研究生: |
王怡文 YI-WEN, WANG |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
公園尋路標示系統中英文字編排之尋路績效及偏好度之研究與創作 A study of the typography used in park wayfinding signage systems with respect to navigation performance and user preference. |
指導教授: |
施令紅
Shih, Ling-Hung 王秀鳳 Wang, Hsiu-Feng |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
美術學系 Department of Fine Arts |
論文出版年: | 2010 |
畢業學年度: | 98 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 129 |
中文關鍵詞: | 尋路行為 、標示系統 、文字 、視認性 |
英文關鍵詞: | Wayfinding, Signage Systems, Typography, Legibility |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:137 下載:21 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來台灣城市國際化的發展,國內越來越多非華語系國家的人口成長,而在標示系統上也注意到雙語系文字標示的重要性,故在休憩的公園環境中,標示上的中英文字編排係影響到本國民與非華語系國人的視認性。在透過公園標示系統中英文字視認性之績效測量與滿意度的實驗結果所示:(一)在標楷體、中黑體與中圓體三種中文字型中,以中黑體獲得的視認性程度最高。(二)在Arial與Times New Roman兩種英文字型中,以Arial獲得的視認性程度最高。(三)在字級部分,以越大的字級效果越好,其視認程度越高。最後根據實驗結果,以其視認性程度最高的中英文字型、字級來做為創作依據。
創作目的在(一)服務機能:多功能標示系統,除了指引方向,並能帶給民眾便利目的。(二)夜間照明:標示系統為補足夜間的注目性,增加自明性以達到日夜指引功能。(三)結合環境:結合大安森林公園的生態特性與元素,形成融入當地環境的視覺表徵。
In recent years, as Taipei rapidly evolves into a cosmopolitan city with growing numbers of foreigners residing in the city, the government officials begin to value the importance of establishing bi-lingual signage system in the city. The different typography displayed in these bi-lingual signage at various leisure parks affects the legibility when read by both the Chinese and non-Chinese speaking population.
A survey conducted on navigation performance and user preference for the typography used in signage system at a leisure park shows that (a) of the three types of Chinese fonts – Kai Style, Hei Style, and Yuan Style, Hei Style scores the highest degree of legibility, (b) of the two types of English fonts, Arial and Times New Roman, Arial offers a higher legibility, and (c) the greater the font size, the better the legibility.
Following the results of the survey, a signage system is constructed using fonts and font sizes that offer the highest degree of legibility. The purpose of the construction is to provide residents in the park with (a) multi-purpose signage system which offers clear orientation and directions, (b) self-luminous signage allowing easy reading and identification during day and night, and (c) clear visual representations which integrate well into Daan Park’s unique ecological environment.
王人弘(2003)。地下街尋路行為與空間概念建構之研究。未出版之碩士論文,私立中原大學,桃園縣。
王瑞卿(2002)。購物中心「探路系統」指標設計之研究。未出版之碩士論文,私立中原大學,桃園縣。
丘永福(1994)。圖文編輯。台北市:藝風堂。
丘永福(2005)。字學。台北市:藝風堂。
林磐聳(1996)。創造都會風情的全方位設計。設計雜誌,70,33-38。
胡嘉昕(2002)。捷運台北車站空間環境與標識系統使用後評估之研究-以使用者尋路的觀點探討。未出版之碩士論文,國立台北科技大學,台北市。
宮澤功(1998)。指標設計與都市空間。設計雜誌,82,71-73。
張悟非(1992)。從認知心理的觀點來探討視覺資訊設計的方向。工業設計雜誌,21(1),2-11。
張銘勳(1994)。中文筆畫數及字形於VDT 顯示幕之閱讀識認性研究(國科會大學生暑期參與專題研究計畫成果報告)。雲林縣:國立雲林科技大學。
張碧珠主編(2000)。文字造形設計篇。台北:藝風堂。
陳佑松(2007)。避難標示圖像設計之視認性研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學,台北市。
陳格理(1997)。圖書館的標示系統。台北市立圖書館館訊,15(2),11-31。
陳格理(1999)。圖書館尋路工作之理念與設計。中國圖書館學會會報,62, 119-134。
陳雅芳(1993)。校園視覺標識之設計原則探討。未出版之碩士論文,私立中原大學,桃園縣。
湯嘉明(2001)。液晶顯示器上動態中文字視認性與視覺動向之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立雲林科技大學,雲林縣。
楊子葆(2005)。街道家具與城市美學。台北市:藝術家。
葉國棟(2006)。中文字型種類以及字距與行距對國小六年級學童閱讀速度之影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立台中教育大學,台中市。
經濟部商業司(1997)。公共標識設計手冊,p.28-31。
廖志忠(1997)。環境指標設計之分類研究及個案探討,我國專業設計人才培育研討會論文,p.123-131。
蔡保田(1987)。調查研究法在教育上的應用。中國教育學會(主編),教育研究方法論。台北市:師大書苑。
蔡登傳(2001)。應用文字的字形描述值評估其視認度之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學,台北市。
鄭金豊(2003)。以尋路行為認知模式探討捷運車站的標示系統-以台北捷運忠孝復興站為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立台北科技大學,台北市。
龍冬陽、李建國(1996)。商業環境設計。設計雜誌,69,56-59。
蘇宗雄(1988)。文字造型與文字編排。台北:檸檬黃出版社。
Allen, G.L. (1999), "Spatial abilities, cognitive maps, and wayfinding – bases for individual differences in spatial cognition and behavior", in Golledge, R.G. (Eds),Wayfinding Behavior – Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 46-80.
Arthur, P., & Passini, R. (1992). Wayfinding: People, signs and architecture. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
Carpman, J. R., Grant, M., and Simmons, D. A. 1984. No more mazes: Research about design for wayfinding in hospitals. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Hospitals.
Chen, J. L., & Stanney, K. M. (1999). A theoretical model of wayfinding in virtual environments: Proposed strategies for navigation aiding. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 8(6), 671-685.
Conroy, R. A. (2001). Wayfinding in the real and virtual world. In Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments. Department of architecture (pp. 23-48).London: University College London.
Downs R.M., (1979). Mazes, Minds and Maps, in Sign Systems for Libraries, D. Pollet et al.eds. New York: R.R.Bowker, 19.
Downs,R.J., and Stea, D., (1973). Cognitive Maps and Spatial Behavior. Image and Environment, 8-26. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Elvins, T. T. (1997). Virtually lost in virtual worlds - wayfinding without a cognitive map. Computer Graphics, 31(3), 15-17.
Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1980). "Verbal reports as data". Psychological Review 87 (3): 215–251
Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Evans, G., Fellons J., Zorm, M., & Doty, K. (1980). Cognitive Mapping and Architecture. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 474-478.
Garcia, M. L. and Caldera, C. I. (1996). The effect of color and typeface on the readability of on-line text, Computers Industrial Engineering, 31(2), 519-524.
Gibson, E.J., (1969), Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development,Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gluck, M., (1991). ‘Making Sense of Human Wayfinding: Review of Cognitive and Linguistic Knowledge for Personal Navigation with a New Research Direction’. In: Mark, D. M. and Frank, A. U. eds.: Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space, NATO ASI Series. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 117–135.
Golledge, R.G. (1999), "Human wayfinding and cognitive maps", in Golledge, R.G. (Eds),Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 5-45.
Huang, J.T. & Wang, M.Y., (1992), From unit to Gestalt: Perceptual dynamics in recognizing Chinese characters, in Chen, H.C & Tzeng, O.J.L., Language Processing In Chinese, 3-35.
ISO 9241-11 (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) —Part 11: Guidance on Usability.
Ju, R.H.; Jou, I.C.; & Tsay, M.K. (1992). Global study on data compression techniques for digital Chinese character patterns, IEE Proceedings-e, 139(1),1-8.
Kingery, D., & Furuta, R. (1997). Skimming electronic newspaper headlines: a study of typeface, point size, screen resolution and monitor size. Information Processing and Management, 33(5), 685-696.
Lavie. T. & Tractinsky, N. (2004), Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60(3), 269-298.
Lynch, K., (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McLendon, C. B. & Blackistone, M. (1982). Signage – Graphic Communications in the Built World. New York : Mcgraw-Hill.
Nielsen, J. (1993).Usability engineering. San Diego, CA:Academic Press:224
Nigel, B. & Miles, M. (1994) Usability measurement in context. Behaviour and Information Technology, 13, 132-145.
O'Neill, M. J. (1991). Effects of signage and floor plan configuration on wayfinding accuracy. Environment and Behavior, 23(5), 553-574.
Preece, J. Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Ridenour, A. (2000). Wayfinding gets you there. Facilities Design & Management, 19(3), 43-58.
Sanders, M.S., & McCormick, E.J. (1992). Human Factors in Engineering and Design, 7th Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New Yo rk.
Sims, M. (1991). Sign Design: Graphics, Materials, Technigues, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Todd Hays, (1999), Showing the way, Step - By - Step Graphics, Peoria, Vol.15, p.80-87.
Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55(4), 189-208.