研究生: |
林國祥 Kuo–HsiangLin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
「框架效應」對國中學生創新行為方案選擇傾向及其相關因素之研究 A Impact of Farming Effects on Tendency Towards Choices of Innovative Behavior with In Junior High School Students and Its Relevant Factors |
指導教授: | 潘裕豐 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
創造力發展碩士在職專班 Continuing Education Master's Program of Creativity Development |
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 101 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 90 |
中文關鍵詞: | 框架效應 、創新 、創新行為 、創造性傾向 |
英文關鍵詞: | framing effects, innovation, Innovative Behavior, innovative tendency |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:202 下載:17 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究在探討框架效應對國中學生創新行為方案選擇傾向,及在背景變項上的差異。本研究以基北區國中生為研究對象,共370位,並以自編問卷(國中學生行為方案選擇傾向)、國中學生創造性傾向問卷作為研究工具。量表所得資料經描述性統計、卡方檢定、獨立樣本t考驗等統計方法進行分析本研究結果如下所示:
一、在中性情境中,不論「屬性框架」是正面或負面語詞皆讓國中學生傾向選擇創新行為方案。
二、在負面情境中,正面語詞的「屬性框架」會讓國中學生傾向選擇傳統行為方案;負面語詞的「屬性框架」讓國中學生傾向選擇創新行為方案。
三、在正面情境中,負面語詞的「屬性框架」讓國中學生傾向選擇創新行為方案。
四、在正面情境中,正面語詞的「屬性框架」不會讓國中學生顯著的傾向選擇傳統行為方案。
五、「國中學生創新行為選擇傾向」對「創造性傾向」與其部分向度有相關性。
六、不同學校與在家排行序對「國中學生創新行為選擇傾向」在特定情境與屬性框架下有顯著差異。
七、雙親教育程度與學校區域的不同對國中學生創造性人格發展有顯著差異。
根據上述研究結果,研究者提出數點對教學、輔導及未來研究上的建議,以供教師和父母參考。
The purpose of this research is to explore the impact of framing effects on tendency toward choices of innovative behavior within junior high school students and differences of sexes, schools, parental education and birth order.
The study adopted survey research design, and the sample including 370 participants from junior high school students in the district of Keelung and Taipei. The instruments used in this study including self-made “tendency toward choices of Junior School Students’ behavior program”, and “Junior High School Students’ Innovative tendency survey”. All of collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, chi-square, independent-sample t-test. The results were found as following:
1. In the neutral situation, in spite of attribute framing is positive or negative wordings, it makes junior school students tend to choose innovative behavior program.
2. In the negative situation, attribute framing of the positive wordings makes junior school students choose traditional behavior program, instead of one of the negative wordings makes them choose innovative behavior program.
3. In the positive situation, attribute framing of the negative wordings significantly let them choose innovative behavior program .
4. In the positive situation, the positive wordings don’t let them significantly let them choose traditional behavior program .
5. A impact of tendency toward choices of innovative behavior within junior high school students is significantly related to innovative tendency and its partial dimensions.
6. There are significant differences in schools birth order of the special situation and attribute of tendency toward choices of innovative behavior within junior high school students.
7. There are significant differences in parental education and school district of junior high school students’ innovative personality development.
According to the above outcomes, the investigator proposed several suggestions about educational guidance and further studies to teachers and parents for guidance.
中文部分
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。臺北:心理。
王木榮(1985)。威廉斯創造力測驗修訂研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。
王臣名(2007)。團隊創新氛圍、團隊工作動機及團隊創造力傾向對團隊研發績效關聯性之實證研究—以K公司研發團隊為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。
王姿涵(2010)。國科會專題研究計畫助理創造性傾向對團隊凝聚力與創新行為關係之影響—以國立臺北科技大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北。
王霆、陳永、袁淳(2003)。點子成金:杜拉克談創新策略。臺北:百善書房。
申繼亮、王鑫、師保國(2005)。青少年創造性傾向的結構與發展特徵研究。
交大管理學報,27,249-273。
何畏、易家詳(譯)(2001)。經濟發展理論-對於利潤、資本、信貸、利息和景氣循環的考察(原作者:J. A. Schumpeter)。臺北:貓頭鷹。
吳思華(2002)。哈佛商業評論精選24:創新。臺北:天下文化。
吳家瑋(2001)。框架概念運用在社會行銷理念宣導之初探(未出版之碩士論文)。私立世新大學,臺北。
吳清山(2004)。學校創新經營理念與策略。教師天地,128,30-44。
吳靖國(2003)。創新教學如何可能?-從「創造」意涵的哲學思維談起。載於國立臺灣海洋大學(主編),創新教學理論與實務(頁49-80)。臺北:師大書苑。
吳蓉燕(2003)。文學創造力的條件與創作的歷程(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。
呂淑屏(2002)。國民小學運用知識管理推動教學創新之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄。
李乙明、李淑貞(譯)(2005)。創造力理論與應用(原作者:Robert J. Sternberg)。臺北:五南。
李德高(1990)。創造心理學。臺北:五南。
杜明城(譯)(2000)。創造力(原作者:米阿里.契克森米哈賴)。臺北:時報文化。
林信惠、陳勇達、吳金山、鄭菲菲(2007)。框架效應對電子議價影響之研究。
林煌凱(2002)。國中教師教學創新接受度與資訊科技融入教學關注階層之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。
係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學,高雄。
施雯黛(譯)(2001)。創造力 : 15種創意潛能大開發(原作者:中川昌彥)。臺北 : 商智文化。
洪榮昭(1998)。創意領先。臺北:張老師文化。
徐作聖、邱奕嘉(譯)(2000)。創新管理(原作者:A. Afuah)。臺北:華泰。
張世忠(2002)。教學創新應用與實例。臺北:學富文化。
張玉成(1993)。思考技巧與教學。臺北:心理。
張依依(2007)。公共關係理論的發展與變遷。臺北:五南。
張明輝(2004)。精緻學校經營的理念與策略。載於張明輝(主編),教育政策與教育革新(頁341-369)。臺北:師大書苑。
張根榮(2001)。企業競爭策略與創新領域配適對企業競爭力之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。私立中原大學,桃園。
張毓欣(2012)。青少年流行文化與創造性人格之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
莊淇銘(2011)。章魚工作成功術。臺中:晨星
許婉君(2008)。高績效人力資源實務、社會支持、組織承諾與個人創新行為關
郭純真(2004)。組織創新氣氛、研發人員創造力與組織創新能力關聯性之研究-以臺灣生物科技產業為例(未出版之碩士論文)。私立長榮大學,台南
郭誌光(2002)。個人創造力、組織創新氣候、及組織創新績效之關係─臺北市廣告公司的實證研究(未出版之碩士論文)。私國立中正大學,嘉義。
陳文玲(2002):從對望到對話:根據「學」「業」觀點打造廣告創意教育課
陳宇秩(2012): 「框架效應」對企業員工創新企劃案接受傾向之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
陳明璋(2004)。創新理論。取自http://www.innovation.org.tw/school/sch02.htm#top
陳昭儀(2000)。傑出理化科學家之人格特質及創造歷程之研究。大學報:科學教育類,45(1),27-45。
陳昭儀(2003)。傑出科學家及藝術家之比對研究。教育與心理研究,26,199-225。
陳昭儀(2003)。創意人物研究之回顧與探析。資優教育季刊,87,27-40。
陳英豪、吳裕益(1995)。測驗與評量。高雄:復文圖書。
陳婷婷(2009)創業家精神之知覺對創新行為及工作滿意度的影響:以思考風格及經驗開放性為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
陳龍安(2007)。創造思考教理論與實際。臺北:心理。
陳麗君(2009)。國小學童科學創造力相關因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義。
彭炎祺(2005)。「心智組態」與「框架效應」對衝突協商之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮。
曾志朗(2005)。創造力之探源,猶如摸象。科學人雜誌中文版,45,12-13。
馮清皇(2002)。創新管理在國民小學校務經營的意涵。教師天地,117,32-34。
黃致凱(2003)。組織創新氣候知覺、個人創新行為、自我效能知覺與問題解決型態關係之研究-以銀行業為研究對象(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄。
楊光昱 (2010)。高雄市國中創意運動會表現優異學生創造能力與傾向之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北。
溫玲玉、陳明輝(2008)。組織創新氣候與員工敬業貢獻度對個人創新行為影響之研究。載於元培科技大學(主編),健康與管理學術研討會論文集(頁1-10)。編者。
葉永銘(2001)。日據時代臺灣傑出西畫家的成長環境、學習歷程與人生際遇之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。私立輔仁大學,新北。
葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學-過去、現在與未來。臺北:心理。
董奇(1995)。兒童創造力發展心理。臺北:五南。
賈馥茗(1976)。英才教育。臺北:開明。
潘朝昱(2008)。國中學生創造性傾向量表編製及相關因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
潘裕豐(2007)。﹝創新變革與策略思維專題研究﹞,未出版的原始資料。
蔡啟通、高泉豐(2004)。動機取向、組織創新氣候與員工創新行為之關係:Amabile動機綜效模型之驗證。管理學報,21(5),571-592。
蔡淑君(2010)。創造力競賽活動對國中學生創造力與創造性傾向之成效研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
蕭富峰、李田樹(譯)(2002)。創新與創業精神(原作者:P. Drucker)。臺北:臉譜。
賴士葆、王秉鈞、黃佑安(1997)。企業創新能力對新產品研發過程影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。
謝育容(譯)(2006)。創新者的思考(原作者:大前研一)。臺北:商周文化。
簡晨羽(2009)。南投縣學童創造性環境、親子互動關係與創造人格特質對其創意生活體驗的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。私立臺南科技大學,台南。
英文部分
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A mode of creativity and innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 40-167.
Adair, J. (2007). Leadership for innovation: How to organize team creativity and harvest ideas. London, England: Kogan Page.
Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-497.
Barton, S. L., Duchon, D. D., & Dunegan, K. J. (1989). An empirical test of Staw and Ross's prescriptions for the management of escalation of commitment behavior in organizations. Decision Sciences, 20(3), 532-544.
Betz, F. (1987). Managing technology- Competing through new ventures, innovation, and corporate Research. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
Bobic M., Davis, E., & Cunnignham, R. (1999). The Kirton adoption-innovation inventory Find Group Problem Solving Success Rates. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30(1), 61-74.
Callahan, C. M. (1978). Developing creativity in the gifted and talented. Virginia, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
Clark, J., & Guy, K. (1998). Innovation and competitivenss: A review. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26 (20), 64-91.
Csikzentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Certo, S. C.(2003). Modern management. New Jersey, NJ:Prentice Hall.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
Davis, G. A., & Subkoviak, M. J. (1975). Multidimensional analysis of a personality-based test of creative potential. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12(1), 37-43.
Drucker, P. F. (1986). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York, NY: Harper & Row
Edwin, C. S., Emily J. S., & John C. H. (2005). The creative personality. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 300-314.
Ellis, K. (2005). Research on educational innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: Eye on Education.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of communication, 43, 51-58.
Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of pearsonality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 272-296), New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gerhards, J., & Rucht. D. (1992). Mesomobilization: Organizing and framing in two protest campaigns in West Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 555-595
Grupp, H. (1998). Foundations of the economics of innovation: Theory, measurement, and practice. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
Greene, C. S. & Harich, K. R. (1996). The strategic relevance of innovation: A pedagogical perspective. Journal of Education for Business, 71, 257-263.
Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gregory J. F. (1991). Synthetic and analysis thought: Similarities and difference among art and scientists students. Creativity Research Journal, 4,145-155.
Holt, K. (1983). User-oriented product innovation-some research findings. Technovation, 3(3), 199-208.
Hurt, H., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4, 58-65.
Haberlandt, K. (1994). Cognitive psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Hickey, M., & Webster, P. (2001). Creative thinking in music. Music Educators Journal, 88(1), 19-24.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302.
Kanter, R. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds). Research in organizational behavior, 10, 169-211.
Kaufman. S., & Smith. J.(1997). Implementing change in existing locally unwanted land uses: A case study. Journal of Planning Education and Research,16(3), 188-200.
Kahneman D., & Tversky A. (1979), Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica , 47, 263-291.
Krishnamurthy P., Patrick C., & Edward B. (2001). Attribute framing and goal framing effects in health decisions, organizational behavior and human decision. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 85(2), 382-399.
Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296.
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 76(2), 149-188.
Meyerowitz, Beth, E., & Chaiken, S. (1987), The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500-510.
Moenaert, R. K., Caeldries, F., Lievens, A., & Wauters, E. (2000). Communication flows in international product innovation teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 360-377.
Mackinnon, D. W (1962). The personality correlates of creativity: A study of American architects. In S. Nielson (Ed.), Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Applied Psychology (pp. 11-39). Oxford, England: Munksgaard.
Mendelsohn. G. A. (1976). Associative and attention processes in creative performance. Journal of Personality, 44, 341-369.
Mccrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 258-1265.
Osborne, S. P. and Brown, K. (2005). Managing change and innovation in public service organizations. London, England: Routledge.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (5th ed.). New York: The Free.
Robbins, S. P. (2004). Organizational behavior (11th ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2002). Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Personal Education.
Rich, J. M. (1992). Innvoations in education: Reformers and their critics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Rogers, E. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.)., New York, NY: Free Press.
Savioz P., & Sannemann, E. (1999). The concept of the integrated innovation process. IEEE, 2, 137-143.
Snyder, N. T. and Duarte, D. L. (2003). Strategic innovation: Embedding innovation as a core competency in your organization. San Francisco, NC: Jossey-Bass.
Sloane, P. (2007). The innovative leader: How to inspire your team and drive creativity. London, England: Kogan Page.
Scott, S. G., Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Storey, J. and Salaman, G. (2005). Managers of innovation: Insight into making innovation happen. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Tushman, M. & Nadler, D. (1988). Organizing for innovation. California Management Review, 3, 74-92.
Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Keith, P. (2001). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211,453-458.
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problem in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590-607.
West M. A. (1987). A measure of role innovation at work, British Journal of SocialPsychology, 26, 83-85.
Woodman, R. H., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R, W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
Williams, F. E. (1980). Creativity Assessment Packet: Manual. New York, NY: D.O.K.
Woodman, R. H., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R, W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.