當代的自由國家已經逐漸呈現多元文化的風貌。每個國家皆欲在社會文化要素中的「差異性」與「統合性」之間尋求一個適當的平衡點，因而使得公民教育的審慎規畫益顯重要。本論文即是要探討在當代多元的民主社會情境中，「自由主義應如何修正其公民資格觀，以容納更多的文化差異？」及「自由主義應如何確立適當的公民教育內涵，以維持政治社群的穩定？」。本論文以上述的問題作為探討的主軸，而其可分為四個部份。一、 討論自由主義的基本主張，以及歸納其公民資格觀。二、 引介多元文化論者楊與泰勒的觀點，來批判自由主義公民資格觀的兩個面向：個人主義和平等主義。他們的論述質疑自由主義並未正視文化與群體的特殊性。三、 以自由主義者秦力克的理論修正來容納多元文化論的主張，使文化可以成為自由主義理論中的重要角色。秦力克將文化視為羅爾斯理論中社會基本善的一項，並且嘗試從自由主義的立場來證成少數權利的設計。四、 討論學者之間所爭議的尤德案與莫札特案，以釐清自由主義容忍少數群體的界線和基礎，並探究其公民教育的意義和限制。 Modern liberal countries are increasingly multicultural. All of them seek to balance its elements of social and cultural diversity with those of cohesion, an aspiration which invokes the importance of education for citizenship. So this essay will explore in the context of a pluralistic democratic society, “ How should liberalism amend its conception of citizenship to accommodate more cultural differences?” and “How should liberalism establish the appropriate content of civic education to maintain the stability of its political community ?” These question are the pivot of this article，which can be further divided into four parts . The first part is to discuss the basic claims of liberalism and the liberal conception of citizenship. Second, I will introduce multiculturalism, which emphasizes the vital role of culture and attacks two dimensions of the liberal conception of citizenship: individualism and egalitarianism . Third, Will Kymlicka argues that the claim of culture can be accommodated by liberal theory. He treats culture as one of Rawls’s primary social goods and tries to defend special rights for cultural minorities from a liberal position. I will, in last part, discuss two case（Wisconsin v. Yoder ；Mozert v. Hawkins） to clarify the boundaries of liberal tolerance and its grounds, and to explore the meanings of liberal civic education and its limits.

Modern liberal countries are increasingly multicultural. All of them seek to
balance its elements of social and cultural diversity with those of cohesion,
an aspiration which invokes the importance of education for citizenship. So
this essay will explore in the context of a pluralistic democratic society, “
How should liberalism amend its conception of citizenship to accommodate more
cultural differences?” and “How should liberalism establish the appropriate
content of civic education to maintain the stability of its political
community ?”
　These question are the pivot of this article，which can be further divided
into four parts . The first part is to discuss the basic claims of liberalism
and the liberal conception of citizenship. Second, I will introduce
multiculturalism, which emphasizes the vital role of culture and attacks two
dimensions of the liberal conception of citizenship: individualism and
egalitarianism . Third, Will Kymlicka argues that the claim of culture can be
accommodated by liberal theory. He treats culture as one of Rawls’s primary
social goods and tries to defend special rights for cultural minorities from a
liberal position.
　I will, in last part, discuss two case（Wisconsin v. Yoder ；Mozert v.
Hawkins） to clarify the boundaries of liberal tolerance and its grounds, and
to explore the meanings of liberal civic education and its limits.

中文部份：
1. 石元康（1995）。當代自由主義理論。台北：聯經。
2. 江宜樺（1998）。自由主義、民族主義與國家認同。台北：揚智。
3. 李豐斌譯（1984）Norman Hampson著。啟蒙運動。台北：聯經。
4. 李豐斌譯（1999）Frederick Watkins 著。西方政治傳統—近代自由主義之發展。台北
：聯經。
5. 李苹綺譯（1998）James A. Banks著。多元文化教育概述。台北：心理。
6. 沈清松（1995）。盧梭社會契約論的評析：一個奠基性迷思的轉變。載於張福建、蘇文
流主編：民主理論：古典與現代。台北：中研院社科所。
7. 何信全（1999）。儒學與自由主義人觀的比較。台灣哲學研究，第二期，pp141-162。
8. 林火旺（1992）。自由主義與政治中立。美國月刊，8卷，9期，pp74-83。
9. 林火旺（1995）。自由主義社會與公民道德。哲學與文化，22卷12期，pp1071-1084。
10. 林火旺（1998a）。公民身份：認同與差異。載於蕭高彥、蘇文流主編：多元主義。台
北：中研院社科所。
11. 林火旺（1998b）。族群差異與社會正義。台大哲學論評，21期，pp249-268。
12. 林火旺（1998c）。羅爾斯正義論。台北：台灣書店。
13. 林火旺（1999a）。倫理學。台北：五南。
14. 林火旺（1999b）。少數族群可否拒絕政府的教育？---自由社會公民教育的意義與限
制。台灣大學教育哲學學術研討會發表論文。
15. 林信華（2001）。後現代社會的認同（identity）現象。「歐洲社會理論：現代與後
現代」圓桌討論會論文，中研院歐美所主辦。
16. 周志宏（2001）。教育義務與義務教育—義務教育是誰的義務？月旦法學雜誌，第七
十五期。pp7-8。
17. 陳曉林譯（1986）Isaiah Berlin 著。自由四論。台北：聯經。
18. 張秀雄（1998）。公民教育的理論與實施。台北：師苑。
19. 張錦華（1997）。公共領域、多文化主義與傳播研究。台北：正中。
20. 張佳琳（1993）。台灣光復後原住民教育之語言政策分析。載於中國教育學會主編：
多元文化教育。台北：台灣書店。
21. 溫明忠、鄧毓浩、張樹倫、董秀蘭（1997）。邁向二十一世紀的公民教育---公民教材
發展取向之探討。師大公訓系，邁向二十一世紀的公民教育研討會。
22. 鄔昆如（1997）。西洋哲學史。台北：正中。
23. 蔡英文（1998）。價值多元主義、相對主義與政治認同：柏林、雷茲與柏雷論點之分
析。載於蕭高彥、蘇文流主編：多元主義。台北：中研院社科所。
24. 廖炳惠（1995）。回顧現代文化想像。台北 : 時報。
25. 錢永祥（1995）。社會整合與羅爾斯自由主義的政治性格。載於錢永祥等編：哲學與
公共規範。台北：中研院，pp115-133。
26. 蕭高彥（1998）。多元文化與承認政治理論。載於蕭高彥、蘇文流主編：多元主義。
台北：中研院社科所。
27. 聶松齡（1999）。差異與承認---泰勒的多元文化論及其省思。台灣大學三民主義研究
所碩士論文。
28. 蘇永明（2000）。垂直多元與水平多元的思考模式。載於但眧偉、蘇永明主編：文化
、多元文化與教育。台北：五南。
29. 羅慎平譯（1999）Andrew Vincent著。當代意識型態。台北：五南。
30. 中國時報（2000），11.28.9版，12.2.15版，12.3.15版。
31. 聯合報（1997），5.6.6版。
英文部份：
1. Ackerman，Bruce A.（1980）.Social Justice of The Liberal State. New Haven:
Yale University Press.
2. Adorno，T.W.（1978）.Negative Dialectics. London ：Routledge.
3. Arneson，Richard＆Shapiro，Ian（1996）.Democratic Autonomy and Religious
Freedom: A Critique of Wisconsin V. Yoder. In Ian Shapiro and Russell Hardin（
ed.）Political Order : Nomos　　　 ⅩⅩⅩⅧ.New York: New York University
Press.
4. Barbalet，J.M.（1988）.Citizenship. Open University Press.
5. Berlin，Isaiah（1990）.The Crooked Timber of Humanity. London :John Murry.
Brinbaum,Pierre.
6. Burtt，Shelley（1996）. In Defense of Yoder：Parental Authority and the
Public Schools .In Ian Shapiro and Russell Hardin（ed.）Political Order : Nomos
ⅩⅩⅩⅧ.New York: New York University Press.
7. Callan，Eamonn（1997）. Creating Citizens :　Political Education and
Liberal Democracy. Oxford，New York :Clarendon Press.
8. Chaplin，Jonathan（1993）How Much Cultural and Religious Pluralism can
Liberalism Tolerate？In John Horton (ed.) Liberalism，Multiculturalism，and
Toleration. London : Macmillan.
9. Conover，Pamela Johnston（1995）.Citizen Identity and Conception of the
Self. The Journal of Political Theory. 3,pp133-165.
10. Deway，John（1963）.Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillian.
11. Dworkin， Ronald（1978）.Liberalism. In Stuart Hampshire （ed.）Public and
Private Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Fraser，Nancy ＆Gordon，Linda（1994）.Civil Citizenship against Social
Citizenship. In Bart Van Steenbergen（ed.）The Condition of Citizenship.
London: SAGE Publication.
13. Galston，William A.（1989）.Pluralism and Social Unity. Ethics（99）
，pp711-126。
14. Galston，William A.（1991）. Liberal Purposes : Good , Virtues and Duties
in Liberal State. Cambridge University Press.
15. Galston，William A.（1995）.Two Concepts of Liberalism . Ethics,105（3）,
pp516-534.
16. Gray，John（1986）.Liberalism . Milton Keynes: Open Press.
17. Gutmann，Amy（1987）. Democratic Education .New Jersey, Princeton
University Press.
18. Gutmann，Amy（1995）.Civic Education and Social Diversity .Ethics，105
：pp557-579.
19. Gutmann，Amy and Thompson，Dennis（1996）. Democracy and Disagreement.
Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
20. Horton，John（1993）.Liberalism，Multiculturalism，　　　 and Toleration.
In John Horton (ed.) Liberalism， Multiculturalism，and Toleration.　London :
Macmillan.
21. Kelly，George Armstrong（1995）.Who need a Theory of Citizenship. In
Ronald Beiner （ed.）Theorizing Citizenship. State University of New York
Press.
22. Kymlicka，Will（1989）Liberalism， Community and Culture. Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
23. Kymlicka，Will and Norman ,Wayne（1995）.Return of the Citizen：A Survey
of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory .In Ronald Beiner （ed.） Theorizing
Citizenship. State University of New York Press.
24. Kymlicka，Will（1995a）.Multicultural Citizenship. In Gershon Shafir （ed.
） The Citizenship Debates: A Reader. Minnesota University Press.
25. Kymlicka，Will（1995b）Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
26. Kymlicka，Will and Norman，Wayne（2000）.Citizenship in　　Culturally
Diverse Societies: Issues, Context, Concepts. In Will Kymlicka and Wayne Norman
（ed.）Citizenship in Diverse Society. Oxford University Press.
27. Larmore，Charles E.（1987）.Patterns of Moral Complexity .New York:
Columbia University Press.
28. Larmore，Charles E.（1990）.Political Liberalism. Political Theory.18（3）,
pp339-360.
29. Larmore，Charles E.（1994）.Pluralism and Reasonable Disagreement. Social
Philosophy and Policy（11）.
30. Macedo ，Stephen（1995）.Liberal Civic Education and Religious
Fundamentalism :The Case of God v. John Rawls? Ethics，105,pp468-496.
31. Macedo，Stephen（2000）. Diversity and Distrust: Civic Education in a
Multicultural Democracy. Cambridge, Mass : Harvard University Press.
32. Mclaughlin，T. H. (1992). Citizenship，Diversity and Education : A
Philosophical Perspective .Journal of Moral Education，21（2）.pp235-246.
33. McCabe ， David （1995）. Liberal　Education　is　Moral Education. Social
Theory and Practice，21（1），pp83-96.
34. Mill，John Stuart（1991）.On Liberty and Other Essays .　Oxford University
Press.
35. Nagel，Thomas（1986）.The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
36. Nicholson，Linda J.（1990）.Feminism/Postmodernism. London: Routledge.
37. Oldfield，Adrian（1990）.Citizenship ＆Community: Civic Republicanism ＆
The Modern World. London and New York: Routledge.
38. Pojman，Louis P.（1999）.Ethics：Discovering Right and Wrong. Wadsworth
Publishing Company.
39. Rawls，John（1971）.A Theory Of Justice. Cambridge ，Mass： Harvard
University Press.
40. Rawls，John（1985）.Justice as Fairness：Political not Metaphysical .
Philosophy & Public Affairs，14（3）,pp223-251.
41. Rawls，John（1993）.Political Liberalism .New York: Columbia University
Press.
42. Raz，Joseph（1994）.Ethics in the Public Domain. New York: Clarendon
Press : Oxford University Press.
43.　Shipley，Joseph T.（1984）.The Origin of English words. Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins University Press.
44. Spinner，Jeff（1994）.The Boundaries of Citizenship . Baltimore:The Johns
Hopkins Press.
45. Spinner，Jeff（2000）.Religion in Public and Private Education .In Will
Kymlicka and Wayne Norman（ed.） Citizenship in Diverse Society. Oxford
University Press.
46. Taylor，Charles（1989）.Cross-Purpose: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate.
In Nancy L. Rosenblum (ed.) Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge ,
Massachusetts： Harvard University Press.
47. Taylor，Charles（1992）.Multiculturalism and The Politics of Recognition
：An essay /by Charles Taylor：With commentary by Amy Gutmann. New Jersey
：Princeton University Press.
48. Waldron，Jeremy（1987）.Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism. The
Philosophical Quarterly.37（147）,pp127-150.
49. Young，Iris Marion（1990）.Justice and the Politics of Difference. New
Jersey: Princeton University Press.
50. Young，Iris Marion（1995a）.Polity and Group Difference：A Critique of the
Ideal of Universal Citizenship .In Ronald Beiner （ed.）Theorizing Citizenship.
State University of New York Press.
51. Young，Iris Marion（1995b）.Together in Difference：Transforming the Logic
of Group Political Conflict .In Will Kymlicka（ed.）The Right of Minority
Culture，155-178.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Young，Iris Marion（2001）.Equality of Whom？Social Group and Judgement of
Injustice. The Journal of Political Philosophy ，9（1）,pp1-18.
參考網站：
錫安山全球資訊網：http://home.zion.org.tw/