簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 沈沛萱
Shen, Pei-Syuan
論文名稱: 大陸學校圖書館經營現況探討—以合肥地區小學圖書館為例
The state of elementary school libraries in Hefei of China
指導教授: 陳昭珍
Chen, Chao-Chen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 圖書資訊學研究所
Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 107
中文關鍵詞: 圖書館經營小學圖書館圖書教師合肥
英文關鍵詞: Library management,, Elementary school library, Teacher librarian, Hefei
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201886
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:122下載:30
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 學校圖書館與圖書教師,在協助推動學校教育及學生學習上具有非常重要的地位,大陸也有許多地方開始執行圖書教師的制度,但各地情況不一,但只有部分地區有提供專門的培訓與職缺。
    本研究旨在觀察大陸學校圖書館經營現況,以合肥地區小學圖書館為研究對象,探討合肥學校圖書館營運情況、圖書教師培訓對圖書教師自我效能評估的影響,並根據圖書教師的五項服務層級,劃分圖書教師的實際日常工作內容,瞭解合肥小學圖書教師的工作內涵。
    本研究以日誌法、問卷法為研究方法,發放給合肥小學圖書教師填答,共20所合肥地區小學參與,問卷於2015年9月以線上問卷形式填答;日誌於2015年9月選一週,填寫5天的工作日誌,並以電子檔形式線上回傳。
    根據回收之工作日誌與其問卷,歸納出以下結論:一、合肥學校圖書館經營現況:1.學校圖書館推動備受重視。2.學校圖書館人力與專業訓練普及。3.圖書教師每日主要工作為進行圖書館基礎工作。4.圖書教師自評於學習環境、社區責任、閱讀業務等表現良好;二、學校資源投入與圖書教師工作分佈時間之比例關係:1.學校購書經費與圖書教師工作內涵於進階層級呈正向微弱相關。2.學校閱讀活動經費與圖書教師工作內涵整體呈低相關。3.學校圖書館每週開放時數與圖書教師於進階級工作呈正向微弱相關。4.學校長期支援圖書館人數與圖書教師工作於進階級呈正向微弱相關。5.圖書教師參與18個月培訓人數與其工作內涵於基礎層級呈低相關;三、圖書教師自我效能評估與工作內涵的關係:圖書教師半數以上認為在整體效能表現為「高效能」,有6成的學校會進行「進階層級」工作,但實際進階層級工作執行量偏低。
    建議永續經營學校圖書館,持續與學校溝通,爭取支持。圖書教師培訓課程中特別加強資訊能力,並要求圖書教師重視自我提升。

    School libraries and teacher librarian have a very important place in helping to elementary school education and student learning. There are also many places in China that have begun to implement the system of teacher librarian, but the situation varies from place to place, but only some areas provide specialized training and position.
    The purpose of this study is to observe the current situation of the school library in the China, taking the elementary school library in Hefei as the research object, discuss the operation of Hefei school library and the influence of teacher librarian training on the self-efficacy evaluation of teacher librarian, and according to the five services level of teacher librarians, the division of practice daily routine of the contents of the teacher librarians to understand the work of Hefei elementary school teachers working content. In this study, the diary method and questionnaire method were used as research methods to be issued to Hefei elementary school teachers. A total of 20 elementary schools in Hefei were invited to participate in the questionnaire in September 2015, and the diary method was selected in September 2015 for one week, fill in the 5-day diary method, and return to the electronic file form online.
    According to the collecting of the work log and its questionnaire, summed up the following conclusions: First, the Hefei school library’s operation situation: 1. School library is valued. 2. School library manpower and professional training popularization. 3. Teacher librarians work daily for the basic work of the library. 4. Self-evaluation of teacher librarian in the learning environment, community responsibility, reading business performance is good. Second, the school resource investment and the proportion of the teacher librarian work time distribution:
    1. School book budget and teacher librarian work content in the advanced level was weak positive correlation. 2. The school reading activities and the contents of the teacher librarian work as a whole was low positive correlation. 3. The hours of school library opening per week is weak positively related to the teacher librarian’s work in the advance level. 4. The number of long-term support library manpower in the school is weak positive correlation with the teacher librarian’s work in the advance level. 5. The number of teachers participating in the 18-month training is low in relation to the content of their work in the basic level. Third, the relationship between self-efficacy of teacher librarians and the work content: more than half of teacher librarians agree that the overall efficacy performance is "high efficacy ", 6o% of the school will be "advanced level" work, but the actual implement is low.
    It is recommended to continuously operate the school library, continue to communicate with the school for support. Teacher librarians training courses in particular to strengthen the information capacity, and asked the teacher librarians attach importance to self-improvement.

    摘要 II Abstract III 目 次 V 表 次 VI 圖 次 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 7 第三節 研究範圍與限制 9 第四節 名詞釋義 9 第二章 文獻探討 13 第一節 學校圖書館 13 第二節 圖書教師的角色 18 第三節 大陸學校圖書館與圖書教師相關研究 27 第三章 研究設計與實施 31 第一節 研究架構 31 第二節 研究方法與設計 32 第三節 研究對象 35 第四節 研究工具 36 第五節 研究流程 41 第四章 研究結果與分析 45 第一節 學校圖書館經營現況 45 第二節 圖書教師工作內涵 48 第三節 圖書教師自我效能評估 55 第四節 資源投入與圖書教師工作內涵關係 70 第五節 圖書教師自我效能與其工作內涵關係 79 第六節 綜合討論 82 第五章 研究結論與建議 87 第一節 結論 87 第二節 建議 91 參考文獻 93 附件一、圖書教師工作日誌歸納範例 99 附件二、正式問卷 102

    中文文獻
    于斌斌、於良芝(2012)。學校圖書館利用對中學生學業表現的影響研究——以XJ中學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。南開大學,南投縣。
    呂瑞蓮、林紀慧(2005)。全國國民小學圖書館現況調查研究。中華民國圖書館學會學報,75,261-309。
    呂瑞蓮、林紀慧(2008)。國民小學圖書資訊教師知能指標及現況之研究。師大學報:教育類,53(2),83-110。
    宋元誠(2001)。中學圖書館在資訊技術教育中的座標--兼對圖書館老師的定位思考。中小學圖書情報世界,(6),15-17。
    李文馨(1995)。學校圖書館員。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。取自:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679785/
    李雪莉(2002)。給孩子野地棒球般的樂趣。天下雜誌,263,110。
    沈麗雲(2009)。日本中小學圖書館發展概況。中小學圖書情報世界,9,59-63。
    卓珊瑜(2014)。國民小學「圖書館閱讀推動教師」之角色理論與實務落差之探討(碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/35831267241702700855
    周秀芬(2012)。臺中市國民小學圖書教師角色知覺和工作之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。東海大學教育研究所,臺中市。
    周倩如(2003)。美國學校圖書館媒體中心支援教學之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學圖書資訊研究所碩士論文,台北縣。
    邱子恆、李宜樺、陳倩冬(2001)。兒童圖書館(室)之空間規劃研究。國立中央圖書館臺灣分館館刊,7,29-43。
    邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市,五南。
    侯璦琿、楊軍、吳麗(2016)。農村小學生課外閱讀存在的問題及教師指導策略研究——以錦州市為例。渤海大學,遼寧省。
    孫玉肖(2014)。農村小學生語文課外閱讀存在的問題與對策(未出版之碩士論文)。河北師範大學,河北省。
    涂進萬(2014)。學校圖書館在M世代的教育角色。書香遠傳,115,56-58。
    崔小宜(2016)。利用圖書館資源提高學生的文學閱讀素養。語文建設,(27),69-70。
    張小甯、杜文軍、孫力軍(2015)。中小學圖書館管理現狀與對策分析——以S中學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。石河子大學,新疆維吾爾自治區。
    教育部(2002)。國民小學圖書館設立及營運基準。取自:http://www.lac.org.tw/law/documents/01/711281113571.pdf
    梁月霞(2011)。香港小學圖書教師制度。圖書教師電子報,1。取自:http://teacherlibrarian.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/index.php?id=62。
    盛美雲(1995)。問卷法。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。取自:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1681344/
    莊道明(2012)。資訊素養。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。取自:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679154/?index=4
    陳一心家族基金會(2013)。“學校圖書館的一天”—中國內地、香港、台灣學校圖書館比較研究報告。取自:http://www.cysff.org/download/A%20Day%20in%20the%20Life%20of%20a%20School%20Library%202013%20CN.pdf
    陳一心家族慈善基金(2014)。第四屆國際會議:圖書館裡的學校-石頭湯悅讀校園聯盟第一期圖書教師培訓畢業典禮暨閱讀實踐分享會。取自:http://www.cysff.org/event_2014_june_tc.html
    陳昭珍(2010)。圖書教師輔導團 簡介。圖書教師電子報,1。取自:http://teacherlibrarian.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/index.php?id=16
    陳昭珍(2012)。閱讀為何不一樣:香港中小學圖書館參訪有感。圖書教師電子報,17。取自:http://teacherlibrarian.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/index.php?id=97
    陳昭珍、簡馨瑩、林菁、賴苑玲、陳海泓(2011)。圖書教師手冊。臺北市:教育部。
    陳秋雯(2014)。因應M世代學習的中學圖書館經營—以2014年香港參訪中學圖書館為例。圖書教師電子報,35。取自:http://teacherlibrarian.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/index.php?id=220
    陳海泓(2002)。中小學圖書館和圖書教師在教育改革中角色的探討。台南師院初等教育學報,15,123-154。
    彭鳳(2007)。中學圖書館對學生資訊素質教育與培養作用研究(Master's thesis),四川大學。
    曾品方(2011)。小學圖書館空間改造歷程之探析。圖書與資訊學刊,(78),87-99。doi:10.6575/JoLIS.2011.78.05
    曾禮珍(2015)。「圖書教師」對國小圖書館經營推動及閱讀態度影響之研究(碩士論文)。取自:http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/34523506210921691963
    楊思偉(2000)。司書教諭(日本)。教育大辭書。取自:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1303740/
    葉爽美(2011)。農村中小學生利用學校圖書館的現狀調查及對策研究。圖書館論壇,31(3),164-168。
    路士桂(2003)。圖書館老師在中學教學中的能動作用。山東行政學院山東省經濟管理幹部學院學報,(1),120-121。
    劉其順、范會超(2013)。小學圖書館建設與管理之我見。教學儀器與實驗,(08),26-28。
    課程發展議會(2002)。基礎教育課程指引:各盡所能‧發揮所長(小一至中三)。香港:香港教育局。
    課程發展議會(2014)。基礎教育課程指引─聚焦‧深化‧持續(小一至小六)。香港:香港教育局。
    賴坤玉、林珊如(2010)。臺北市銘傳國小學童使用學校圖書館影響因素研究。教育資料與圖書館學,48(1),3-34。
    簡耀東(1994)。中日韓三國圖書館法規選編。文華圖書館管理資訊股份有限公司。
    蘇佩芬(2003)。學校圖書館員專業資格認定之研究─台北縣市高中圖書館員之觀點(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,臺北縣。
    龔新(2014)。如何成為稱職的中職圖書館老師。教育教學論壇,(20),66-67。

    英文文獻
    Amanda, C. (2000). The Janus factor: Explaining the uniqueness of the teacher librarian. Retrieved from http://www.warriorlibrarian.com/LIBRARY/janus.html
    American Association of School Librarians. (2009). Empowering Learners: Guidelines for School Library Programs. Chicago: American Library Association.
    Atwell, N. (2007). The Reading zone: How to help kids become skilled, passionate, habitual, critical readers. New York: Scholastic.
    Combes, B. (2007). Techno savvy or just techno oriented? How do the Net generation search for information? Proceeding of ASLA XX Biennial Conference, Australia, 007, 1-12.
    Commonwealth of Australia (2011). Potential of school libraries and teacher librarians to contribute to improved educational and community outcomes. In Education and Employment Committee (Eds.), School Libraries and Teacher Librarians in 21st century Australia (pp.37-58). Australia: Canberra
    Dow, M. J., & McMahon-Lakin, J. (2012). School Librarian Staffing Levels and Student Achievement as Represented in 2006-2009 Kansas Annual Yearly Progress Data. School Library Research, 15.
    Dutton Ewbank, A. (2015). Union-Active School Librarians and School Library Advocacy: A Modified Case Study of the British Columbia Teacher-Librarians' Association and the British Columbia Teachers' Federation. School Library Research, 18, 1-23.
    Greenwood, H., Creaser, C., & Maynard, S. (2009). Successful primary school libraries: Six case studies. The School Librarian, 57(2), 76-78.
    Hughes, H. E. (2013). School libraries and teacher-librarians: evidence of their contribution to student literacy and learning. Curriculum and Leadership ,11(12), 1-6.
    Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research (2nd ed.). NH: Heinemann.
    Krolak, L. (2006). The role of libraries in the creation of literate environments. International Journal of Adult And Lifelong Education, 4(1/4), 5.
    Lonsdale, M. (2003). Impact of school libraries on student achievement: A Review of the research. Retrieved from http://www. asla. org. au/research/
    Nakamura, Y. (2000). Teachers' Perceptions of School Libraries: Comparisons from Tokyo and Honolulu. School Libraries Worldwide, 6(1), 66-87.
    O'Connell, J. (2014). Researcher’s Perspective: Is Teacher Librarianship in Crisis in Digital Environments? An Australian Perspective. School Libraries Worldwide, 20(1).
    Rieman, J. (1993). The Diary study: a Workplace-oriented research tool to guide laboratory efforts. In Proceedings of the INTERACT'93 and CHI'93 conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 321-326).
    Room to read. (2015). School Libraries Cross-National Evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjJ_9-7_enJAhXMGY4KHdUKB-IQFggaMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.roomtoread.org%2FXNE2015&usg=AFQjCNFJC-TRJmi8H65jTGuX1oX0ul_mOQ&sig2=ddotNLXDXrzfbPCK8IGPUQ&cad=rja
    Rosenfeld, E. (2007). From literacy support to literacy leadership. Teacher Librarian, 34(3), 6-7.
    Schroeder, N. K. (2010). Developing a Culture of Reading in Middle School: What Teacher-Librarians Can Do (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.elementaryed.ualberta.ca/GraduatePrograms/CappingInformationEDEL900/~/media/elementaryed/Documents/GraduatePrograms/Capping_SamplePaper_Schroeder.pdf
    Society of College, National and University Libraries. (2005). The Seven Pillars of Information Literacy model. Retrieved November 1, 2011, from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/activities/inf_lit/sp/model.html.
    Todd, R, J., & Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Student learning through Ohio school libraries: Background, methodology and report of findings. Ohio Educational Library Media Association.
    Yuriko, N. (2010). School Libraries and Resource Centers. News Letter for IFLA section, (11).

    下載圖示
    QR CODE