研究生: |
平子航 Ping, Tzu-Hang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
以科技接受模式探討技術型高級中等學校學生使用數位學習平台之行為意圖:以自我導向學習為調節變項 A Study on Vocational High School Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use E-learning Platform based on the Technology Acceptance Model: The Moderating Effect of Self-Directed Learning |
指導教授: |
李懿芳
Lee, Yi-Fang |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工業教育學系 Department of Industrial Education |
論文出版年: | 2019 |
畢業學年度: | 107 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 138 |
中文關鍵詞: | 科技接受模式 、自我導向學習 、數位學習平台 、技術型高級中等學校 |
英文關鍵詞: | Technology Acceptance Model, E-learning Platform, Self-Directed Learning, Vocational High School |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201900336 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:224 下載:1 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在以科技接受模式探討技術型高級中等學校學生運用數位學習平台進行專業科目課程學習之行為意圖,並分析自我導向學習在知覺易用性與知覺有用性對使用態度關係中的調節效果。本研究以台北市立及新北市立技術型高級中等學校電機電子群學生共370人為樣本,透過各校任教電工機械課程老師協助,將台達電數位學習活動納入教學活動中,再進行「台達電數位學習平台行為意圖與自我導向學習調查問卷」施測,所得量化資料採取描述性統計、結構方程模式及迴歸等方法進行統計分析。主要研究結論包括:一、技高學生運用數位學習平台學習電工機械時,對平台易用性、有用性、使用態度、行為意圖的感受程度良好。二、技高學生對數位學習平台知覺易用性、有用性、使用態度及行為意圖的整體模型適配度良好。三、技高學生自我導向學習能力越高,知覺易用性對使用態度的影響亦愈強。根據上述結論,主要建議包括:一、技高學生宜善用適當的數位學習平台協助學習,二、教師宜重視學生自我導向學習能力的提升與培養,三、未來研究可擴大研究範圍與對象之群科,以供教師、學校行政及後續相關研究之參考。
This study was aimed to discuss the use of DeltaMOOCx e-learning platform among vocational high school students by exploring the behavior intention when applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Additionally, analyzing the self-directed learning upon the attitude of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness as adjustment variables, in order to understand the effectiveness. The samples of is study were more than 370 vocational high school students majored in Electrical and Electronic cluster in Taipei and New Taipei City. With the help of teachers from electric machinery relevant courses, we included the DeltaMOOCx e-learning platform into the education system, which has went forward to implementing a Questionnaire to targeted students. We have used descriptive statistics analysis, structure equation modeling analysis and regression analysis methods resulting from quantitative data, to support statistical analysis. The main research conclusion includes: 1. While Vocational High School students using the e-learning platform to study Electric machinery, the feeling of the platforms ease of use, usefulness, attitude and behavior are positive. 2. The Vocational High School students have an overall model fit for the perceived ease of use, usefulness, attitude and intentions of the e-learning platform. 3. The higher the self-directed learning skills of the vocational high school students, the stronger the perceived ease of use influences the attitudes. According to the above conclusion, the main suggestions contain: 1. The Vocational High School students are capable of using the appropriate e-learning platform to help their studies. 2. Teachers should value the promotion and cultivation of the students’ self-directed learning skills. 3. Future research can expand the study scope and group of subjects, in order for reference for teachers, school administration and the following related research.
壹、中文部分
王佩雯(2018)。以科技接受模式探討使用開放教育資源之學習成效─以成長需求為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文,臺北市。
台達電子文教基金會(2019)。關於DeltaMOOCx。取自http://edu.delta moocx.net/general/home/intro
史瑞芳(2008)。企業e-learning學習方式研究。山西經濟管理幹部學院學報,16(3),83-100。
何克抗(2003)。數位學習與高教改革。載於陳德懷、黃亮華(主編),邁向數位學習社會(172-201頁)。臺北市:遠流。
吳佩芬(2016)。上班族自我導向學習在Facebook建構個人學習網絡情形之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北市。
吳美美(2004)。數位學習現況與未來發展。圖書館學與資訊科學,30(2),92-106。
李大偉、游光昭(1999)。即時群播的教學成效分析。視聽教育,40(4),1-7。
李秉勳(2013)。地方政府員工自我導向學習傾向對於數位學習網站的學習動機與學習滿意度之相關研究-以嘉義縣政府為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
李建儒(2008)。數位學習者人格特質、自我導向學習與學習成效之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用─Graphics& Basic。臺北:心理。
李飛翔(2017)。高中職軍訓教官心理資本與自我導向學習關係之研究-以雲嘉南地區為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
周君倚、陸洛(2014)。以科技接受模式探討數位學習系統使用態度-以成長需求為調節變項。資訊管理學報,21(1),83-105。
林叔宜(2012)。國中導師教學風格、自我導向學習與學習滿意度間關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。義守大學,高雄市。
林信志、湯凱雯、賴信志(2010)。以科技接受模式探討大學生學習以網路教學系統製作數位教材之意圖和成效。數位學習科技期刊,2(1),60-78。
林嘉純(2009)。自我導向學習能力對建構取向網路學習環境偏好之影響-中高齡者的轉化學習(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北市。
林燕珍、何榮桂(2011)。數位學習服務平台簡介及其應用。台灣教育,670,12-21。
邱瓊慧、吳祥明(2000)。談遠距教師進修。資訊與教育,76,41-46。
施茂陽(2010)。成人學習者自我導向學習傾向、學習動機與工作滿意度之相關研究-以S科技大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。南台科技大學,臺南市。
柯皓仁(2007)。館員繼續教育與數位學習研究計畫。國家圖書館委託,未出版之研究計畫。123。
洪淑芬、楊崇宏、周照偉、林建宏、蔡賢亮(2013)。國民小學高年級學生對互動式電子白板教學之學習動機與滿意度研究。數位學習科技期刊,5(1),29-50。
洪雪芬(2003)。e-Learning融入數學領域教師進修之研究-以K12數位學校為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東縣。
范淑媚(2007)。高雄縣社區大學學員自我導向學習傾向與學習滿意度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
徐茂洲(2010)。大學生運動觀光阻礙量表構念效度驗證之研究。運動休閒管理學報,7(1),174-186。
徐茂洲、葉明如(2012)。鳳山體育館SBL超級籃球聯賽男女現場觀眾觀賞行為意圖模式之恆等性檢定。運動休閒管理學報,9(2),1-21。
張其純、高碧連、陳淑慧(2013)。運用Moodle數位學習平台提昇學習滿意度一某區域教學醫院為例。管理資訊計算,2(1),233-244。
張晉昌、黃學堂(2008)。高職學生不同學習風格對數位學習成效影響之研究。技術及職業教育學報,2(1),37-57。
張基成、徐郁昇(2011)。高職學生電工機械混成式數位學習效果。科學教育學刊,19(6),549-579。
張瑋珊(2009)。僕人領導行為、組織承諾與離職傾向之關聯性研究─自我導向學習傾向的調節效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北市。
教育部(2005)。挑戰2008:國家發展重點計畫。取自http://english.moe. gov.tw/dl-4861-E6DDA1DA-F033-4A67-BA93-281330463074.html
教育部(2016)。2016-2020資訊教育總藍圖。取自http://ws.one.edutw/001/ Upload/3/relfile/6315/46563/65ebb64a-683c-4f7a-bcf0-325113ddb436.pdf。
許金山(2006)。混合式數位學習歷程及成效之分析。生活科技教育月刊,39(1),66-83。
許嘉容(2018)。情境式數位學習教材設計之研究—以國中生物科分類單元為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立雲林科技大學,雲林縣。
郭倉義、呂宗翰、蔡憲唐、曾一原(2008)。數位學習系統接受度之研究:自我導向學習的觀點。電子商務學報,10(4),963-987。
陳幼梅(2016)。高雄市中年女性自我導向學習與幸福感關係之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
陳玉潔(2010)。參與電腦職業訓練課程學員對自我導向學習、電腦態度及資訊素養之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。樹德科技大學,高雄市。
陳佩英、黃天仕、許美鈞、侯仲宸(2016)。當「研究法」遇見數位學習:教與學翻轉的經驗談。數位學習科技期刊,8(1),51-70。
陳明星、陳乃華(2012)。一般學生與身心障礙學生在使用數位學習平台之滿意度調查研究--以中部某科技大學為例。朝陽學報,17,89-106。
陳英正、陳英豪(2017)。以科技接受模式探討國小資源班教師實施資訊科技融入教學之意願。人文社會科學研究:教育類,11(2),17-37。
陳進卿(2010)。以科技接受模式探討國中學生互動式電子白板使用行為之研究—以台中市立育英國民中學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
彭成瑋(2000)。網路教學系統的理念,設計與實作(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義市。
曾婉婷(2016)。成人自我導向學習量表之編製研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
曾淑美、余家瑛、張博鈞,(2017)。科技接受模式對個人雲採用意圖的影響─以電腦自我效能為調節變數。TANET2017臺灣網際網路研討會,臺中市。
游光昭、李大偉(2003)。網路化教育訓練概論。臺北市:師大書苑。
游曉薇、陳姿香、廖純怡(2005)。數位學習。網路社會學通訊期刊,49,1-6。
黃明玉(2004)。成人學習者自我導向學習傾向、班級學習氣氛與學習滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
黃淑玲(2000)。網際網路合作學習環境中學習互動型態與認知風格對學習效果之影響--以二次函數之教學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
黃富順(2002)。成人學習。臺北:五南。
黃朝曦(2017)。撼動全球教育的新一代數位學習--磨課師。師友月刊,610,9-13。
楊心怡、李啟嘉(2015)。問題導向學習對法律系大學生問題解決能力及自我導向學習之研究。教育科學研究期刊,60(1),131-155。
楊國德(2002)。歐美國家網路學習的應用與發展趨勢。成人教育,67,9-19。
葉玉珠、葉怡伶、林俊甫(2013)。數位學習正向個人特質之量表發展:知識管理、自我調整學習與意義建構。數位學習科技期刊,5(3),59-89。
廖長彥、張菀真、陳玉欣、辜玉旻、柯華葳、陳德懷(2016)。設計與評估電腦輔助邏輯句型課程對學生句子能力與動機之影響。數位學習科技期刊,8(4),1-26。
廖瑞琳(2012)。技職院校學生對數位學習系統使用感受與行為之研究-以科技接受模式為基礎。遠東學報,29(3)。
劉世雄(2013)。臺灣不同城鄉地區國小教師的教學信念與其運用資訊科技融入教學之探討。課程與教學,14(3),47-76。
劉仲矩、林宛儒(2015)。企業員工數位學習文化認知類型之研究。數位學習科技期刊,7(3),83-104。
劉泇甫(2018)。以科技接受模式探討消費者網路購買旅遊平安險之行為---以訊息框架為調節因子(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
劉恬妏(2003)。教師網路學習行為之觀點轉化歷程研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。
蔡文憲(2010)。國小教師自我導向學習與其參與數位學習效能之研究─兼及建構取向學習觀探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
鄧運林(1992)。自我導向學習對成人學生學習行為、學業成績影響之實驗研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
鄧運林(1995)。成人教學與自我導向學習。臺北市:五南。
鄭寶梅(2008)。數位學習在圖書館員繼續教育之應用。臺灣圖書館管理季刊,4(3),44-65。
賴玲玲、林姝吟(2016)。數位學習平台可用性研究。臺北市立圖書館館訊,33(4),35-49。
薛慶友、傅潔琳(2015)。數位學習平台的應用特色與評析。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(4),77-84。
謝國榮(2008)。非正規高齡教育機構英語學習者溝通恐懼、自我導向學習傾向與學習滿意度關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
顏永森、胡學誠、柯天盛(2011)。數位學習注意力對學習成效影響之研究。T&D飛訊,112,1-21。
顏春煌(2015)。數位學習:觀念、方法、實務、設計與實作。臺北:碁峰出版社。
羅藝方、楊淑晴、吳妹容(2015)。以科技接受模式理論探究教師對電子白板融入教學的接受與使用情形。教育學報,43(2),145-172。
蘇以青、柯薰貴、劉雅瑛(2008)。課室教學與數位學習兩種學習模式的比較-學習者之主觀經驗。高雄護理雜誌,25(1),8-21。
蘇秀招(2006)。高雄縣市國民中學專任行政人員自我導向學習傾向與學習滿意度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
貳、英文部分
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I., & Madden T .J. (1986). Prediction of goal directed behavior:attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
Allen, R. (2002). Online mastery a certification curriculum for faculty. Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Denver, Colorado.
Baziukaitė, D., Vaira , Z., & Idzelytė, D. (2008). A tool to support self-education in a lifelong learning. In Innovative techniques in instruction technology, e-learning, e-assessment, and education (pp. 92-97). Springer: Dordrecht.
Bishop, D. C., Giles, S. M., & Bryant, K. S. (2005). Teacher receptiveness towardweb-based training and support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 3-14.
Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). A conceptual framework for understanding self-direction in adult learning. Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice, 18-33.
Candy, P. C. (2004). Linking thinking: Self-directed learning in the digital age. Canberra,, Australia: Department of Education, Science and Training.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-learning and the science of instruction (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA : Pfeiffer .
Clark, R.C., & Kwinn, A. (2007). The new virtual classroom: Evidence-based guidelines for synchronous e-learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Crick, R. D., & Wilson, K. (2005). Being a learner: A virtue for the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(3), 359-374.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, & user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Fellenz, R. A. (1985). Self-direction: A clarification of terms and causes. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Adult Education Research Conference (pp. 164-169).
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research reading. Massactusetts, MA : Addison-Wesley.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Galland, P. (2002). Techie teachers-web-based staff development at your leisure.TechTrends, 46(3), 7-10.
Gossman, D. C. (1995). A study of trainee attitude variables as related to locusand self-directedness. (Doctoral Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University). Diss-ertation Abstracts International-A, 56, 4257.
Grow, G. (1994). In defense of the staged self-directed learning model. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(2), 109-114.
Guglielmino, L. M. (1977). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 6467.
Hair, J. F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2009). Anderson multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40(3), 414-433.
Heide, A., Stilborne, L., & Genco, P. (1999). The teacher's complete & easy guide to the Internet. Teacher Librarian, 27(1), 50.
Hmelo, C. E., & Lin, X. (2000). Becoming self-directed learners: Strategy development in problem-based learning. Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions, 227-250.
Holden, A. M. (1996). The effects of metacognitive advice and control if sequence on student achievement and attitude toward computer assisted instruction and content (Doctoral dissertation, The Louisiana State University ). DissertationAbstracts International., 56, 2655.
Janet, H. (2003). An interactive study of teachers' online discussions of young adult literature (pp. 1-165). Kent State University.
Joseph, H. J. D. (2000). The University of Wisconsin-Stout asynchronous learningnetwork case study options: Using technology to remove learning barriers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network. 4(2), 25.
Kapp, K. M. (2003). Winning E-learning proposals: The art of development and deli-very, J. Ross publishing.
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for Leaders and Teachers. New York: Cambridge. Association Press.
Konate, D. (2008). The high performance asymptotic method in numerical simulation. Mathematical Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and e-Learning (pp. 33-50). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Kratz, R. J. (1980). Implications of self-directed learning for functionally illiterate adults. Adult Education Research Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
Lampert, M. (1985). Understanding, doing, and teaching multiplication. Institute for Reaching on Teaching, Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI.
Lau, A. & Tsui, E. (2009). Knowledge management perspective on e-learning effectiveness. Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(4), 324-325.
Long, H. B. & Associates (1989). Self-directed learning: Emerging theory and practice. Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education of the University of Oklahoma.
Loyens, S. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411-427.
Luther, T. (2007). Corporate E-Learning : An inside view of IBM's solutions. OUP USA.
Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2006). Elearning: the key concepts. Routleedge.
Moore, M. G. (1980). Independent study. Redefining the discipline of adult education, 5, 16-31.
Mourad, S. A. (1979). Relationship of Grade Level, Sex, and Creativity to Readiness for Self-Directed Learning Among Intellectually Gifted Students. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia.
Orawiwatnakul, W., & Wichadee, S. (2011). A comparison of students' outcomes in two classes: Business administration students VS communication artsstudents based on self-Directed learning activities. Contemporary issues in Education Research, 4(5), 23-32.
Parsons, A. M. (2008). A Delphi study of best practices of online instructional design practices in Malaysia. Doctoral dissertation, Capella University.
Penland, P. (1979). Self-initiated learning. Adult Education, 29(3), 170-179.
Pilling-Cormick, J. (1997). Transformative and self-directed learning in practice. New directions for adult and continuing education, 74, 69-77.
Rosemary, K. H. (2010). Self-directed learning management system: Enablingcompetency and self-efficacy in online learning environments. The Claremont Graduate University.
Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sandsbury, F. C. (1996). The relationship of self-directed learning orientation andgoal setting perceptions to job performance of Penn State County extensiondirectors (Doctoral Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University). DissertationAbstracts International-A, 57, 3361.
Sharma, R. C. & Mishra, S. (2007). E-learning best practices and lessons learned. hershey, ebook, PA :Information Science Pub, 150-155.
Tabbakh, T., & Freeland-Graves, J. (2016). Development and validation of the multidimensional home environment scale (MHES) for adolescents and their mothers. Eating Behaviors, 22, 76-82.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6(2), 144-176.
Tough, A. (1979). Major learning efforts: Recent research and future directions. Adult Education, 4, 250-265.
West, R. F., & Bentley E. L. (1990). Structural analysis of the self-directed learning readiness scale: A confirmatory factor analysis using lisrel modeling. In H. B. Long and Associate, Advances in Research and Practice. Oklahoma Research Center for continuing Professional and Higher Education of the University of Oklahoma.
Wiley, K. (1982). Effects of a self-directed learning project and preference for a struct-ure on self-directed learning readiness. Nursing Research, 32(3), 181-185.
Yang, S. C., & Liu, S. F. (2004). Case study of online workshop for the professionaldevelopment of teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 733-761.
Zirkle, C. (2002). Using the Internet: To enhance teacher education. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers, 77(5), 24-25.