研究生: |
張雅富 Chang, Ya-Fu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
以創作行為及創意成份為基礎的創作表現模式之研究 A Creativity Model Based on Creative Behavior and Creative Component |
指導教授: |
張玉山
Chang, Yu-Shan |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development |
論文出版年: | 2016 |
畢業學年度: | 104 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 107 |
中文關鍵詞: | 創作表現 、計畫性行為理論 、創造力成份理論 |
英文關鍵詞: | Creativity, Theory of Planned Behavior, Componential Theory of Creativity |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204473 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:136 下載:4 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討計劃性行為理論與創造力成份理論對創作表現之影響,分析國中學生的計畫性創作行為、創造力成份對創作表現的個別影響與綜合影響,並依據研究結果,提出相關建議。
本研究採取相關研究,以台北市某公立國中的200位八年級與九年級學生作為研究對象,研究工具主要為:學生活動作品、設計學習單、產品創意量表、構想創意評分表、計畫性行為要素量表與創造力成份要素量表。所蒐集的數據資料,以結構方程式進行分析,建構創作行為及創意成份對創作表現影響之結構模式。
本研究的主要結果如下:(1) 計畫性創作行為對國中學生創作表現無顯著直接影響,但具間接影響;(2)創造力成份對國中學生創作表現具有正向影響;(3)國中生計畫性創作行為呈正面傾向;以及(4)國中生創造力成份呈正面傾向。
The purpose of this study was to discuss the effect of Theory of Planned Behavior and Componential Theory of Creativity on student creativity.
The study used correlation research method. Participants were 200 8th and 9th grader junior high students in Taipei. Research instruments included students’ products, learning worksheets, product creativity scale, idea crea-tivity scale, planned behavior scale, and creative component scale. For the confirmatory factor analyses of scales and the structural equation mod-eling, AMOS 20.0 software was used.
The findings were as follows: (1) Planned behavior had no direct effectts on creative performance but an indirect effect on student creative per-formance; (2) Creative component had positive effects on the junior high students creative performance; (3) Junior high students’ planned creativity behavior had a positive tendency, and (4) Junior high students’ creative component had a positive tendency. Based on research findings, relative recommandations were proposed as well.
一、中文文獻
江郁君(2009)。大學生捐血意圖的研究~計劃行為理論之應用(碩士論文)。取自http://ir.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/retrieve/43552/metadata_01_04_s_05_0013.pdf
吳淑鶯、陳瑞和(2006)。計劃行為理論應用於網路書店購買行為之研究。中華管理評論國際學報,9(4),1-23。
蔡清田、鄭又嘉、陳鳳珠、雲大維、林峰毅、李旭民、賴乾永、吳錦雲、吳毓智(2007)。學校本位課程發展的新猷與教務課程領導。台北市:五南。
吳靜吉、程炳林(1992)。國民中小學生學習動機、學習策略與學業成績之相關研究。國立政治大學學報,66,13-39。
林均燁(2011)。創造力教育在創新經濟時代的社會責任與發展策略。朝陽學報,16,1-30。
林邵珍(2003)。運用 ARCS 動機設計模式之生活科技教學。生活科技教育月刊,36(4),52-59。
林福貹(2006)。論述科學創造力。屏縣教育季刊,26。1-4。
姚亭琇(2006)。Amabile創造力成份模式與共識評量技術之驗證-以國小六年級寫作為例(碩士論文)。取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22094NSYS5331049%22.&searchmode=basic#XXX
施嬌容(2003)。美術鑑賞如何提升小學生的創造力。視覺藝術教師天地-教育論文。取自http://arthome.hk/2008/teacher/essay/appriciation-SzeKiuYung.pdf
孫志誠、嚴貞 (2003)。創造力評量的內涵與方法初探。設計研究,3, 184-193。
國家教育研究院(2015)。十二年國民基本教育科技領域課程綱要草案。取自十二年國民基本教育領域/科目/群科課程綱要草案網路論壇http://12basic-forum.naer.edu.tw/sites/default/files/國民中小學及普通型高中-科技領域課程綱要草案.pdf
張玉山(2003)。虛擬團隊之創造力研究-以師院勞作課程為例(博士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號091NTNU0036022)
張春興、林清山(2002)。教育心理學。台北市:東華書局。
張龍翔(2008)。由期望效用理論推估民眾之環境巨災風險認知(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號097NHU05700004)
教育部(2003)。教育部創造力教育政策白皮書。取自http://www.cyut.edu.tw/~yllo/creative_im/creative_white_paper.pdf
教育部(2014)。願景與藍圖。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫。取自http://12basic.edu.tw/Detail.php?LevelNo=230
教育部(2015年10月10日)。大學校院創新創業扎根計畫【線上網站】。取自http://ecsos.moe.edu.tw/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&layout=ustartarticle&id=51&Itemid=53
教育部(2015年10月10日)。生技產業創新創業人才培育計畫【線上網站】。取自http://web.nchu.edu.tw/~iebt/
教育部(2015年10月10日)。教育部教育創新專案計畫【線上網站】。取自http://www.innov-edu.ncku.edu.tw/index.php
郭生玉(2005)。心理與教育研究法。台北:精華。
郭明德(2009)。創造力理論模式之探討及其在學校創新教學的啟示。研習資訊,26(2),65-73。
游光昭、韓豐年、徐毅穎、林坤誼(2005)。國中學生科技態度量表之發展。高雄師大學報,19,69-83。
黃譯瑩(2006)。學術社群說出創造力的語言及其反映的思維:以三大創造力研究文本為例。
經濟部工業局(2010)。創新產業條例。取自https://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/external/ctlr?PRO=document.DocTitleView&id=881&t=0
經濟部工業局(2015年10月10日)。產業升級創新平台計畫【線上網站】。取自http://tiip.itnet.org.tw/
經濟部工業局(2015年10月10日)。產業創新騰龍搶珠計畫【線上網站】。取自http://www.taiwan-innovation.org.tw/
葉玉珠(2000)。「創造力發展的生態系統模式」及其應用與資訊領域之內涵分析。教育心理學報,32(1),95-122。
葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學—過去、現在與未來。台北市:心理出版社。
劉潔心(2015年10月17日)。理性行為理論、計畫性行為理論、整合性行為模式(國立臺灣師範大學線上課程講義)。取自http://ocw.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/file.php/89/oc-ljs091013.pdf
二、外文文獻
Adams (2006). The Source of Innovation and Creativity. National Center on Education and the Economy, 1-59.
Ajzen,_I._(1985). From intentions to action: A theory of planned behaviour. In Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (Eds.). Action-control: From cognition to behaviour, 11-39.
Ajzen,_I._(1989). Attitude structure and behavior. In Breckler, S. J., & Greenwald, A. G. (Eds.), Attitude Structure and Function, 241-274.
Ajzen,_I._(1988). Attitude, personality, and behavior. Chicago:Dorsey press.
Ajzen,_I.,_&_Fishbein,_M._(1975). Beliefs, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Reading. Ma: Addison-Wesley.
Ajzen,_I._(1991). The theory of planning behaviour. Organizational Behav-ior and the Human Decision Process, 50, 179-211.
Ajzen,_I.,_&_Driver,_B._L._(1992). Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24, 207-224.
Ajzen,_I.,_&_Madden,_T._J._(1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Ex-perimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
Amabile,_T._M._(1983a). A model of creativity and innovation in organiza-tions. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-131.
Amabile,_T._M._(1983b).The social psychology of creativity. NY : Spring-er-Verlag.
Amabile,_T._M._(1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, Colorado: West view Press.
Amabile,_T._M._(1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40, 39-58.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a system’s perspective for the study of Creativity. In R.J.Sternberg(Ed.), Handbook of creativity, 313-338. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2000). New conceptions and research approach to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for crea-tivity in Education. In Heller, K. A.
Dzewaltowski, D. A., Noble, J. M., & Shaw, J. M. (1990). Physical activity participation: Social cognitive theory versus the theories of reasoned action planned behavior. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 12(4), 338-405.
Fishbein,_M._(1963). An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Human Relations, 16, 233-240.
Fishbein,_M._(1967). Attitude and the prediction of behavior. In Martin-Fishbein (Eds.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement, 477-492. New York: Wiley.
Fishbein,_M._(1980). A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications. In Howe, H., & Page, M. (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 27, 65-116. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Mar-keting Research, 18, 39-50.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
Gatch, C. L., & Kendzierski, D. (1990). Predicting exercise intention:The theory of planned behavior. Research Quarterly For Exercise and Sport, 61(1), 100-102.
Guilford, J._P._(1985). The structure-of-intellect model. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements,and applica-tions. 225–266. New York: Wiley.
Guilford,_J._P._(1977). Way beyond the IQ. Creative Education Foundation.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998) , Applied Multivariate Data Analysis , Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (2000). LISREL VI, Analysis of linear struc-tural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods (7th ed.). Mooresville, IN, Scientific Software.
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Publisher.
Lee, C., & Green, R. T. (1991). Cross-cultural examination of the fishbein behavioral intentions model. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2), 289-305.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Simonton, K. D. (1999). Creativity from a historiometric perspective In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. NewYork: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Identifying and developing creative giftedness. Roeper Review, 23(2),60-64.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T.L. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivated crea-tivity in a culture conformity. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. L. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51 (7), 77- 688.
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Pren-tice-Hall, Inc.
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wallas, G. (1926). Stage in the creative process, The creativity question. Duke University Press.
Yvette R., & Lindsay T. (1999). “Structural equation modeling with Lisrel: application in tourism”, Tourism Management, 20, 71-88.