簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳婷婷
Ting-Ting Chen
論文名稱: 創業家精神之知覺對創新行為及工作滿意度的影響:以思考風格及經驗開放性為調節變項
Effects of the Perception of Entrepreneurship on Innovative Behavior and Job Satisfaction: Thinking Styles and Openness to Experience as Moderating Variables.
指導教授: 陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 創造力發展碩士在職專班
Continuing Education Master's Program of Creativity Development
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 92
中文關鍵詞: 創業家精神創新行為工作滿意度思考風格經驗開放性
英文關鍵詞: entrepreneurship, innovative behavior, job satisfaction, thinking styles, openness to experience
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:278下載:37
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要探討教職員知覺之主管創業家精神對其創新行為及工作滿意度的影響,並進而了解個人思考風格與經驗開放性是否會與其所知覺之創業家精神產生交互作用而對創新行為及工作滿意度造成效果。為達到前述目的,本研究以國軍所屬七所軍事基礎院校的教師、行政人員及隊職幹部為研究對象,研究工具包括研究者修編的「創業家精神之知覺」、「創新行為」及「經驗開放性」量表,經過預試之後修訂成正式量表,並同時採用國內學者修編的「工作滿意度」及「思考風格」量表,針對所回收375份有效樣本,分別以描述性統計、相關分析及階層迴歸等統計方法考驗相關假設。研究結果如下:
    一、教職員知覺之主管創業家精神對其工作滿意度具有正向影響;而當知覺主管「創新自主性」越高時,則其所表現的創新行為較高。
    二、教職員的思考風格會對其創業家精神之知覺與工作滿意度之間具有調節效果,其中以「創新自主與立法型」及「創新自主與司法型」的交互作用對工作滿意度最具調節效果。
    三、教職員經驗開放性的高低對主管創業家精神之知覺與其工作滿意度之間的關係具有顯著的調節效果,其中以創業家精神之知覺的「競爭積極」與經驗開放性的交互作用對工作滿意度最具調節效果。
    近年來各軍事院校在面臨人力嚴重短缺及民間學校競爭的壓力下,有賴教職員創新的行為表現,如創新課程設計、精進行政作業流程及創造學校特色等,而教職員創新的行為表現需有主管創業家精神的領導,才能獲得支持與進步。

    Purposes of this study were to investigate effects of the perception of entrepreneurship on innovative behavior and job satisfaction. Additionally, this study explored the interaction between perception of entrepreneurship and its mediating variables, thinking styles and openness to experience. The interaction also used to examine the effects on innovative behavior and job satisfaction.
    Study subjects include faculty, administrators, and official cadres of seven military universities in Taiwan. Study instrument comprises three pretested dimensions (the perception of entrepreneurship, innovative behavior, and openness to experience) and two established scales by domestic scholars, job satisfaction and thinking styles. Descriptive statistical analyses, correlation, and hierarchical multiple regression were employed to test study hypotheses based on 375 valid respondents. Main findings of this study are as followings.
    (1) Perception of entrepreneurship to manager has positive effects on job satisfaction. The more innovative autonomy of managers perceived by the respondents, the better performance could be expected on their innovative behavior.
    (2) There are interactions between thinking styles and perception of entrepreneurship as well as job satisfaction. Significant interactions with job satisfaction found in both “innovative autonomy vs legislative style” and “innovative autonomy vs judicial style”.
    (3) There are significant interactions between openness to experience and perception of managerial entrepreneurship as well as job satisfaction, especially for the perception of managerial entrepreneurship with competitive and aggressive characteristics.
    Military universities in Taiwan have been facing serious manpower shortage and various challenges from general universities. It is time for staff of military universities to think of more innovative behavior and creative performance, such as creative curriculum design, simplified administrative procedure, and forming distinguishing features of the university. With successful leadership of managerial entrepreneurship, any innovative behavior among staff of military universities may be encouraged and improving.

    誌謝.................................................ⅲ 中文摘要..............................................ⅴ 英文摘要............................................. ⅶ 目錄................................................. ix 表目錄............................................... xi 圖目錄............................................... xii 第一章 緒論............................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機...................................1 第二節 研究目的與問題...................................4 第三節 名詞釋義........................................6 第二章 文獻探討........................................9 第一節 創業家精神之知覺.................................9 第二節 創新行為........................................15 第三節 工作滿意度......................................19 第四節 創業家精神之知覺與創新行為及工作滿意度..............22 第五節 思考風格........................................24 第六節 思考風格與創業家精神之知覺、創新行為及工作滿意度.....29 第七節 經驗開放性......................................32 第八節 經驗開放性與創業家精神之知覺、創新行為及工作滿意度...35 第三章 研究方法........................................37 第一節 研究架構與研究假設...............................37 第二節 研究對象........................................38 第三節 研究工具........................................41 第四節 實施程序........................................48 第五節 資料分析........................................49 第四章 研究結果與討論...................................51 第一節 各研究變項的描述統計..............................51 第二節 思考風格對創業家精神之知覺與創新行為及工作滿意度之調節效果分析.....................................................53 第三節 經驗開放性對創業家精神之知覺與創新行為及工作滿意度之調節效果分析....................................................60 第四節 研究結果的討論....................................64 第五章 結論與建議 .......................................71 第一節 結論.............................................71 第二節 研究限制.........................................73 第三節 研究建議.........................................74 參考文獻................................................77 一、中文部份.............................................77 二、英文部份.............................................80 附錄:研究量表............................................87

    一、中文部份
    于子雁(2003)。購併企業之組織文化與工作滿足相關研究—以證券業為例。元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
    王岱伊(2002)。小組合作學習策略之研究。交通大學資訊科學系碩士論文。
    王陸鎰(2006)。人格特質、組織結構、工作滿意與工作績效關係之研究─以台中加工出口區行政人員為例。朝陽科技大學工業科技與管理系碩士論文。
    王嘉宏(2002)。知識學習、知識擴散方式與工作績效關係之研究--以航運業為例。國立海洋大學航運管理研究所碩士論文。
    江順興(2003)。創業導向、行銷策略與經營績效關係之研─以大陸台商為例。國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理所碩士論文。
    朱倩儀(2004)。成人學習者思考風格與創造力之相關研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所博士論文。
    何怡慧(2003)。大學生思考風格量表修訂及其相關因素之研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    余慶華(2002)。消費金融從業人員之工作投入、工作滿足、薪酬福利與工作績效之相關研究—以高雄地區銀行為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    吳佳玲(2006)。大學生生活經驗與思考風格之相關研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    呂麗珍(2001)。高中、高職會計學教師工作滿意之研究。中原大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    李吉仁(2006)。「創新者的思考」推薦序:燃起創新與創業的熱情。台北:商周出版。
    李孟修(2005)。思考風格對創新行為模式干擾效果之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
    李俊杰(2004)。組織生涯管理、員工個人生涯規劃、人格特質與工作滿意度之關聯研究。國立成功大學工業管理科學碩士論文。
    卓正欽(2000)。組織中分配正義與程序正義對員工組織承諾、工作滿意度及離職傾向之研究—以會計事務所為探討對象。國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    周玉霜(2001)。國中教師與學生思考風格及其教學互動之關係。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    房美玉(2002)。儲備幹部人格特質甄選量表之建立與應用-以某高科技公司為例。人力資源管理學報,2(1),1-18。
    林南宏、何慶煌 (2007)。創業家精神與經濟指標的關聯性研究:1996~2005的實證分析。創業管理研究,2(4),113-142。
    林相吉(2005)。組織文化、領導風格與工作滿足關係之研究—以海軍軍士官為例。義守大學工業工程與管理學系碩士論文。
    邱淑妙(2006)。團隊人格特質、轉換型領導與團隊效能之關係探討-團隊凝聚力之中介角色。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    唐永泰(2006)。轉換型領導、工作動機與員工創新行為的關係。人力資源管理學報,6(4),47-66。
    徐漢宏(2002)。電子產業研發人員創新思考風格量表之建構。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    翁秋玲(2000)。高中教師與學生思考格及其教學互動之關係。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    高彩珠(2006)。校長的創業家精神與教職員的組織公民行為關聯性之研究-以台灣區國民中學之學校組織經營為例。國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    常國強(2005)。組織創業家精神及創新與組織績效關係之研究。國立中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士班論文。
    張玉成(1998)。思考風格與教學效能。國民教育,38(3),37-41。
    張誠仁(2001)。個人特質、工作滿足、工作壓力、主管領導與離職傾向關係之研究—壽險行銷人員之探討。逢甲大學保險學系碩士論文。
    莊順天(1999)。工作特性、工作滿足、組織承諾與離職意願之探討—以高雄市公民營銀行為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    許雅婷(2002)。人格特質與團隊組合對知識分享.創新績效的影響。東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    許翡珊(2000)。知識類型、角色衝突與個人創新性。銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
    陳炳煌(2003)。學習單、思考風格及自我概念與國小高年級學童科技創造力之關係。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文碩士論文。
    陳俊儒(2006)。個人特性、人力資源管理活動與創新績效關係之多層級探討。國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
    陳雅文(2001)。國小教師與學生思考風格及其教學互動之關係。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    黃荷婷(2003)。研發團隊成員目標導向與創新行為、創新績效-自我效能與集體效能的中介效果。東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    黃晴逸(2004)。國小學童思考風格量表之編製及其與創造力之相關研究。國立新竹師範學院輔導教學研究所碩士論文。
    黃寶棟(2006)。人格特質、創業動機、創業策略與創業績效之關係研究—以台灣區中小企業創業家為例。國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    楊志弘、鄭伊芬(2006)。東森電視公司各部門員工人格特質、組織文化與員工創造力之關聯性研究。傳播管理學刊,7(3),17-40。
    廖素華(1978)。國小校長領導方式、教師人格特質與教師工作滿足的關係。政大教育所碩士論文。
    趙心潔(1998)。激勵性報酬、員工屬性與工作滿意度之研究—以高科技產業為實證對象。文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    劉常勇(2004)。創業管理的十二堂課。台北:天下文化。
    劉常勇、謝如梅(2006)。創業管理研究之回顧與展望:理論與模式探討。創業管理研究,1(1),1-43。
    劉炳森(1989)。組織文化與工作滿足關係之研究―以人格特質為中介變項。國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    蔡木霖(2002)。公賣局獎酬結構改變對組織公平、組織承諾、工作滿足及績效的影響。台北大學企業管理學系博士論文。
    蔡坤宏(2000)。組織承諾、工作滿足與離職意圖的關係:Meta 分析。中華管理評論,3(4),33-49。
    蔡明田、余明助(2000)。企業文化、組織生涯管理與組織績效之關係研究—以台灣高科技產業為例。管理評論,7(2),249-270。
    蔡啟通、高泉豐(2004)。動機取向、組織創新氣候與員工創新行為之關係:Amabile動機綜效模型之驗證。管理學報,21(5),571-592。
    蕭富峰、李田樹譯(2005)。創新與創業家精神。台北:臉譜。
    蕭筱筠(2002)。以人格特質為甄選依據─ 題目有效性之分析。國立中央大學第八屆企業人力資源管理實務專題研究成果發表。
    賴柏甫(1994)。關稅人員工作滿足與工作意願之研究。國立中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    賴倩慧(2003)。領導型態、企業文化對學習型組織運作與員工工作滿足之關聯性研究。國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    薛亞敏(2003)。非營利組織員工之組織文化、領導型態認知與其工作態度關聯性之探討—以財團法人製藥工業技術發展中心為例。中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    韓繼成(2002)。國民中學訓導人員角色壓力、人格特質與工作滿意度關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    藍偉峰(2003)。領導風格、組織文化、工作滿意與離職傾向之關係研究—以技職院校教師為研究對象。國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    羅宗敏、王俊仁、許雄傑(2007)。創業者人格特質對創業績效影響之研究:關係網絡之中介效果。創業管理研究,2(4),57-88。

    二、英文部份
    Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
    Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
    Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185-201.
    Amabile, T. M., Contri, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.
    Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 963–970.
    Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
    Baron, R. A., (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 275-294.
    Begley, T. M. (1995). Using founder status, age of firm, and company growth rate as the basis for distinguishing entrepreneurs from managers of smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 249-263
    Bird, B. J. (1989). Entrepreneurial behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
    Bommer, M., & Jalajas, D. S. (1999). The threat of organizational downsizing on the innovative propensity of R&D professionals. R&D Management, 29, 27-34.
    Burke, L. A., & Witt, L. A. (2002). Moderators of the openness to experience- performance relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 712-721.
    Busenitz, L.W., & Lau, C. M. (1996). A cross-cultural cognitive model of venture creation, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20 (4), 25-39.
    Busentiz, L. W., Spencer, J. W. & Gomez, C. ( 2000). Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena, Academy of Management Journal, 43, 994-1003.
    Chi-Tung Tsai. (1992). A componential framework of creativity: A synthetic approach. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 1, 131-153. (in Chinese)
    Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). An introduction of the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
    Cummings, A., & Oldham, G R. (1997). Enhancing creativity: Managing work context for the high poteniial employee. California Management Review, 40, 22-39.
    Cunningham, J. B., & Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29, 45–61.
    Daniel, M. Cable & Timothy A. Judge. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 67, 294-311.
    Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 301-331.
    Davis, D. S., & Schwimmer, P. C. (1981). Relational thinking styles: Learning to see the forest and the trees. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 449.
    Dellas M., & Gaier E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: the individual. Psychologial Bulletin, 73, 55-73.
    Dollingers, M. J. (2003). Entrepreneurship: Strategies and resources, (3rd.). Prentice Hall.
    Fournet, G. P., Distefano, M. K. Jr., & Pryer, M. W. (1966). Job satisfaction issues and problem. Personnel Psychology, 19, 165-183.
    George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513-524.
    Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several seven five-factor models. In Merveilde I., Deary I., De Fruyt F., Ostendorf F. (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7-28). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
    Hays, R. D., Hayashi, T., & Stewart, A. L. (1989). A five item measure of socially desirable re-sponse set. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 629-636.
    Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 29-40.
    Hurt, H. Y., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 1, 58-65.
    Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302.
    Janssen, O. (2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1039-1050.
    Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cumming (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 10, 169-211. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Kaufman, J. C. (2002). Narrative and paradigmatic thinking styles in creative writing and journalism students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 201-219.
    Kim, J., & Michael, W. B. (1995). The relationship of creativity measures to school achievement and to preferred learning and thinking style in a sample of Korean high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 60-74.
    Krause, D. E. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovation-related behaviors. An empirical investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 79-102.
    Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction in MD. Handbook of Individual and organizational Psychology, Chicago: Rand McNally.
    Low, M. B., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, 14, 139-161.
    Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Manogement Review, 21,135-172.
    McCormick, Ernest J., Ilgen, Daniel R. (1980). Industrial Psychology. Reprinted in Taipei: Jwang Yuan Publishing Co..
    McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1990). Personality in adulthood, New York: Guilford Press.
    Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770-791.
    Ming-Huei Chen. (2007). Entrepreneurial leadership and new ventures: Creativity in entrepreneurial teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 239-249.
    Moon, Myung Jae. (1999). The pursuit of managerial entrepreneurship: Does organization matter? Public Administration Review, 59, 33-43.
    Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43.
    Peter F. Drucker. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. MA, USA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Reprinted 2004.
    Pitt, Leyland F. & Rushieda Kannemeyer. (2000). The role of adaptation in microenterprise development: A marketing perspective. Journal of development Entrepreneurship, 5, 137-155
    Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial Attitude & Performance. Homewood, Illions: Dorsey Press.
    Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (1999). Management, (6ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
    Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation, (4ed.). New York: Free Press.
    Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506-516.
    Savioz, P., & Sannemann, E. (1999). The concept of the integrated innovation process. IEEE, 2, 137-143.
    Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Schmit, M. J., Kihm, K. A., & Robie, C. (2000). Development of a global measure of personality. Personnel Psychology, 53, 153-193.
    Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
    Seashore, S. E., & Taber, T. D. (1975). Job satisfaction and their correlations. American Behavior and Scientists, 18, 333-368.
    Se-Hwa Wu, Lu-Miao Yan, Tzu-Shian Han & Mei-YA Wang. (2000).Relationship between personal creativity and the innovation on the Internet. Paper presented at the Conference of Creativity and Innovation: the Characteristic and Development of Technology Creativity, Natinal Cheng Chi University, Taipei, Taiwan. (in Chinese)
    Smith, P. C., Kendall, L., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Allowing for thinking styles. Educational Leadership, 52, 36-40.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York:Cambridge University Press.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1993). Thinking styles and the gifted. Roeper Review, 16, 122-130.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
    Stevenson, H., & Harmeling, S. (1990). Entrepreneurial management’s need for a more “Chaotic” theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 1-14.
    Stevenson, L.A. (1986). Against all odds: The entrepreneurship of women. Journal of Small Business Management, 24, 30-36.
    Stewart, W. H.,Watson, W. E., Carland, J. C., & Carland, J. W.(1999). A proclivity for entrepreneurship: A comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers. Journal of Business Venturing, 14, 189-214.
    Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problem in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590-607.
    Van der Vegt, G. S., & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29, 729-751.
    Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H.(1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minn.: University of Minnesota Industrial Relations Center.
    Yang, S. C., & Lin, W. C. (2004). The relationship among creative, critical thinking and thinking styles in Taiwan High School Students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 33-45.
    Zhang, L. F., & He, Y. (2003). Do thinking styles matter in the use of and attitudes toward computing and information technology among Hong Kong university students? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 137, 517-544.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE