簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳淑鈴
論文名稱: 教學產出策略對在職教師數位教材製作成效之探討
指導教授: 陳明溥
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 108
中文關鍵詞: 數位教材製作教學產出策略目標設定電腦先備知識
英文關鍵詞: e-learning courseware production, productive instructional strategy, goal setting, prior knowledge of computer
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:181下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討教學產出策略對在職教師數位教材製作成效的影響。研究樣本為55位在職教師,以研習班別為單位分派為「形成性產出組」及「總結性產出組」;而教師所具備之電腦先備知識則分為高先備知識組與低先備知識組。
    研究結果發現:(1)在提問表現方面,教學產出策略對學習者的提問數量有顯著的關係,形成性產出組的問題數較總結性產出組少;電腦先備知識對學習者的提問數量亦有顯著的關係,高先備知識組的問題數較低先備知識組少。(2)在教學設計學習成效上,教學產出策略╳電腦先備知識交互作用未達顯著,形成性產出組顯著優於總結性產出組;高先備知識組顯著優於低先備知識組。(3)在工具使用學習成效上,教學產出策略╳電腦先備知識交互作用未達顯著,形成性產出組與總結性產出組無顯著差異;而高先備知識組顯著優於低先備知識組。(4)在學習態度方面,學習者對教學活動的接受度、滿意度、幫助度及產出要求均持正面的看法。

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of productive instructional strategy on in-service teachers’ e-learning courseware production performance and attitudes. Participants were assigned into two experiment groups: the formative production group and the summative production group, and learners were identified as high prior knowledge or low prior knowledge.
    The results showed that, on the performance of asking questions, productive instructional strategy had a significant relationship with the number of questions, that formative production group asked little questions than summative production group; prior knowledge of computer had a significant relationship with the number of questions, that high prior knowledge group asked little questions than low prior knowledge group. On the performance of instructional design, interaction of productive instructional strategy and prior knowledge of computer wasn’t significant. In terms of productive instructional strategy, the formative production group outperformed the summative production group. In terms of prior knowledge of computer, the high prior knowledge outperformed the low prior knowledge. On the performance of tool use, the interaction of productive instructional strategy and prior knowledge of computer wasn’t significant. In terms of productive instructional strategy, there had no significant difference between two groups. In terms of prior knowledge of computer, the high prior knowledge outperformed the low prior knowledge. Finally, in terms of the learning attitude, most of the learners held a neutral and positive attitude toward the learning activities.

    附表目錄 附圖目錄 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與背景 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 第三節 研究限制與範圍 第四節 名詞解釋 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 目標設定理論的相關研究 第二節 學習的認知歷程 第三節 歸納與結論 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究對象 第二節 研究設計 第三節 研究工具 第四節 實驗程序 第五節 資料分析 第四章 結果與討論 第一節 學習歷程提問表現分析 第二節 學習成效分析 第三節 學習態度分析 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論 第二節 建議 附錄一 學習者背景資訊問卷 附錄二 學習歷程提問記錄表 附錄三 數位教材作品評量表 附錄四 學習態度問卷(形成性產出組) 附錄五 學習態度問卷(總結性產出組) 參考文獻 表3-1 實驗教學之分組及各組人數分配 表3-2 教學產出策略各組之作品產出時機分配表 表3-3 學習者背景資訊問卷題目分類及題數分配 表3-4 教材內容與教學目標規劃表 表3-5 數位教材作品評量表之評分面向與評分重點 表3-6 在教學設計面向作品評量的評分重點、項目及配分 表3-7 在工具使用面向作品評量的評分重點、項目及配分 表3-8 學習態度問卷問題項目、題目編號及題數分配 表4-1 教學產出策略在各階段提問次數之次數與百分比分佈 表4-2 教學產出策略在提問次數的卡方統計量分析 表4-3 電腦先備知識在各階段提問次數之次數與百分比分佈 表4-4 電腦先備知識在提問次數的卡方統計量分析 表4-5 各組在數位教材製作成效之平均數、標準差及人數資料 表4-6 數位教材製作成效之變異數分析摘要 表4-7 各組在教學設計學習成效之平均數、標準差及人數資料 表4-8 教學設計學習成效之變異數分析摘要 表4-9 各組在工具使用學習成效之平均數、標準差及人數資料 表4-10 工具使用學習成效之變異數分析摘要 表4-11 學習成效分析摘要表 表4-12 各組學習者對教學活動的接受度之平均數、標準差及人數資料 表4-13 學習者對學習活動的接受度之變異數分析摘要 表4-14 各組學習者對數位教學概念學習後的滿意度之平均數、標準差及人數資料 表4-15 學習者對數位教學概念學習後的滿意度之變異數分析摘要 表4-16 各組學習者對學習方式對學習過程的幫助之平均數、標準差及人數資料 表4-17 學習者對學習方式對學習過程的幫助之變異數分析摘要 表4-18 形成性產出組在學習方式對學習過程的幫助之變異數分析摘要 表4-19 總結性產出組在學習方式對學習過程的幫助之變異數分析摘要 表4-20 低電腦先備知識組在學習方式對學習過程的幫助之變異數分析摘要 表4-21 高先備知識組在學習方式對學習過程的幫助之變異數分析摘要 表4-22 各組學習者對產出要求的看法之平均數、標準差及人數資料 表4-23 學習者對產出要求的看法之變異數分析摘要 表4-24 學習態度分析摘要表 圖2-1 指定目標、個人目標、自我效能與績效的關係 圖2-2 目標設定和自我調整理論的關係 圖2-3 以資訊處理理論為基礎的學習與記憶模式 圖2-4 認知監控模式 圖3-1 研究架構 圖3-2 實驗程序 圖4-1 教學產出策略各組學習者在各單元的提問分佈 圖4-2 電腦先備知識各組學習者在各單元的提問分佈 圖4-3 教學產出策略與電腦先備知識在學習方式對學習過程之交互作用圖(1) 圖4-4 教學產出策略與電腦先備知識在學習方式對學習過程之交互作用圖(2)

    王曉璿、宋倩萍(2004,10月)。產出型資訊教師在職進修研習模式探討。論文發表於國立台東大學電子計算機中心、教育部電子計算機中心主辦之「TANET 2004」台灣網際網路研討會,台東。
    吳正己(1999)。類比式電腦教材研究發展(三):教材評估。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,計畫編號:NSC86-2511-S-003-031,台北。
    李玉慶(2004)。學校資訊教育本位課程的發展與實施策略。研習資訊,21(6),16-23。
    李光烈(2000)。國小自然科教師應用創造性問題解決的教學策略之行動研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
    李雪莉(2000)。教師運用資訊網路能力調查。天下雜誌2000年教育特刊,16-102。
    李隆盛(1995)。國中工藝、生活科技教學策略之研究。行政院國家科學委員會。
    張春興(1996)。教育心理學--三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:臺灣東華書局。
    教育部(2001)。中小學資訊教育總藍圖初稿。2005年5月1日,取自http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/MOECC/EDU7892001/information/itpo/itprojects/itmasterplan.htm
    教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。2005年5月1日,取自http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/EJE/EDU5147002/9CC/9CC.html?TYPE=1&UNITID=225&CATEGORYID=0&FILEID=124759
    郭諭陵(1993):有效的教學策略舉隅。中等教育,44(3),100-105。
    彭聃齡、張必隱(2000)。認知心理學。台北:東華。
    程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係:自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報:教育類,67-92。
    劉佩雲(2000)。自我調整學習模式的驗證,教育與心理研究,23期,173-206。
    鄭芬蘭(1999)。學習動機目標導向在學習輔導上的應用。學生輔導,62,90-99。
    鄭昭明(1997)。認知心理學。台北:桂冠。
    顧瑜君(2000)。增能進修模式初探:以學校為中心的課程發展做為教師專業成長的可能性。載於中國教育學會、中華民國師範教育學會、中華民國師範教育學會主編,新時代師資培育的變革─知識本位的專業(頁33-64)。高雄:復文。
    Achilles, C. M., & Hoover, S. P. (1996). Exploring problem-based learning (PBL) in grades 6-12. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 406406).
    Albion, P. R. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers' preparedness for teaching with technology. Retrieved July 25, 2002, from http://www.usq.edu.au/users/albion/papers/site99/1345.html
    Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1998). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge n academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375-404.
    Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988) Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology. 80(3), 260-267.
    Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
    Bandura, A.(1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Qrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processe, 50, 248-287.
    Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of personality and social Psychology, 56, (5), 805-814.
    Becker, H. J. (2000). Access to classroom computers. Communications of the ACM, 43(6), 24-25.
    Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161-186.
    Botterill, C. (1977). Goal-setting and performance on an endurance task。 Paper presented at the conference of the Canadian Association of Sports Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
    Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In E. W. Franz & Rainer H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Brown R., & Pressley, M. (1994). Self-regulated reading and getting meaning from text: The Transactional Strategies Instruction Model. In D. H., Schunk & B.J., Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp.155-180). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Clifton, C. J., & Sowiaczek, M. L. (1981). Integrating new information with old knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 9(2), 142-148.
    Como, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp.83-110). New York: Springer.
    Como, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions and educational research. Educational Research, 22(2), 14-22.
    Como, L. (1994). Student volition and education: Outcomes, influence, and practice. In D. H., Schunk & B. J., Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp.229-254). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Compeau, D. R., & Higgins C. A. (1995a). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skill. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118-143.
    Compeau, D. R., & Higgins C. A. (1995b). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
    Corno, L. (1980). Individual and class level effects of parent-assisted instruction in classroom memory support systems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 278-292.
    Cronbach, L., & Snow, R. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. N.Y.: Irvington.
    Dochy, F. (1994). Prior knowledge and learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (Second edition, pp.4698-4702). Oxford/ New York: Pergamon Press.
    Dossett, D. L., Latham, G. P. & Mitchell, T. R. (1979). Effects of assigned versus participatively set goals, knowledge of results, and individual differences on employee behavior when goal difficulty is held constant. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64,291-298.
    Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. NY: Harper.
    Earley, P. C., & Kanfer, R. (1985). The influence of component participation and role models on goal acceptance, goal satisfaction, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 378-390.
    Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values & academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp.75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.
    Eccles, J. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585-609.
    Edward, A. M., & Florence, B., (1998). The value of setting goals. CORNELL hotel and restaurant administration quarterly.
    Erez, M., Gopher, D., & Arzi, N. (1990). Effects of goal difficulty, self-set goals, and monetary rewards on dual task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 247-269.
    Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognition Monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills. NY: Academic Press.
    Franken, R. E. (1998). Human motivation.CA, USA: brooks/Cole.
    Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W.(1992). Principles of Instructional Design(4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Garcia, T., McCann, E. J., Turner, J. E., & Roska, L. (1998). Modeling the mediating role of volition in the learning process. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 392-418.
    Geen, R. G. (1995). Human motivation: A social psychological approach. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Gellatly, I. R., & Meyer, J. P. (1992). The effects of goal difficulty on physiological arousal, cognition, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology ,77, 693-704.
    Gilliland, S. W., & Landis, R. S. (1992). Quality and quantity goal on complex decision task: Strategies and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 672-681.
    Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 884-891.
    Goal Setting. (1999). Retrieved March 8, 2005, from http://www.mindtools.com/pggoalst.html
    Good, T. L., & Stipek, D. J. (1983). Individual differences in the classroom. In G. Fenstermacher, et al. (Eds.), 1983 National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Gredler, M. B. (1991). Learning and instruction: Theory and practice (2nd Ed.) NY: Macmillan.
    Harterr, S. & Connell, J.P.(1984).A model of children's achievement and related self-perceptions of completence, control, and motivational orientation. In J. Nicholis (ED.), The development of achievement motivation (pp.219 -250). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Hollenbeck, J. R., & Brief, A. P. (1987). The effects on individual differences and goal origin on goal setting and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 392-414.
    Hollenbeck, J. R., & Klein, H.(1987). Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problem, prospects, and proposal for future research. Journal of applied Psychology, 72, 212-220.
    Hollenbeck, J. R., O’leary, A M., Klein, H. J., & Patrick, M. W. (1989). Investigation of the construct validity of a self-report measure of goal commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 951-956.
    Huber, V. L. (1985). Effects of task difficulty, goal setting, and strategy on performance of a heuristic task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 492-504.
    Huber, V. L., & Neale, M.A. (1987). Effects of self-and-competitor goals on performance in an interdependent bargaining task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 492-504.
    Kahney, H. (1986). Problem solving: a cognitive approach. Open University Press, Miton Key.
    Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognitive-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp.101-128). New York: Springer.
    Kuhl, J. (1987). Action control: The maintenance of motivational states. In F. Halish, & J. Kuhl (Eds.), Motivation, intention, and volition (pp.279-291). New York: Springer.
    Kuhl, J. (1994). Action versus state oriention: Psychometric properties of the Action Control Scale (ACS-90). In J. Kuhl, & J. Beckman (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp.47-60). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
    Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: The dynamics of personality systems and interactions. In M., Boekaerts & P. R., Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.111-169). San Diego: Academic Press.
    Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 212-247.
    Lemos, M. S. (1999). Students’ goals and self-regulation in the classroom, International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 471-485.
    Lewin, K. (1961). Intention, well, and need. Reprinted in T. Shipley (Eds.), Classics in Psychology (pp.5-22). NY: Philosophical Library.
    Linder, R. W., Bruce, R. H., & Wayne, I. G. (1996). The design and development of the ‘‘Self-Regulated Learning Inventory’’: A status report. (ERIC No. ED401321).
    Locke, E. A. (1982). Relation of goal level to performance with a short work period and multiple goal levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 512-514.
    Locke, E. A. (1996). Motivation through conscious goal setting. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 5, 117-124.
    Locke, E. A. & Latham, G.. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Locke, E. A. & Latham, G.. P. (2002). Building a practically usefully theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35 Odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
    Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 241-251.
    Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., & Erez, M. (1988). The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review, 13, 23-39.
    Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.
    Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1996). Motivation and teachers' computer use. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 818)
    Matsui, T., Okada, A., & Mizuguchi, R. (1981). Expectancy theory prediction of the goal theory postulate: ”The harder the goals, the higher the performance”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 54-58.
    Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition (2nd ed.). NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
    McCombs, B. L. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp.170-200). New York: Springer.
    McKeachie, W. J. et al. (1987). Teaching and learning in the college classroom. A review of the research literature (1986) and November 1987 supplement. The Regents of University Michigan.
    Mesch, D. J., Farh, J. L., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1994). Effects of feedback sign on group goal setting, strategies, and performance. Group and Organization Management, 19, 309-333.
    Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E.(1999). Multimedia-supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 17(3), 215-248.
    Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observation of mental models. In D. Gentner, & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models. Hillsdale, HJ: Lawence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Oliver, T. A., & Shapiro, E. (1993) Self-efficacy and computers. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20, 81-85.
    Palmer, D. J., & Goetz, E. T. (1988). Selection and use of study strategies: The role of the studier’s beliefs about self and strategies. In C. E. Weinstein, & E. T. Goetz (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp.41-62). NU: Academic Press.
    Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames, & M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments (vol.6, pp.117-160). CT: JAI Press.
    Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M., Boekaerts & P. R., Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.13-39). San Diego: Academic Press.
    Pintrich , P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1),33-40.
    Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D.H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory , research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Pokay, P., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 41-50.
    Reason, J. (1991). Human error. NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.), N.Y.: Macmillan, 376-391.
    Ryan, T. A. (1970). Intentional behavior. NY: Ronald Press.
    Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Education Psychologist, 25, 71-86.
    Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
    Schunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings. In D. H., Schunk & B. J., Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp.75-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In J.E. Maddux (Ed.). Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp.281-303). NY: Plenum Press.
    Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382.
    Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-Regulation through Goal Setting. ERIC/CASS Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 462 671).
    Shih, Y. F. & Alessi, S. M. (1993). Mental models and transfer of learning in computer programming. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 154-175.
    Snow, R. E. (1977). Research on aptitude for learning: A progress report. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Cognitive Psychology. TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
    Taylor, F. W. (1967). Principles of scientific management. NY: Norton.
    Tobias, Sigmund (1981). Adaptation to individual difference. In F. Farley & N. Gordon (Eds.), Psychology and Education, Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
    Tobias, Sigmund (1982). When do instructional methods make a difference? Educational Researcher, 11(4), 4-10.
    Tubbs, M. E. & Dahl, J. G. (1991). An empirical comparison of self report and discrepancy measures of goal commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 708-716.
    Tubbs, M. K. (1986). Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. Journal of applied Psychology, 71, 474-483.
    Updegraff, K. A., Eccles, J.S., Barber, B. L., & O’Brien, K. M. (1996). Course enrollment as self-regulatory behavior: Who takes optional high school math course? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 239-259.
    Wang L., Ertmer A. P., & Newby J. T. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231-250.
    Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E.(1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed, pp.315-327 ). New York: Macmillan.
    Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A. (1987). Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 416-425.
    Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989a). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407-415.
    Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989b). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H.Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp.1-25). NY: Springer-Verlag.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulating academic learning and achievement: The emergence of a social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 2(2), 173-201.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H., Schunk & B. J., Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp.3-24). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M., Boekaerts & P. R., Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.13-39). San Diego: Academic Press.

    QR CODE