摘要

本研究旨在以女性主義教育學之觀點，探究國小女性教師教學風格發展之經驗學習歷程，並對五位國小女性教師進行深度訪談，以深入探討國小女性教師所建構之女性經驗學習模式。研究結果發現國小女性教師經驗學習之循環歷程富涵了女性主義教育學之特質（連結、同理、關愛、重視位置性、顧及師生權力關係），而其教學風格與經驗學習則互為影響，且其經驗學習對於教學風格之改善有實質助益；此外，國小女性教師之經驗學習歷程受學校教師美學社群之影響，並且能產生非正式學習之效應；而國小女性教師所建構出的經驗學習模式為多重循環。最後針對女性教師自身、學校及未來研究提出相關建議。

Abstract
The thesis is to explore the elementary school female teachers’ teaching style development and the experiential learning from the perspective of the feminist pedagogy. Five elementary school female teachers were interviewed in this study in order to analyze the elementary school female teachers’ experiential learning models. The outcomes of the analysis can be divided into five parts. Firstly, the characteristics of the feminist pedagogy affect the elementary school female teachers’ experiential learning a lot. Secondly, the teaching styles are influenced by the experiential learning while the experiential learning is also affected by the teaching styles at the same time. Thirdly, the experiential learning from the elementary school female teachers benefits to the improvement of the teaching styles. Fourthly, the teachers’ aesthetic communities play an important role on the elementary school female teachers’ experiential learning and then causes to the forming of the informal learning. Fifthly, the experiential learning models constructed by the elementary school female teachers can be seen as the multiple loops. The conclusion reviews the research findings and offers related suggestions

參考文獻
【中文部份】
王瑞香（2000）。自由主義女性主義。載於顧燕翎（主編），女性主義理論與流派（頁121-155）。台北：女書。
方淑儀（2012）。「隨聚即散」－教師美學社群與非正式學習之研究。成人及終身教育學刊，18，129-165頁。
李政賢譯（2006）。質性研究設計與計畫撰寫。台北：五南。譯自Catherine Marshall and Gretchen B. Rossman（1999）. Designing qualitative research（3rd ed）. Newbury Park, Calif. : Sage Publications.
林美和（2006）。女性主義教育學模式及其核心概念。載於林美和著，成人發展、性別與學習（頁237-254）。台北：五南。
林美和（2006）。從女權運動到性別研究。載於林美和著，成人發展、性別與學習（頁67-89）。台北：五南。
林芳玫（2000）。自由主義女性主義。載於顧燕翎（主編），女性主義理論與流派（頁3-34）。台北：女書。
洪漢鼎、夏鎮平譯（1995）。眞理與方法 : 補充和索引。台北：時報。譯自Wahrheit und Methode: Erganzungen Register.
徐宗國（1996）。紮根理論研究法：淵源、原則、技術與涵義。載於胡幼慧（主編），質性研究—理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（頁47-65）。台北：巨流。
陸敬忠（2004）。哲學詮釋學 : 歷史、義理與對話之「生化」辯證。台北：五南。
郭屏萍（2002）。自閉症兒童家長經驗學習歷程之研究。國立中正大學成人與繼續教育所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。
莊子秀（2000）。後現代女性主義。載於顧燕翎（主編），女性主義理論與流派（頁299-335）。台北：女書。
陳怡心（2004）。成年早期女性經營兩性親密關係之經驗學習。暨南國際大學成
人與繼續教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，南投。
陳雪雲（2003）。變遷社會中女性主義成人教育學—從現代到後現代主體。載於中華民國成人教育學會（主編），社會變遷與成人教育（頁281-313）。台北：師大書苑。
陳榮華（1998）。葛達瑪詮釋學與中國哲學的詮釋。台北：明文。
黃光國（2003）。社會科學的理路。台北：心理。
黃明月（2000）。成人經驗學習理論之探討。國立台灣師範大學社會教育學刊，29，35-56頁。
黃淑玲（2000）。烏托邦主義/馬可思主義女性主義。載於顧燕翎（主編），女性主義理論與流派（頁37-79）。台北：女書。
黃 蓉（2008）。高齡者照顧失能老人經驗學習歷程之研究。。國立中正大學成人與繼續教育所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。
鄒川雄（2003）。生活世界與默會知識：詮釋學觀點的質性研究.。載於齊力、林本炫（主編），質性研究方法與資料分析（頁19-53）。嘉義：南華大學社教所。
潘慧玲（2003）。性別與教育——追求平等的教育。載於潘慧玲（主編），性別議題導論（頁78-101）。台北：高等教育。
鄭至慧（2000）。存在主義女性主義。載於顧燕翎（主編），女性主義理論與流派（頁83-120）。台北：女書。
謝安琪（2008）。慈濟高齡環保志工經驗學習之研究。國立中正大學成人與繼續教育所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。
嚴祥鸞（1996）。參與觀察法。載於胡幼慧（主編），質性研究—理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（頁195-221）。台北：巨流。
嚴素娟（2003）。保母訓練班學員經驗學習之研究~女性主義觀點。國立台灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北。
【英文部份】
Akkoyunlu, B. ＆ Soylu, M. Y. (2008). A study of student’s perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning style. Educational Technology ＆Society, 11(1), 183-193.
Alfred, M. V. & Nanton, C. R. (2009). Survival of the supported: social capital networks and the finish line. In C. R. Nanton and M.V.(Eds). Social capital and women’s support systems: networking learning and surviving(pp.83-93). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Alvesson, M. & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflective methodology: new vistas for qualitative research. London: SAGE.
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy B. M., Goldberger N. R., amd Tarule J. M.（1986）.Women's ways of knowing：the development of self, voice ,and mind. N.Y.：Basic Books.
Brookfield, S. (1990). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Buch, K. ＆ Bartley, S. (2002). Learning style and training delivery mode preference. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14(1), 5-10.
Campbell, K. & Varnhagen, S. (2002). When faculty use instructional technologies: using Clark's delivery model to understand gender differences. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 32(1), 1.
Carpenter, S. and Johnson, L. E. (2001). Women derive collective self-esteem from their feminist idenity. Psychology of Women Quartely, 25,254-257.
Coffey, A. & Delamont, S.（2000）. Feminism and the classroom teacher : research, praxis, and pedagogy. London : RoutledgeFalmer.
Cohen, J. H. & Amidon, E. J. (2004). Reward and punishment: a way of practice teaching style? The Journal of Educational Research, 97(5), 269-277.
Coldren, J. & Hively, J. (2009). Interpersonal teaching style and student impression formation. College Teaching, 57(2), 93-98.
Crook, S. (1998). Minotaurs and other monsters: ”everyday life” in recent social theory. Sociology, 32(3), 523-540.
Davies, P.（2008）. Informal learning：a vision for the twenty-fist century. Adults Learning, 19(8), 18-19.
Dever, B. V. & Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Is authoritative teaching beneficial for all students? A multi-level model of the effects of teaching style on interest and achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(2), 131-144.
English. L. M.(2006). Women, knowing, and authenticity: Living with contradictions. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 111, 17-25.
Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247-273.
Evans, C. (2004). Exploring the relationship between cognitive style and taching. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 509-530.
Evans, C., Harkins, M. J. ＆ Young, J. D. (2008). Exploring teaching styles and cognitive styles: Evidence from school teachers in Canada. North American Journal of Psychology, 1(3), 567-582.
Fan, W. & Ye, S. (2007). Teaching styles among Shanghai teachers in primary and secondary schools. Educational Psychology, 27(2), 255-272.
Flannery, D. D. (2000). Identity and Sef-Esteem. In E. Hayes, D. D. Flannery, A. K. Brooks, E. J. Tisdell, J. M. Hugo. Women as learner (pp.53-78). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1989). Truth and method. New York : Crossroad.
Garrick, J.（1998）. Informal Learning in the workplace：Unmasking human resource development. New York : Routledge.
Gilbert, M. K. (2010). Educated in agency: A feminist service-learning pedagogy for community border crossings. Boston College.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.
Haapalainen, R. (2006). Contemporary art and the role of museums as situational media. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 5(3),153-166.
Hoekstra, A., Beijaard, D., Brekelmans, M. & Korthagen F. (2007). Experienced teacher’s informal learning from classroom teaching. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 13(2), 189-206.
Hayes, E. (2000). Voice. In E. Hayes, D. D. Flannery, A. K. Brooks, E. J. Tisdell, J. M. Hugo. Women as learner (pp.79-109). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Jansen, T., Finger, M. ＆Wildemeersh, D. (1998) Reframing reflectivity in view of adult education for social responsibility: Reconciling the irreconcilable. In D. Wildermeersch et al. (eds.) Adult education and social responsibility. (pp.239-250). Europaischer Verlag der Wissenschafted: Peter Lang.
Jarvis, P. (1985). Thinking critically in an information society: A sociological analysis. Lifelong-Learning, 8(6), 11-14.
Jordan, J. V. (1991). Empathy and the Mother-Daughter relationship. In J. V. Jordan, A. G.. Kaplan, J. B. Miller, I. P. Stiver and J.L. Surrey, Women’s growth in connection: writings by stone center (pp28-34). New York : Guilford Press.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning : experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, D. A. (1999). The learning style inventory version 3. Boston: Hay Resources Direct.
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., ＆ Mainemelis, C. (2000). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg ＆ L.F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspective on cognitive, learning and thinking styles (pp.227-247). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kolb, D. A., Baker, A. C. and Jensen P. J. (2002). Conversation as experiential learning. In A. C. Baker, P. J. Jensen and D. A. Kolb, Conversational learning: an experiential approach to knowledge creation(51-66). Westport, Conn. : Quorum Books.
Kolb, A. & Kolb, D. A. (2009). On becoming a learner: the concept of learning identity. http://www.learningfromexperience.com.
Lamm, A. J., Cannon, K. J., Roberts, T. G., Irani, T. A., Snyder, L. J., Brendemuhl,J.,＆ Rodriguez, M. T. (2011). An exploration of reflection: Expression of learning style in an international experiential learning. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(3), 122-135.
Lee, B. (2006). Caring-self and women’s self-esteem: a feminist’s reflection on pastor care and religious education of Korean-American women. Pastor Psychology, 54(4), 337-353.
Luke, C. & Gore, J.（1992）. Introduction. In Luke, C. and Gore, J.(Eds), Feminisms and critical pedagogy(pp.1-14). New York : Routledge.
Maffesoli, M. (1996). The time of the tribes : the decline of individualism in mass society. London: Sage.
Maher, F. A. & Tereault, M. K.(1996).Women’s ways of knowing in women’s studies, feminist, pedagogies, and feminist theory. In N. Goldberger, J. Tarule, B. Clinchy, and M. Belenky (Eds), Knowledge, Difference and Power(pp.148-174). New York: Basic Books.
Mamo, M., Kettler, T., ＆ Husmann, D. (2005). Learning styles responses to an online soli erosion lwsson. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 34, 44-48.
Clark, P. A. (2000). Student responses to feminist pedagogy. University of South Florida.
Mosston, M. & Ashworth, S. (2002). Teaching Physical Education. San Francisco:Benjamin Cummings.
Noddings, N.(1996). The Cared-For. In Gordon S., Benner, P. and Noddings, N.(Eds)., Caregiving : readings in knowledge, practice, ethics, and politics(pp.22-39). Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
Noddings, N. (2002). Care Ethics and Character Education. In Noddings, N.(Ed), Educating moral people : a caring alternative to character education. New York : Teachers College Press.
Noddings, N. (2005). The challenge to care in schools : an alternative approach to education. New York : Teachers College Press.
Platsidou, M. ＆ Metallidou, P. (2009). Validity and reliability issues of two learning style inventories in Greek sample: Kolb’s learning inventory and felder ＆ soloman’s index of learning styles. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(3), 324-335.
Pratt, D. D. (1998). Five perspectives on teaching in adult and higher education. Malabar, Fla. : Krieger Pub. Co.
Sawchuk, P. H.（2008）.Heories and methods for research on informal and work：towards cross-fertilization. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(1), 1-16.
Schwandt, J. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: interpretivism, hermeneutics and social constructionism. In Y. S. Lincoln & E. G. Guba (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research.(pp.189-213).London: Sage.
Simon, S. J. (2000). The relationship of learning style and training method to end-user computer satisfaction and computer use: A structrual equation model. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 18(1), 41-59
Surrey, J. (1991). The relational self in women: clinical implication. In J. V. Jordan, A. G.. Kaplan, J. B. Miller, I. P. Stiver and J.L. Surrey, Women’s growth in connection: writings by stone center (pp35-43). New York : Guilford Press.
Tarule, J. M.（1996）.Voices in Dialogue. In N. Goldberger, J. Tarule, B. Clinchy, and M. Belenky (Eds), Knowledge, Difference and Power(pp.274-304). New York: Basic Books.
Tisdell, E. J. (2000). Feminist Pedagogies. In E. Hayes, D. D. Flannery, A. K. Brooks, E. J. Tisdell, and J. M. Hugo. Women as learner (pp.155-183). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Vasilyuk, F. (1992). The psychology of experience. New Nork: New york university press.
Warnke, G..( 1987). Gadamer: hermeneutics, tradition, and reason Gadamer : hermeneutics, tradition, and reason. Oxford : Polity Press.
Wentzel, K. R. ( 2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73(1), 287-301.
Yildirim, N. (2010). Increasing effectiveness of strategic planning seminars through learning style. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 12-24.
Zoghi, M., Brown, T., Williams,B., Roller, L., Jaberzadeh, S., Palermo C., …Holt, T. A. (2010). Learning style preferences of Australian health science students. Journal of Allied Health, 39(2), 95-103.
http://www.teach-nology.com/teachers/methods/