研究生: |
莊潔 Chuang, Chien |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
學校環境教育人員工作職責與專業素養內涵探究 A Study on Tasks and Competencies of Environmental Education Personnel in Elementary and Secondary Schools in Taiwan |
指導教授: |
張子超
Chang, Tzu-Chau |
口試委員: |
林明瑞
Lin, Ming-Ray 王順美 Wang, Shun-Mei 張育傑 Chang, Yu-Jie 高翠霞 Kao, Trai-shar 張子超 Chang, Tzu-Chau |
口試日期: | 2022/07/15 |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
環境教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Environmental Education |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 233 |
中文關鍵詞: | 正規教育體系環境教育 、學校環境教育人員 、工作職責 、專業素養內涵 、職能分析 |
英文關鍵詞: | formal environmental education, school environmental education personnel, tasks, competencies, competency analysis |
研究方法: | 調查研究 、 紮根理論法 、 文件分析法 、 內容分析法 、 半結構式訪談法 、 焦點團體法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201150 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:168 下載:16 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
教育工作者是引領學生邁向友善環境與永續生活方式的關鍵角色,因此,提升人員的專業素養為推動環境教育之必要路徑。我國環境教育法執行已逾十年,累積數量可觀的認證環境教育人員,尤其以學校單位所屬環教人員比例最高。然而目前正規體系環教人員缺乏專業素養發展指引,應進一步探討以利人員專業成長,並做為人員職涯藍圖。
本研究旨在探究正規教育體系下中小學校環境教育人員的職責與專業素養內涵。以教師專業發展、成人學習、職能積木模式為理論,研究採混合設計,以紮根理論的質性研究分析方法進行職責框架的建立,再透過職能分析的流程,彙整為專業素養內涵,並以敘述性統計與IPA分析結果。研究期程自2018到2022年,分四階段進行:前導階段,以文件分析、訪談三位學者與四位資深環境教育工作者蒐集資料,彙整後透過同儕研究會議與專家諮詢會議建立初步架構;第二「確立職責」階段,透過學者專家與實務工作者共32位之三場焦點團體確認職責、工作內容架構;第三「檢核內涵」階段,邀請上述32位成員逐項檢視各層級內容,獲得修訂建議與必要性統計數據後,得出具體作為與專業素養內涵;第四調查階段,運用「學校環境教育人員專業素養內涵分析調查」問卷,調查43位中小學績優環境教育人員,獲得質性意見與統計數據,與前階段比對後修訂為「學校環境教育人員專業素養內涵分析」。
研究最終提出以下幾點結論:一、學校環境教育人員應包含行政、教學、領導三類角色;二、從個人擴及到團隊的專業素養成長;三、「有系統的規劃學校師生EE增能活動」一項應優先改善;四、「最必要專業素養內涵」應為學校環教人員優先提升項目;五、「學校環境教育人員專業素養架構」為三層級模式。研究結果可供未來學校環境教育人員自我檢核、課程規劃與政策訂定之參考,並提出未來研究主題與對象建議。
Educators play the key roles in leading students towards a sustainable lifestyle. Building capacities of educators, therefore, is the necessary path to promote environmental education. Environmental Education Act in Taiwan has been implemented for more than a decade, and a considerable number of certified environmental education personnel has accumulated. More than a half are personnel from school, but lack of professional development guidelines. Research and exploration should be undertaken to provide educators direction for development and career blueprint.
This research aims to explore the tasks and competencies of environmental educators in primary and secondary schools, with theories of professional development and competency building blocks model. With mixed method, grounded theory was used in qualitative data analysis to establish the task framework, and competencies included knowledge and skills were developed through the process of competency analysis and with the results of descriptive statistics and IPA. The study is conducted in four phases: First, collecting data from content analysis and interviews on scholars and senior educators, developing the framework of tasks of school environmental educators, then revising the framework after an expert consulting meeting. In the second stage, the tasks and work content were confirmed through tree focus group discussions with 32 experts. Third, advise of experts and senior practitioners were collecting through a verification questionnaire, then revised and developed the behavior index and competencies as framework version 3.0. In the final stage, questionnaire was applied with 43 awarded educators, then revised as version 4.0 as the result of this study.
According to the results, the research finally came up with the following conclusions: the roles of school environmental educators are not limited to administration and teaching; school environmental education should be promoted by teams; “Planning EE activities systematically for teachers and students’ environmental literacy” should be prioritized for improvement; "most necessary competencies" for school environmental educators should be prioritized for professional development; three levels of "competency framework for school environmental educators" are proposed. The research results can be used as a reference for future self-assessment, policy formulation and professional development curriculum planning.
一、中文文獻
丁一顧、王孝維(2018)。後教師專業發展評鑑時期教師專業學習之省思與展望:工作嵌入式專業學習的觀點。教育研究月刊,293,4-17。
王喜青、周儒(2020)。探索臺灣環境學習中心教師專業能力及其影響因素。科學教育學刊,28(1),49-73。DOI:10.6173/CJSE.202003_28(1).0003
王喜青、林慧年、周儒、陳維立(2011)。林務局自然教育中心環境教育教師專業職能表現及成長需求初探。環境教育研究,9(1),79-108。
王順美(2001)。綠色學校與環境教育。於張子超(編)環境教育課程設計,頁177-198。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
王順美(2004)。社會變遷下的環境教育--綠色學校計畫。師大學報,49(1),159-170。
王順美(2004)。臺灣中等學校環境教育指標建構之研究。環境教育研究,2(1),25。
王順美(2009)。教育:綠色學校的實踐-能源教育主題為例。於 蘇慧貞(編)永續校園營造指南,247-267。臺北市:教育部。擷取自永續校園資訊網:https://www.esdtaiwan.edu.tw/ESDguide.asp
王順美(2020)。實作為基礎的師培環境教育課程之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,13(1),27-52。
王順美、梁明煌(2004)。綠色學校夥伴網路計畫。教師天地,132,22-28。
王懋雯、林勇成、徐榮崇、許仁利、魏雪玲(2015)。台灣生態學校。國教新知, 62(4),32-50。
王麗雲、潘慧玲(2000)。教師彰權益能的概念與實施策略。教育研究集刊,44,173-199。
朱惠芳(2007)。台北縣環境教育輔導團發展歷程探討。2007年兩岸四地環境教育研討會論文集。北京,第110-118頁。
行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(2013)。職能發展及應用推動要點。臺北:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。
行政院環境保護署(1997)。加強學校環境教育三年實施計畫。行政院環保署暨教育部86.12.15(86)環署綜字第78149 號及台(86)環字第86125919 號函核定。
行政院環境保護署(2016)。國家環境教育行動方案。中華民國 105 年 8 月 17 日行政院備查 (院臺環字第 1050034341 號函)
何昕家、吳志忠、杜士豪、周駿逸、許浩哲、江虹儀(2021年10月16-17日)。探討疫情下的環境教育學習趨勢改變-以瑪寶線上冒險趣為例(口頭發表)。載於中華民國環境教育學會、台北市立大學地球環境暨生物資源學系環境教育與資源碩士班(主編),2021年中華民國環境教育學術暨實務交流國際研討會-暖化世界下的永續行動研討會議手冊(頁327-329)。
吳鈴筑(2018)。臺灣環境教育政策與立法影響之研究。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所博士論文。臺北:未出版。
李佳蓉(2017)。從知識移轉觀論 TPACK 之不足。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(1),頁 141-148。
李茂榮(2011)。工作場所成人學習研究新進展。教育學術月刊,2011: 11,84-87。
周雅容(1997)。焦點團體法在調查研究上的應用。調查研究, 3, 51-73.
周儒(2000)。行動研究與教師環境教育能力之發展。台灣教育,589,22-28頁。
周儒、蔡慧敏、王喜青(2006)。探索國家公園解說員環境教育與環境解說專業成長需求與課程架構。國家公園學報,16(2),頁61-83。
林明瑞(主編)(2016)。全國性環境教育卓越發展指引。行政院環境保護署委託研究計畫。臺中市:國立臺中教育大學。
林韋伶(2008)環保有功小學推展環境教育模式之探討--以民國91-96年為例。臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文。臺北市:未出版。
邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例解析(第五版)。臺北市:五南。
晏涵文(2001)。教育改革與環境教育。於張子超(編)環境教育課程設計,頁27-47。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
高文彬(2012)。人力資源發展-職能基礎觀點。臺北:雙葉。
高翠霞(2015)。學校環境教育人員認證展延意願及研習需求。國教新知,62(4),3-13。doi: 10.6701/TEEJ.201512_62(4).0001
高翠霞、高慧芬(2004)。臺灣地區國小環境教育指標系統探究。環境教育研究,1(2),71-104。
高翠霞、高慧芬、林吟霞、張育傑(2020)。環境教育法實施後,環境教育場域主要要素、機制、策略、績效(含:環境教育人員、參與者、課程、方案、場域經營、資源整合等)整體優化之整合型計畫-我國「環境教育人員」認證展延專業發展輔導系統建置—運用Competency模型與DACUM理論規畫,科技部補助專題研究計畫報告(MOST105-2511-S845-006-MY3),臺北市:臺北市立大學學習與媒材設計學系。
高翠霞、高慧芬、范靜芬(2014)。「環境教育人員」之專業職能初探。環境教育研究,10(2),51-72。
高翠霞、高慧芬、莊潔(出版中)。環境教育人員核心能力之探究。環境教育研究,18(1)。
高翠霞、高慧芬、林吟霞、張育傑(2020)。環境教育法實施後,環境教育場域主要要素、機制、策略、績效(含:環境教育人員、參與者、課程、方案、場域經營、資源整合等)整體優化之整合型計畫-我國「環境教育人員」認證展延專業發展輔導系統建置—運用Competency模型與DACUM理論規畫,科技部補助專題研究計畫報告(MOST105-2511-S845-006-MY3)。臺北市:臺北市立大學學習與媒材設計學系。
高翠霞、張子超(2016)。環境教育的發展脈絡與融入十二年國教的方法。課程與教學季刊,19(2),27-51。
高翠霞、張育傑、高慧芬(2022)。我國「環境教育人員」職能分析、專業發展與培訓體系之研究—運用iCAP職能模式建構,科技部計畫成果報告(MOST109-2511-H845-004),臺北市:臺北市立大學學習與媒材設計學系。
高翠霞、蔡崇建(2017)。環境教育法實施後主要環境教育要素及機制整體優化之研究-我國「環境教育人員」職能評估系統與認證指標之建立,科技部補助專題研究計畫報告(MOST 102-2511-S-845-001-MY3),臺北市:臺北市立大學教育學系。
張世璿、丁一顧(2016)。國民小學教師領導核心能力指標建構之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,33(1),1-38。
張巧昀、王喜青(2021年10月16-17日)。從實體到線上的轉變歷程-以東眼山自然教育中心暑期營隊「巨人之森歷險記」為例(口頭發表)。載於中華民國環境教育學會、台北市立大學地球環境暨生物資源學系環境教育與資源碩士班(主編),2021年中華民國環境教育學術暨實務交流國際研討會-暖化世界下的永續行動研討會議手冊(頁330-331)。
張新仁、邱上真、王瓊珠(2008)。中小學教師評鑑標準之理論與研究基礎。載於潘慧玲(主編),教師評鑑理論與實務,頁20-50。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心。
張德銳(2013)。教師專業發展評鑑的檢討與展望:實踐本位教師學習的觀點。教育資料與研究,108,1-30。
張德銳(2017)。專業發展導向教師評鑑的意義、目標與運作過程。於張德銳、李俊達(編),專業發展導向教師評鑑:理論與實務,頁1-11。臺北市:五南。
張德銳、高紅瑛、康心怡(2010)。教學專業發展評鑑系統實務手冊與研究。臺北市,五南。
教育部(2011)。聽!校園裡的綠色樂章:教育部環保小組20年回顧與展望。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2012)。中華民國師資培育白皮書。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2016a)。中華民國教師專業標準指引。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2021)。110年教育部永續循環校園--探索及示範計畫。臺北市:作者。
教育部資訊及科技教育司(2014)。教育部環境教育人員認證指引手冊。臺北市:作者。
莊潔、高翠霞(2021)。2011-2020年環境教育人員認證展延分析。環境教育研究,17(1),1-48。dio: 10.6555/JEER.17.1.001
許毅璿(2021)。以未來觀點看現在世界:教育部「新世代環境教育發展(NEED)」。教育部環境教育政策推動專案計畫-教育部110年11月19日綠色學校夥伴網路平臺回應委員工作坊,教育部新世代環境教育發展四年策略地圖講座。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南。
陳進春、鄭百成、曾瑞譙(2008)。重視度表現值分析法在發展教師教學效能上的應用。測驗統計年刊,16,85-92。DOI: 10.6773/JRMS.200812.0010
勞動部勞動力發展署(2013) 職能基準發展指引。新北市:作者。iCAP職能發展應用平台http://icap.wda.gov.tw/
黃富順(2002)。成人學習。臺北市,五南。
黃富順(2010)。成人教育導論。臺北市,五南。
黃嘉莉、陳學志、王俊斌、洪仁進(2020)。師資職前教師專業素養與課程基準之建構及其運用。教育科學研究期刊,65(2),1-35。
楊冠政(1997)。環境教育。臺北市:明文。
楊崇德(2017)。國小施行戶外教育之問題與因應。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(7),頁 164-166。
楊嵐智、莊潔、高翠霞(2021年10月16-17日)。中日美環境教育人員認證展延之比較研究(口頭發表)。載於中華民國環境教育學會、台北市立大學地球環境暨生物資源學系環境教育與資源碩士班(主編),2021年中華民國環境教育學術暨實務交流國際研討會-暖化世界下的永續行動研討會議手冊(頁175-176)。
葉欣誠(2017)。探討環境教育與永續發展教育的發展脈絡,環境教育研究,13(2),67-109。Doi: 10.6555/JEER.13.2.67
齊祿禎(2007)。國小環境教育課程實施與環境教育輔導團運作現況研究—以臺北市永續校園夥伴學校為例。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所課程領導與管理碩士學位在職進修專班碩士論文。臺北市:未出版。
劉冠妙、李詩雯、蔡佾昇、葉冠妤、洪暐筑、潘偉翔(2021年10月16-17日)。疫情下推動環境教育的困境與突破~以羅東自然教育中心線上課程為例(口頭發表)。載於中華民國環境教育學會、台北市立大學地球環境暨生物資源學系環境教育與資源碩士班(主編),2021年中華民國環境教育學術暨實務交流國際研討會-暖化世界下的永續行動研討會議手冊(頁334-337)。
潘慧玲(主編)(2003)。教育研究的取鏡:概念與應用。臺北市:高等教育。
潘慧玲(主編)(2008)。教育評鑑理論與實務。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心。
賴春金、李隆盛(2011)。職能分析的方法與選擇。T&D 飛訊,114。國家文官學院。
環保署環境保護人員訓練所(2014)。環境教育人員核心科目及專業領域120小時訓練架構。https://www.epa.gov.tw/training/782C0D29B72AF2CF
謝馥蔓(2017)。我國職能基準發展現況、趨勢與應用。工業安全衛生月刊,1,9-16。
二、英文文獻
Alkaher, I. & Gan, D. (2020). The role of school partnerships in promoting education for sustainability and social capital, The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(6), 416-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1711499
Andreou, N. (2020). Towards a generation of sustainability leaders: eco-schools as a global green schools movement for transformative education. In: Gough A., Lee J.CK., Tsang E.P.K. (eds.) Green schools globally. international explorations in outdoor and environmental education, (pp. 31-45) Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46820-0_3
Arbuthnott, K. D., Sutter, G. C., Belcher, J. & Stewart, S. (2022). There’s nothing like the real thing: nature connection and emotion in outdoor and online songs for nature workshops, Environmental Education Research.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2074377
Ayers, W. (2014). Teaching the personal and the political: Essays on hope and justice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Beery, T. (2020). What we can learn from environmental and outdoor education during COVID-19: A lesson in participatory risk management. Sustainability, 12(21), 9096. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219096
Bertschy, F., Künzli, C., & Lehmann, M. (2013). Teachers’ competencies for the implementation of educational offers in the field of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 5(12), 5067–5080. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su5125067
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Cardy, R. L. & Selvarajan, T. T. (2006). Competencies Alternative frameworks for competitive advantages. Business Horizons, 49, 235-245.
Chen, Y.-C. (2018). Applying importance-performance analysis to assess student employability in Taiwan. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 10(1), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-10-2017-0118
Conway, P.F., Murphy, R., Rath, A. & Hall, K. (2009). Learning to teach and its implications for the continuum of teacher education: A nine-country cross-national study. University College Cork and Teaching Council of Ireland.
Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Thacker, I. (2021). A comparison of perceived and observed learning from professional development: Relationships among self-reports, direct assessments, and teacher characteristics. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119899101
Cunningham, A. E., Etter, K., Platas, L., Wheeler, S., & Campbell, K. (2015). Professional development in emergent literacy: A design experiment of teacher study groups. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 31, 62-77.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E. & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
Day, C. (2017). Competence-based education and teacher professional development. In Mulder, M. (ed.) Competence-based vocational and professional education (pp. 165-182). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_8
Delamare Le Deist, F. & Winterton, J. (2005). What is competence? Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 27–46.
Evans, M.R. and Chon, K. (1989). "Formulating and evaluating tourism policy using importance-performance analysis". Hospitality Education and Research Journal, 13(3), 203-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634808901300320
Fan, S. C. (2022). An importance–performance analysis (IPA) of teachers’ core competencies for implementing maker education in primary and secondary schools. Int J Technol Des Educ, 32, 943–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09633-7
Fien, J. & Corcoran, P. B. (1996). Learning for a sustainable environment: professional development and teacher education in environmental education in the asia--pacific region. Environmental Education Research, 2(2), 227-236.
Fien, J. & Tilbury, D. (1996). Learning for a Sustainable Environment: An Agenda for Teacher Education in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok: UNESCO Principle of Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.
Fleming, M. L. (2009). Environmental Education Professional Development Needs and Priorities Study. Funded by EETAP, EPA, FWS. Retrieved from http://eeinsc.org/Files/EE/2010/needs_and_priorities.pdf
Gastel, B. & Day, R. A. (2016). How to write and publish a scientific paper (8th ed.). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98(4), 506–528.
Gonczi, A, Hager, P & Oliver, L (1990). Establishing competency-based standards in the professions, Research paper no. 1 (National Office of Overseas Skills Recognition), Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
Gough, A. (2020) Transforming Education Through Green Schools: Trials, Tribulations and Tensions. In: Gough A., Lee J.CK., Tsang E.P.K. (eds) Green Schools Globally. International Explorations in Outdoor and Environmental Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46820-0_23
Gough, N. (1992). Blueprints for greening schools: principles, policies and practices for environmental education in Australian secondary schools. Prahran, Vic. : Gould League of Victoria.
Grant, J. S. & Davis, L. L. (1997). Selection and use of content experts for instrument development, Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3<269::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hogan, C. (2000). Facilitating empowerment: a handbook for facilitator, trainers, and individuals. Australia: Kogan Page Publications.
Hungerford, H. R. (2010) Environmental Education (EE) for the 21st Century: Where have we been? Where are we now? Where are we headed? Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 1-6.
Keller-Schneider, M, Zhong, H. F., & Yeung, A. S. (2020) Competence and challenge in professional development: teacher perceptions at different stages of career. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(1), 36-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2019.1708626
Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., Swanson, R., & Robinson, P. A. (2020). The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. (10th ed.) London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429299612
Krueger, R. A. (2003). 焦點團體訪談(Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research, 2nd ed.) (洪志成、廖梅花譯)。濤石文化。(原著出版於2001年)
Li, Y. & Krasny, M. E. (2019). Practice change in environmental education-lessons from professional development. Environmental Education Research, 25(7), 1119-1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1540033
Liu, S. & Phelps, G. (2020). Does teacher learning last? Understanding how much teachers retain their knowledge after professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(5), 537-550. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0022487119886290
Liu, S. Y., Yeh, S. C., Liang, S. W., Fang, W. T. & Tsai, H. M. (2015). A national investigation of teachers’ environmental literacy as a reference for promoting environmental education in Taiwan. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(2), 114-132.
Lombardo, M. M. & Eichinger, R. W. (1996). The Career Architect Development Planner (1st ed.). Minneapolis: Lominger.
Louws, M. L., van Veen, K., Meirink, J. A., & van Driel, J. H. (2017). Teachers’ professional learning goals in relation to teaching experience. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 487-504. doi:10.1080/02619768.2017.1342241.
Marcinkowski, T.J. (2010). Contemporary Challenges and Opportunities in Environmental Education: Where Are We Headed and What Deserves Our Attention? The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 34-54.
Martilla, J.A. and James, J.C. (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41, 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
Matherson, L., & Windle, T. (2017). What Do Teachers Want from Their Professional Development? Four Emerging Themes. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 83(3), 28-32.
May, T. S. (2000). Elements of Success in Environmental Education Through Practitioner Eyes. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(3), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960009598639
McCall, M. W., Lombardo, M. M., & Morrison, A. M. (1988). The lessons of experience: How successful executives develop on the job. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 28 (1), 1-24.
McDonald, J. T. & Dominguez, L. A. (2010). Professional Preparation for Science Teachers in Environmental Education. In Bodzin, A. M., Kelin, B. S., & Weaver, S. (eds.) The Inclusion of Environmental Education in Science Teacher Education, pp.17-30, Dordrecht: Springer.
Merritt, E. G., Stern, M. J., Powell, R. B. & Frensley, B. T. (2022). A systematic literature review to identify evidence-based principles to improve online environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 28(5), 674-694. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13504622.2022.2032610
Mikulić, J. and Prebežac, D. (2008). Prioritizing improvement of service attributes using impact range‐performance analysis and impact‐asymmetry analysis. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 18(6), 559-576. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520810920068
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (2005). 質性研究資料分析 (Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed.) (張芬芬譯)。雙葉。(原著出版於1994年)
Mogren, A. & Gericke, N. (2017). ESD implementation at the school organization level, part 2 – investigating the transformative perspective in school leaders’ quality strategies at ESD schools, Environmental Education Research, 23(7), 993-1014, DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2016.1226266
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.
Mujahidin, E., Syamsuddin, Nurhayati, I., Hafidhuddin, D., Bahruddin, E., & Endri, E. (2021). Importance performance analysis model for implementation in national education standards (SNPs). Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(5), 114. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0127
Mulder, M. (2017). Competence-based Vocational and Professional Education: Bridging the Worlds of Work and Education. Switzerland: Springer.
OECD (2004). Completing the foundation for lifelong learning: An OECD survey of upper secondary schools. Paris: OECD.
Oh, Haemoon. (2001). Revisiting importance–performance analysis. Tourism Management, 22(6), 617-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00036-X.
O'Neill, M.A. & Palmer, A. (2004). Importance-performance analysis: a useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880410517423
Opfer, V. D. & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407. https://doi.org/ 10.3102/0034654311413609
Palmer, J. A. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st century- Theory, practice, progress and promise. London: Routledge.
Potter, G. (2010). Environmental education for the 21st century: Where do we go now? The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 22-33. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00958960903209975
Qablan, A. (2018). Building capacities of educators and trainers. In Leicht, A., Heiss, J., & Byun, W. J. (eds) Issues and trends in Education for Sustainable Development. (pp.148-149) Paris: UNESCO.
Quay, J., Gray, T., Thomas, G., Allen-Craig, S., Asfeldt, M., Andkjaer, S., Beames, S., et al. (2020). What future/s for outdoor and environmental education in a world that has contended with COVID-19? Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 23(2), 93-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-020-00059-2
Rauch, F. & Steiner, R. (2013). Competences for education for sustainable development in teacher education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(1), 9-24.
Rubio, D. M. G., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Simmons, D.A. (2005). Developing guidelines for environmental education in the United States: The national project for excellence in environmental education. In Johnson, E. A. & Mappin, M. J. (Eds.), Environmental education and advocacy, (pp.161-183). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sleurs, W. (2008). Competencies for ESD (Education for Sustainable Development) Teachers. A Framework to Integrate ESD in the Curriculum of Teacher Training Institutes: Comenius 2.1 Project 118277-CP-1-2004-BE Comenius-C2, 1. Accessed 13 January 2016. http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/esd/inf.meeting.docs/ EGonInd/8mtg/CSCT%20Handbook_Extract.pdf
Smith, R. M. (1982). Learning how to learn: Applied learning theory for adults. Chicago: Follet.
Spalding, E., Klecka, C. L., Lin, E., Wang, J. & Odell, S.J. (2011). Learning to Teach: It's Complicated but It's not Magic. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(1),3-6.
Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superiorperformance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Sterling, S. (2010). Learning for resilience, or the resilient learner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in a paradigm of sustainable education. Environmental Education Research, 16(5-6), 511-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.505427
Stone, N. J. (2000). Exploring the relationship between calibration and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 12(4), 437–475.
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing ground theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Tai, M. K., & Kareem, O. A. (2020). Headteacher change leadership competency- a study in malaysian primary schools. Professional Development in Education, 46(2), 292-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1561494
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment:An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review, 15(4), 666-681. https://doi.org/10.2307/258687
Timm, J-M., & Barth, M. (2021). Making education for sustainable development happen in elementary schools: the role of teachers. Environmental Education Research, 27(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1813256
UNECE (2012). Learning for the future: Competences in education for sustainable development. Switzerland:United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
UNESCO (2014). Roadmap for Implementing the Global Action Program on Education for Sustainable Development. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: learning objectives. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
UNESCO (2021). Berlin Declaration on Education for Sustainable Development. https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/esdfor2030-berlin-declaration-en.pdf
UNESCO (2021). Global survey for teachers on education for sustainable development and global citizenship education. Accessed 2021/4/16 from https://survey.alchemer.eu/s3/90310926/Teachers-readiness-for-education-for-sustainable-development-and-global-citizenship
van Veen, K., Zwart, R., & Meirink, J. (2012). What makes teacher professional development effective? A literature review. In Kooy, M. & van Veen, K. (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters: International perspectives (pp. 3–21). London: Routledge.
Verhelst, D., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2021). School effectiveness for education for sustainable development (ESD) What characterizes an ESD-effective school organization. Educational Management Administration & Leadership,1-24. https://doi.org/10.11771741143220985196
Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45-66). Cambridge (State of Washington), Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
Wesselink, R. & Wals, A. E. J (2011) Developing competence profiles for educators in environmental education organisations in the Netherlands. Environmental Education Research, 17(1), 69-90.
Wilke, R. L, Peyton, R. B., & Hungerford, H. R. (1987) Strategies for the training of teachers in environmental education: a discussion guide for UNESCO training seminars on environmental education. Paris: UNESCO.
Zepeda, S. J. (2012). Instructional supervision: applying tools and concepts (3rd). New York: Routledge.
Zhou, G. (2015). Environmental pedagogical content knowledge-A conceptual framework for teacher knowledge and development. In Stratton, S. K, Hagevik, R., Feldman, A., & Bloom, M. (eds.), Educating science teachers for sustainability, pp.185-203, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16411-3_11
三、日文文獻
谷内篤博(2002)。企業内教育の現状と今後の展望。経営論集,12(1),61-76。
後藤田洋介、粂 綾香、中澤静男(2018)。ESD子どもキャンプ, 学生の学び・気づき, ESDを実践する教員に必要な資質・能力。次世代教員養成センター研究紀要,4,85-94。
環境人材育成コンソーシアム事務局 (2010)。『大学における教養科目としての「環境力」を有する T 字型人材育成プログラムガイドライン。http://fields.canpan.info/report/download?id=4502
四、網站資料
Arets, J. (2018). Five myths about the 70:20:10 reference model. Retrived from: https://702010institute.com/5-myths-702010-reference-model/
ETA (n.d.). Building blocks for competency models tiers 6-9 occupation-specific and management competencies. https://www.careeronestop.org/CompetencyModel/competency-models/pyramid-download.aspx?industry=building-blocks
The writing center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (2022). Should I Use “I”? Tips and tools. Assessed in 2022/02/08, https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/should-i-use-i/
區家欣(無日期)。疫情之下的環境教育-壽山線上暑期營隊。環境友善種子網站:https://www.friendlyseed.com.tw/service/20/portfolio/689
教育部(2011)。學校及教育部所屬機關執行環境教育法常見問答。(更新日期:100年7月7日)擷取自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2700/News_Content.aspx?n=F84C9B045D336AF4&sms=BFD0035AFA4CEA76&s=C732469A8A927660
教育部(2016b)。教師專業發展評鑑將於106學年度起轉型為教師專業發展支持系統。取自師資培育及藝術教育司2016年10月4日發布之新聞稿https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=55BD57743E88E277
教育部統計處(查詢時間:2018/12/12,資料更新日期:2018/05/23)
經建會綜合計劃處(2010)。歐盟「EUROPE 2020策略」的規劃與啟示。2012年2月9日,取自:http://www.cepd.gov.tw/dn.aspx?uid=830993_457.pdf.
鄭芬蘭(2000)。國家教育研究院教育大辭書網站-能力。引用網址: http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1308730/
五、法條與作業要點:
中等學校、國民小學教師教育學程科目及學分審核原則(2012 年 05 月 21 日公布,2017年06月17日廢止)
中華民國戶外教育宣言(2014年6月26日)
中華民國教師專業素養指引-師資職前教育階段暨師資職前教育課程基準(2021年5月4日)
高級中等以下學校教師專業發展評鑑規準(105年版)(2016年4月25日臺教師(三)字第1050040254號函發布)
國民中小學辦理戶外教育實施原則(2018年08月03日)臺教授國部字第1070086116號。
補助大專校院開設環境永續發展通識課程及學分學程作業要點 (臺教資(六)字第160071104B號)
學校人員申請環境教育人員認證之研習時數認定原則(2012年3月14日)。
環境教育人員認證及管理辦法(2013年10月17日)。
環境教育法(2010年6月5日)。
環境教育認證審查小組設置要點(2011年6月5日)。