簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李銘薰
論文名稱: 電腦與數位3C專業虛擬社群知識分享之影響因素研究
A Study on Factors Affecting Konwledge Sharing of Computer and 3C Digital Professional Virtual Community.
指導教授: 卜小蝶
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 圖書資訊學研究所
Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 186
中文關鍵詞: 虛擬社群知識分享個人動機社會資本組織酬償
英文關鍵詞: Virtual Community, Knowledge Sharing, Personal Motivations, Social Capital, Organizational Reward
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:269下載:38
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 網際網路的發展促使人們得以在虛擬空間裡進行溝通、互動與情感交流,也形成許多所謂的虛擬社群。這類社群與實體社群同樣具備知識分享功能,但在分享的動機、結構與層次上有相當不同。因此,本研究希望以重視知識分享的專業型虛擬社群為對象,瞭解其特性;影響其成員進行知識分享的因素;以及虛擬社群成員之人口背景、社群參與經驗是否會影響其對知識分享因素的認同程度及進行知識分享的意願。
    過去相關研究中,多以個人、社會、組織等三種層次因素來探討虛擬社群的知識分享因素。本研究嘗試以個人動機、社會資本、組織酬償等三種觀點出發,探討可能促進虛擬社群成員進行知識分享的因素。研究方法是針對臺灣地區「電腦與數位3C」專業虛擬社群進行調查,包括PTT、Mobile01、PCDVD…等社群,共計回收519份有效問卷。再透過敘述性統計、因素分析、變異數分析及多元迴歸分析等統計方法,進行調查結果之分析與詮釋。
    研究結果顯示,臺灣地區「電腦與數位3C」專業虛擬社群的成員以男性為主,且普遍具有高學歷,其中大專院校以上佔95%。同時,從差異性分析中也發現,以社群成員之社群參與經驗,來區別其在社群中的活動特性,會比以現實人口背景屬性來得更有意義。同時,透過因素分析,本研究共提出八項可能促進虛擬社群成員進行知識分享的因素,包括「專業能力」、「長期助人」、「聲譽」、「人際凝聚力」、「社群認同」、「互動密度」、「平等性」、及「組織酬償」等。此外,透過多元迴歸分析,實證上述因素對知識分享意圖的影響力。其中「專業能力」、「互動密度」、及「平等性」未達統計顯著水準。而「長期助人」、「人際凝聚力」、「社群認同」與「組織酬償」則具有正向之影響力,其中以「社群認同」影響力最高,其它三項因素影響力較小。值得注意的是,「聲譽」呈負向影響力,顯示不少成員並不是為了獲取名聲而進行知識分享,此項結果與其它相關研究不同,需要進一步探究。最後本研究也針對虛擬社群經營及後續研究提出一些具體建議。

    The development of internet promote the communication, interaction, and the exchange of emotion in the virtual space and form many so-called virtual community.Virtual community also have knowledge-sharing functions.However, in the sharing of the motive, structure and levels are quite different.This study wants to explore the characteristics of professional virtual community, the knowledge-sharing factors, And the background of population and the participation experiences of the virtual community members will affect it's knowledge-sharing factors and the degree of recognition to the wishes of knowledge sharing.
    Related research in the past, often from the personal, social, and organizational factors to explore three levels of knowledge-sharing of virtual community. This study examines the knowledge-sharing factors of the virtual community members from the standpoint of the personal motivations, social capital, and organizational rewards. Recovered 519 valid questionnaires to investiagte the professional virtual community of the computer and 3C digital in Taiwan .Through descriptive statistics, factor analysis, analysis of variance and the multiple regression analysis to explain the outcome of the investigation of the professional virtual community of the computer and 3C Digital in Taiwan.
    The results showed that Taiwan's professional virtual community of the computer and 3C Digital dominated by men, and generally have high academic qualifications or excellent level of expertise. From the Variance analysis, we find that is more meaningful to distinguish the members' activities of the virtual community in the participation experiences than the realistic background of population. Finally, this study proposed eight factors to promote knowledge sharing of the virtual community by factor analysis method and demonstrated the influence to the intentions of the knowledge sharing by the multiple regression analysis.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與研究問題 3 第三節 研究流程與論文架構 4 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 虛擬社群之特性及類型 7 第二節 虛擬社群的知識特性與知識分享 13 第三節 知識分享理論與方法 17 第三章 研究設計 36 第一節 研究概念架構 36 第二節 名詞解釋與量表來源構念題項說明 39 第三節 前置研究與研究取樣 43 第四節 資料分析方法與研究限制 46 第四章 研究分析 50 第一節 社群參與經驗與人口背景資料特性分析 50 第二節 因素分析、信度檢定與研究變項相關分析 86 第三節 社群參與經驗與人口背景屬性對研究變項之差異性分析 107 第四節 多元迴歸分析 121 第五章 結論與建議 128 第一節 研究結論 128 第二節 研究建議 136 中文參考文獻 141 外文參考文獻 142 附錄一 專業型虛擬社群知識分享之影響因素研究問卷 145 附錄二 屬質變項交叉表 150 附錄三 主成分分析萃取因素之題項與構念解釋 184

    中文參考文獻
    丁耀民(2005)。人際關係網路對虛擬社群使用意願的影響。未出版之碩士論文,清華大學資訊系統與應用研究所,新竹市。
    尤克強(2001)。知識管理與創新。臺北:天下文化。
    吳有順(2000)。網路社群知識分享過程之研究─以企業管理教學網站為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學企業管理學系,台北市。
    吳叡人譯,Anderson, b.(1999/1991)。想像的共同體:民族主義的起源與散佈。台北:時報。
    邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南。
    林祐聖、葉欣怡譯,林南著(2005/2001)。社會資本(Social Capital)。臺北:弘智文化。
    胡瑋珊譯,Davenport, T.H. & Prusak, L. (1998/2001)。知識管理(Working Knowledge)。臺北:中國生產力中心。
    張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏(2000)。經濟學理論與實際。台北:翰蘆。
    陳文德與黃應貴主編(2002)。社群研究的省思。中央研究院民族學研究所:台北市。
    黃芳銘(2002)。結構方程模式理論與應用。台北:五南。
    黃剛銘(2004)。虛擬社群激勵機制研究。未出版之碩士論文,南華大學管理研究所。
    莊雅婷(2001)。虛擬社群之經營。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所,臺北市。
    曾武清(2004)。虛擬社群的集體記憶與儀式傳播:一個關於「龍魂不滅」的初探性研究。資訊社會研究,6,199-234。
    曾真真、黃經智(2004)。虛擬社群之社會資本對資訊使用意願之影響。中華管理評論,7(2),63-76.
    楊子江、王美音譯, Nonaka, I & Takeuchi, H.(1997/1995)。創新求勝:智價企業論(The Knowledge-Creating Company)。臺北:遠流。
    翟本瑞(2001)。網路文化。台北:揚智文化。
    榮泰生(2005)。SPSS與研究方法。台北:五南。
    廖鐿鈤(2001)。網路入侵-虛擬社群對真實世界的滲透。未出版之碩士論文,南華大學社會學研究所。
    蔣佩真(2002)。虛擬社群的知識分享:認知與行為間的關係。未出版之碩士論文,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所,高雄市。
    謝光范、吳怡萱譯,Crispin Thurlow, Laura Lengel & Alice Tomic(2004/2006)。電腦中界傳播:人際互動與網際網路(Computer Mediated Communication : Social Interaction and the Internet)。臺北:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。
    羅家德(2005)。社會網分析講義。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。

    外文參考文獻
    Adler, P. Richard. & Christopher, J. Anthony. (1999). Internet community primeroverview and business opportunities. Harper Collins Publishing Inc.
    Ahuja, M., Galletta, D. & Carley, K.Individual Centrality and Performance in Virtual R & D Groups : An Empirical Study.Management Science,49(1),21-38.
    Armstrong, A. G. & Hagel, J. (1996). The real value of on-line communities. Harvard Business Review, May-June.
    Armstrong, Arthur. G. & Hagel, J.(1997). Net Gain: Expanding Markets Through Virtual Communities.McKinsey & Company.
    Blau, P. M.(1964).Exchange and Power in Social Life .New York:Wiley
    Bock,G.,Zmud,R.W. & Kim,Y. (2005).Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing:Examining The Roles of Extrinsic Motivatiors,Social-Psychological Forces,and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
    Burt, R.S.(1992).Structural Holes : The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press.
    Burt, R.S.(1998).The network structure of social capital.Paper presented at the conference on social networks and Social Capital, Duke University, Durham,NC.
    Chaudhury, A., Mallick, D. N. & Rao, H. R. (2001), Web Channel In E-Commerce. Association For Computing Machinery, 44(1), 99-104.
    Coleman, J.S.(1990).Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
    Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Devi, R. G. & Ravindranath, M. (2001),Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics : a structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management,26(3),431-445.
    Drucker, P.F.(1993).Post-Capitalist Society. Harper Collins.
    Garvin, D.A.(1993).Building a learning organization.Harvard Business Review.71(4),78-91.
    Granovetter, M.S.(1985).Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology,91(3),481-510.
    Greenberg, J. & Liebman, M. (1990).Incentives:The Missing in Strategic Performance. The Journal of Business Strategy, 8-11.
    Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T.(1999).What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?Harvard Business Review.106-116.
    Harris, D.B.(1996, Sep. 15).Creating a Knowledge Centric Information Technology Environment.
    Kankanhalli, A., Tan, Bernard C.Y., Wei, Kwok-Kee.(2005)Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories : An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly,29(1),113-143.
    Kannan, P.K., Chang, A.M., & Whinston, A.B.(1998). Making information on the I-Way: data junkyard or information gold mine?. Communications of the ACM, 41(3),35-43.
    Kollock, P.(1999). Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge.
    Komito, L.(1998).The net as a foraging society:Flexible communities.The Information Society.14,97-106.
    Kozinets, R. V. (1999). E-tribalized Marketing? The Strategic Implications of Virtual Communities of Consumption. European Management Journal, 17(3),252-64
    of Consumption. European Management Journal, 17 (3):252-64
    Lee, F.S.L., Vogel, D., Limayem, M.(2002). Virtual Community informatics: What We Know and What We Need to Know. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Retrieved in December 29, 2007 from http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2002/1435/08/14350214b.pdf
    Lee, F.S.L., Vogel, D., Limayem, M.(2003). Virtual Community informatics: A review and research agenda. Journal of information technology theory and Application, 5(1), 47.
    Lin, Nan.(2001).Social Capital. New York : Cambridge University Press.
    Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S.(1998).Social Capital,Intellectual Capital, And The Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
    Nonaka, I.(1994).A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science,5(1),14-37.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., & K.Umemoto. (1996). A theory of organizational knowledge recreation. International Journal of Technology Management,11(7),833-845.
    Nonaka, I., & Konno, N.(2000).SECI Ba and leadership:a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation?Long range Planning3,5-34
    O’Dell, C.and Grayson, C.J.(1998).If only we knew what we know:identification and transfer of internal best practices. California Management Review,40(3),154-175.
    Polanyi, M.(1960). Personal knwoledge:towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Rogers, E. & Kincaid, D.(1981)Communication Networks : Toward a New Paradigm for Research. New York : The Free Press
    Tönnies, F.(1988).Community and Society.Transcation books.
    Turkle, S.(1998).Identity in The Age of The Internet. Proceedings of Computer-Human Interaction.258-267.
    Turner, J.H. & Dolch, N.A.(1996). Using Classical theorists to Reconceptualize community Dynamics. Research in Community Sociology, 6, 19-36.
    Shumaker, S. & Brownell, A.(1984).Toward a Theory of Social Support: Closing Conceptual Gaps. Journal of Social Issues,40(4),11-36.
    Wasserman & Faust ,K. (1994) Social Network Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press
    Wasko, M. & Faraj, S.(2000).It Is What One Does:Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems,9(2),155-173.
    Wasko, M. & Faraj, S.(2005).Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital And Knowledge Contribution In Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
    Whetten, D. A. (1982). Issues in Conducting Research, in D.L.Rogers and D.A. Whetten (ed.), Interorganozational Coordination:Theory, Research, and Implementation.Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press, 97-121.

    QR CODE