簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 徐郁昇
Hsu, Yu-Sheng
論文名稱: 混成式數位學習對高職電工機械之認知、技能、情意之影響效果
The Effects of Blended Learning on Electrical-Machinery Course of Vocational High School Student's Cognitive, Skill, and Affective
指導教授: 張基成
Chang, Chi-Cheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技應用與人力資源發展學系
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 58
中文關鍵詞: 混成式數位學習自我覺知效果電工機械學習成效
英文關鍵詞: Blended learning, Self-perceived effect, Electrical-machinery, Learning effect
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:242下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究目的為探討混成式數位學習對電工機械的學習成效(包括學習成就與自我覺知效果)之影響。實驗對象為高職電機科二年級學生修習「電工機械」課程的兩班學生,實驗組學生三十三名與控制組三十二名。實驗組為混成式數位學習,控制組為傳統式學習,實施時間為期五週。結果顯示:ㄧ、混成式數位學習對於學生的學習成就無顯著影響。二、與傳統式學習相較之下,混成式數位學習對於學生的自我覺知效果有正面影響,達顯著的面向為認知最高,技能次之。三、接受混成式數位學習的學生在前、後「自我覺知效果(認知、技能、情意)」上有顯著差異。

    This study examined the impact of Blended learning on electrical machinery learning, as measured by both learning achievement and self-perceived effects. The subjects were two classes of second-year vocational high school students who takes electrical-machinery course in the department of Electrical Technology. There were 33 students in an experimental group and 32 students in a control group. The experimental group used Blended learning and the control group used traditional learning. The experiment lasted for 5 weeks. The results were as follows: (1) Blended learning had no impact on learning achievement. (2) Compares with the traditional learning, Blended learning had a significant impact on self-perceived effects. These effects ranked in decreasing order of importance which are cognitive and skill. (3) There was a significant difference in self-perceived effect (cognitive, skill, and affective) for experimental group.

    謝 誌 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 目 錄 iv 表 次 vi 圖 次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 3 第三節 研究限制 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 混成式數位學習之定義 5 第二節 混成式數位學習之特性 6 第三節 混成式數位學習之活動設計 7 第四節 混成式數位學習效果之評估 10 第五節 學習成效 14 第六節 混成式數位學習之相關研究 16 第三章 研究設計與實施 17 第一節 研究架構 17 第二節 研究方法 18 第三節 實驗教學與流程 20 第四節 研究對象 26 第五節 研究工具與信效度 27 第四章 研究結果與討論 30 第一節 不同學習方式對學習成就之影響分析 30 第二節 不同學習方式對自我覺知效果之影響分析 32 第三節 綜合討論 36 第五章 研究結論與建議 38 第一節 結論 38 第二節 建議 39 參考文獻 41 一、中文部分 41 二、西文部份 42 附 錄 47 附錄一 成就測驗之項目分析、難度、鑑別度摘要表 48 附錄二 成就測驗之試題難度、鑑別度與內容分析表 50 附錄三 自我覺知效果項目分析摘要表 51 附錄四 自我覺知效果因素分析摘要表 52 附錄五 電工機械之成就測驗 53 附錄六 電工機械自我覺知效果量表 57

    一、中文部分
    尹玫君、劉世雄(2005)。資訊科技融入教學的學習相關影響因素之研究。當代教育研究,13(2),109-137。
    吳明隆、涂金堂(2008)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北:五南。
    汪冠宏、劉明洲(2010)。以網路虛擬實習工場促進高職學生自我效能之研究。數位學習科技期刊,2(1),45-59。
    林甘敏、陳年興、方國定(2005)。結合傳統與網路教學和純網路教學在學習成效與班級氣氛之比較。當代教育研究,13(4),133-166。
    林凱胤、楊子瑩、王國華(2009)。融入混成學習與知識移轉策略實習輔導模式之成效評估。科學教育學刊,17(4),293-318。
    張春興(2001)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北:東華。
    張基成、周保男(2006)。能力本位網路學習系統之發展、實施與成效評估。科學教育學刊,14(2),209-235。
    張基成、彭星瑞(2008)。網路化檔案評量於國中電腦課程之使用及成效。師大學報:科學教育類,53(2),31-57。
    郭生玉(2001)。心理與教育研究法(十五版)。臺北:精華。
    陳年興、林甘敏(2002)。網路學習之學習行為與學習成效分析。資訊管理學報,8(2),121-133。
    陳怡真、徐新逸(2007)。技能領域數位學習教學設計原則之探討。教學科技與媒體,82,101-112。
    游光昭、徐昊杲、顏銘宏(2006)。技能模擬學習系統之建置與評估。教學科技與媒體,77,51-66。
    謝尚賢(2004)。應用網路輔助教學於土木工程教育之實例研究。國立臺灣大學工程學刊,92,43-55。
    職業訓練數位學習網(2009)。行政院勞委會職訓局-職業訓練數位學習網。2009年12月1日,取自http://el.evta.gov.tw/。

    二、西文部份
    Akkoyunlu, B., & Yilmaz-Soylu, M. (2008). Development of a scale on learners' views on blended learning and its implementation process. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 26-32.
    Alshwiah, A. (2009). The effects of a blended 1earning strategy in teaching vocabulary on premedical students' achievement, satisfaction and attitude toward English language. Unpublished master's thesis, Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain.
    Baldwin-Evans, K. (2006). Key steps to implementing a successful blended learning strategy. Industrial and Commercial Training, 38(3), 156-163.
    Bersin, J. (2004). The blended learning book: Best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
    Bielawski, L., & Metcalf, D. (2005) Blended eLearning: integrating knowledge, performance support, and online learning (2nd ed.). Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
    Bolliger, D. U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Keys factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61-67.
    Bonk, C. J. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education. Educause Quarterly, 11(4), 22-30.
    Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspective, Local Designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
    Burgess, L. (2003). WebCT as an e-learning tool: A study of technology students’ perceptions. Journal of Technology Education, 15(1), 6-15.
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Cottrell, D. M., & Robison, R. A. (2003). Blended learning in an accounting course. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 261-269.
    Delialioglu, O. & Yildirim, Z. (2008). Design and development of a technology enhanced hybrid instruction based on MOLTA model: Its effectiveness in comparison to traditional instruction. Computers & Education, 51(1), 474-483.
    Futch, L. S. (2005). A study of blended learning at a metropolitan research university. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida, FL.
    Garrison, D. M., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. Internet & Higher Education, 10(1), 53-64.
    Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2009). Evaluating the quality of e-learning at the degree level in the student experience of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 652-663.
    Gülbahar, Y., & Madran, R. (2009). Communication and collaboration, satisfaction, equity, and autonomy in blended learning environments: A Case from Turkey. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2), 117-138.
    Hu, P. J., Hui, W., Clark, T. H. K., Milton, J., Ma, W., & Tam, K. Y. (2005). Examining e-learning effectiveness, outcomes and learning style: A longitudinal field experiment. Paper presented at the Meeting of Pacific Asia Conference on Information System. Thailand: Bangkok.
    Hwang, A., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2009). Seeking feedback in blended learning: competitive versus cooperative student atitudes and Their Links to Learning Outcome. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(3), 280-293.
    Karppinen, P. (2005). Meaningful learning with digital and online videos: Theoretical perspectives. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal, 13(3), 233-250.
    Kerres, M., & Witt, C. D. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 101-113.
    Kim, K. J., Bonk, C. J., & Teng, Y. T. (2009). The present state and future trends of blended learning in workplace learning settings across five countries. Asia Pacific Education, 10(3), 299-308.
    Lanham, E., & Zhou, W. (2003). Cultural issues in online learning — is blended learning a possible solution? International Journal of Computer Processing of Oriental Languages, 16(4), 275-292.
    Lee, C., Yeh, D., Kung, R., & Hsu, C. (2007). The influences of learning portfolios and attitudes on learning effects in blended e-learning for Mathematics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(4), 331-350.
    Lin, Q. (2008). Student satisfactions in four mixed courses in elementary teacher education program. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 53-59.
    Linn, R. L., & Miller, M, D. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching (9th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Motiwalla, L., & Tello, S. (2000). Distance learning on the internet: an exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(4), 253-264.
    Mouzakis, C. (2008). Teachers' perceptions of the effectiveness of a blended learning approach for ICT teacher training. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 461-482.
    Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40.
    Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426.
    Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Integrating educational technology into teaching (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
    Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: a comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), 1-13.
    Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Education and Technology, 43(6), 51-54.
    Summers, J. J., Waigandt, A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2005). A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovative Higher Education, 29(3), 233-250.
    Taradi, S. K., Taradi, M., Radic, K., & Pokrajac, N. (2005). Blending problem-based learning with Web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid-base physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 29(1), 35-39.
    Uribe, D., Klein, J. D., & Sullivan, H. (2003). The effect of computer-mediated collaborative learning on solving ill-defined problem. Educational Technology, Research and Develpment, 51(1), 5-19.
    Usta, E., & Ozdemir, S. M. (2007). An analysis of students' opinions about blended learning environment. Paper presented at the International Educational Technology (IETC) Conference, Nicosia, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.
    Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Jouranl on E-Learning, 6(1), 81-94.
    Vaughan, N. D., & Garrison, D. R. (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 1-12.
    Wakefield, A. B., Carlisle, C., Hall, A. G., & Attree M. J. (2008). The expectations and experiences of blended learning approaches to patient safty education. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(1), 54-61.
    Woods, R., Baker, J., & Hopper, D. (2004). Hybrid structures: Faculty use and perception of web-based courseware as a supplement to face-to-face instruction. Internet & Higher Education, 7(4), 281-297.

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE