本研究從地方本位教育的實務工作中開始，以研究者的工作團隊「善步地方教育工作室」在天母推動的地方本位教育課程為起點。本研究運用Smith(2002)提出的地方本位教育的文化研究、自然研究、解決真實問題、工作現場實習、參與社區發展與公民議題五個重要取向為架構，以聯合國所提供的未來發展原則-永續發展目標（Sustainable Development Goals,[SDGs]）為依歸，蒐集關於天母地區各面向的資料，並訪談天母在地重要團體及地方人士，發展天母地區的地方本位教育重要的教育內涵，並編製一份審議問卷，邀請天母地區重要的地方人士以及當地學校環境教育業務職掌的老師們填寫問卷，判斷其重要性及他們對於各重要內涵的想法，最後統整、修改成天母地區之地方本位教育內涵。

此研究產出天母地區的地方本位教育內涵共19條，文化研究6條，自然研究4條，解決真實問題2條，工作現場實習2條，參與社區發展與公民議題5條。文化研究、自然研究、解決真實問題較有交集，工作現場實習、參與社區發展與公民議題則有爭議較大且分數較低。

This study is inspired by environmental education in praxis, starting from the environmental programs offered by the researcher’s own working group, Good Step: Place-Based Education Studio in Tianmu. This study uses the five dimensions of place-based education (cultural studies, nature studies, real world problem solving, internships and entrepreneurial opportunities, and induction into community) proposed by Smith (2002) as its guiding framework. The researchers look into the above aspects in the research field and ask important community figures what content they believe is important for place-based education in Tianmu. Additionally, applicable development principles offered by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) produced at the United Nation’s 2012 Sustainable Development Conference were chosen as the theoretical basis for designing a questionnaire, which was distributed to important community members in Tianmu, as well as school administrators and teachers in charge of environmental education, in order to analyze what they believed this educational content.

This study is focused on place-based education, and uses data collection, interviews and surveys to produce a set of place-based education content based in Tianmu’s local resources. Through these place-based education programs, school children in Tianmu will enhance their sense of place, citizenship/civic consciousness, and environmental literacy, and recognize their place as part of the community and environment.

中文部分：

王玉民(1994)社會科學研究方法原理。臺北市：洪葉文化

呂彥億(2008)。以德懷術建構國民中小學美術資優班入學鑑定模式之研究。國立臺中教育大學特殊教育學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。

全球化教育 (2008)。歐洲委員會北南中心，里斯本。

林明地 (2002) 學校與社區關係 。台北：五南書局。

林喬茵(2014) 。教師群參與地方本位課程設計歷程之環境教育專業發展─以金門一所國
中的閩式建築課程為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。

李光中、張惠珠 (2006) 促進東部鄉村學校和原住民部落協力推動社區林業之行動 研究 (I)。林務局。

洪如玉(2012)安居與否？批判地方教育學與相關爭議之探究。臺灣教育社會學研究 十二卷一期2012年6月，頁43～73

洪如玉(2010)全球化時代教育改革與發展的另類思考：地方本位教育。幼兒教保研究期刊第 5期。

洪如玉(2013)「地方」概念之探究及其在教育之啟示。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報。

夏鑄九（1999）〈市民參與和地方自主性：台灣的社區營造〉，《城市與設計學報》9/10: 175-185。

許雅惠譯(2002)。成人及繼續教育(原作者：Paulo Freire)。臺北市：五南。

黃可欣 (2007) 促進鄉村學校與社區之夥伴關係以邁向永續發展之行動研究—以台 東縣利吉和富源社區為例 。國立花蓮教育大學生態與環境教育研究所碩士論文。

陳吉文(2008) 。地方本位科學課程對國小學童科學學習成就與地方感之影響。國立花蓮
教育大學科學教育研究所，花蓮市。

陳繹如(2013) 。環境學習中心地方本位課程發展與實踐之初探。未出版之碩士論文，
國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。

陳富雄(1999) 。國小鄉土教學活動進行環境議題探索學習之研究。未出版之碩士論文，
國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。

黃薇樺(1998) 。以社區鄉土資源結合環境教育理念進行鄉土教學活動課程之研究。未出
版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。

葉乃嘉(2008)。《研究方法的第一本書》。臺北：五南。

楊弘任（2004）《社區如何動起來？—黑珍珠之鄉的派系、在地師傅與社區總體營造》，台北：台灣大學社會學研究所博士論文。
楊弘任（2011）〈何謂在地性？從地方知識與在地範疇出發，《思與言：人文與社會科學雜誌》49(4): 5-29。

楊倍華(2007) 。澎湖群島高中職學生環境素養調查與地方感影響分析。國立臺灣師範大
學。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。

蔡勇斌、余瑞芳、白子易、莊順興(譯)(2005)環境科學概論調查與應用(W. P. Cunningham, M. A. Cunningham)。台中市：滄海書局。(原著出版年2002)。

賴雅芬(1997) 。國小教師利用鄉土教學活動進行環境教育之參與式行動研。未出版之碩
士論文，國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。

盧詩欣(2009)。兒童的旅遊經驗對地理知識與地方感影響之研究。未出版之碩士論文，
國立新竹教育大學人資處社會學習領域碩士班，新竹市。

環境教育課程編輯小組（2007）。環保與生活。新北市：普林斯頓。

環保署(2012)。環境教育法相關法規彙編。台北市：環保署。

英文部分：
Athman, Julies & Monroe, Martha. (2004) .The effects of Environment-based Education on Students’ Achievement Motivation and The Effect of Environment-based Education on Student’ Critical Thinking Skills and Disposition Toward Critical Thinking.Journal of Interpretation Research, 9(1): 9-25.
Brecher, J., Costello, T. and Smith, B. 2000. Introduction, Globalization and its Spector. Globalization from Below. Cambridge, MA. South End Press.

Cassen, B. 2003. "On the Attack. A Movement of Movements?" New Left Review. Vol. 19. January-February.

Cresswell, Tim(2004)Place: A Short Introduction.Oxford: Blackwell.

Clark, John. 2003. Worlds Apart: Civil Society and the Battle for Ethical Globalization. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

Cunningham , W. P. , Cunningham M. A. (2005). Principles of Environmental Science. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Daly, M. (1997). ‘Welfare states under pressure: Cash benefit in European welfare states
over the last ten years’, Journal of European Social Policy

Epstein, B. 2001. Anarchism and the Anti-globalization Movement. Monthly Review. Vol. 53. No.4. pp. 1-14.

Gruenewald, D. A. (2003a). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher.

Gruenewald, D. A. (2003b). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal.

Gruenewald, D. A. (2005). More than one profound truth: Making sense of divergent criticalities. Educational Studies.

Gruenewald, D. A. & Smith, G. (Eds.) (2008). Place-based education in the global age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Harvey, David(1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
Relph,Edward (1976)Place and Placelessness.London:Pion.

Held, D. and McGrew, A. 2002. The New Politics of Globalization: Mapping Ideals and Theories. Globalization/Anti-Globalization. Cambridge: Polity Press.

IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1991) Caring for the Earth. A Strategy for Sustainable Living. London: Earthscan.

Keck, M. E. and Sikkink, K. 1998. Transnational Advocacy Networks in International Politics: Introduction. Activists beyond Borders. New York: Cornell University Press.

Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Washington, DC: Institute for Interna
tional Economics.

Massey, Doreen(1993)“Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place,”inJon Bird, Barry Curtis, Tim Putnam, George Robertson and Lisa Tickner (eds), Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change (pp. 59-69). London: Routledge.

Marschall, Miklos. 2002. “Legitimacy and Effectiveness: Civil Society Organizations’ Role in Good Governance.”

McIntyre, A. 2002. Postgraduate Degrees in Agitprop. Review. Pp.17
.
Micklethwait, J. and Wooldridge, A. 2001. The Globalization Backlash. Foreign Policy. pp. 16-26.

M. Weidenbaum and R. Batterson. (2002). “The Pros and Cons of Globalization”.

Moore, Mike. 2003. A World Without Walls: Freedom, Development, Free Trade and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, G. A. (2002)Place-based education: Learning to be where we are.Phi Delta Kappan,83(8),584-594

Smith, G. A. (2002)Place-based education: Learning to be where we are.Phi Delta Kappan,83(8),584-594

Smith, Jackie. “Behind the Anti-Globalization Label” Dissent

Stapp,W.B.,&Wals,A.E.J.(1944).An Action Research Approach to Enviromantal Problem Solving.In L. Bardwell,M. Monore&M.Tudor(Eds.),Enviromental Problem Solving：Theory, Practice and Possibilities in Enviromental Education.Troy, Ohio：North American Association for Environmental Education.

Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research - Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Relph,Edward (1976)Place and Placelessness.London:Pion.

Tim Cresswell.(2004).Place: A Short Introduction.Blackwell Publishing Ltd:Oxford.
UNESCO. 1975. "The Belgrade Charter." UNESCO-UNEP Environmental Education Newsletter. Vol. 1

UNESCO. 1978. "Framework for Environmental Education, Declaration of the Tbilisi Intergovernmenral Conference on Environmental Education." Final Report. Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education. Paris, France.
UNESCO-UNEP(1978).The Tblisi Declaration,Connect