本研究旨在探討組織知識創造流程的議題，包括組織知識創造流程、組織知識創造的促進
機制、組織知識創造的障礙及組織知識創造障礙的因應對策等共計四個部分。本研究採質
的個案研究法進行，研究設計上採多重個案整體性設計，透過深度訪談的方式進行資料的
搜集，在研究過程中，研究者訪談了五家個案公司，共計十位受訪者，訪談後將訪談內容
轉錄為逐字稿，並依Creswell（1998）的資料分析螺蜁進行資料的管理與分析，最後得到
下列結論：
1、組織知識創造流程包含六個階段，分別為（一）取得知識，（二)分享知識，（三）提
出概念，(四）概念具體化，（五）產出成果，（六）擴散知識。
2、組織知識創造的促進機制共計八項，分別為（一）建立有利於組織知識創造的組織文化
，（二）尋找與組織文化特質相符的員工，（三）運用經營手法以提升組織的核心能力，
（四）鼓勵創意，（五）將知識創造列為績效考核項目，（六）提供具體的獎勵措施，（
七）推動標準化流程，（八）建置舒適的環境。
3、組織知識創造的障礙共計八項，分別為（一）各部門受限於既定計畫無法配合研發時程
，（二）研發時程不易掌握且無法縮短，（三）所需人員招募不易，（四）技術層級的突
破有困難，（五）研發過程中會不斷出現新的問題，（六）同業模仿而導致削價競爭，（
七）資料隨員工離職而流失，（八）跨部門溝通協調有困難。
4、組織知識創造障礙的因應對策共計九項，分別為（一）由主管協調各單位時程的安排，
（二）進行時程規劃並確實掌握每個檢核點，（三）提供發揮的舞台以吸引有經驗的人才
，（四）善用各項外部資源以從事新技術的開發，（五）讓研發人員在特定的範圍內發揮
創意，（六）事先釐清問題並試著解決，若無法解決則停止開發，（七）拉大技術的領先
差距，（八）傳承並應用累積的經驗，（九）促進各單位之間的溝通協調。

The main purposes of this study were to explore the issue of organizational
knowledge creation process, including the process of organizational knowledge
creation, the mechanism of promoting organizational knowledge creation, the
barriers of organizational knowledge creation, and solutions to the barriers
of organizational knowledge creation. The method employed by this research was
multiple case study of qualitative research. The data was collected by in-
depth interviews. In the process of the research, the author interviewed with
10 co-researchers in the 5 corporations. After the interviews, the author
coded the tapes into word processor format files. Then, according to data
analysis spiral (Creswell, 1998), we can get the findings of the study as
follows:
1.There are six steps in the process of organizational knowledge creation. The
six steps are listed as follows: (1) acquiring knowledge, (2) sharing
knowledge, (3) proposing concepts, (4) specifying concepts, (5) producing
achievements, and (6) spreading knowledge.
2.There are eight mechanisms of promoting organizational knowledge creation.
They are listed as follows: (1) establishing organizational culture beneficial
for organizational knowledge creation, (2) looking for the employees fit for
organizational culture, (3) promoting the core ability of organization with
management, (4) encouraging creativity, (5) including knowledge creation into
performance- evaluation items, (6) providing specific rewards, (7) carrying
out standardization process, and (8) establishing comfortable environment.
3.There are eight barriers of organizational knowledge creation. They are
listed as follows: (1) It’s hard to comply with research schedule for
departments because of the already decided plans respectively, (2) the
research procedures are difficult to control and can’t be shortened, (3) the
recruitment is difficult to carry out, (4) to make a breakthrough of technical
level is difficult, (5) new problems will occur constantly through research
process, (6) the price war because of imitations in the same business, (7)
data loss because of the employee resignations, and (8) difficulties of cross-
department coordination.
4.There are eight solutions of organizational knowledge creation. They are
listed as follows: (1) the schedule arrangement for departments coordinated by
managers, (2) schedule planning and controlling each check-point exactly, (3)
providing platform to attract experienced persons, (4) developing new
techniques with outside resources, (5) let researchers show their creativities
in specific range, (6) formulating and trying to solve problems in advance and
stop developing if problems can’t be solved, (7) increasing the technical
leading gap, (8) transferring and applying the accumulating experiences, (9)
enhancing the coordination between departments.

一、中文部分
Badaracco, J.（1991/1991）. Knowledge link：how firms compete through
strategies alliance.
梁炳球（譯）。企業聯盟新戰略。台北: 聯經。
Christopher Meyer.(1998). Relentless growth: how Silicon Valley innovation
strategies can work in your business.
余淑賢。拜矽谷為師 : 高科技企業不斷成長的經營奧秘。台北 : 商周 : 城邦文化發行
Davenport, T. H. ＆ Prusak (1998/1999). Working Knowledge: How Organization
Manage What They Know. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
胡瑋珊（譯）。知識管理—有效運用知識創造競爭優勢。台北：生產力中心。
Drucker, P. F.等著(2000) Havard Business Review on Knowledge Management。
　　張玉文（譯）。知識管理-哈佛商業評論。台北：天下遠見。
James Brain Quinn, Jordan J. Baruch, Karen Anne Zien(1997/2000). Innovation
explosion : using intellect and software to revolutionize growth strategies.
洪明洲（譯）。知識管理與創新。 台北 : 商周。
Leonard-Barton, D. ( 1995/1998) Wellsprings of Knowledge. Boston: Harvard
Business School Press.
王美音（譯）。知識創新之泉—智價企業的經營。台北 : 遠流。
Maxwell, J.A.(1996/2001).Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach.
高薰芳、林盈助、王向葵(譯)。質化研究設計－一種互動取向的方法。台北：心理。
Ikujiro Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. (1995/1997). The Knowledge Creating
Company.
楊子江、王美音(譯)。創新求勝—智價企業論。台北：遠流。
Richard A. D'Aveni.(1994/1998) Hyper competition : managing the dynamics of
strategic maneuvering.
許梅芳（譯）。 超優勢競爭：新時代的動態競爭理論與應用。台北市 : 遠流。
Robert K. Yin(1984/2001). Case study research : design and methods.
尚榮安（譯）。個案研究法。台北 : 弘智文化出版。
Stewart, T. (1997/1999). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations.
New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
宋偉航（譯）。智慧資本 : 資訊時代的企業利基。台北 : 智庫出版。
小原一樹（2002）。加速知識管理的組織IQ。知識管理與組織IQ（5）。NRI, From:
http://www.nri.co.jp/kikou/020430_1.php.
邱莉玲（2000）。知識管理競爭大未來。經濟與產業趨勢二０００白皮書，358-359。台北
：工商時報。
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。台北：五南。
陳永隆（2002）。知識價值鏈。未出版。
陳永隆（2001）。KM導入實力-PARTⅠ 打造知識創造型新企業。
網際先鋒，5，102-107。
張吉成、周談輝、黃文雄（2002）。組織知識創新—企業與學校贏的策略。台北：五南。
二、英文部分
Argyris, Chris, and　Schon, Donald. (1996). Organizational Learning Π:
Theory, Method, and Practice. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
Becker, H. S. (1986). Writing for social scients: how to start and finish your
thesis, book, or article. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Boisot, M.（1998）. Knowledge asserts: securing competitive advantage in the
information economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W.（1998）. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing
among five traditions. London: Sage Publications.
G. A. Pall, (1987). Quality Process Management Book Review. International
Journal of Operations and　Production Management
Gardner, J. (1986). Making them more creative. Training, 5, 30-45.
Grant, R. M. (1996a),Prospering in Dynamically competitive Environments:
Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration, Organization Science, 7(
4), 375-387.
Grant, R. M.（1996b）. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic
Management Journal, 17（Winter Special Issue）, 109-122.
Janine Naphapiet. (1998). Social Capital Intellectual And The Organizational
Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(
　　2), 242-266.
Maula, M. (2000). Three parallel knowledge processes. Knowledge and Process
Management, 7 (1), 55-59.
Merriam, S. B.(1998).Case study research in education. Thousand Oaks, CA.
Jossey, Bass.
Mike, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded
source book ( ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S.(1998).Social capital, intectual capital, and the
organizational advantage.Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
Ikujiro Nonaka, I., The concept of ba: Building a foundation of knowledge
Creation. (1998). California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54 .
Ikujiro Nonaka, I., (2000). Organizational capabilities in Product Development
of /Japanese Firms: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings. Organization
Science, 9(6), 699-718.
Ikujiro Nonaka, I., (1991). The knowledge-creating company, Harvard Business
Review, 96-104.
Ikujiro Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. and Konno, N. (2000), SECI, Ba and Leadership：
a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation, Long Range Planning, 33, 5 -34.
Ikujiro Nonaka, (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Know Creation,
Organization Science, 5, 14-37
Polanyi, Michae. (1966). Thetacit dimension. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday,.
Purser, R. E., and Pasmore, W. A., (1992). Organization for Learning, In
Pasmore, William A., and Woodman, Richard W (ed.), Research in Organizational
Change and Development, London: JAI Press Inc,.
Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., and　Finkeistein, S.（1996）. Managing professional
intellect: making the most of the best. Harvard Business Review, 74（2）, 71-
80.
Ulrich, Dave, (1998). Intellectual capital = competence × commitment. Sloan
Management Review, Winter, 15-26.