本研究的目的在於發展一套評估資訊科技融入教學的線上調查系統及相關的問卷。以中小學校長、主任、資訊組長、和教師為測試對象，進行系統與問卷的測試。系統設計方面，重點在於探討系統功能的可用性和網路調查可能遭遇的困難。問卷方面，研擬了主管問卷和老師問卷，以所開發的調查系統進行線上問卷測試，重點在於探討問卷題目的適宜性。
本研究的測試結果如下：
一、系統：測試時，系統的連線、線上問卷的呈現、記錄與圖表的呈現、資料庫資料的存取等皆穩定，可確定系統運作已具穩定性。如何分析取得之資料所代表的意義，是未來需探討的議題。於測試過程中亦發現，擬以線上系統取得資料尚不易，目前在國內尚有實施的一些困難。
二、問卷：多數測試者皆可順利完成問卷，但有少數測試者覺得部分題目的題意不清。問卷題目是否能真正評估資訊科技融入教學，如何使問卷題目更本土化，配分方式如何調整，仍待未來更深入的探討。

The purpose of this study was to develop an online survey system and its related questionnaires for collecting data concerning school ICT integration. The focus was on testing the usability of the system and the questionnaires. Principals, school directors, technology coordinators, and teachers were invited to test the online survey system and the questionnaires. The results of this study are as follows:
The survey system: During the testing period, the system functioned normally. The presentation of the questionnaires, the recording of online data, the presentation of charts, and the access to the databases were quite stable. However, the issue of how to effectively analyze the obtained online data needs to be explored further in the future. Using an online survey to collect data is still facing some obstacles that require investigators consider better strategies to overcome the hurdles.
The questionnaires: Most of the participants were able to complete the questionnaires. However, some of them indicated that certain question items were not clear enough. The issue of how to construct a locally appropriate online questionnaire constitutes an important challenge for the future study.

壹、中文部分
宋曜廷、張國恩、侯惠澤(2005)。資訊科技融入教學:借鏡美國經驗，反思台
灣發展。教育研究集刊，51(1)，31-62。
高雄市教育局(2003)。高雄市政府教育局資訊教育中心各級學校資訊基礎
建設分析統計。[On-Line Available]
http://epass.kh.edu.tw/school/statistics.jsp
黃光雄、蔡清田(民88)。課程設計—理論與實際。台北：五南。
臺北市政府(2004)。「臺北市政府推動網路新都續階綱要計劃」評量指標。
[On-Line Available]
http://www.tcg.gov.tw/cgi-bin/classify/index.cgi?
class_id=%41%30%33% 2C%42%31%%39%2C%43%30%35
貳、英文部分
Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia
(2004).ProfilerPRO: Getting Groups the Knowledge They
Need. [On-Line Available] http://www.profilerpro.com/
Byrom, E., & Bingham, M. (2001). Lessons learned: Factors
influencing the effective use of technology for teaching
and learning. [On-Line Available]
http://www.seirtec.org/publications/lessons.pdf
CEO Forum (2001). Key building blocks for student
achievement in the 21st century.[On-Line Available]
http://www.ceoforum.org/downloads/report4.pdf
Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1991).
Changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology- rich classroom. Educational leadership, 48(8), 45-53.
Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teacher: A developmental
conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal,
6(2), 207-226.
Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. L. (1977).
Measuring stages of concern about the innovation：A
manual for use of the SOC questionnaire.(ERIC document
reproduction service no. ED 147342).
Hall, G. E., Loucks, S. F., & Newlove, B. W. (1975).
Measuring Level of Use of the innovation: A manual for
trainers, interviewers, and raters. Austin:Research and
Development Center for Teacher Education, University of
Texas.
IEA(2005). Second Information on Technology in Education
Study 2006. [On-Line Available]
http://www.iea.nl/sites2006.html
IEA(2005). Second Information on Technology in Education
Study 2006. [On-Line Available]
http://www.sites2006.net/exponent/index.php?section=3
ISTE(2000). ISTE National Educational Technology Standards
(NETS) and Performance Indicators for Teachers. [On-Line
Available] http://cnets.iste.org/teachers/pdf/page09.pdf
ISTE(2000). ISTE National Educational Technology Standards
for Students (NETS*S). [On-Line Available]
http://www.iste.org/netst/netst.pdf
Jones, B. F.,Valdez, G..,Nowakowski, J. & Rasmussen, C.
(1994).Excerpted and
summarized from Designing Learning and Technology for
Educational Reform.
Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation
(LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology
use. Learning & Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40-42.
North Central Regional Education Laboratory. (2000). enGauge: A framework for effective technology use. [On-Line
Available] http://www.ncrel.org/engauge/
Pelgrum, W. J., & Anderson, R. (1999). ICT and the emerging
paradigm for life long learning: A worldwide educational
assessment of infrastructure, goals and practices.
Amsterdam:International Association for the Evaluation of
Educational Achievement. University of Twente OCTO
Southeast and Islands Regional Technology in Education
Consortium (2000).
Technology integration progress gauge.[On-Line Available]
http://www.seirtec.org/eval/gauge.doc
Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D.C. (1997).
Teaching with technology:Creating student-centered
classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
US Department of Education. (2004). Preparing Tomorrow’s
Teachers to Use Technology Program(PT3). [On-Line
Available] http://www.ed.gov/programs/teachtech/index.html
Yuen, H. K., Law, N., & Wong, K. C. (2003). ICT
implementation and school leadership Case studies of ICT
integration in teaching and learning.
[On-Line Available]
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?
Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0740410204.html