簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蘇怡如
Su, Yi-Ju
論文名稱: 正負促發效果如何影響消費者品牌形象
Positive and Negative Priming Effects: How Priming Affects Customer’s Brand Image
指導教授: 蕭中強
Hsiao, Chung-Chiang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Management
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 103
中文關鍵詞: 促發物目標物解釋範圍模型相互假設促發效果
英文關鍵詞: Context, Target, Dimensional Range Overlap Model, Reciprocity Hypothesis, Priming Effect
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202203940
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:196下載:24
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 市面上商品銷售的過程中,剛推出或即將推出但尚未被大眾所熟知的品牌及商品,要怎麼讓消費者注意到並做出購買行為是非常關鍵的點,這是因為大眾還未對這樣的品牌產生過多的連結、品牌知識更甚至於刻板印象,可塑性較高。研究中以虛擬餐廳品牌「Forest Aurant」,作為本研究實驗中的目標物,探討的現象來自於現實活中人們購買商品的決策是由不同的外來因素影響所組成,其中有部分影響因素並沒有讓受測者察覺,若能不經意地操弄這些因素使人們認為自己是在理性的情況下選擇購買商品,將能使該商品或品牌更容易讓我們從記憶中提取並且使用。(Higgins, Rholes, & Jonees,1977;Srull & Wyer,1979)
    本研究主要探討兩個促發物與目標物間三者互相影響的效果,為解釋範圍重疊模型 (Dimensional Range Overlap Model) 的擴充,雖然實驗的結果並沒有成功,但過程中發現在問卷的設計上廣告與品牌標誌影響效果不同,評價標準的廣度、給予受測者的清單和問題都是影響受測者評價的關鍵所在。
    在生活中消費者每次在決定是否購買商品的當下,都會有相似的現象發生,商家若能讓自家的品牌標誌或給予受測者的廣告時盡可能排除這些外在因素,就能使其所要操弄的效果更為顯著。而未來相關的研究建議盡可能地使受測者在每次填寫問卷時的情境相同,將整體問卷設計得更直觀,使受測者在每次評價問卷時的思考方式更一致,才能凸顯由實驗所產生的促發效果。

    During the process of product sales, goods that have just launched but not known by the public or are about to launch yet have an essential point on how to get the attention of consumers and further purchase the product. It is because that people did not have any stereotypes about the brand of goods. In this study, we set the virtual restaurant brand, "Forest Aurant", as the target in the questionnaire, we found that people buy the product because of many kinds of reason. The process of priming occurs constantly and results in an influenced decision, with or with the consumer’s awareness; the presence of consciousness simply determines the type of priming effect to be obtained. (Higgins, Rholes, & Jonees,1977;Srull & Wyer,1979)
    The purpose of the research is to investigate the priming effect between two context and target. Also, it is the further research of Dimensional Range Overlap Model. Although the experiments in the study have not been consistent with the hypotheses, we still found some important factors that cause the inconsistent. The effects of advertisement and logo, the standard of evaluation, the list and question in the questionnaire are also the key factors of the subject's evaluation.
    All these factors may happen in our life. If business could make their own logo or advertisement excluded by these external factors, they would affect consumer behavior. For the future research, in order to highlight the priming effect, we suggest that it could set the scenario as simple as possible so that the subjects were more consistent with their evaluation on the questionnaire.

    目 次 謝誌 ----------------------------------------------------i 中文摘要 ------------------------------------------------ii 英文摘要 -----------------------------------------------iii 目次 ---------------------------------------------------iv 表次 ---------------------------------------------------vi 圖次 --------------------------------------------------vii 第壹章 緒論 --------------------------------------------1 第一節 研究背景 -----------------------------------------1 第二節 研究動機與目的 ------------------------------------1 第貳章 文獻探討 ----------------------------------------3 第一節 促發效果 (Priming Effect) ------------------------3 第二節 解釋範圍重疊模型 (Dimensional Range Overlap Model)-5 第三節 相互假設 (Reciprocity Hypothesis) ----------------6 第參章 假設 -------------------------------------------8 第一節 研究假設 -----------------------------------------8 第肆章 研究方法 ---------------------------------------11 第一節 實驗概述 ----------------------------------------11 第二節 前測 --------------------------------------------12 第三節 主實驗 ------------------------------------------24 第伍章 研究結果 ----------------------------------------30 第一節 實驗一 ------------------------------------------30 第二節 實驗二 ------------------------------------------31 第三節 實驗三 ------------------------------------------33 第四節 實驗四 ------------------------------------------34 第陸章 結論 --------------------------------------------37 第一節 總結 --------------------------------------------37 第二節 研究限制 ----------------------------------------39 第三節 理論貢獻與實務意涵 -------------------------------41 第四節 未來研究 ----------------------------------------41 附件 --------------------------------------------------43 參考文獻 ----------------------------------------------102

    許舒婷(2015)。雙重正價促發物的周邊效果:解釋範圍重疊模型之延伸。碩士論文。台北:國立台灣師範大學。
    吳思穎(2014)。雙重正價促發物對目標產品之影響。碩士論文。台北:國立台灣師範大學。
    Chien, Y., Wegener, D.T., Hsiao, C., Petty, R.E., (2010). Dimensional Range Overlap and Context Effects in Consumer Judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (October),530—542.
    Bargh, J.A., & Pietromoncao, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 437—449.
    Higgins, E. Tory, William S. Rholes, & Carl R. Jones (1977). Category Accessibility and Impression Formation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13 (March), 141—154.
    Herr, Paul M., Sherman, S. J., & Fazio, R. H. (1983). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental SocialPsychology,19,323—340.
    Higgins, E. Tory, Bargh, J. A., & Lombardi, W. J. (1985). Nature of priming effects on Categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11,59—69
    Herr, Paul M. (1989). Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects, Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (June), 67—75.
    Hsiao, Chung-Chiang (2002). The Reciprocity Hypothesis as an Explanation of Perception Shifts in Product Judgement, Dissertation, Purdue University.
    Leonard L. Martin (1986). Set/ Reset: Use and Disuse of Concepts in Impression Formation Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 493—503.

    Lu, Ruiyi-Eunice(2014).Context Effect under Dual Contexts: The Influence of Positive and Negative Primes to Product Judgment, Master Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University
    Lu Tse Hsien(2013). Context Effects under Multiple Contexts: An Extension of Dimensional Range Overlap Model, Master Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University
    Meyers-Levy, Joan and Brian Sternthal (1993). A Two –Factor Explanation of Assimilation and Contrast Effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (3), 359-368
    Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1981). Personal Involvements as a Determinant of Argument-based Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847
    Richard E. Petty, John T. Cacioppo & David Schumann (1983). Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement. Journal of Consumer Research,10 (October), 135—144.
    Sherman, Steven J., Karin Ahlm, Leonard Berman, and Steven Lynn (1978), "Contrast Effects and Their Relationship to Subsequent Behavior, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14 (July), 340-350.
    Yi (1990). Direct and Indirect Approaches to Advertising Persuasion .Journal of Business Research, 20 (June), 279—290.
    Yi, Youjae (1990). Cognitive and Affective Priming Effects of the Context for Print Advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 19 (June), 40—48.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE