簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳裕隆
Yu-Lung Chen
論文名稱: 運用概念引導機制支援真實的網路探究學習環境
Using Conceptual Guidance Mechanism to Support Web-Based Authentic Inquiry Learning Environment
指導教授: 張國恩
Chang, Kuo-En
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊工程學系
Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering
論文出版年: 2001
畢業學年度: 89
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 91頁
中文關鍵詞: 概念引導探究學習概念構圖
英文關鍵詞: conceptual guidance, inquiry learning, concept mapping
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:228下載:28
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘要
    本研究的主要目的是在探討「概念引導探究學習系統」對於學習成效的促進效果,並提出結構化探究學習模式,以供未來設計網路探究學習教材的參考。
    本研究以台北市永吉國中二年級兩個班級57名學生作為研究對象,隨機分派為兩組,一組作為實驗組,探究學習歷程中提供概念引導,另一組為控制組,探究學習歷程中不提供概念引導。其結果發現:
    一、本研究運用自行設計的概念引導探究學習系統,以國中二年級學生為研究對象,進行實證教學研究,結果發現概念引導機制對地球科學課程「溫室效應」單元及「泥火山與噴砂現象」單元的學習成效促進效果並不顯著。
    二、以概念引導機制對國中學生知識結構修正成效的促進效果實證考驗,經二因子混合設計變異數分析,其結果發現實驗組的知識結構修正成效有顯著提昇,但控制組則無明顯變化。
    三、經概念圖變化過程分析發現,概念引導機制確可協助學生驗證自己的假設,並指引其思考的方向,使得概念引導機制在探究學習過程中成為學生的學習夥伴,進而促進其知識結構修正的成效。
    四、根據問卷分析,實驗組與控制組的受試者均對「概念導引探究學習系統」持正面肯定的態度。且實驗組的受試者對於引導機制的評價持較為正面肯定的態度。

    ABSTRACT
    The purpose of this research is to investigate the effects of learning achievement and knowledge model by conceptual guidance mechanism supported inquiry.
    The subjects were fifty-seven eighth grade students from a middle school in Taipei city. Students were randomly assigned into ”Conceptual Guidance” and “Non-Conceptual Guidance” groups.
    There were two results for this research: (1) The ”Conceptual Guidance” and “Non-Conceptual Guidance” groups scored no significant differences in the immediate effect of learning achievement. (2) For the effect of refining knowledge model, the ”Conceptual Guidance” group performed significantly better than the “Non-Conceptual Guidance” group.

    目 錄 附表目錄 ………………………………………………………………Ⅲ 附圖目錄 ………………………………………………………………Ⅳ 第一章 緒論 ………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景與動機 ………………………………………..… 1 第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………..3 第二章 文獻探討 …………………………………………………… 4 第一節 探究學習的意義、模式與理論基礎 ……………… ………4 第二節 電腦輔助的探究學習環境 ……………… ..……………..8 第三節 結構化探究學習模式 ……………………………………..10 第三章 概念引導探究學習系統 …………………………………..15 第一節 系統架構 ……………… ………………………………….15 第二節 使用者介面 ……………………………………………….16 第三節 軟體工具 ………………………………………………….20 第四節 引導機制 ……… ………………………….………………22 第四章 研究方法 ……………………………………………….….39 第一節 實驗對象 ………………………………………………….39 第二節 實驗設計 ………………………………………………….39 第三節 實驗材料 ………………………………………………….40 第四節 實驗工具 ………………………………………………….41 第五節 實驗程序 ………………………………………………….42 第五章 實驗結果與討論 …………………………………………..45 第一節 概念引導機制促進學習效果之成效分析 ……………….45 第二節 概念引導機制促進知識結構修正之成效分析 ………….47 第三節 概念引導機制之效果呈現 ……………………………….50 第四節 網路探究學習問卷分析 ………………………………….56 第五節 討論 ……………………………………………………….60 第六章 結論與未來發展方向 …………………………….……….63 第一節 結論 …………………… …….……………………………63 第二節 未來發展方向 …………………………………………….64 參考文獻 ………………………………………… …………………66 附錄一 實驗材料(溫室效應) ………………………………………72 附錄二 實驗材料(泥火山與噴砂現象) ……………………………79 附錄三 網路探究學習問卷 …………………………… ………….86

    參考文獻
    壹、中文部分 :
    毛松霖 (1996):國中生地球科學觀測資料之「解釋能力」與「概念形
    成」之教學策略研究。行政院國家科學委員會印行。
    宋德忠,陳淑芬和張國恩(1998),電腦化概念構圖系統在知識結構測量
    上的應用。測驗年刊,第45輯2期,頁37-56。
    何文雄 (1999):「促進我國中小學網際網路教育品質提昇」研究分析報
    告。資訊與教育,第70期,頁14-25。
    余民寧 (1997):有意義的學習-概念構圖之研究。商鼎文化出版社。
    李勝富 (1996):資訊時代的教學新模式。教育資料與研究,第9期,頁
    49-54。
    林清山 (1992):布魯納的教學理論。載於黃光雄編:教學原理。台北:
    師大書苑,頁59-70。
    林寶山 (1998):教學原理與技巧。台北:五南。
    陳櫻代 (1999):概念構圖策略促進閱讀理解能力之研究。國立台灣師範
    大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
    黃台珠 (1994):概念圖在國中生物教學上的成效研究(I)。國科會計
    劃:NSC83-0111-S-017-015。
    郭重吉 (1992):從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改進。科學發
    展月刊,第20卷第5期,頁548-570。
    楊榮祥(1978):探討教學模式分析流程圖之運用。載於國立台灣師範大學
    科學教育中心民國70年編:自然科學教學方法研究,科學教育月刊第
    1-41期抽印本,第3期,頁182-193。
    楊榮祥(1983):科學教育方法-理論與實際(五)探討式與講解式教學模式
    之比較。載於國立台灣師範大學科學教育中心民國77年編:自然科學
    教學法專輯,科學教育月刊抽印本(17),頁130-146。
    韓善民 (1998):資訊教育基礎建設-加速篇。資訊與教育,第68期,頁
    14-16。
    貳、英文部分 :
    Anderson, R. D. (1983). A consolidation and appraisal of
    science education meta-analyses. Journal of Research in
    Science Teaching, 20(5), 497-509.
    Appleton, K. (1993). Using theory to guide practice: Teaching
    science from a constructivist perspective. School Science
    and Mathematics, 93(5), 269-274.
    Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A cognitive
    view. New York: Holt,Rinehart & Winston.
    Bell, P., & Davis, E. A. (1996). Designing an activity in the
    Knowledge Integration Environment. Annual meeting of
    American Educational Research Association.
    Bell, P., Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C.(1995). The Knowledge
    Integration Environment:Theory and Design.
    http://kie.berkeley.edu/KIE/info/publications/Theory&
    design.html.
    Chiappetta, E. L., & Russell, J. M. (1982). The relationship
    among logical thinking,problem solving instruction, and
    knowledge and application of earth science subject matter.
    Science Education, 66(1), 85-93.
    Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1991). Anchored
    Instruction and its relationship to Situated Cognition.
    Educational Researcher,19(6),2-10.
    Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The
    Jasper Series as an example of Anchored Instruction:
    Theory, Program description, and Assessment data.
    Educational Psychologist,27(3),291-315.
    Coleman, E. B. (1998). Using explanatory knowledge during
    collaborative problem solving in science. Journal of the
    Learning Sciences, 7(3?), 387-427.
    Day, J. D., & Cordon, L. A. (1993). Static and dynamic measures
    of ability: An experimental comparison. Journal of
    Educational Psychology, 85, 75-82.
    Edmondson, K. (1995). Concept mapping for the development of
    medical curricular. Journal of Research in Science
    Teaching, 32, 777-793.
    Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive Development (2nd ed.).
    Englewood Cliffs. NJ:Prentice-Hall.
    Gabel, D. L., Rubba, P. A., & Franz, J. R. (1977). The effect
    of early teaching and training experiences on physics
    achievement, attitudes toward science and science teaching,
    and process skill proficiency. Science Education, 61, 503-
    511.
    Hill, J. R. (1999). A conceptual framework for understanding
    information seeking in Open-Ended information systems.
    ETR&D,47,5-27.
    Hoadley, C. M., Bell, P., & The KIE Research Group .(1996). Web
    for your head –The design of digital resources to enhance
    lifelong learning. D-Lib Magazine,September 1996.
    Igelsrud, D., & Leonard, W. H. (1988). Labs: What research says
    about biology laboratory instruction. American Biology
    Teacher, 50(5), 303-306.
    Jackson, S. L., Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E.
    (1995). Learner-Centered software design to support
    students building models. Annual meeting of American
    Educational Research Association.
    Jackson, S. L., Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E.
    (1995). Model-It : A case study of Learner-Centered
    software design for supporting model building.
    http://hi-ce.eecs.umich.edu/papers/.
    Linn, M. C. (1998). Using assessment to improve learning
    outcomes: Experiences from the Knowledge Integration
    Environment (KIE) and the Computer as Learning Partner
    (CLP). Annual meeting of American Educational Research
    Association.
    Lockhart, R. S., Lamon, M., & Gick, M. L. (1988). Conceptual
    transfer in simple insight problems. Memory & Cognition,
    16, 36-44.
    Looi, C. K. (1998). Interactive learning environments for
    promoting inquiry learning.Journal of Educational
    Technology Systems, 27(1), 3-22.
    Lyons, D., Hoffman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1997). An
    investigation of the use of the World Wide Web for on-line
    inquiry in a science classroom. Meeting of National
    Association for Research in Science Teaching.
    Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational Psychology: A cognitive
    approach. Boston: Little Brown.
    Nakhleh, M., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Influence of levels of
    information as presented by different technologies on
    students’ understanding of acid, base, and PH concepts.
    Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1077-1096.
    Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept Maps and Vee Diagrams: Two
    metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning.
    Instructional Science, 19, 29-52.
    Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn.
    Cambridge University press.
    Plomp, T., Nieveen, N., & Pelgrum, H. (1996). Curricular
    aspects of computers in education. Cross National Policies
    and Practices on Computers in Education,9-26.
    Pryor, A., Soloway, E., & Hi-C Research Group. (1997).
    Foundations of science :Using technology to support
    authentic science learning.http://hi-ce.eecs.umich.
    edu/papers/.
    Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (1998). Iterative design of a
    technology-supported biological inquiry curriculum. Annual
    meeting of American Educational Research Association.
    Saunders, W. L., & Shepardson, D. (1987). A comparison of
    concrete and formal science instruction upon science
    achievement and reasoning ability of sixth grade
    students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(1),
    39-51.
    Schacter, & John. (1997). Feasibility of a web-based assessment
    of problem solving.Annual Meeting of the American
    Educational Research Association.
    Schmid, R. E., & Telaro, G. (1990). Concept mapping as an
    instructional strategy for high school biology. Journal of
    Educational Research, 84, 78-85.
    Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. E. (1994). Learner-centered
    design: the challenge for HCI in the 21st century,
    Interactions, 1(2), 36-48.
    Soloway, E., Krajcik, J. S., & Finkel, E. A. (1995). The
    investigators’ Workshop project : Supporting science
    modeling and inquiry via computational media &
    technology. Annual meeting of American Educational Research
    Association.
    Soloway, E., Pryor, A., Krajcik, J., Jackson, S., Stratford, S.
    J.,Wisnudel, M., & Klein, J. (1996). ScienceWare’s Model-
    It : Technology to support authentic science inquiry.
    http://hi-ce.eecs.umich.edu/papers/.
    Spitulnik, M. W., & Krajcik, J. (1998). Technological tools to
    support inquiry in a science methods course. Journal of
    Computer in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 17(1), 63-74.
    Starr, M. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (1990). Concept maps as
    heuristic for science curriculum development: Toward
    improvement in process and product. Journal of Research in
    Science Teaching, 27, 987-1000.
    Suthers, D., & Jones, D. (1997). An architecture for
    intelligent collaborative educational systems. AI&ED 97.
    Suthers, D., & Members of the Advlearn Project. (1996).
    Distributed tools for collaborative learning and coached
    apprenticeship approaches to critical inquiry . ITS 96.
    Suthers, D., Toth, E. E., & Weiner, A. (1997). An integrated
    approach to implementing collaborative inquiry in the
    classroom. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 97.
    Tinnesand, M., & Chan, A. (1987). Step 1:Throw out the
    instructions. ScienceTeacher,54(6), 43-45.
    Tobin, K., & Capie, W. (1982). Relationships between formal
    reasoning ability, locus of control, academic engagement
    and integrated process skill achievement.Journal of
    Research in Science Teaching, 19(2), 113-121.
    Trowbridge, L. W. (1978). 探討教學及創造能力的發展。載於國立台灣
    師範大學科學教育中心民國70年摘譯:自然科學教學方法研究,科學
    教育月刊第1-41期抽印本(3),頁176-181。
    Vye, N. J., Goldman, S. R., Voss, J. F., Hmelo, C., Williams,
    S., & Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997).
    Complex mathematical problem solving by individuals and
    dyads. Cognition and Instruction,15(4),435-484.
    White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling,
    and metacognition : Making science accessible to all
    students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1),3-118.

    QR CODE