簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 謝逸勳
Yi-Hsun, Hsieh
論文名稱: 新北市國民小學教師領導與教師專業發展之相關研究
The study of the relationships between teacher leadership and teachers’ professional development in elementary schools of New Taipei City.
指導教授: 黃乃熒
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育學系
Department of Education
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 184
中文關鍵詞: 教師領導教師專業發展
英文關鍵詞: Teacher Leadership, Teacher’s Professional Development
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:183下載:44
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討新北市教師領導與教師專業發展的現況教師專業發展的現況,並分析不同的個人背景變項以及學校環境變項知覺教師領導與教師專業發展的差異情形,進而探究教師領導與教師專業發展的關係與教師領導對教師專業發展的預測力。
    為達成上述研究目的,本研究採取問卷調查法,參酌相關文獻後,編制「國民小學教師領導與教師專業發展調查問卷」作為研究工具。以新北市202所國民小學為研究母群體,在依據學校規模採取分層隨機抽樣填答人數,共發出526份問卷,份問卷,回收問卷計469份,回收率達89.18%;剔除填答不完整等無效問卷14份,總計有效問卷為455份,有效問卷回收率達86.5%。本研究以SPSS for Windows17.0版統計套裝軟體進行描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析以及皮爾遜積差相關等統計方法。
    綜合文獻探討及調查研究結果之發現,獲致以下九項結論:
    壹、教師領導運作現況已具相當的實踐,程度最高為個別自我領導。
    貳、教師專業發展現況已具相當的實踐,程度最高為培養專業精神。
    參、教師知覺教師領導的程度為師專或碩士學歷教師高於學士,且服務年資11
    至20年高於5年以下,擔任職務以主任最高。
    肆、教師知覺教師專業發展程度以師專高於碩士與學士,且學校規模13至24班
    普遍高於比60班以上學校。
    伍、教師領導與教師專業發展存有正面相互影響的關係
    陸、教師領導中個別自我領導與同儕合作領導會影響教師專業發展中增進專業知能、持續專業進修與精進專業實踐的發展
    柒、教師領導中同儕合作領導之運作對教師專業發展中增進專業知能、持續專業進修與精進專業實踐最為重要
    捌、教師領導中個別自我領導之運作對教師專業發展中培養專業精神層面影響最大
    玖、教師領導中教學文化領導在目前教育現場中最不受重視。

    This research intends to explore the relationship between teacher leadership and teacher’s professional development at elementary schools in New Taipei City, including the impact of their different backgrounds on this relationship.
    The main purposes of this study were: investigate the present situations of elementary school teacher leadership and teacher’s professional development; explore the relationship between teacher leadership and teacher’s professional development at elementary schools, including the impact of their different backgrounds on this relationship; explore the relationship between elementary teacher leadership and teacher’s professional development; discuss the significantly prediction between elementary school teacher’s leadership and teacher’s professional development; provide results of this research to school teachers, school administrators, educational authorities, and future researcher for their reference.
    As stratified samples, 526 elementary school teachers in New Taipei City were randomly selected. Each was given a uniform questionnaire. As a result, 455 valid questionnaires were retrieved. The valid retrieval rate amounts to 86.5%. The data analyzed by mean, standard deviation, t-test, one-way ANOVA, product-moment correlation, stepwise multiple regression.
    According to the analysis and discussion upon this mentioned result, the following conclusions were numerated:
    1. The teacher leadership of elementary school teachers in New Taipei City could be categorized as medium to high level but teaching culture leadership is the last one.
    2. The teacher’s professional development of elementary school teachers in New Taipei City could be categorized as medium to high level.
    3. Some of the enquired background variables like educational background, post, and seniority did impose significant difference upon teacher leadership in elementary schools in New Taipei City.
    4. Some of the enquired background variables like educational background and school size did impose significant difference upon teacher’s professional development in elementary schools in New Taipei City.
    5. There is a medium positive correlation between teacher leadership and teacher’s professional leadership in New Taipei City.
    6. Self-individual leadership and peer-collaboration leadership in teacher leadership would inference teacher professional development, especially
    7. Peer-collaboration leadership would influence promoting professional knowledge, continuing professional learning, and striving professional practice in teacher’s professional development.
    8. Self-individual leadership in teacher leadership would inference cultivating professional sprit in teacher’s professional development most.
    9. Teaching-culture leadership in teacher leadership would be the last part we focused.
    Finally, based on the result of this research, suggestions are provided for school teachers, school administrators, educational authorities, and future researchers for their reference.

    第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………………………01 第二節 待答問題與名詞釋義………………………………………………………05 第三節 研究方法與步驟……………………………………………………………08 第四節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………………………10 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 教師領導概念的源起發展、意義與特質…………………………………11 第二節 教師專業發展之意義與特質………………………………………………37 第三節 教師領導與教師專業發展之相關研究……………………………………51 第三章 研究設計與實施 第一節 研究架構……………………………………………………………………65 第二節 研究對象……………………………………………………………………68 第三節 研究工具……………………………………………………………………72 第四節 實施程序……………………………………………………………………90 第五節 資料處理……………………………………………………………………92 第四章 研究結果分析與討論 第一節 新北市國民小學教師領導現況分析與討論………………………………95 第二節 新北市國民小學教師專業發展現況之分析與討論..……………………116 第三節 新北市國民小學教師領導與教師專業發展之相關與預測分析…..……136 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論………………………………………………………………………147 第二節 建議………………………………………………………………………152 參考文獻 壹、中文部分…………………..…………………………………………………157 貳、外文部分……………………………………………………………………..160 附錄 附錄一 專家效度問卷…………………………………………………………..167 附錄二 預試問卷……………..…………………………………………………177 附錄三 正式問卷……………..…………………………………………………181

    壹、中文部分
    王保進(1999)。視窗版SPSS 與行為科學研究。臺北市:心理。
    任東屏 (1999)。碩士程度的女性國小教師專業發展研究。臺東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺東縣。
    朱經明(2007)。教育及心理統計學。臺北市:五南。
    李俊湖 (1992)。國小教師專業成長與教學效能關係之研究。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    李俊湖(2007)。教師專業成長。研習資訊,24,6。
    汪惠芳 (2009)。國民小學教師專業發展與教師關注之研究。中臺科技大學文教事業經營研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中縣。
    沈翠蓮(1994)。國民小學教師專業成長、教學承諾與學校效能之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    呂木琳(1995)。臨床視導與教師專業成長。臺北市:師大書苑。
    呂錘卿(2000)。國民小學教師專業成長指標及其規劃模式之研究。高雄師範大學教育系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    周崇儒(1997)。國民小學教師專業成長、組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究。臺北市立師範學院。國民教育研究所碩士班論文,未出版,臺北市。
    吳明清(2004)。教育研究-基本觀念與方法分析。臺北市:五南。
    吳清山(2006)。師資培育的理念與實踐。教育研究與發展,2(1),14-25。
    吳清山、林天祐(2008)。教師領導。教育研究,183,136-137。
    吳清山、林天祐(2004)。教育小辭書。臺北市:五南
    吳百祿 (2010)。教師領導研究。高雄:復文。
    吳明隆(2006)。SPSS 統計應用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計。臺北市:知城。
    施佩芳 (2010)。國民小學校長知識領導、教師學習文化與教師專業發展之研究。中正大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
    林欣儀(2008)。臺中市國民小學教師領導之研究。臺中教育大學教育學系碩士班論文,臺中市,未出版。
    林瑄敏(2009)。桃園縣國民小學教師知覺學校文化與教師專業發展關係之研究。臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    邱亭伊(2008)。英國中小學教師專業發展政策之研究─以英格蘭為例。國立暨南大學碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
    洪幸如(2002)。國民中學教師專業發展之研究--以臺北市與屏東縣為例。國臺灣師範大學教育學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    洪英雄(2007)。高屏兩縣原住民地區國小教師專業發展現況之調查研究。高雄師範大學教育研究所,未出版,高雄市。
    孫秋雄(2009)。國小校長變革領導行為與教師專業發展關係之研究。暨南國際大學教育行政與政策學系碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
    孫國華(1997)。國民小學教師生涯發展與專業成長之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    陳玉桂(2006)。學校革新中不可忽視的面向:談教師領導。學校行政雙月刊,45,26-46。
    陳亭燏 (2009)。校長教學視導、教師知識分享與教師專業發展關係之研究─以屏東縣國民小學為例。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
    陳美玉(1999)。教師專業學習與發展,臺北:師大書苑。
    陳佩英(2008)。教師領導之興起與發展,教育研究,171,41-57。
    陳怡潔(2006)。國中校長教學領導、教師領導與家庭教養文化對學生表現影響之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    陳淑君 (2009)。臺北市國民中學學習領域召集人教師領導之研究。臺灣師範大學教育學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    莊勝利(2005)。我國中小學校領導的新思維—教師領導。學校行政,40,17-29。
    郭生玉(2005)。心理與教育研究法。臺北市:精華書局。
    郭蕙菱(2004)。臺南縣市國民小學校長教學領導與教師專業成長關係之研究。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
    郭騰展(2007)。台北縣國民小學教師領導與學校文化關係之研究。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北縣。
    張寶丹(2004)。國小教師專業發展與形象知覺之研究──以高雄縣為例。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
    張慶鴻(2008)。高雄市國民小學教師專業發展及其領導行為與學校組織文化關係之研究。屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
    楊振昇 (2003)。教學領導與教師專業發展。教育資料集刊,28,287-318。
    蔡清田與雲大維(2008)。行動研究及其在教師專業發展與學校課程發展的啟示。行動研究國際學術研討會。國立台東大學師範學院。
    蔡進雄(1995)。有效的班級經營:談教師領導、班級氣氛與學生學業成就。教育資料文摘,214,147-159。
    蔡進雄(2000)。轉型領導與學校效能。臺北:師大書苑。
    蔡進雄(2001)。新世紀學校行政的發展方向。臺東師院學報,12(下集),1-18。
    蔡進雄(2004)。論教師領導的趨勢與發展。教育資料與研究,59,92-97。
    蔡進雄(2005)。超越轉型領導:國民中小學校長新轉型領導影響教師組織承諾之研究。國民教育研究集刊,13,37-63。
    蔡進雄 (2007)。國民中學教師教學領導之建構與發展--以學習領域召集人為例。學校行政,52,20-43。
    賴志峰(2009)教師領導的理論及實踐之探析。教育研究與發展,5(3),113-144。
    賴志峰(2008)。分散式領導的意義、構面與主張。教育研究,171, 28-40。
    鄭詩釧(2005)。國民中小學組織文化與教師專業發展之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    簡茂發(2003)。國民小學教師教學專業展之研究。臺北:李連教育基金會。
    羅嘉慧(2010)。桃園縣國民小學組織信任影響教師領導之研究。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北縣。
    饒見維(2003)。教師專業發展-理論與實務。臺北:五南。

    貳、外文部分
    Aleccia, V.A.(2007).National board certification: Its
    effect on teacher leadership in Oregon and Washington
    public secondary schools.Unpublished doctoral
    dissertation, George Fox University, Newberg, Oregon.
    Barkley, Bottoms, Gene, Feagin, &Clark.(2004).
    Leadership matters: Building leadership capacity.
    Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
    Barth, R. S. (1999). The teacher leader providence, RI: The
    Rhode Island Foundation.
    Barth, R. S. (2001). Learning by heart. San Francisco:
    Jossey-Bass.
    Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond
    expectations. NY: The Free Press.
    Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Manual for the
    multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto,
    California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
    Blandford, S. (2001). Professional development in schools.
    In F. Banks, & A. S. Mayes
    (Eds.), Early professional development for teachers
    (pp. 12-19). London, WC: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.
    Bauer, S. C., Haydel, J. & Cody,C. (2003) .Cultivating
    teacher leadership for school
    improvement. Annual Meeting of the Mid-South
    Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document
    Reproduction Service № . ED482 519.)
    Berdos, A. (2009). Principal leadership in the effective
    elementary school professionallearning community: A
    multiple case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
    University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell.
    Bogner, J.(2002). Teacher leadership and peer coaching.
    Masters project, Teacher Leadership Insitute.
    Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York:Harper & Row.
    Can, Niyazi (2007)."Primary Educat on School
    Administrators' Proficiency Level As Instructional
    Leaders In Developing And Applying New Curricula".
    Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 3 (2), 228-
    244.
    Calderhead, J. (1988). Teachers’ professional learning.
    New York: The Falmer Press.
    Chen, Z.(2007). Teacher leadership and teacher professional
    development in the context of new curriculum reform in
    Chinese Mainland. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
    The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
    Clemson-Ingram, R., & Fessler, R. (1997). Innovative
    programs for teacher leadership.
    Action in Teacher Education, 19(3), 95-106.
    Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry:Building and
    sustaining capacity for school improvenment.Educational
    Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 375-395.
    Crowther, F., Kaagan, S.S., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L.
    (2002). Developing teacher leaders:How teacher
    leadership enhances school success. Thousand Oaks, CA:
    Corwin.
    Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports
    student learning. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 6-11.
    Darling-Hammond, L., Bullmaster, M., & Cobb, V. (1995).
    Rethinking teacher leadership through professional
    development schools. The Elementary School Journal, 96
    (1), 86-106.
    Danielson, C. (2006). Teacher leadership: That strengthens
    professional practice. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
    Davis, M. W. (2009). Distributed leadership and school
    performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The
    George Washington University, Washington, D. C.
    Dickerson, P. L. (2003). Principal leadership style and the
    dimensions of teacher leadership in Texas Public
    Schools. Unpublished doctorial dissertation. Texas
    A& M University.
    Donaldson, G. A. (2001). Cultivating leadership in schools:
    Connecting people, purpose, and practice. New York:
    Teachers College Press.
    Du, F. (2007). A case study of teacher leaders as group
    leaders:Implications for research in teacher education.
    The Teacher Educator,42(3), 185-208.
    Duke,D. L. (1990). Teaching: An Introduction . New York:
    McGraw-HillPublishing Company.
    Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school
    leadership. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker
    Institute.
    Erffmeyer, E.S.,& Martary, C.R.(1990). A quantified
    approach to evaluation of teacher professional growth
    and development professional leadership through a
    goalsetting process. Journal of Personnal Evaluation in
    Education, 3,275-300.
    Forster, E.M.(1997).Teacher leadership:Professional right
    and responsibility. Action in Teacher Education, 19
    (3),82-94.
    Frost, D., & Durrant, J. (2003). Teacher leadership:
    Rationale, strategy, and impact. School leadership &
    management, 23(2), 173-186.
    Gehrke, N. (1991). Developing teacher leadership skills.
    (ERIC ED330691).
    Gibb, C. A. (1954). Leadership. In G. Lindzey (Ed.),
    Handbook of social psychology, vol.2. Reading (pp. 877-
    917), MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Gonzales, L. D. (2001). The sustainability of teacher
    leadership beyond the bounderies of an enabling school
    culture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University
    of Florida.
    Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of
    analysis. Leadership Quarterly,13(4), 423.
    Harris, B. M. (1985). Supervisory behavior in education.
    (3rd ed.). New Jersy: Prentice Hall Inc.
    Harris, A. (2002). School improvement: What’s in it for
    schools? London: Falmer Press.
    Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership and
    schoolimprovement. In A. Harris et al. (2003),
    Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 72-
    83).London: RoutledgeFalmer.
    Harrison,J.W.,&Lembeck, E.(1996). Emergent teacher leaders.
    In G. Moller&M.
    Katzenmeyer(Eds.), Every teacher is a leader. Realizing the
    potential of teacher leadership(pp. 101-116). San
    Francisco, CA;Jossey-Bass.
    Hargreaves, A. (1991). Contrived collegiality: The
    micropolitics of teacher collaboration. In J. Blasé
    (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power,
    conflict, and cooperation. (pp. 46-70). Newbury Park,
    CA: Corwin Press.
    Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (1996). Teachers’
    professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In I.
    F. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’
    professional lives (pp. 1–27). London; Washington, DC:
    Falmer Press.
    Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. G. (1992). Introduction. In A.
    Hargreaves and M. G. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding
    teacher development (pp. 1-19). UK / New York:
    Cassell / Teachers College Press.
    Jackson, B. L. (2009). The impact of a professional
    learning community initiative on the role of teacher-
    leaders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston
    College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
    Johnson, R. J. (2007). Teacher leadership: A case study of
    an elementary principal. Unpublished doctoral
    dissertation, Capital University.
    Johnson, S., & Donaldson, M.(2007). Overcoming obstacles to
    leadership. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 8-13.
    Kaiser, H. F. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark Ⅳ. Educational
    and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111-117.
    Katzenmeyer, M., and G. Moller. (2001). Awakening the
    sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders,
    2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    LeBlanc, P. R., & Shelton, M. M. (1997). Teacher
    leadership: The needs of teachers. Action in Teacher
    Education, 19(3), 32-48.
    Leithwood, K., Jantzi D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing
    leadership for changing times. Buckingham, UK: Open
    University Press.
    Leogrande, C. J. C. (1995). Teacher leadership: Bridging
    two worlds. Unpublished doctorial dissertation,
    Syracuse University.
    Lieberman, A. & Miller, L. (2000). Teachers: Transforming
    their world and their work.NY: Teachers College Press.
    Lieberman, A., Saxl, E., and Miles, M. (1988). Teacher
    leadership: Ideology and practice.In A. Lieberman
    (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools. New
    York: Teachers College Press.
    Little, J.W.(2001). Professional development in the pursuit
    of reform. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 184-192.
    Lord, Brian &Miller, Barbara (2000). An Appealing and
    Inescapable Force in School Reform? Education
    Development Center. 2010/08/10 Retrieved from
    http://www.ed.gov/inits/Math/glenn/LordMill er.doc
    Lynch, M. L.,& Strodl, P.(1991).Teacher Leadership:
    Preliminary development of a questionnaire.(ERIC
    Document Reproduction Service No. ED349267)
    McEwan, E. (1998). Seven steps to effective instructional
    leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
    McGregor, D. M. (1960). The human side of enterprise, New
    York: McGraw-Hill.
    Miller, B., Moon, J.,& Elko, S.(2000). Teacher leadership
    in mathematics and science: Casebook and facilitator’s
    guide. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Moller, G.., & Pankake, A. (2006). Lead with me: A
    principal’s guide to teacher Leadership , NY: Eye on
    Education.
    Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher led school
    improvement : Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching
    and Teacher Education, 22 (8), 961–972.
    Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school
    improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
    Reeves, D.B. (2004) Accountability for learning.
    Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and
    Curriculum Development.
    Reynolds, D. & Cuttance, P. (1993). School effectiveness:
    Research, policy and practice . London: Cassell.
    Ritchie , R., & Woods, P. A. (2007). Degrees of
    distribution: Towards an understanding of variations in
    the nature of distributed leadership in schools. School
    Leadership and Management, 27(4), 363-381.
    Rizvi, M. & Elliot, B. (2005). Teacher’s perceptions of
    their professionalism in government primary schools in
    Karachi, Parkistan. Asia-Pacific Fournal of Teacher
    Education, 33, 35-52.
    Robb, L. (2000). Redefining staff development: A
    collaborative model for teachers and administrators.
    Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Robbins, S. P. (1996). Organization behavior. School
    climate instrument: A pilot study in Pretoria and
    environs. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of
    Pretoria, South Africa.Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: A
    Simon & Schuster Company. Scherman, V.(2002).
    Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations
    of the newreform.Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-
    22.
    Silva, D.Y.Gimbert, B,&Nolan.(2000).Sliding the doors:
    Locking and unlocking possibilites of teacher
    leadership. Teachers College Record,102(4),779-804.
    Sledge J.R. and Morehead, P. (2006, Feb). "Toler- ated
    Failure or Missed Opportunities and Potentials for
    Teacher Leadership in Urban Schools?" Current Issues in
    Education [On- line], 9 (3). 2010/10/05 Retrieved from
    http://cie .ed .asu .edu/volume9/number3.University of
    Chicago Press.
    Smylie, M.A., and Denny, J.W. (1990). “Teacher Leadership:
    Tensions And Ambiguities In Organizational
    Perspective.” Educational Administration Quarterly,26,
    235–259. University Council for Educational
    Administration and Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
    Smylie, M. A. (2008). Foreword. In M. M. Mangin & S. R.
    Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using
    research to inform and reform (pp. ix-x). New York:
    Teachers College Press.
    Snell, J., & Swanson, J. (2000). The essential knowledge
    and skills of teacher leaders: A search for a
    conceptual framework. Paper presented at the Annual
    Meeting of the Educational Research Association, New O
    rleans, LA.
    Somech, A. (2005). Directive versus participative
    leadership: Two complementary approaches to managing
    school effectiveness. Educational Leadership Quarterly,
    41(5), 777-800.
    Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The
    Educational Forum, 69(2), 143-150.
    Stone,M., Horejs, J.,&Lomas,A.(1997). Commonalities and
    differences in teacher leadership at the elementary,
    middle, and high school level. Action in Teacher
    Education, 19(3), 49-64
    Timperley, H. S. (2005). Developing theory from practice.
    Journal of Curriculum Studies,37(4), 395–420.
    Tindill. & Coplin,Lynda. (1989). evaluating staff
    development activities. Education Canada,29(1),16-23.
    Troen, V., and K. Boles. (1993). Teacher leadership: How to
    make it more than a catch phrase.Education Week,
    November.
    Vogel, L. (2004). School district-university partnership:
    Graduate student perceptions of the strengths and
    weakness of a reformed leadership development program.
    Planning and Changing, 35(3&4), 209-222.
    Vonk, H. (1991). Some Trends in the Development of
    Curricula for the Professional Preparation of Primary
    and Secondary School Teachers in Europe: A comarative
    Study. British Journal of Educational Studies, 39 ( 2),
    117-137.
    Wasley, P. A.(1992). Working together: Teacher leadership
    and collaboration. In C. Livingston (Ed.), Teacher
    leaders: Evolving roles (pp. 21-55). Washington, DC:
    National Education Association.
    Wesley D. Hickey, and Sandra Harris (2005). Improved
    Professional Development Through Teacher Leadership.
    The Rural Educator, 26, Number 2, Win 2005
    Whitaker, T., Whitaker, B., & Lumpa, D. (2000). Motivating
    and inspiring teachers: The educational leader’s guide
    for building staff morale. Larchmont, N.Y.: Eye on
    Education.
    Whitney, B. T.(2009). Searching for Pattern of Discourse in
    a Sea of Professional Development Professional Learning
    and Teacher Discourse. Retrieved Oct 10, 2010,
    http://scholarwork.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
    article=1019&context=td
    Widden, M. F. (1987). Perspectives on Staff Development.
    New York: The Falmer Press.
    Wynne, S. M. (2004). A study of the relationships between
    teacher leadership and school culture in secondary
    schools within the Eastern School District on Prince
    Edward Island. Unpublished master’s thesis.,
    University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
    York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about
    teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of
    scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 225-
    316.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE