研究生: |
陳家平 Chen, Chia-Ping |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
內在因素以及打鬥經驗如何共同影響個體攻擊性一致性 The influence of intrinsic factors and fighting experience on aggressive consistency |
指導教授: |
許鈺鸚
Hsu, Yu-Ying |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
生命科學系 Department of Life Science |
論文出版年: | 2019 |
畢業學年度: | 107 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 68 |
中文關鍵詞: | 攻擊性 、一致性 、經驗效應 、紅樹林鱂魚 |
英文關鍵詞: | aggressiveness, consistency, experience effect, Kryptolebias marmoratus |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.SLS.008.2019.D01 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:169 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
動物經常藉由打鬥競爭有限的資源,但在打鬥的過程中會付出一些代價如時間和能量甚至會受傷及死亡。動物的打鬥行為會受到個體的內在因素(intrinsic factor)如年齡、體型、打鬥能力和荷爾蒙基礎值所影響。許多動物的行為在不同的時間地點會展現出一致性。除此之外,個體於打鬥行為中所獲得之獲勝和落敗經驗會提供個體評估自身打鬥能力的資訊,進而改變個體往後的打鬥行為。個體在得到獲勝經驗後,會展現出較高的攻擊性及獲勝機率(勝者效應,winner effect),而在經歷過落敗經驗後則會有較低的攻擊性及獲勝機率 (敗者效應,loser effect)。然而打鬥提供的資訊的影響可能會因個體內在因子有所不同,因而呈現不同強度的勝者/敗者效應。依據打鬥經驗來改變自身的攻擊性對於個體有重大的影響。但獲勝/落敗經驗是否會影響個體攻擊性一致性以及影響的時間長短目前尚不清楚,而這樣的影響是否也會因為個體的內在因子而有所不同? 本研究以紅樹林鱂魚(Kryptolebias marmoratus)為實驗物種。先以相近體長配對進行打鬥,以檢測其打鬥能力後,分別給予實驗物種獲勝經驗、落敗經驗或者控制(無打鬥)經驗處理。每次經驗處理前、處理後1天以及處理後4週皆以鏡像測試測量實驗個體的攻擊性。本研究結果顯示:(1)打鬥能力較佳的個體具有較高的攻擊性;(2)年齡越大/體型越大的個體在獲得打鬥經驗後與年齡較小/體型較小的個體相比有較慢的攻擊延遲時間;(3)個體展現出經驗效應,其中觀察到明顯的勝者效應,但沒有觀察到敗者效應;(4)個體在短期(1天)以及長期(4週)內都展現出攻擊性的一致性;(5)個體在獲得獲勝經驗後雖然會改變攻擊性,但並不會影響個體攻擊性的一致性;(6)年齡較小以及經驗前睪固酮濃度較高的的個體在獲得打鬥經驗後,攻擊性較具有一致性。
Animals fight for limited resources. Fighting behavior would be influenced by intrinsic factors like fighting ability, body size and hormonal state of the individual. Recent studies show that individuals usually behave consistently over time and in different contexts. Besides, winning and losing experience would provide information about individuals’ fighting ability and change their fighting behavior. It can also be affected by the outcomes of the individual’s previous fights: winning and losing experiences tend to increase and lower an individual’s aggressiveness and chances of winning subsequent fights, respectively (winner and loser effects). However, the importance of winning/losing experiences might depend on the intrinsic factors of individuals.Winner and loser effect would change an individual’s aggressiveness but there is no experiment has proof that whether and how winner and loser effects would influence individual’s aggressive consistency, and whether the influence of winning/losing experiences is dependet on individuals’ intrinsic factors.
I used K. marmoratus as the study animal. I first divided the fish into better and worse fighters by staging size-matched contests. Then I randomly assign individuals to 3 experience treatments (winning, losing and no recent contest experience). I measure the aggressiveness of the fish, before and after the experience treatments (1 day after and 28 days after) by recording the attack behaviors that the fish deliver to their mirror images.
The result showed that: (1) Better fighters behaved more aggressiveness than worse fighters; (2) Older/larger individuals attacked slower; (3) Winning (but not losing) experience affected the fish’s aggressiveness; (4) Individuals showed consistency in their aggressiveness in both one-day-period and four-week-period; (5)Winning increased individuals’ aggressiveness but didn’t influence aggressive consistency of individuals; (6) Younger and individuals at higher testosterone level showed more aggressive consistency after receving fighting experience.
Adamo, S. A., & Hoy, R. R. (1995). Agonistic behaviour in male and female field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus, and how behavioural context influences its expression. Animal behavior, 49 (6), 1491-1501.
Adams, E., & Caldwell, R. (1990). Deceptive communication in asymmetric fights of the stomatopod crustacean Gonodactylus breeding. Animal behavior, 39, 706-716.
Arnott, G., & Elwood, R. W. (2009). Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Animal behavior, 77 (5), 991-1004.
Arnqvist, G., & Henriksson, S. (1997). Sexual cannibalism in the fishing spider and a model for the evolution of sexual cannibalism based on genetic constraints. Evolutionary Ecology, 11 (3), 255-273.
Austad, S. N. (1983). A game theoretical interpretation of male combat in the bowl and doily spider (Frontinella pyramitela). Animal behavior, 31, 59-73.
Bakker, T. C. M., Feuthdebruijn, E., & Sevenster, P. (1989). Asymmetrical Effects of Prior Winning and Losing on Dominance in Sticklebacks (Gasterosteus-Aculeatus). Ethology, 82 (3), 224-229.
Briffa, M., Sneddon, L. U., & Wilson, A. J. (2015). Animal personality as a cause and consequence of contest behaviour. Biology Letters, 11 (3).
Chang, C., Li, C.-Y., Earley, R. L., & Hsu, Y. (2012). Aggression and related behavioral traits: the impact of winning and losing and the role of hormones. Integrative and comparative biology, 52 (6), 801-813.
Chapman, M. R., & Kramer, D. L. (1996). Guarded resources: the effect of intruder number on the tactics and success of defenders and intruders. Animal Behaviour, 52(1), 83–94. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0154
Creel, S. (2001). Social dominance and stress hormones. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16(9), 491–497.
D'Eath, R. B. (2004). Consistency of aggressive temperament in domestic pigs: The effects of social experience and social disruption. Aggressive Behavior, 30 (5), 435-448.
Dall, S. R. x., Houston, A. I., & McNamara, J. M. (2004). The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecology Letters, 7 (8), 734-739.
Dewitt, T. J., Sih, A., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol, 13 (2), 77-81.
Dickinson, J. L. (1992). Scramble competition polygyny in the milkweed leaf beetle: combat, mobility, and the importance of being there. Behavioral Ecology, 3(1), 32–41.
Dingemanse, N. J., Both, C., Drent, P. J., van Oers, K., & van Noordwijk, A. J. (2002). Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild. Animal Behaviour, 64 (6), 929–938.
Draud, M., & Lynch, P. A. (2002). Asymmetric contests for breeding sites between monogamous pairs of convict cichlids (Archocentrus nigrofasciatum, Cichlidae): pair experience pays. Behaviour, 139 (7), 861-873.
Dzieweczynski, T. L., & Leopard, A. K. (2010). The effects of stimulus type on consistency of responses to conflicting stimuli in Siamese fighting fish. Behavioural Processes, 85 (2), 83-89.
Earley, R., Lu, C.-K., Lee, I.-H., Wong, S., & Hsu, Y. (2013). Winner and loser effects are modulated by hormonal states. Frontiers in Zoology, 10 (1), 6.
Earley, R. L., & Hsu, Y. (2008). Reciprocity between endocrine state and contest behavior in the killifish, Kryptolebias marmoratus. Hormones and Behavior, 53 (3), 442-451.
Earley, R. L., Lu, C.-K., Lee, I.-H., Wong, S. C., & Hsu, Y. (2013). Winner and loser effects are modulated by hormonal states. Frontiers in Zoology, 10 (1), 6.
Eckert, C. G., & Weatherhead, P. J. (1987). Owners, floaters and competitive asymmetries among territorial red-winged blackbirds. Animal Behaviour, 35(5), 1317–1323.
Edenbrow, M., & Croft, D. P. (2012). Sequential hermaphroditism and personality in a clonal vertebrate: The mangrove killifish. Behavioural Processes, 90 (2), 229-237.
Enquist, M., Leimar, O., Ljungberg, T., Mallner, Y., & Segerdahl, N. (1990). A test of the sequential assessment game: fighting in the cichlid fish Nannacara anomala. Animal Behaviour, 40 (1), 1-14.
Fawcett, T. W. & Johnstone, R. A. (2010). Learning your own strength: winner and loser effects should change with age and experience. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B,1427-1434
Fero, K., & Moore, P. A. (2008). Social spacing of crayfish in natural habitats: what role does dominance play? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62(7), 1119–1125.
Gibbons, J. M., Lawrence, A. B., & Haskell, M. J. (2009). Consistency of aggressive feeding behaviour in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 121 (1), 1-7.
Gosling, S. D. (2001). From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychological Bulletin, 127 (1), 45-86.
Grageda, M. V. C., Sakakura, Y., & Hagiwara, A. (2004). Early development of the self-fertilizing mangrove killifish Rivulus marmoratus reared in the laboratory. Ichthyological Research, 51 (4), 309-315.
Haller, J., Halasz, J., Makara, G. B., & Kruk, M. R. (1998). Acute effects of glucocorticoids: behavioral and pharmacological perspectives. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 23(2), 337–344.
Hsu, Y., Earley, R. L., & Wolf, L. L. (2006). Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biological Reviews, 81 (1), 33-74.
Hsu, Y., Lee, S.-P., Chen, M.-H., Yang, S.-Y., & Cheng, K.-C. (2008). Switching assessment strategy during a contest: fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus. Animal Behaviour, 75(5), 1641–1649.
Hsu, Y., & Wolf, L. L. (2001). The winner and loser effect: what fighting behaviours are influenced? Animal Behaviour, 61 (4), 777-786.
Hsu, Y. Y., Lee, I. H., & Lu, C. K. (2009). Prior contest information: mechanisms underlying winner and loser effects. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63 (9), 1247-1257.
Huang, S.-P., Yang, S.-Y., & Hsu, Y. (2010). Persistence of Winner and Loser Effects Depends on the Behaviour Measured. Ethology, 117(2), 171–180.
Huehner, M. K., Schramm, M. E., & Hens, M. D. (1985). Notes on the behavior and ecology of the killifish Rivulus marmoratus poey 1880 (Cyprinodontidae). Florida Scientist, 48, 1-7.
Huntingford, F. A. (1982). Do inter-and intraspecific aggression vary in relation to predation pressure in sticklebacks? Animal Behaviour, 30 (3), 909–916.
Jacob, A., Nusslé, S., Britschgi, A., Evanno, G., Müller, R., & Wedekind, C. (2007). Male dominance linked to size and age, but not to'good genes' in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Bmc Evolutionary Biology, 7 (207).
Lan, Y.-T., & Hsu, Y. (2011). Prior contest experience exerts a long-term influence on subsequent winner and loser effects. Frontiers in Zoology, 8(1), 28.
Leshner, A. I. (1975). A model of hormones and agonistic behavior. Physiology & Behavior, 15(2), 225–235.
Lindstrom, K. (1992). The effect of resource holding potential, nest size and information about resource quality on the outcome of intruder-owner conflicts in the sand goby. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol, 30, 53-58.
Marler, C. A., Oyegbile, T. O., Plavicki, J., & Trainor, B. C. (2005). Response to Wingfield's commentary on “A continuing saga: The role of testosterone in aggression”. Hormones and Behavior, 48 (3), 256-258.
McElreath, R., & Strimling, P. (2006). How noisy information and individual asymmetries can make “personality” an adaptation: a simple model. Animal Behaviour, 72 (5), 1135–1139.
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2010). Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc, 85 (4), 935-956.
Natarajan, D., de Vries, H., Saaltink, D.-J., de Boer, S., & Koolhaas, J. (2009). Delineation of Violence from Functional Aggression in Mice: An Ethological Approach. Behavior Genetics, 39 (1), 73-90.
Neat, F. C., Taylor, A. C., & Huntingford, F. A. (1998). Proximate costs of fighting in male cichlid fish: the role of injuries and energy metabolism. Animal Behaviour, 55, 875-882.
Nussey, D., Wilson, A., & Brommer, J. (2007). The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20 (3), 831-844.
Øverli, Ø., Harris, C. A., & Winberg, S. (1999). Short-term effects of fights for social dominance and the establishment of dominant–subordinate relationships on brain monoamines and cortisol in rainbow trout. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 54 (5).
Øverli, Ø., Korzan, W. J., Höglund, E., Winberg, S., Bollig, H., Watt, M., Renner, K. J. (2004). Stress coping style predicts aggression and social dominance in rainbow trout. Hormones and Behavior, 45 (4), 235-241.
Parker, G. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47 (1), 223-243.
Rands, S. A., Cowlishaw, G., Pettifor, R. A., Rowcliffe, J. M., & Johnstone, R. A. (2003). Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs. Nature, 423 (6938), 432.
Reby, D., McComb, K., (2003). Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Animal behaviour, 65 (3), 519-530.
Smith, J.M., Parker, G.A., (1976). The logic of asymmetric contests. Animal behaviour, 24 (1), 159-175.
Stamps, J., & Krishnan, V. (1994). Territory acquisition in lizards: II. Establishing social and spatial relationships. Animal Behavior, 47(6), 1387-1400.
Taylor, D. S., Fisher, M. T., & Turner, B. J. (2001). Homozygosity and Heterozygosity in three Populations of Rivulus marmoratus. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 61(4), 455–459.
Taylor, D. S. (2012). Twenty-four years in the mud: what have we learned about the natural history and ecology of the mangrove Rivulus, Kryptolebias marmoratus? Integrative and Comparative Biology, 52 (6), 724-736.
Tokarz, R. R. (1985). Body size as a factor determining dominance in staged agonistic encounters between male brown anoles (Anolis sagrei). Animal Behaviour, 33 (3), 746–753.
Trainor, B. C., Bird, I. M., & Marler, C. A. (2004). Opposing hormonal mechanisms of aggression revealed through short-lived testosterone manipulations and multiple winning experiences. Hormones and Behavior, 45 (2), 115–121.
Wells, M. (1988). Effects of body size and resource value on fighting behaviour in a jumping spider. Animal Behavior, 36 (2), 321-326.
Werner, E. E., Mittelbach, G. G., & Hall, D. J. (1981). The role of foraging profitability and experience in habitat use by the bluegill sunfish. Ecology, 62 (1), 116-125.
Wilson, D. S., & Yoshimura, J. (1994). On the coexistence of specialists and generalists. The American Naturalist, 144 (4), 692-707.
Wilson, A. J., Grimmer, A., & Rosenthal, G. G. (2013). Causes and consequences of contest outcome: aggressiveness, dominance and growth in the sheepshead swordtail, xiphophorus birchmanni. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67 (7), 1151–1161.
Wolf, M., & Weissing, F. J. (2012). Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27 (8), 452-461.
Zielinski, W. J., & Vandenbergh, J. G. (1993). Testosterone and competitive ability in male house mice, Mus musculus: laboratory and field studies. Animal Behaviour, 45 (5), 873–891.