.
    Radecki, P. M., & Swales, J. M. (1988). ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System 16(3), 355-365.
    Rassaei, E. (2015). Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and L2 development. System, 49, 98-109.
    Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Elements of the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(1), 24-33.
    Robinson, P. (2001). Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17(4), 368-392.
    Rubin, A. M., & Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(4), 635-654.
    Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta- analysis of the research. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133–164). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
    Saito, H. (1994). Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 46-70.
    Salikin, H., Bin-Tahir, S. Z., Kusumaningputri, R., & Yuliandari, D. P. (2017). The Indonesian EFL Learners' Motivation in Reading. English Language Teaching, 10(5),81-90.
    Salteh, M. A., & Sadeghi, K. (2012). Teachers’ corrective feedback in L2 writing revisited: Concerns against and suggestions for its employment. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(3), 375-383.
    Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58(4), 835-874.
    Sheen, Y. (2011). Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning. New York, NY: Springer.
    Schmidt, R. (1990). The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
    Schmidt, R. (2001). Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Schmidt, R. (2012). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. Perspectives on Individual Characteristics and Foreign Language Education, 6, 27.
    Schulz, R. A. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students' and teachers' views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 343-364.
    Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA‐Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244-258.
    Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge – Taylor & Francis Group.
    Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 85-94.
    Semke, H.D. (1984). The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195-202. 67
    Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference?. RELC Journal, 23(1), 103-110.
    Simpson, J. M. (2006). Feedback on Writing: Changing EFL Students' Attitudes. TESL Canada Journal, 24(1), 96-112.
    Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
    Sparks, R. L., & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning differences: Affective or native language aptitude differences?. The Modern Language Journal, 75(1), 3-16. Straub, R. (1997). Students' reactions to teacher comments: An exploratory study. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 91-119.
    Streiner, D. L. (2005). Finding our way: an introduction to path analysis. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50(2), 115-122.
    Tangpermpoon, T. (2008). Integrated approaches to improve students writing skills for English major students. ABAC Journal, 28(2).
    Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327-369.
    Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 337-343.
    Tsao, C. H. (2012). The effect of error correction on EFL student writing. Journal of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-110.
    Tsao, J. J. (2018). Toward a Model of Taiwanese EFL College Students' Self-regulated Learning in L2 Writing: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach (Doctoral dissertation, Tamkang University, Department of English).
    Tu, S., & Zhou, Y. (2015). A Study on the Relationship between Motivation and
    Interpretation Competence of English Majors. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(7), 214-221.
    Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 29, 271-360
    Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics 19(4), 515–37.
    Wenden, A. L. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 32-55.
    Zhang, J. (2015). Improving English Listening Proficiency: The Application of ARCS Learning-Motivational Model. English Language Teaching, 8(10), 1-6.
    Zhang, Y., & Guo, H. (2012). A study of English writing and domain-specific motivation and self-efficacy of Chinese EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 16(2).

    下載圖示
    QR CODE