研究生: |
金怡安 Jin, Yi-An |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
台灣家族企業二代接班人和諧/衝突轉化機制探討 Research on the Harmony/Conflict Transformation Mechanism of the Second Generation Successor of Family Businesses in Taiwan |
指導教授: |
康敏平
Kang, Min-Ping |
口試委員: |
許書瑋
Hsu, Shu-Wei 酈芃羽 Li, Peng-Yu 康敏平 Kang, Min-Ping |
口試日期: | 2023/06/21 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
全球經營與策略研究所 Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy |
論文出版年: | 2023 |
畢業學年度: | 111 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 82 |
中文關鍵詞: | 家族企業 、接班問題 、中小企業 、虛性和諧 |
英文關鍵詞: | Family Business, Succession problems, Small and Medium Size Business, Superficial Harmony |
研究方法: | 半結構式訪談法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202300913 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:118 下載:24 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
中小家族企業可謂是台灣的經濟命脈,依據現行資料顯示台灣目前第一代的創業老闆年紀偏高,為了未來企業永續著想,必然得考慮該如何傳承,否則很容易引發家族紛爭,搞得兩敗俱傷。然而因為種種因素,並非每位二代接班人都十分願意接班,有些會為了維持家族和諧而委屈求全,有些則會與家族發生衝突鬥爭,接班前與接班後與家族成員的關係和自身心態是否會發生變化,以及有哪些關鍵事件造成其轉變,轉變的歷程為何。本研究採取半結構式訪談法,受訪者為來自台灣中小企業二代接班人,藉由訪談來全面性了解影響接班因素探討以及二代接班面臨虛性和諧時的態度轉變過程以及後續影響。本研究以半結構式訪談法深入探討了二代接班人在企業接班前後的心態轉變,以及其對家族和企業衝突的影響。研究發現,初期以虛性和諧維持穩定的二代接班人,會因一代是否願意進行「權力下放」與「主動關懷」而產生變化。若一代不願進行權力轉移與關懷,可能導致虛性和諧轉變為實質衝突,影響家族與企業運作。然而,一旦一、二代之間建立起實性和諧關係,並打破傳統家庭角色框架,將有助於建立平等互相尊重的關係,進一步提升企業穩定發展的可能。本研究對於理解家族企業接班的過程及其挑戰提供了有力的見解。
Small and medium-sized family businesses can be considered the lifeblood of Taiwan's economy. Current data indicate that the age of the first-generation entrepreneurs in Taiwan is generally high. For the sustainability of these enterprises in the future, succession planning becomes imperative to avoid family disputes that can lead to mutual destruction. However, due to various factors, not every second-generation successor is willing to take over the family business. Some acquiesce for the sake of family harmony, while others may engage in conflict and struggle with their families. The relationships with family members and the self-perception of the successors may change before and after succession. The key events causing these transformations and the progression of these changes are of considerable interest.
This study employs semi-structured interviews with second-generation successors from small and medium-sized enterprises in Taiwan, to comprehensively understand the influencing factors and explore the process and subsequent impact of attitude changes when facing potential conflict during succession.
Our research in-depth investigates the mentality changes of the second-generation successors before and after enterprise succession, as well as the influence on family and business conflicts. Findings suggest that initially harmonious successors can be affected by the first-generation's willingness to "delegate power" and "proactively care". If the first generation is reluctant to transfer power and provide care, it may cause the superficial harmony to transform into substantial conflict, affecting the operation of the family and business. However, once a substantive harmonious relationship is established between the first and second generations, breaking the traditional family role framework can contribute to the establishment of equal and mutually respectful relationships, further enhancing the possibility of stable business development. This study provides potent insights into understanding the process and challenges of family business succession.
Debicki, B. J., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., Pearson, A. W., & Spencer, B. A. (2016). Development of a socioemotional wealth importance (SEWi) scale for family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 47-57.
FamilySearch. https://www.familysearch.org/zh-hans/blog/power-storytelling-choose-connection-zh
Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton University Press.
Garman, A. N., & Glawe, J. (2004). Succession planning. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 56(2), 119.
Handler, W. C. (1989). Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review, 2(3), 257-276.
Jehn, K. A., Chadwick, C., & Thatcher, S. M. (1997). To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. International journal of conflict management.
Lansberg, I. (1988). The succession conspiracy. Family business review, 1(2), 119-143.
Lansberg, I., Perrow, E. L., & Rogolsky, S. (1988). Family business as an emerging field. Family business review, 1(1), 1-8.
Le Breton–Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, L. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 28(4), 305-328.
Litterer, J. A. (1966). Conflict in organization: A re-examination. Academy of Management Journal, 9(3), 178-186.
Longenecker, J. G., & Schoen, J. E. (1978). Management succession in the family business. Journal of Small Business Management (pre-1986), 16(000003), 1.
Michael-Tsabari, N., & Weiss, D. (2015). Communication traps: Applying game theory to succession in family firms. Family Business Review, 28(1), 26-40
Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers?. Journal of corporate finance, 13(5), 829-858.
Morris, M. H., Williams, R. O., Allen, J. A., & Avila, R. A. (1997). Correlates of success in family business transitions. Journal of business venturing, 12(5), 385-401.
Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative science quarterly, 296-320.
Rothwell, W. J., & Poduch, S. (2004). Introducing technical (not managerial) succession planning. Public Personnel Management, 33(4), 405-419.
Sullivan, S. E., & Bhagat, R. S. (1992). Organizational stress, job satisfaction and job performance: where do we go from here?. Journal of management, 18(2), 353-374.
Thomas, K. W. (2008). Thomas-kilmann conflict mode. TKI Profile and Interpretive Report, 1(11).
Verderber, R. F., & Verderber, K. S. (1998). Inter-act: Using interpersonal communication skills. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Ward, J. (2016). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. Springer
Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C., & Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non–family firms: A resource–based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 28(4), 363-381.
104獵才顧問事業群. (2019). 《2019台灣企業接班危機調查》. 一零四資訊科技股份有限公司.
Chen, C. y. (2022). 台商富二代,心靈負二代(一):為什麼他們的子女不願接班?. 獨立評論. https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/52/article/12522
Morton, S. J. (2022, February 28). 說故事的力量——選擇連結.
Stocker, M. (2022). 二代接班人,你該爭取做自己. DDG. https://www.ddg.com.tw/archives/journal/successor
马军. (2009). 家族和谐是家族企业持续发展的基础. 岳阳职业技术学院学报, 24(4), 104-106.
王连娟. (2008). 家族企业接班与接班人选择. 华东经济管理, 22(5), 90-93.
安永會計師事務所. (2022). 《2022全球家族企業調查報告:家族企業的再生力量—跨代創業精神》. EY Taiwan 安永聯合會計師事務所.
张峥. (2015, October 23). 影响第二代接班意愿的3个因素. 哈佛商業評論. https://www.hbrchina.org/2015-10-23/3508.html
杨丽慧, & 王连娟. (2014). 家族企业代际传承中的矛盾与冲突分析——以安海斯-布希为例. 中国集体经济, (12), 50
陆雅铃. (2012). 对 “富二代” 不接班现象的探讨. 中小企业管理与科技, (4), 190-191.李秀娟. (2015). 重拾家文化: 如何提升接班意愿. 清华管理评论, (12), 32-41.
秦夢群. (2004). 教育行政-理論部分. 台北市:五南.
張春興. (1989). 張氏心理學辭典, 臺北: 東華書局.
許士軍, & 陳光中. (1989). 行政院國家科學會專題研究報告.
許士軍. (1997). 家族主義, 專業主義與創業-以華人企業為背景的探討. 管理評論, 16(1), 1-9.
陳泰和. (2001). 台灣家族企業接班人選擇因素之硏究: 以" 交易成本"," 信賴機制"," 網絡關係" 之觀點探討 (Doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan University Department of International Business).
陳乾振, & 汪寧欣. (2021, May 19). 從衝突中探索傳承的真義. 安侯建業. https://home.kpmg/tw/zh/home/insights/2021/05/tw-conflict-in-inheritage.html
黃光國(1984)。談家族企業的組織型態,中國論壇,13(7)
黃囇莉. (1999). 人際和諧與衝突: 本土化的理論與研究. 台北: 桂冠.
經濟部中小企業處 . (2021). 2021中小企業白皮書. 經濟部中小企業處.
葉匡時, & 操禮芹. (1996). 家族企業接班過程的網絡分析. 管理學報 (原管理科學學報), 13(2), 197-225.
資誠聯合會計師事務所. (2020). 《2020台灣家族企業傳承白皮書》. 資誠聯合會計師事務所PwC Taiwan.
臺灣董事學會. (2017). 2017 華人家族關鍵報告. 臺灣董事學會.
蘇靜怡(2006)。台灣家族型態之中小企業接班問題的探討。﹝碩士論文。國立交通大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hr3jeb。
龔心怡. (2015). 你是虎爸虎媽? 論東西方父母參與之差異性. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 4(12), 8-11.