簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊端容
論文名稱: 國小統計教學軟體設計及其對於學生統計圖形概念理解之研究
The Design and Evaluation of a Software for Elementary Students’ Learning of Statistics
指導教授: 張國恩
Chang, Kuo-En
宋曜廷
Sung, Yao-Ting
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 103
中文關鍵詞: CAI統計思維統計圖形理解多媒體統計軟體
英文關鍵詞: CAI, statistical thinking, Comprehension in statistical graph, multimedia
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:124下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究的目的旨在設計輔助國小學生統計圖表學習之CAI教學軟體,並進行實證性研究,以檢測學童使用此教學軟體後其統計概念理解之成效。研究者基於四個統計思維階層,「描述資料」、「組織及簡化資料」、「呈現資料」、「分析和解讀資料」,並探究相關文獻所指之統計圖表學習難處,作為軟體設計之理念架構及參考,實際建置出一個輔助國小學童進行統計圖表學習之CAI統計軟體。
    研究以125位四年級學生作為實驗對象,讓他們使用所設計出的CAI統計軟體進行統計圖表的學習。結果顯示,整體而言,使用此軟體確能增進學童在統計上的學習成效,尤其是折線圖的部份,成效更為顯著,此外,學生對於以多媒體的方式進行數學學習,持正向態度。
    此研究結果期能提供老師做為統計圖表教學上的參考。

    The purpose of this study was to design a CAI software for learning statistic and examined the learning effect of the CAI software for elementary students. Based on four statistical thinking, i.e., data describing, data organizing and simplifying, data presenting, and data analyzing and interpreting, and the relevant literature of statistical graph learning, this study designed and developed a CAI software for statistics learning.
    The participants were 125 fourth graders learning the concept of statistical graph. The results showed this CAI software could promote the conceptual learning of statistical graph, and there was particularly significant effect in frequency polygon. Furthermore, students’ attitudes toward CAI software of statistic were positive.
    The findings above are helpful for designing software for statistic and are able to provide insights for statistics teaching.

    第一章 緒論..................... ..................1 1.1 研究動機 ..................................1 1.2 研究目的...................................4 1.3 研究假設...................................5 第二章 文獻探討.....................................6 2.1 統計概念的意涵及相關研究.....................6 2.1.1統計意涵......................................6 2.1.2統計學習的認知歷程.............................6 2.1.3小結.........................................9 2.2 統計圖的意涵及相關研究......................11 2.2.1統計圖的意涵 .................................11 2.2.2統計圖的相關研究..............................11 2.2.3小結....................... .................13 2.3 國小統計課程架構之探討......................14 2.3.1國小統計教材架構..............................14 2.3.2國小統計教學活動..............................15 2.3.3小結....................... .................18 2.4 利用CAI來學習統計之相關研究.................19 2.4.1 CAI的意涵...................................19 2.4.2 CAI之發展原則...............................19 2.4.3 利用CAI來學習統計之相關研究...................23 2.4.4小結........................................26 第三章 國小統計教學軟體設計與發展....................29 3.1 設計原則與理念.............................29 3.2 教材架構..................................30 3.3 教材內容說明...............................33 第四章 研究方法....................................46 4.1 實驗對像..................................46 4.2 實驗設計..................................46 4.3 實驗工具..................................47 4.4 實驗程序..................................51 第五章 研究結果與討論...............................52 5.1 統計圖形成就測驗...........................52 5.1.1國小學童統計圖表成就測驗(總分的部份)............53 5.1.2 描述資資....................................53 5.1.3組織及簡化資料(整理資料)、呈現資料(製作圖表).....54 5.1.4分析和解讀資料................................55 5.1.5 長條圖......................................56 5.1.5 折線圖......................................57 5.2 學生態度問卷...............................58 5.3 討論......................................61 第六章 結論與建議...................................65 6.1 結論......................................65 6.2 建議......................................66 參考文獻...........................................67 附錄一.............................................73 附錄二.............................................86 附錄三.............................................96 附錄四.............................................98

    參考文獻:

    ㄧ、中文部份
    王立行(1992)。電腦輔助教學的理論與實務探討。資訊與教育雙月刊,30期,24-33頁
    朱建正(1996)。從具體解題活動出發的國小統計教材設計的理念與實際。國立嘉義師範學院八十四年度數學教育研討會。
    辛佩倚(2006)。多媒體遊戲在兒童空間定位學習上之研究,國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。全國博碩士論文網,095NTNU5395001。
    邱皓政(2000)。量化研究與統計分析。台北市:五南。
    林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。台北市:東華。
    洪瑞鴻(2002)。國小學童統計圖概念測驗工具之編製及其相關研究。國立台中師範學院數學教育學系研究所碩士論文。全國博碩士論文網,090NTCTC480011
    花婉馨(2005)。 以電腦為輔助工具發展九年一貫國小統計統整教學模組。國立國立台北師範學院數學教育研究所碩士論文。全國博碩士論文網,093NTPTC480011
    教育部(2002)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要-數學領域。台北:教育部。
    教育部(2006)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要-數學領域。台北:教育部。
    張國恩( 1999 )。從學習科技的發展看資訊融入教學的內涵。北縣教育。41,16-25。
    張少同(2003)。青少年的數學概念學習研究:青少年的統計概念發展研究。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告。NSC91-2521-S-003-007。
    張紹勳、張紹評、林秀娟(2003)。SPSS For Windows 統計分析-初等統計與高等統計。台北市:文魁資訊股份有限公司。
    陳幸玫(2004)。九年一貫數學能力指標的詮釋-國小統計。行政院國家科學委員會研究報告NSC92-2522-S152-007。
    陳幸玫(2005)。國小統計圖表解讀之教學研究-與「社會」和「自然與生活科學」課程之連結。行政院國家科學委員會研究報告NSC93-2521-S-152-002。
    陳幸玫(2005)。國小統計課程之內涵與教學理念。科學教育月刊,287期,2-12。
    陳英豪、吳裕益(1998)。測驗與評量。高雄市:復文圖書出版社。
    黃隆華(2005)。小學數學乘法遊戲化學習軟體設計研究,國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。全國博碩士論文網,093NTNU5395035。
    黃碧雲(2005)。以能力指標結構為基礎的電腦適性測驗編製及動畫補救教學之應用—以國小數學領域四年級能力指標代數、統計與機率為例。國立台中師範學院數學教育研究所碩士學位論文。全國博碩士論文網,093NTCT1480015。
    楊雅婷(2005)。應用多媒體電腦輔助教學於九年一貫數學課程-統計圖表,逢甲大學應用數學研究所碩士論文。全國博碩士論文網,093FCU05507002。
    楊雁婷(2007)。兒童時間化聚與計算遊戲化學習軟體之設計與應用,國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    鄒聖馨(2000)。國小數學科統計課程設計之研究─真實解讀計劃(AEP) ,國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所。全國博碩士論文網,088NTPTC611006。
    潘樾生(2004)。國小學童統計初步概念結構分析之研究,臺中師範學院/數學教育學系在職進修教學碩士學位班。全國博碩士論文網,093NTCT1480005。
    蔡阜鋼(2004)。國小學童統計圖概念分析之研究,臺中師範學院/數學教育學系在職進修教學碩士學位班。全國博碩士論文網,093NTCT1480004。
    顏嘉吟(2005)。運用SOLO分類法探究國小高年級學童統計圖表之認知層次,國立台北師範學院數學教育研究所碩士論文。全國博碩士論文網,093NTPTC480018。
    蘇國樑(1999)。如何培養統計思維與統計方法。科學教育月刊,216,17-24。
    蘇國樑(1999)。統計概念的啟蒙和發展。科學教育月刊,220,9-16。
    蘇國樑(1999)。統計概念的啟蒙-統計圖。科學教育月刊,221,2-9。
    蘇國樑、許天維(民83)。國小兒童統計概念之分析與研究(Ι)--資料分佈概念之分析。國科會專題研究計劃報告,NSC 83-0111-S180-002N。
    蘇國樑(1995)。國小兒童統計概念分析之研究(II)--統計圖概念之分析。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC84-2511-S180-001。
    譚寧君(1994):國民小學數學新課程統計圖表教材分析。臺灣省國民學校教師研習會編印。

    二、外文部份
    Bakker, A. (2001). Symbolizing data into a ‘bump’. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.),Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2,81-88. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.
    Bakker, A. (2002). Route-type and landscape-type software for learning statistical data analysis. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics .
    Ben-Zvi, D. and Friedlander, A.: 1997b, Statistical thinking in a technological environment , in J.B. Garfield and G. Burrill (eds.), Research on the Role of Technology in Teaching and Learning Statistics, International Statistical Institute, Voorburg, The Netherlands, pp. 45–55
    Ben-Zvi, D. (2000). Toward Understanding the Role of Technological Tools in Statistical Learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning ,2,1-2, 127-155.
    Ben-Zvi & Garfield (2004). Statistical Literacy, Reasoning, and Thinking: Goals, Definitions, and Challenges. In Ben-Zvi & Garfield (Eds.). The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking, 3-15. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 5-43.
    Connor, D., & Davies, N.(2001). An International Resource for Learning and Teaching. Teaching Statistics, 24, 59-61.
    Curcio, F.R. (1987). Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 382-393.
    Davies, N., Roberts, I. & Cole, T. (2002). Using ICT and Web-Based Materials for Learing & Teaching and Data Handling Across the Curriculum in Schools. In B. Phillips (Ed.), ICOTS6 Papers for School Teachers, 227-232.
    Garfield, J. (1995). How students learn statistics. International Sataisticla Review, 63,1,25-34.
    Glencross, M. J., and Binyavanga, K. W. (1997). The role of technology in statistics education: A view from a developing region. In J. Garfield and G. Burrill (Eds.), Research on the Role of Technology in Teaching and Learning Statistics(Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute), 301-308.
    Graham, A. (1987). Statistical investigations in the secondary school. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Hancock, Chris, Kaput, James J. & Goldsmith, Lynn T. (1992) Authentic Inquiry With Data: Critical Barriers to Classroom Implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27,3, 337-364.
    Hand, D. J. (1998). Breaking misconceptions-statistics and its relationship to mathematics (with discussion). The Statistician ,47 ,2, 284-286.
    Handal, B., & Herrington, A. (2003). Re-examining categories of computer-based learning in mathematics education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 3, 3, 275-287.
    Hammerman JK, Rubin A (2004). Strategies for Managing Statistical Complexity with New Software Tools. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3, 2, 17-41.
    Jones, G., Thornton, C., Langrall, C., Mooney, E., Perry, B., & Putt, I. (2000). A framework for characterizing children’s statistical thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(4), 269-307.
    Jones, G., Mooney, E., Langral C., and Thorton, C. (2002). Student's individual and collective statistical thinking. Proceeding of the Sixth International Conference on teaching Statistics
    Konold, C. (2002). Teaching concepts rather than conventions. New England Journal of Mathematics, 34(2), 69-81.
    Lane-Getaz, Sharon J. Simulate and Stimulate to Understand: Learning Statistics with Fathom. Capstone submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Teaching, September 2002. Hamline University, Saint Paul, Minnesota
    Laura Bagnal. (1994). Tabletop and Tabletop Jr.: two tools for hands-on data exploration for kids. CHI Conference Companion 1994: 63-64. Retrieved October 19, 2006, from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=260043&coll=portal&dl=ACM
    Lajoie, S. P., Jacobs, V. R. & Lavigne, N. C. (1995). Empowering children in the use of statistics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 401–425.
    Lovett, M.C., & Greenhouse, J.B. (2000). Applying cognitive theory to statistics instruction. The American Statistician, 54, 196-206.
    Moore, D. S., Cobb, G. W., Garfield, J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1995). Statistics education fin de siècle. The American Statistician, 49, 250-260.
    Moore, D. (1988). Comment in harold hotelling: The teaching of statistics. Statistical Science,3,1,63-108.
    Moore,D.S. (1997). New Pedagogy and New Content:The case of statistics. Interanal Statistical Review,65,2,123-165.
    Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in Probability and Statistics: Reflections and Directions, Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, pp.465-494, NCTM.
    Shaughnessy, J. M. and Zawojewski, J. S. (1999). Secondary Students’ Performance on Data and Chance in the 1996 NAEP, The Mathematics Teacher, Vol.92, No.8, pp.713-718.
    Russell, S. J. & Friel, S. N. (1989). Collecting and Analyzing Real Data in the Elementary School Classroom. In P. R. Trafton &A. P. Shulte (Eds.), New Directions for Elementary School Mathematics (134-148). Reston. VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
    Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26 (2), 114-145
    Wild, C. J. (1995). Continous improvement of teacning:A case study in a large statistics course. Internal Statistical Review, 63,1,49-68.

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2100/12/20
    QR CODE