1989年法蘭西斯・福山以歷史終結的論述引發關注，在歷史終結論中，福山認為自由民主意識形態將會主導未來世界的意識形態，但就現實面而言，當前的自由民主並未如預期的減少社會內部矛盾，以二十一世紀初的國際況來看，歐美國家民粹主義與極端政黨興起，阿拉伯國家至今仍舊尚未出現民主，而東亞地區的中國與新加坡的良善治理反而引起各界關注，這也不禁讓人們對歷史終結的論述產生疑問。對於這些現象，法蘭西斯・福山在二十一世紀初從國家治理層面進行探討，並從政治秩序觀點解析歐美的政治衰敗現象。此時法蘭西斯・福山對於自由民主的態度，相較於過去的樂觀而言，而言有轉趨保守之趨勢。
本研究旨在探究法蘭西斯・福山自1989年以來的政治思想，除先分析其學思歷程外，將其思想主軸歸納為三：即「自由民主：人類歷史終結之始」、「國家建構：強化治理能力之道」與「政治秩序：自由民主發展之常」。期望藉此能掌握法蘭西斯・福山政治論述的核心內涵，進而理解當代健全民主與國家治理之道。

In 1989, Francis Fukuyama is arousearoused the concern cause on “the end of history” in 1989,. on In the description of the end of history, Fukuyama think that in the future liberal democracy will dominate world ideology in the future. In factHowever, the current liberal democracy hasn’t has not reduced contradictions within of intrinsic societiesy, as he predicted. to view the international situation atIn the beginning ofearly 21st century, for example, the rise of Populism populist and Extremist extremist party parties in Europe and the United States, and democracy isn’t come out difficult to develop in Arabian Countrycountries; , Instead of the Instead, authoritarianism’ good governance of China and Singapore in the East Asia region draws world's attention, and. these These situation examples let people rethink that whether the end of history is end correct or not. For To explain these phenomena, in 21st century Francis Fukuyama starting started from state governance side to discussed, and analyzed the phenomenon of political decay in Europe and the United States by fromin the perspective of political order. At In this time, Francis Generally speaking, Fukuyama's attitude toward liberal democracy has a tendency to become conservative compared to the past optimismwas become more conservative than before.
The purpose of this study is to explore the political thoughts of Fukuyama since 1989. In addition to analyzing the course of his thoughts, his main axis of thought is divided into three: "Liberal Democracy: The Beginning of the End of Human History", "National Building: The Road to Strengthen Governance”, and "Political Order: The Normality of Liberal Democracy." It is hoped that we can grasp the core connotation of Francis Fukuyama's political discourse and understand the way of modern sound democracy and state governance.

一、中文文獻
王連喜(1998)，《黑格爾歷史哲學》，廣州市：廣東人民出版社。
王謙、李昌麟、林賢治等譯，David Potter, David Goldbalt, Margaret Kiloh etc.著(2000)，《民主化的歷程》，臺北市：韋伯文化。
包剛升(2015)，〈“福山的菜單”與政治現代化的邏輯—評《政治秩序與政治衰朽》〉，《開放時代》，第3期，頁214-223。
江亮演、賴保禎、張德聰、紀俊臣(1986)，《社會科學概論》，臺北市：商鼎數位。
江宜樺、林建甫、林國明(2004)，《社會科學通論》，臺北市：國立臺灣大學出版中心。
朱謙之(1936)，《黑格爾的歷史哲學》(一冊)，上海：商務印書館。
朱浤源(2010)，《撰寫博碩士論文實戰手冊》，新北市：中正書局。
朱榮智、危芷芬、吳天泰、吳新興 等(2011)，《社會科學概論》，臺北市：五南圖書。
朱雲漢(2015)，《高思在雲：一個知識份子對二十一世紀的思考》，臺北市：遠見天下文化。
向祖文(2004)，《大國霸權主義對蘇聯解體的影響》，河南師範大學學報，第31卷第5期，頁36-37。
吳定(2013)，《公共政策辭典》，臺北市：五南圖書。
吳國卿、鄧博宸 譯， Acemoglu Daron& Robison James著(2015)，《國家為什麼會失敗：權力、富裕與貧窮的根源》(Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty)，新北市：遠足文化。
何兆武、陳啟能(2002)，《當代西方史學理論》，臺北市：五南書局。
林文謙(2009)，〈短篇書評：State Building: Governance and the World Order in the 21st Century〉，《政治科學季評》，第21期，頁19-23。
林秀雲 譯，Earl Babbie著(2013)，《社會科學研究方法》（The practice of social research(3th edition)），臺北市：雙葉書廊。
林文謙、傅恆德(2014)，〈世界政治中的失敗國家：概念、發展路徑及重建策略〉，《人文社會科學研究》，頁57-78。
洪瑞閔(2016)，〈極端化的法國？民族陣線的興與衰〉，《巴黎視野》，第34期，頁12-17。
秦偉、吳軍(2000)，《社會科學研究方法》，四川：人民出版社。
翁福元(2009)，《教育政策社會學：教育政策與當代思潮之對話》，臺北市：五南圖書。
徐浩、侯建新(2001)，《當代西方史學流派》，臺北市：昭明出版社。
徐崇溫(2012)，〈新自由主義與國際金融危機〉，《毛澤東鄧小平理論研究》，第4期。
陳思賢 譯，Andrew Heywood 著(2009)，《政治的意識型態》，臺北市：五南圖書。
陳瑋鴻(2011)，〈從歷史終結到秩序的開端：福山新著《政治秩序的諸種起源》〉，《思想》，第18期，頁341-345。
陳義彥、吳重禮、冷則剛、高永光 等(2018)，《政治學》，臺北市：五南圖書。
郭豫斌(2007)，《圖解世界史—現代卷》，臺中市：知己圖書。
郭豫斌(2007)，《圖解世界史—近代卷（上）》，臺中市：知己圖書。
夏傳位(2014)，〈新自由主義是什麼？三種觀點的比較研究〉，《臺灣社會學》，第27期，頁141-166。
張亞中、左正東、陳欣之(2011)，《國際關係總論》，新北市：揚智文化。
張芳全(2012)，〈教育、經濟發展與政治民主之關聯研究：跨時間數列的探索〉，《教育研究與發展期刊》，第8卷 第3期，頁123-162。
閻學通、孫學峰(2001)，《國際關係研究實用方法》，北京：人民出版社。
楊日青、李培元、林文斌、劉兆隆 譯，Andrew Heywood著(2009)，《Heywood’s 政治學新論》，新北市：韋伯文化。
楊永明(2010)，《國際關係》，新北市：前程文化。
楊永明(2017)，《補上一堂國際關係課》，臺北市：捷徑文化。
楊茹涵(2012)，〈戰爭、人性與政治秩序：威廉・高汀《蒼蠅王》的政治解讀〉，東吳大學政治學系碩士論文(未出版)。
鄭維東(2002)，《政治秩序的建構：儒家政治文化與政治穩定》吉林：吉林人民出版社。
薛華(1987)，《黑格爾對歷史終點的理解》，新北市：谷風出版社。
謝維敏 譯，William J. Dobson 著(2014)，《獨裁者的進化—收編、分化、假民主》，新北市：左岸文化。
魏柏高(2016)，〈歷史終結後的福山〉，《政治科學季評》，第49期，頁1-6。
羅秋立(2009)，〈論政治理性主義視閾中的“歷史終結論”－福山政治哲學方法論研究〉，《河南大學學報》，第49卷第6期，頁62-68。
關中(2005)，《意識型態和美國外交政策》，新北市：臺灣商務。
蘇慶軒(2008)，〈國家建制與白色恐怖：五〇年代初期臺灣政治案件形成之原因〉，國立臺灣大學政治學系碩士論文(未出版)。
二、英文文獻
Carothers, Thomas (2007), The “Sequencing” Fallacy, Journal of Democracy, Vol.18, No.1, pp. 12-27.
Doh, Chull Shin & June Kim Hannah(2017), Liberal Democracy as the End of History: Western Theories versus Eastern Asian Realities, Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, Vol.2, No.2, pp.133-153.
Faraji, Farbod and Mitul Bhat (2010), A Conversation with Dr. Francis Fukuyama, Dimensions of Exploitation, Vol.12, No.1, pp. 43-46.
Fukuyama, Francis (1989), The End of History? , The National Interest, Vol.16, summer, pp. 3-18.
Fukuyama, Francis (1989-1990), A Reply to My Critics, The National Interest, Vol.18, Winter, pp. 21-28.
Fukuyama, Francis (1991), Liberal Democracy as a Global Phenomenon, Political Science and Politics, Vol.24, No.4, pp. 659-664.
Fukuyama, Francis (1992), The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Free Press).
Fukuyama, Francis (1995),Francis Fukuyama, Reflections on the End of History, Five Years Later, History and Theory, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp.27-43.
Fukuyama, Francis (1999), Second Thoughts: the End of History 10 Years Later, New Perspective Quarterly, Vol.16, Summer, pp.40-42.
Fukuyama, Francis (2001), Social Capital, Civil Society and Development, Third World Quarterly, Vol.22, No.1, pp. 7-20.
Fukuyama, Francis (2004), State Building: Governance and the World Order in the 21st Century (New York: Cornell University Press).
Fukuyama, Francis (2004), The Imperative of State-Building, Journal of Democracy, Vol.15, No.2, pp. 17-31.
Fukuyama, Francis (2004), Why There Is No Science of Public Administration, Journal of International Affair, Vol. 58, No.1, pp.189-201.
Fukuyama, Francis (2004), The Neoconservative Moment, The National Interest, Summer, No. 76, pp.57-68.
Fukuyama, Francis (2005), “Stateness” First, Journal of Democracy, Vol.16, No.1, pp. 84-88.
Fukuyama, Francis (2007), Liberalism versus State-building, Journal of Democracy, Vol.18, No.3, pp. 10-13.
Fukuyama, Francis (2010), Transitions to the Rule of Law, Journal of Democracy, Vol.21, No. 1, pp. 31-44.
Fukuyama, Francis (2011), Is There a Proper Sequence in Democratic Transitions? , Current History, Vol.110, Issue.739, pp.308-310.
Fukuyama, Francis (2012), The Origins of Political Order: from Prehuman Times to French Revolution (New York: Farrer, Straus and Giroux).
Fukuyama, Francis (2012), The Patterns of History, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 23, No.1, pp. 14-26.
Francis Fukuyama (2012), The Future of History, Foreign Affairs, Vol.91, No.1, pp. 53-61.
Fukuyama, Francis (2013), The “End of History” 20 Years Later, New Perspectives Quarterly, Vol.30, No.4, pp.31-39.
Fukuyama, Francis (2013), Democracy and the Quality of the State, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 23, No.1, pp. 5-16.
Fukuyama, Francis (2015), Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy (New York: Farrer, Straus and Giroux).
Fukuyama, Francis (2015), Why Democracy Performing so Poorly?, Journal of Democracy, Vol.26, No.1, 2015, pp. 11-20.
Grotenhuis, René (2016), Nation-Building as Necessary Effort in Fragile States (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).
Huntington, Samuel P. (1993), The Clash of Civilization?, Foreign Affairs, Vol.72, No.3, pp. 22-49.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1996), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon ＆ Schuster Paperbacks).
Huntington, Samuel P. (1998), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).
Heywood, Andrew (2004), Political Theory: An Introduction (Third Edition) (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
James, Piazza (2008), Do Failing State Promote Transnational Terrorism?, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 52, No.3, pp. 469-488.
Knutsen, Torbjørn (1991), Answered Prayers: Fukuyama, Liberalism and the End-of-History Debate, Bulletin of Peace Proposal, Vol.22, No.1, pp. 77-85.
Kurlantzick, Joshua (2013), Democracy in Retreat: The Revolt of the Middle Class and the Worldwide Decline of Representative Government (New Haven: Yale University Press).
Kuhner, Timothy K. (2016), The Corruption of Liberal and Socialist Democracy, Fordham Law Review, Vol.84, pp. 2453-2476.
Lipset, Seymour M. (1960), Political Man (New York: Doubleday).
McNeill, William H.(1999), A World History (Oxford University Press).
Moore, Barrington (1966), Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (Boston: Beacon Press).
Neil, Fantom & Serajuddin Umar (2016), Policy Research Working Paper 7528: The World Bank’s Classification of Countries by Income (World Bank Group).
Nelson, Hank (2004), The State of Francis Fukuyama (Canberra: State Society and Governance in Melanesia, Research School for Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University).
Piketty, Thomas (2014), Capital in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge, M.A.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).
Puddington, Arch (2018), Democracy in Crisis: Freedom in the World 2018, pp.1-20.
Puddington, Arch and Sarah Repucci (2018), Democracy Beleaguered, Journal of Democracy, Vol.29, No.2, pp. 128-142.
Rosa, Brooks (2005), Failed States, or the State as Failure?, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol.72, No. 4, pp.1159-1196.
Rosecrance, Richard (2005), Review: State Building: Governance and the World Order in the 21st Century, Political Science Quarterly, Vol.120, No.2, pp. 307-308.
Rothstein, Bo (2009), Creating Political Legitimacy Electoral Democracy Versus Quality of Government, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp.311-330.
三、網路資源
夏逸平，〈歷史終結了嗎？對權力與善的反思〉，《哲學》，2017，https://philosophy.hk01.com/channel/%E6%80%9D%E6%BD%AE%20AVANT-GARDE/85938/%E6%AD%B7%E5%8F%B2%E7%B5%82%E7%B5%90%E4%BA%86%E5%97%8E%EF%BC%9F%E5%B0%8D%E6%AC%8A%E5%88%A9%E8%88%87%E5%96%84%E7%9A%84%E5%8F%8D%E6%80%9D，檢索日期：2018/4/1。
曹起瞳，〈被誤解的福山：政治秩序及其衰敗〉，端傳媒，2015, https://theinitium.com/article/20151023-opinion-francis-fukuyama-political-order-political-decay-caoqitong/，檢索日期：2018/4/1。
CONTEMPORARY THINKERS, Allan Bloom, http://contemporarythinkers.org/allan-bloom/introduction/，檢索日期：2018/4/23。
Francis Fukuyama, Our Post-human Future,2002, https://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/05/books/chapters/our-posthuman-future.html，檢索日期：2018/3/4。
George Lowery，Fukuyama '74 speaks at democracy panel Nov. 18，cornell chronicle，2014，http://news.cornell.edu/stories/2014/11/fukuyama-74-speaks-democracy-panel-nov-18，檢索日期：2018/3/4。
Johns hopkins university，Francis Fukuyama， https://www.sais-jhu.edu/faculty/fukuyama/，檢索日期：2018/3/4。
Linda Koffmar, This year’s Johan Skytte Prize winner announced, Uppsala University, 2015, http://www.uu.se/en/media/press-releases/press-release/?id=2684&area=3,8&typ=pm&lang=en,檢索日期：2018/4/1。
Nicholas Wade，A Dim View of a 'Posthuman Future'，The New York Times，2002，http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/02/science/a-dim-view-of-a-posthuman-future.html，檢索日期：2018/3/4。
The University of Chicago, Nathan Tarcov, Political Science, https://political-science.uchicago.edu/directory/nathan-tarcov, 檢索日期2018/4/1。
The John M. Olin Center for Inquiry into the Theory and Practice of Democracy, The Decline of the West?, 2000, http://olincenter.uchicago.edu/declinewest.html,檢索日期：2018/3/29。
The World Bank Group Guidance for Supporting State- Building in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States: A Tool-Kit,2012, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PUBLICSECTORANDGOVERNANCE/Resources/285741-1343934891414/8787489-1347032641376/SBATGuidance.pdf, 檢索日期：2018/6/3。