從過去科學教育相關的實證研究中發現，科學教育經常與學生的生活情境脫節及學習興趣低落，面對生活在一個日益受複雜系統（complex systems）支配的學習環境中，如何讓科學教育能處理複雜系統及活用學校所教授的知識已是當務之急，新時代科學教育應重視將知識與生活真實情境相結合。本研究結合戶外環境場域資源，依其地理區域特色及學科知識來發展系統思考學習地圖，地圖中所呈現的系統思考概念對應五大主題科學教育課程來實施，除了在戶外可以進行學習地圖所安排的科學課程外，課程內容為促進學生在學習上的理解及提高學習興趣，融入數位科技擴增實境（Augmented Reality, AR）技術來幫助學生更視覺化的學習，解決戶外學習場域的事物受空間與時間的限制，無法進行觀察及了解科學原理中的交互作用的困境，此設計稱為「擴增實境融入戶外學習系統思考」（Augment Reality-enriched Outdoor Learning System Thinking, AREOLEST）。本研究目的為發展AREOLEST，以社區公園周遭學校之國小六年級學生為研究對象，以準實驗法進行實驗教學，並了解學生學習成效及其是否受學習風格、認知負荷之影響，最後再調查學習後滿意度情形。研究結果發現，學生之學習成效有顯著成果，此設計適合不同學習風格的學生使用，同時學習內容及方式也不會造成學生過多的認知負荷，課程結束後所得到的整體滿意度及延後測驗皆有相當良好的成效，故AREOLEST的課程設計方式適合國小學生在戶外進行科學教育進行學習，值得教育單位利用及參考。

From past researches related to science education, it is found that science education has a low disconnection with students' living situations and their learning interests. How can science education be fused in a learning environment will be the most important focus point since the environment is increasingly dominated by complex systems and the use of knowledge taught in schools. This study combines outdoor environment field resources and develops a system thinking learning map according to its geographical area characteristics and subject knowledge. The concepts of system thinking presented in the map are implemented in accordance with five major science education courses. The learning map can be scheduled in outdoor science curriculum, promote students’ understanding and increase interest in learning. It incorporates digital technology, Augmented Reality (AR), to help students to learn more visually, and to solve the problems of outdoor learning areas that are limited by space and time, also those scientific principles which are hard to observe and understand. This design is called "Outdoor Learning System Thinking, AREOLEST". The purpose of this study is to develop AREOLEST, sixth-grader students in primary and secondary schools around the community park joined the research, the researcher used quasi-experimental methods for experimental teaching and to understand students' learning effectiveness whether they are affected by learning styles and cognitive load. Finally, the satisfaction of AREOLEST was investigated after experiments. The results showed that students' learning effectiveness are significant, it indicates this design is suitable for students with different learning styles. Meanwhile, the learning content and methods will not cause too much cognitive load on the students. The overall satisfaction and postponement test obtained after the experiments, all of them presented the curriculum design method of AREOLEST is suitable for elementary school students to carry out science education in the outdoors, which is worthy of reference and use by educational units.

中文文獻
井川直衛編，邱信典譯，《巴克禮的心靈世界》，臺北：雅歌出版社，1997。
王文科（2002）。教育研究法。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
吳明隆（2011）。論文寫作與量化研究（第三版）。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
莊孟憲、李文獻、杜雨霖、 謝欣宜、 葉重利（2011，11月）。都市裡的自然教室-台南市巴克禮紀念公園環境教育課程發展。論文發表於2011 環境教育學術暨實務交流研討會，花蓮縣。
黃芳銘（2002）。結構方程模式理論與應用。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
潘稀祺（2003）。為愛航向福爾摩沙--巴克禮博士傳，人光出版社。
巴克禮紀念公園，財團法人臺南企業文化藝術基金會出版，2008年1月15日。
陳新豐（2016）。國小高年級學生線上數位閱讀認知負荷量表編製。教育研究與發展期刊, 12（4）, 1-22.
英文文獻
Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z. K. (2009). Applying Kolb's experiential learning cycle for laboratory education. Journal of engineering education, 98(3), 283-294.
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom： definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14.
Andersen, D. F., & Richardson, G. P. (1997). Scripts for group model building. System Dynamics Review： The Journal of the System Dynamics Society, 13(2), 107-129.
Antonenko, P. D., & Niederhauser, S. (2010). The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 140–150.
Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education： Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 103647.
Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching： The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518-560.
Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Orion, N. (2010). System thinking skills at the elementary school level. Journal of Research in Science Teaching： The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 540-563.
Atasoy, B., Tosik-Gün, E., & Kocaman-Karoğlu, A. (2017). Elementary school students' attitudes and motivations towards augmented reality practices. Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 18(2), 435-448.
Becker, C., Lauterbach, G., Spengler, S., Dettweiler, U., & Mess, F. (2017). Effects of regular classes in outdoor education settings： A systematic review on students’ learning, social and health dimensions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(5), 485.
Behl, D. V., & Ferreira, S. (2014). Systems thinking： An analysis of key factors and relationships. Procedia Computer Science, 36, 104-1
Bhattacherjee, A. (2000). Acceptance of e-commerce services： the case of electronic brokerages. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A： Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, 30(4), 411-420.
Burns, A., & Danyluk, P. (2017). Applying Kolb’s model to a nontraditional preservice teaching practicum. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(3), 249-263.
Buxton, C. A. (2010). Social problem solving through science： An approach to critical, place-based, science teaching and learning. Equity & excellence in education, 43(1), 120-135.
Cabrera, D., & Colosi, L. (2008). Distinctions, systems, relationships, and perspectives (DSRP)： A theory of thinking and of things. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(3), 311-316
Cabrera, D., Cabrera, L., & Powers, E. (2015). A unifying theory of systems thinking with psychosocial applications. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(5), 534-545.
Cabrera, D., Colosi, L., & Lobdell, C. (2008). Systems thinking. Evaluation and program planning, 31(3), 299-310.
Cai, S., Chiang, F. K., & Wang, X. (2013). Using the augmented reality 3D technique for a convex imaging experiment in a physics course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 856-865.
Campbell, N. A., & Reece, J. B. (2003). Biology concepts & connections (6th ed.). San　Francisco： Benjamin Cummings Company press．
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2015). The worked example effect, the generation effect, and element interactivity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 689.
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2017). The expertise reversal effect is a variant of the more general element interactivity effect. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 393-405.
Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning： Suggestions for future research. Journal of science education and technology, 22(4), 449-462.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction： Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Davidz, H. L., & Nightingale, D. J. (2008). Enabling systems thinking to accelerate the development of senior systems engineers. Systems Engineering, 11(1), 1-14.
Davis, J. C. (1986). Statistics and data analysis in geology (Vol. 646). New York et al.： Wiley.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology： system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International journal of man-machine studies, 38(3), 475-487.
Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66-69.
Dettweiler, U., Lauterbach, G., Becker, C., & Simon, P. (2017). A Bayesian mixed-methods analysis of basic psychological needs satisfaction through outdoor learning and its influence on motivational behavior in science class. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2235.
Dettweiler, U., Ünlü, A., Lauterbach, G., Becker, C., & Gschrey, B. (2015). Investigating the motivational behavior of pupils during outdoor science teaching within self-determination theory. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 125.
Ding, L., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling： A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 119-143.
Djonko-Moore, C. M., Leonard, J., Holifield, Q., Bailey, E. B., & Almughyirah, S. M. (2018). Using culturally relevant experiential education to enhance urban children’s knowledge and engagement in science. Journal of Experiential Education, 41(2), 137-153.
Duh, H. B., & Klopfer, E. (2013). Augmented reality learning： New learning paradigm in co-space. Computers and Education, 68(1), 534-535.
Ehrlinger, J., & Eibach, R. P. (2011). Focalism and the failure to foresee unintended consequences. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), 59-68.
Evagorou, M., Korfiatis, K., Nicolaou, C., & Constantinou, C. (2009). An investigation of the potential of interactive simulations for developing system thinking skills in elementary school： A case study with fifth‐graders and sixth‐graders. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 655-674.
Fűz, N. (2018). Out-of-school learning in Hungarian primary education： Practice and barriers. Journal of Experiential Education, 41(3), 277-294.
Gay, L.R. (1992), Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application, Macmillan, New York, NY.
Giasiranis, S., & Sofos, L. (2016). Production and evaluation of educational material using augmented reality for teaching the module of “representation of the information on computers” in junior high school. Creative Education, 7(09), 1270-1291.
Goldstone, R. L., & Wilensky, U. (2008). Promoting transfer by grounding complex systems principles. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(4), 465-516.
Heft, H. (2013). Environment, cognition, and culture： Reconsidering the cognitive map. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 14-25.
Huang, K. L., Chen, K. H., & Ho, C. H. (2014). Enhancing learning outcomes through new e-textbooks： A desirable combination of presentation methods and concept maps. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(5).
Huang, W. H. (2011). Evaluating learners’ motivational and cognitive processing in an online game-based learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 694-704.
Hung, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Lee, Y.H., & Wu, T.H. (2011). The problem-refining progress of 5th graders' ubiquitous inquiry. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 5(3/4), 255-267.
Hung, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Lin, I. H., & Hung, X. T. (2010). The development of a computerized ecology observation competence assessment. Advanced Materials Research Vols 108-111, 860-865.
Hung, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Su, I. H., & Lin, I. H. (2012). A concept-map integrated dynamic assessment system for improving ecology observation competences in mobile learning activities. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 10-19. (ISSN 2146-7242).
Hung, P. H., Lin, Y. F., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). Formative Assessment Design for PDA Integrated Ecology Observation. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 33-42.
Hwang, G. J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments-a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 4.
Hwang, G. J., Hsu, T. C., & Hsieh, Y. H. (2019). Impacts of different smartphone caption/subtitle mechanisms on English listening performance and perceptions of students with different learning styles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 333-344.
Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of computers in education, 2(4), 449-473.
Hwang, G. J., Shi, Y. R., & Chu, H. C. (2011). A concept map approach to developing collaborative Mindtools for context‐aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 778-789.
International Reading Association. (2009). New literacies and 21st-century technologies： A position statement of the International Reading Association. Newark, DE： Author.
Iordache, D. D., Pribeanu, C., & Balog, A. (2012). Influence of specific AR capabilities on the learning effectiveness and efficiency. Studies in Informatics and Control, 21(3), 233-240.
Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education： Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. The Journal of the learning sciences, 15(1), 11-34.
Jagustović, R., Zougmoré, R. B., Kessler, A., Ritsema, C. J., Keesstra, S., & Reynolds, M. (2019). Contribution of systems thinking and complex adaptive system attributes to sustainable food production： Example from a climate-smart village. Agricultural Systems, 171, 65-75.
James, J. K., & Williams, T. (2017). School-based experiential outdoor education： A neglected necessity. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(1), 58-71.
Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). The NMC horizon report： 2012 higher education edition. Austin, TX： The New Media Consortium. Retrieved Augest 21,2019, from https：//files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532397.pdf
Kalyuga, S., Rikers, R., & Paas, F. (2012). Educational implications of expertise reversal effects in learning and performance of complex cognitive and sensorimotor skills. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 313-337.
Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., Browne, A., Mazzuca, D., Tutwiler, M. S., & Dede, C. (2013). EcoMOBILE： Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Computers & Education, 68, 545-556.
Kangas, M., Vuojärvi, H., & Siklander, P. (2018). Hiking in the wilderness： Interplay between teachers’ and students’ agencies in outdoor learning. Education in the North, 25(3), 7-31.
Kao, G. Y. M., Tsai, C. C., Liu, C. Y., & Yang, C. H. (2016). The effects of high/low interactive electronic storybooks on elementary school students’ reading motivation, story comprehension and chromatics concepts. Computers & Education, 100, 56-70.
Keynan, A., Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Goldman, D. (2014). The repertory grid as a tool for evaluating the development of students’ ecological system thinking abilities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 90-105.
Kim, D. H. (1993). Systems archetypes I： diagnosing systemic issues and designing high-leverage interventions. Pegasus Communications. Retrieved Jan. 7, 2019, from：https：//thesystemsthinker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Systems-Thinking-Tools-TRST01E.pdf(accessed 15 August 2019).
Kim, H., & Lee, H. (2019). A Phenomenological Study of Elementary School Teachers' System Thinking-based Science Teaching Experiences. Journal of the Korean earth science society, 40(1), 68-85.
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental Detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational technology research and development, 56(2), 203-228.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of management learning & education, 4(2), 193-212.
Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. A. (2003). Experiential learning theory bibliography. Cleveland, OH： Experience Based Learning Systems Inc.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Sadle River： Prentice Hall.
Langbeheim, E., & Levy, S. T. (2019). Diving into the particle model： Examining the affordances of a single user participatory simulation. Computers & Education, 139, 65-80.
Lee, T., & Jones, G. (2018). Instructional Representations as Tools to Teach Systems Thinking. In Towards a Framework for Representational Competence in Science Education (pp. 133-153). Springer, Cham.
Lembani, M., de Pinho, H., Delobelle, P., Zarowsky, C., & Ager, A. (2010). Health systems resilience： a systems analysis. A case study of technical assistance to HIV services in Cote d’Ivoire in the context of civil unrest following the disputed presidential election of. Retrieved August. 7, 2019, from：https：//pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a4fc/e0c06f2eb110b5f97f9aec3a16a06fbe4b23.pdf
Lezak, S. B., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2016). Systems thinking and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 143-153.
Lin, K. C., & Wang, S. C. (2012). Situated learning for computer fabrication based on augmented reality. Lecture Notes in Information Technology, 23, 249.
Lin, M. C., Tutwiler, M. S., & Chang, C. Y. (2012). Gender bias in virtual learning environments： An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), E59-E63.
Lindemann-Matthies, P., & Knecht, S. (2011). Swiss elementary school teachers’ attitudes toward forest education. The journal of environmental education, 42(3), 152-167.
Liou, W. K., Bhagat, K. K., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Beyond the flipped classroom： A highly interactive cloud-classroom (HIC) embedded into basic materials science courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 460-473.
Liu, I. F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community. Computers & education, 54(2), 600-610.
Liu, L., & Hmelo‐Silver, C. E. (2009). Promoting complex systems learning through the use of conceptual representations in hypermedia. Journal of Research in Science Teaching： The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(9), 1023-1040.
Mackenzie, S. H., Son, J. S., & Eitel, K. (2018). Using outdoor adventure to enhance intrinsic motivation and engagement in science and physical activity： An exploratory study. Journal of outdoor recreation and tourism, 21, 76-86.
Mbilinyi, A., Hasegawa, S., & Kashihara, A. (2017). Estimation and Adaptation Method for Students’ Learning Styles on Web-based Learning Environment. eLmL 2017, 9.
Metcalf, S. J., & Tinker, R. F. (2004). Probeware and handhelds in elementary and middle school science. Journal of science education and technology, 13(1), 43-49.
Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 675–698.
Moore, S.M., Dolansky, M.A., Singh, M., Palmieri, P., & Alemi, P. (2010). The Systems Thinking Scale. Unpublished manuscript, 2010.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education： Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
Nicol, R., Higgins, P., Ross, H., & Mannion, G. (2007). Outdoor education in Scotland： A summary of recent research. Perth & Glasgow, Scotland： Scottish Natural Heritage & Learning and Teaching Scotland.
Nicolaou, C. T., Nicolaidou, I., Zacharia, Z., & Constantinou, C. P. (2007). Enhancing fourth graders’ ability to interpret graphical representations through the use of microcomputer-based labs implemented within an inquiry-based activity sequence. Journal of computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(1), 75-99.
Noll, V. H., Scannell, D. P., & Craig, R. C. (1979). Introduction to educational measurement. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMH).
Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics： A cognitive-load approach. Journal of educational psychology, 84(4), 429.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & van Gerven, P. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63–71.
Reynolds, M. (2016). Towards praxis in systems thinking.In： Frank, Moti, Shaked, Haim, Koral-Kordova, Sigal (Eds.). Systems Thinking： Foundation, Uses and Challenges. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp. 3–33.
Ruether, S. (2018). Barriers to Teachers' Use of Environmentally-Based Education in Outdoor Classrooms. Retrieved Jan. 7, 2019, from： https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7055&context=dissertations
Sabelli, N. H. (2006). Complexity, technology, science, and education. The Journal of the learning sciences, 15(1), 5-9.
Salado, A., Chowdhury, A. H., & Norton, A. (2019). Systems thinking and mathematical problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 119(1), 49-58.
Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline： The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business.
Shaked, H., & Schechter, C. (2013). Seeing wholes： The concept of systems thinking and its implementation in school leadership. International review of education, 59(6), 771-791.
Sheehy, N. P., Wylie, J. W., McGuinness, C., & Orchard, G. (2000). How children solve environmental problems： Using computer simulations to investigate systems thinking. Environmental Education Research, 6(2), 109-126.
Smith, D. M., & Kolb, D. A. (1986). Learning style inventory： User’s guide. Boston, MA： McBer.
Squire, K. D., & Jan, M. (2007). Mad City Mystery： Developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of science education and technology, 16(1), 5-29.
Squire, K., & Klopfer, E. (2007). Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. The journal of the learning sciences, 16(3), 371-413.
Sternberg, R. J., & Pretz, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Cognition and intelligence： Identifying the mechanisms of the mind. Cambridge University Press.
Sumadio, D. D., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2010, March). Preliminary evaluation on user acceptance of the augmented reality use for education. In 2010 second international conference on computer engineering and applications (Vol. 2, pp. 461-465). IEEE.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving： Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational psychology review, 22(2), 123-138.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37-76). Academic Press.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Measuring cognitive load. In Cognitive load theory (pp. 71-85). Springer, New York, NY.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design： 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 1-32.
Tan, Y. S. M., & Atencio, M. (2016). Unpacking a place-based approach–“What lies beyond?” Insights drawn from teachers' perceptions of Outdoor Education. Teaching and teacher education, 56, 25-34.
Uttal, D. H. (2000). Seeing the big picture： Map use and the development of spatial cognition. Developmental Science, 3(3), 247-264.
van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2004). Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. Psychophysiology, 41, 167–174.
Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2008). Instructional efficiency： revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educational Psychologist, 43, 16–26.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use： Development and test. Decision sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
Vonderwell, S., Sparrow, K., & Zachariah, S. (2009). Using handheld computers and probeware in inquiry-based science education. Journal of the Research Center for educational Technology, 1(2), 1-11.
Wei, X., Weng, D., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course. Computers & Education, 81, 221-234
Weng, C., Otanga, S., Weng, A., & Cox, J. (2018). Effects of interactivity in E-textbooks on 7th graders science learning and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 120, 172-184.
Whelan, R. R. (2007). Neuroimaging of cognitive load in instructional multimedia. Educational Research Review, 2, 1–12.
Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, 570-585.
Wu, L., & Chen, J. L. (2005). An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax： An empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(6), 784-808.
Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Tucker, S. (2012). Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(4), 519-541.
Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Van Schooneveld, J. B., & Anderson, E. (2013). Scaffolding informal learning in science museums： How much is too much? Science Education, 97(6), 848-877.
Yoon, S., Goh, S. E., & Yang, Z. (2019). Toward a Learning Progression of Complex Systems Understanding. Complicity： An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 16(1).
Zheng, R., McAlack, M., Wilmes, B., Kohler-Evans, P., & Williamson, J. (2009). Effects of multimedia on cognitive load, self-efficacy, and multiple rule-based problem solving. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 790-803.
Zipke, M. (2017). Preschoolers explore interactive storybook apps： The effect on word recognition and story comprehension. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1695-1712.
Zucker, A. A., Tinker, R., Staudt, C., Mansfield, A., & Metcalf, S. (2008). Learning science in grades 3–8 using probeware and computers： Findings from the TEEMSS II project. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 42-48.